Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias
Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference dur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2147 |
container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | Wehrman, Jordan J. Wearden, John Sowman, Paul |
description | Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment
1
) was presented on every trial. In Experiment
2
, every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment
3
, we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment
1
demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment
2
, this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment
2
, we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment
3
, we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333605588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333605588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIUE3LgZzWUyF3dS6wUKbhS6C5nMSUmZS01mCvXpTZ1awYWQkMD5zn-SD6ELSm54KrJbT3lM44jQfLsZi-gBGtM85hHP-fxwf2d0hE68XxKS8CQlx2jEaZZnJBFjNH8Abb1tG1VhrZzbtGtwGIwB3Xlsm7A6cOtQ7Wxtm8Udnq5tCY0G3Bqs8AIacKqyn1BiB37VNh5wYZU_Q0dGVR7Od-cpen-cvk2eo9nr08vkfhbpmOZdZFQq8pSQklADZVIkSueiVBCzUlMTpykptAADhIXHCwFCc0KoKgpIDWNJwU_R9ZC7cu1HD76TtfUaqko10PZeMs55QoTIsoBe_UGXbe_CzwMVs5hSkfMkUGygtGu9d2DkytlauY2kRG69y8G7DM7lt3dJQ9PlLrovaij3LT-iA8AHwIdSswD3O_uf2C95044x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424115936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment
1
) was presented on every trial. In Experiment
2
, every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment
3
, we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment
1
demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment
2
, this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment
2
, we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment
3
, we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31898065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Assimilation ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bias ; Cognitive Psychology ; Decision making ; Experiments ; Feedback (Response) ; Humans ; Judges ; Judgment ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Stimuli ; Time Factors ; Time Perception</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wearden, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment
1
) was presented on every trial. In Experiment
2
, every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment
3
, we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment
1
demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment
2
, this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment
2
, we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment
3
, we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</description><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIUE3LgZzWUyF3dS6wUKbhS6C5nMSUmZS01mCvXpTZ1awYWQkMD5zn-SD6ELSm54KrJbT3lM44jQfLsZi-gBGtM85hHP-fxwf2d0hE68XxKS8CQlx2jEaZZnJBFjNH8Abb1tG1VhrZzbtGtwGIwB3Xlsm7A6cOtQ7Wxtm8Udnq5tCY0G3Bqs8AIacKqyn1BiB37VNh5wYZU_Q0dGVR7Od-cpen-cvk2eo9nr08vkfhbpmOZdZFQq8pSQklADZVIkSueiVBCzUlMTpykptAADhIXHCwFCc0KoKgpIDWNJwU_R9ZC7cu1HD76TtfUaqko10PZeMs55QoTIsoBe_UGXbe_CzwMVs5hSkfMkUGygtGu9d2DkytlauY2kRG69y8G7DM7lt3dJQ9PlLrovaij3LT-iA8AHwIdSswD3O_uf2C95044x</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creator><creator>Wearden, John</creator><creator>Sowman, Paul</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><author>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wearden, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehrman, Jordan J.</au><au>Wearden, John</au><au>Sowman, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2147</spage><epage>2164</epage><pages>2147-2164</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment
1
) was presented on every trial. In Experiment
2
, every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment
3
, we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment
1
demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment
2
, this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment
2
, we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment
3
, we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31898065</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164 |
issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333605588 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Assimilation Behavioral Science and Psychology Bias Cognitive Psychology Decision making Experiments Feedback (Response) Humans Judges Judgment Perceptions Psychology Stimuli Time Factors Time Perception |
title | Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decisional%20carryover%20effects%20in%20interval%20timing:%20Evidence%20of%20a%20generalized%20response%20bias&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Wehrman,%20Jordan%20J.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2147&rft.epage=2164&rft.pages=2147-2164&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333605588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424115936&rft_id=info:pmid/31898065&rfr_iscdi=true |