Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias

Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference dur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164
Hauptverfasser: Wehrman, Jordan J., Wearden, John, Sowman, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2164
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2147
container_title Attention, perception & psychophysics
container_volume 82
creator Wehrman, Jordan J.
Wearden, John
Sowman, Paul
description Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment 1 ) was presented on every trial. In Experiment 2 , every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment 3 , we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment 1 demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment 2 , this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment 2 , we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment 3 , we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333605588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333605588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIUE3LgZzWUyF3dS6wUKbhS6C5nMSUmZS01mCvXpTZ1awYWQkMD5zn-SD6ELSm54KrJbT3lM44jQfLsZi-gBGtM85hHP-fxwf2d0hE68XxKS8CQlx2jEaZZnJBFjNH8Abb1tG1VhrZzbtGtwGIwB3Xlsm7A6cOtQ7Wxtm8Udnq5tCY0G3Bqs8AIacKqyn1BiB37VNh5wYZU_Q0dGVR7Od-cpen-cvk2eo9nr08vkfhbpmOZdZFQq8pSQklADZVIkSueiVBCzUlMTpykptAADhIXHCwFCc0KoKgpIDWNJwU_R9ZC7cu1HD76TtfUaqko10PZeMs55QoTIsoBe_UGXbe_CzwMVs5hSkfMkUGygtGu9d2DkytlauY2kRG69y8G7DM7lt3dJQ9PlLrovaij3LT-iA8AHwIdSswD3O_uf2C95044x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424115936</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment 1 ) was presented on every trial. In Experiment 2 , every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment 3 , we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment 1 demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment 2 , this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment 2 , we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment 3 , we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31898065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Assimilation ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Bias ; Cognitive Psychology ; Decision making ; Experiments ; Feedback (Response) ; Humans ; Judges ; Judgment ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Stimuli ; Time Factors ; Time Perception</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wearden, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><title>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment 1 ) was presented on every trial. In Experiment 2 , every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment 3 , we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment 1 demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment 2 , this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment 2 , we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment 3 , we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</description><subject>Assimilation</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judges</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIUE3LgZzWUyF3dS6wUKbhS6C5nMSUmZS01mCvXpTZ1awYWQkMD5zn-SD6ELSm54KrJbT3lM44jQfLsZi-gBGtM85hHP-fxwf2d0hE68XxKS8CQlx2jEaZZnJBFjNH8Abb1tG1VhrZzbtGtwGIwB3Xlsm7A6cOtQ7Wxtm8Udnq5tCY0G3Bqs8AIacKqyn1BiB37VNh5wYZU_Q0dGVR7Od-cpen-cvk2eo9nr08vkfhbpmOZdZFQq8pSQklADZVIkSueiVBCzUlMTpykptAADhIXHCwFCc0KoKgpIDWNJwU_R9ZC7cu1HD76TtfUaqko10PZeMs55QoTIsoBe_UGXbe_CzwMVs5hSkfMkUGygtGu9d2DkytlauY2kRG69y8G7DM7lt3dJQ9PlLrovaij3LT-iA8AHwIdSswD3O_uf2C95044x</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creator><creator>Wearden, John</creator><creator>Sowman, Paul</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</title><author>Wehrman, Jordan J. ; Wearden, John ; Sowman, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-fa759700d01fed6b6ac95dae42dc1f4770bc5efe0206355e5c3001abbe7f226b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Assimilation</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judges</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehrman, Jordan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wearden, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sowman, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehrman, Jordan J.</au><au>Wearden, John</au><au>Sowman, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception &amp; psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2147</spage><epage>2164</epage><pages>2147-2164</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Decisional carryover refers to the tendency to report a current stimulus as being similar to a prior stimulus. In this article, we assess decisional carryover in the context of temporal judgments. Participants performed a temporal bisection task wherein a probe between a long and short reference duration (Experiment 1 ) was presented on every trial. In Experiment 2 , every other trial presented a duration the same as the short or long reference duration. In Experiment 3 , we concurrently varied both the size and duration of stimuli. Experiment 1 demonstrated the typical decisional carryover effect in which the current response was assimilated towards the prior response. In Experiment 2 , this was not the case. Conversely, in Experiment 2 , we demonstrated decisional carryover from the prior probe decision to the reference duration trials, a judgment which should have been relatively easy. In Experiment 3 , we found carryover in the judgment of both size and duration, and a tendency towards decisional carryover having a larger effect size when participants were making size judgments. Together, our findings indicate that decisional carryover in duration judgments occur given relatively response-certain trials and that this effect appears to be similar in both size and duration judgments. This suggest that decisional carryover is indeed decisional in nature, rather than due to assimilative effects in perception, and that the difficulty of judging the previous test stimuli may play a role in whether assimilation occurs in the following trial when judging duration.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31898065</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-3921
ispartof Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020-05, Vol.82 (4), p.2147-2164
issn 1943-3921
1943-393X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333605588
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Assimilation
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Bias
Cognitive Psychology
Decision making
Experiments
Feedback (Response)
Humans
Judges
Judgment
Perceptions
Psychology
Stimuli
Time Factors
Time Perception
title Decisional carryover effects in interval timing: Evidence of a generalized response bias
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decisional%20carryover%20effects%20in%20interval%20timing:%20Evidence%20of%20a%20generalized%20response%20bias&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Wehrman,%20Jordan%20J.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2147&rft.epage=2164&rft.pages=2147-2164&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-019-01922-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333605588%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424115936&rft_id=info:pmid/31898065&rfr_iscdi=true