It is not just a ‘trade-off’: indications for sink- and source-limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old-growth beech forest
• Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 2020-04, Vol.226 (1), p.111-125 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 125 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | The New phytologist |
| container_volume | 226 |
| creator | Mund, Martina Herbst, Mathias Knohl, Alexander Matthäus, Bertrand Schumacher, Jens Schall, Peter Siebicke, Lukas Tamrakar, Rijan Ammer, Christian |
| description | • Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role.
• We analyzed the interannual variability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old-growth, unmanaged Fagus sylvatica forest over 14 yr, including six mast years.
• In a multiple linear regression model, c. 71% of the annual variation in wood-NPP could be explained by mean air temperature in May, precipitation from April to May (positive influence) and fruit-NPP (negative influence). GPP of June to July solely explained c. 42% of the variation in wood-NPP. Fruit-NPP was positively related to summer precipitation 2 yr before (R² = 0.85), and negatively to precipitation in May (R² = 0.83) in the fruit years. GPP had no influence on fruit-NPP.
• Our results suggest a complex system of sink and source limitations to tree growth driven by weather conditions and going beyond a simple carbon-mediated ‘trade-off’ between regenerative and vegetative growth. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nph.16408 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333607676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26914521</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26914521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-fa93e95c2d52ee8f3b2db1da4a41c53209728deb4d66fddc9a948cdf18a460ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFFurCx9ACbjRRdq5ZTKzlKK2UNSFgrthMhdMSJuaSZDu-hj6en0SR1O7EDybs_nOz-EH4BTBIQozWixfh4hRyPdAH1EmYo5Iug_6EGIeM8peeuDI-wJCKBKGD0GPIAERRqIPomkT5T5aVE1UtL6JVLRZfzS1MjaunNusP4_BgVOltyfbPQDPtzdP40k8e7ibjq9nsaYI8tgpQaxINDYJtpY7kmGTIaOookgnBEORYm5sRg1jzhgtlKBcG4e4ogxaTQbgsstd1tVba30j57nXtizVwlatl5gQwmDKUhboxR9aVG29CN8FxQRKGWRpUFed0nXlfW2dXNb5XNUriaD8rk2G2uRPbcGebxPbbG7NTv72FMCoA-95aVf_J8n7x8lv5Fl3UfimqncXOPxHE4zIFw37f2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369176067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>It is not just a ‘trade-off’: indications for sink- and source-limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old-growth beech forest</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mund, Martina ; Herbst, Mathias ; Knohl, Alexander ; Matthäus, Bertrand ; Schumacher, Jens ; Schall, Peter ; Siebicke, Lukas ; Tamrakar, Rijan ; Ammer, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Mund, Martina ; Herbst, Mathias ; Knohl, Alexander ; Matthäus, Bertrand ; Schumacher, Jens ; Schall, Peter ; Siebicke, Lukas ; Tamrakar, Rijan ; Ammer, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>• Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role.
• We analyzed the interannual variability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old-growth, unmanaged Fagus sylvatica forest over 14 yr, including six mast years.
• In a multiple linear regression model, c. 71% of the annual variation in wood-NPP could be explained by mean air temperature in May, precipitation from April to May (positive influence) and fruit-NPP (negative influence). GPP of June to July solely explained c. 42% of the variation in wood-NPP. Fruit-NPP was positively related to summer precipitation 2 yr before (R² = 0.85), and negatively to precipitation in May (R² = 0.83) in the fruit years. GPP had no influence on fruit-NPP.
• Our results suggest a complex system of sink and source limitations to tree growth driven by weather conditions and going beyond a simple carbon-mediated ‘trade-off’ between regenerative and vegetative growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-646X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nph.16408</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31901219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Air temperature ; Annual variations ; Beech ; Carbon ; carbon allocation ; Carbon fixation ; climate ; Complex systems ; Crop production ; Fagus - growth & development ; Fagus sylvatica ; forest growth ; Forests ; fruit production ; Fruits ; Growth ; masting ; Net Primary Productivity ; Plant physiology ; Precipitation ; Primary production ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Seasons ; sink or source limitation ; trade‐off ; Trees ; Weather ; Wood</subject><ispartof>The New phytologist, 2020-04, Vol.226 (1), p.111-125</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors © 2020 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2020 New Phytologist Trust.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-fa93e95c2d52ee8f3b2db1da4a41c53209728deb4d66fddc9a948cdf18a460ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-fa93e95c2d52ee8f3b2db1da4a41c53209728deb4d66fddc9a948cdf18a460ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0537-0903 ; 0000-0002-4235-0135 ; 0000-0001-7181-1626 ; 0000-0002-7615-8870 ; 0000-0002-1967-5599 ; 0000-0003-4808-818X ; 0000-0002-8419-4820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26914521$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26914521$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31901219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mund, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knohl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthäus, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebicke, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamrakar, Rijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammer, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>It is not just a ‘trade-off’: indications for sink- and source-limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old-growth beech forest</title><title>The New phytologist</title><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><description>• Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role.
• We analyzed the interannual variability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old-growth, unmanaged Fagus sylvatica forest over 14 yr, including six mast years.
• In a multiple linear regression model, c. 71% of the annual variation in wood-NPP could be explained by mean air temperature in May, precipitation from April to May (positive influence) and fruit-NPP (negative influence). GPP of June to July solely explained c. 42% of the variation in wood-NPP. Fruit-NPP was positively related to summer precipitation 2 yr before (R² = 0.85), and negatively to precipitation in May (R² = 0.83) in the fruit years. GPP had no influence on fruit-NPP.
