Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique
Purpose Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2020-03, Vol.57 (2), p.303-309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Migliore, Federico De Franceschi, Pietro De Lazzari, Manuel Miceli, Carlotta Cataldi, Claudia Crescenzi, Cinzia Migliore, Mauro Pittarello, Demetrio Iliceto, Sabino Bertaglia, Emanuele |
description | Purpose
Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.
Methods
The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46–62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.
Results
The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.
Conclusions
US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333610610</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333610610</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6e866da640530a5f136f565a25a7133ccd503d4e76aa473657185a83b0ae84d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtrFjEUhgdRbK3-ARcScOMmejKZXGYpxRsU3LTQXcgkma-pmclnLlp_j3_UfJ1WwUUhkJyc531Pwtt1Lwm8JQDiXSYgB8BARgzA-YhvHnXHhIkeSzayx-1MJcVSsMuj7lnO1wAwQs-fdkeUjACSyuPu90UoSedYV4t31VtnUXYp6VIz0mtxyceE9kGvDk0hmm9obnWuk6ml3cVG-eXQLnoKDhmdrI8_XGpCZN3sp-RD0KVp7rHi44pq9usOlSuH_GHGUrOpQSdUfkbsV-PzASrOXK3-e3XPuyezDtm9uNtPuouPH85PP-Ozr5--nL4_w4YKVjB3knOr-QCMgmYzoXxmnOmeaUEoNcYyoHZwgms9CMqZIJJpSSfQTg6W0JPuzea7T7GNzUUtPhsXwvZT1VNKOYG2Gvr6P_Q61rS21zVK9oxxwUSj-o0yKeac3Kz2yS86_VIE1CFCtUWoWoTqNkJ100Sv7qzrtDj7V3KfWQPoBuTWWncu_Zv9gO0f0YCsag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382556757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Migliore, Federico ; De Franceschi, Pietro ; De Lazzari, Manuel ; Miceli, Carlotta ; Cataldi, Claudia ; Crescenzi, Cinzia ; Migliore, Mauro ; Pittarello, Demetrio ; Iliceto, Sabino ; Bertaglia, Emanuele</creator><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Federico ; De Franceschi, Pietro ; De Lazzari, Manuel ; Miceli, Carlotta ; Cataldi, Claudia ; Crescenzi, Cinzia ; Migliore, Mauro ; Pittarello, Demetrio ; Iliceto, Sabino ; Bertaglia, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.
Methods
The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46–62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.
Results
The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.
Conclusions
US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-875X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31900838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Airway management ; Anesthesia ; Cardiology ; Complications ; Defibrillators ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Desaturation ; Discomfort ; Feasibility ; Female ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Implantation ; Intermediate Back Muscles ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block - methods ; Patients ; Population studies ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.57 (2), p.303-309</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6e866da640530a5f136f565a25a7133ccd503d4e76aa473657185a83b0ae84d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6e866da640530a5f136f565a25a7133ccd503d4e76aa473657185a83b0ae84d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Franceschi, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lazzari, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miceli, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crescenzi, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittarello, Demetrio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iliceto, Sabino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertaglia, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.
Methods
The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46–62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.
Results
The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.
Conclusions
US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Defibrillators</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Desaturation</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Intermediate Back Muscles</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1383-875X</issn><issn>1572-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtrFjEUhgdRbK3-ARcScOMmejKZXGYpxRsU3LTQXcgkma-pmclnLlp_j3_UfJ1WwUUhkJyc531Pwtt1Lwm8JQDiXSYgB8BARgzA-YhvHnXHhIkeSzayx-1MJcVSsMuj7lnO1wAwQs-fdkeUjACSyuPu90UoSedYV4t31VtnUXYp6VIz0mtxyceE9kGvDk0hmm9obnWuk6ml3cVG-eXQLnoKDhmdrI8_XGpCZN3sp-RD0KVp7rHi44pq9usOlSuH_GHGUrOpQSdUfkbsV-PzASrOXK3-e3XPuyezDtm9uNtPuouPH85PP-Ozr5--nL4_w4YKVjB3knOr-QCMgmYzoXxmnOmeaUEoNcYyoHZwgms9CMqZIJJpSSfQTg6W0JPuzea7T7GNzUUtPhsXwvZT1VNKOYG2Gvr6P_Q61rS21zVK9oxxwUSj-o0yKeac3Kz2yS86_VIE1CFCtUWoWoTqNkJ100Sv7qzrtDj7V3KfWQPoBuTWWncu_Zv9gO0f0YCsag</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Migliore, Federico</creator><creator>De Franceschi, Pietro</creator><creator>De Lazzari, Manuel</creator><creator>Miceli, Carlotta</creator><creator>Cataldi, Claudia</creator><creator>Crescenzi, Cinzia</creator><creator>Migliore, Mauro</creator><creator>Pittarello, Demetrio</creator><creator>Iliceto, Sabino</creator><creator>Bertaglia, Emanuele</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique</title><author>Migliore, Federico ; De Franceschi, Pietro ; De Lazzari, Manuel ; Miceli, Carlotta ; Cataldi, Claudia ; Crescenzi, Cinzia ; Migliore, Mauro ; Pittarello, Demetrio ; Iliceto, Sabino ; Bertaglia, Emanuele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6e866da640530a5f136f565a25a7133ccd503d4e76aa473657185a83b0ae84d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Defibrillators</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Desaturation</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Intermediate Back Muscles</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Franceschi, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Lazzari, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miceli, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cataldi, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crescenzi, Cinzia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Migliore, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittarello, Demetrio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iliceto, Sabino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertaglia, Emanuele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Migliore, Federico</au><au>De Franceschi, Pietro</au><au>De Lazzari, Manuel</au><au>Miceli, Carlotta</au><au>Cataldi, Claudia</au><au>Crescenzi, Cinzia</au><au>Migliore, Mauro</au><au>Pittarello, Demetrio</au><au>Iliceto, Sabino</au><au>Bertaglia, Emanuele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle><stitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</stitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>303-309</pages><issn>1383-875X</issn><eissn>1572-8595</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.
Methods
The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46–62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.
Results
The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.
Conclusions
US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31900838</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1383-875X |
ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2020-03, Vol.57 (2), p.303-309 |
issn | 1383-875X 1572-8595 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333610610 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aged Airway management Anesthesia Cardiology Complications Defibrillators Defibrillators, Implantable Desaturation Discomfort Feasibility Female Hemodynamics Humans Implantation Intermediate Back Muscles Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nerve Block - methods Patients Population studies Prosthesis Implantation - methods Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional Ultrasound |
title | Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A46%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20serratus%20anterior%20plane%20block%20for%20subcutaneous%20implantable%20cardioverter%20defibrillator%20implantation%20using%20the%20intermuscular%20two-incision%20technique&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiac%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Migliore,%20Federico&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=303-309&rft.issn=1383-875X&rft.eissn=1572-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10840-019-00669-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333610610%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382556757&rft_id=info:pmid/31900838&rfr_iscdi=true |