• Our results suggest a complex system of sink and source limitations to tree growth driven by weather conditions and going beyond a simple carbon-mediated ‘trade-off’ between regenerative and vegetative growth.</description><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Annual variations</subject><subject>Beech</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon allocation</subject><subject>Carbon fixation</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Fagus - growth & development</subject><subject>Fagus sylvatica</subject><subject>forest growth</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>fruit production</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>masting</subject><subject>Net Primary Productivity</subject><subject>Plant physiology</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>sink or source limitation</subject><subject>trade‐off</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Wood</subject><issn>0028-646X</issn><issn>1469-8137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFFurCx9ACbjRRdq5ZTKzlKK2UNSFgrthMhdMSJuaSZDu-hj6en0SR1O7EDybs_nOz-EH4BTBIQozWixfh4hRyPdAH1EmYo5Iug_6EGIeM8peeuDI-wJCKBKGD0GPIAERRqIPomkT5T5aVE1UtL6JVLRZfzS1MjaunNusP4_BgVOltyfbPQDPtzdP40k8e7ibjq9nsaYI8tgpQaxINDYJtpY7kmGTIaOookgnBEORYm5sRg1jzhgtlKBcG4e4ogxaTQbgsstd1tVba30j57nXtizVwlatl5gQwmDKUhboxR9aVG29CN8FxQRKGWRpUFed0nXlfW2dXNb5XNUriaD8rk2G2uRPbcGebxPbbG7NTv72FMCoA-95aVf_J8n7x8lv5Fl3UfimqncXOPxHE4zIFw37f2g</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Mund, Martina</creator><creator>Herbst, Mathias</creator><creator>Knohl, Alexander</creator><creator>Matthäus, Bertrand</creator><creator>Schumacher, Jens</creator><creator>Schall, Peter</creator><creator>Siebicke, Lukas</creator><creator>Tamrakar, Rijan</creator><creator>Ammer, Christian</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-0903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-0135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-1626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7615-8870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-818X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8419-4820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>It is not just a ‘trade-off’</title><author>Mund, Martina ; Herbst, Mathias ; Knohl, Alexander ; Matthäus, Bertrand ; Schumacher, Jens ; Schall, Peter ; Siebicke, Lukas ; Tamrakar, Rijan ; Ammer, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4108-fa93e95c2d52ee8f3b2db1da4a41c53209728deb4d66fddc9a948cdf18a460ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Annual variations</topic><topic>Beech</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon allocation</topic><topic>Carbon fixation</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Fagus - growth & development</topic><topic>Fagus sylvatica</topic><topic>forest growth</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>fruit production</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>masting</topic><topic>Net Primary Productivity</topic><topic>Plant physiology</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>sink or source limitation</topic><topic>trade‐off</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Wood</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mund, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knohl, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthäus, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumacher, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siebicke, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamrakar, Rijan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammer, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mund, Martina</au><au>Herbst, Mathias</au><au>Knohl, Alexander</au><au>Matthäus, Bertrand</au><au>Schumacher, Jens</au><au>Schall, Peter</au><au>Siebicke, Lukas</au><au>Tamrakar, Rijan</au><au>Ammer, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>It is not just a ‘trade-off’: indications for sink- and source-limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old-growth beech forest</atitle><jtitle>The New phytologist</jtitle><addtitle>New Phytol</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>226</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>111-125</pages><issn>0028-646X</issn><eissn>1469-8137</eissn><abstract>• Controls on tree growth are key issues in plant physiology. The hypothesis of our study was that the interannual variability of wood and fruit production are primarily controlled directly by weather conditions (sink limitation), while carbon assimilation (source limitation) plays a secondary role.
• We analyzed the interannual variability of weather conditions, gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) of wood and fruits of an old-growth, unmanaged Fagus sylvatica forest over 14 yr, including six mast years.
• In a multiple linear regression model, c. 71% of the annual variation in wood-NPP could be explained by mean air temperature in May, precipitation from April to May (positive influence) and fruit-NPP (negative influence). GPP of June to July solely explained c. 42% of the variation in wood-NPP. Fruit-NPP was positively related to summer precipitation 2 yr before (R² = 0.85), and negatively to precipitation in May (R² = 0.83) in the fruit years. GPP had no influence on fruit-NPP.
• Our results suggest a complex system of sink and source limitations to tree growth driven by weather conditions and going beyond a simple carbon-mediated ‘trade-off’ between regenerative and vegetative growth.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>31901219</pmid><doi>10.1111/nph.16408</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0537-0903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4235-0135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-1626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7615-8870</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1967-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-818X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8419-4820</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-646X |
| ispartof | The New phytologist, 2020-04, Vol.226 (1), p.111-125 |
| issn | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333607676 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Air temperature Annual variations Beech Carbon carbon allocation Carbon fixation climate Complex systems Crop production Fagus - growth & development Fagus sylvatica forest growth Forests fruit production Fruits Growth masting Net Primary Productivity Plant physiology Precipitation Primary production Regression analysis Regression models Seasons sink or source limitation trade‐off Trees Weather Wood |
| title | It is not just a ‘trade-off’: indications for sink- and source-limitation to vegetative and regenerative growth in an old-growth beech forest |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A42%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=It%20is%20not%20just%20a%20%E2%80%98trade-off%E2%80%99:%20indications%20for%20sink-%20and%20source-limitation%20to%20vegetative%20and%20regenerative%20growth%20in%20an%20old-growth%20beech%20forest&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20phytologist&rft.au=Mund,%20Martina&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=226&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=111-125&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nph.16408&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26914521%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369176067&rft_id=info:pmid/31901219&rft_jstor_id=26914521&rfr_iscdi=true |