Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features

Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features

Ru­(II) complex photocages are used in a variety of biological applications, but the thermal stability, photosubstitution quantum yield, and biological compatibility of the most commonly used Ru­(II) systems remain unoptimized. Here, multiple compounds used in photocaging applications were analyzed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Inorganic chemistry 2020-01, Vol.59 (2), p.1006-1013
Hauptverfasser: Havrylyuk, Dmytro, Stevens, Kimberly, Parkin, Sean, Glazer, Edith C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1013
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1006
container_title Inorganic chemistry
container_volume 59
creator Havrylyuk, Dmytro
Stevens, Kimberly
Parkin, Sean
Glazer, Edith C
description Ru­(II) complex photocages are used in a variety of biological applications, but the thermal stability, photosubstitution quantum yield, and biological compatibility of the most commonly used Ru­(II) systems remain unoptimized. Here, multiple compounds used in photocaging applications were analyzed and found to have several unsatisfactory characteristics. To address these deficiencies, three new scaffolds were designed to improve key properties through modulation of a combination of electronic, steric, and physiochemical features. One of these new systems, containing the 2,2′-biquinoline-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (2,2′-bicinchoninic acid) ligand, fulfills several of the requirements for an optimal photocage. Another complex, containing the 2-benzothiazol-2-yl-quinoline ligand, provides a scaffold for the creation of “dual action” agents.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333603177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333603177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-176b850bc63f24daa4bbfd3b7f30f4472b7d19bb75cc42c8b8413517e57e2a683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFO4zAUtFaLllL2E3blI0ik2LFjJ3uDqoVKSFRsV9pbZDtOY5TGxXaE-jt8KY5SuHLy02hm3hsPAL8wmmGU4muh_Mx01m1Vo3ezQqIUsewbmOAsRUmG0f_vYIIimGDGilNw5v0zQqgglP0ApwTnRcFwMQFvG_sqXAUf98HsRAuf-ovV6hKuGxusElvt_8Bb0YpOmW57ROM-44M7XMG_QUjTmhBH0VXw1lhld3sRzIjCTeNsv23g0nQabvpu8LB1lGln1BVctFoFZ7thHvTr5uDN6K_iKUstQu-0PwcntWi9_nl8p-DfcrGZ3ycPj3er-c1DIiijIcGcyTxDUjFSp7QSgkpZV0TymqCaUp5KXuFCSp4pRVOVy5xikmGuM65TwXIyBRej797Zl177UMacSrcxvba9L1NCCEMEcx6p2UhVznrvdF3uXfw-dygxKod6ylhP-VlPeawn6n4fV_Ryp6tP1UcfkYBHwqB_tr3rYuIvTN8B2J6jAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333603177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Havrylyuk, Dmytro ; Stevens, Kimberly ; Parkin, Sean ; Glazer, Edith C</creator><creatorcontrib>Havrylyuk, Dmytro ; Stevens, Kimberly ; Parkin, Sean ; Glazer, Edith C</creatorcontrib><description>Ru­(II) complex photocages are used in a variety of biological applications, but the thermal stability, photosubstitution quantum yield, and biological compatibility of the most commonly used Ru­(II) systems remain unoptimized. Here, multiple compounds used in photocaging applications were analyzed and found to have several unsatisfactory characteristics. To address these deficiencies, three new scaffolds were designed to improve key properties through modulation of a combination of electronic, steric, and physiochemical features. One of these new systems, containing the 2,2′-biquinoline-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (2,2′-bicinchoninic acid) ligand, fulfills several of the requirements for an optimal photocage. Another complex, containing the 2-benzothiazol-2-yl-quinoline ligand, provides a scaffold for the creation of “dual action” agents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-510X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31899619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Inorganic chemistry, 2020-01, Vol.59 (2), p.1006-1013</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-176b850bc63f24daa4bbfd3b7f30f4472b7d19bb75cc42c8b8413517e57e2a683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-176b850bc63f24daa4bbfd3b7f30f4472b7d19bb75cc42c8b8413517e57e2a683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0190-7742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27074,27922,27923,56736,56786</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31899619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Havrylyuk, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkin, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Edith C</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features</title><title>Inorganic chemistry</title><addtitle>Inorg. Chem</addtitle><description>Ru­(II) complex photocages are used in a variety of biological applications, but the thermal stability, photosubstitution quantum yield, and biological compatibility of the most commonly used Ru­(II) systems remain unoptimized. Here, multiple compounds used in photocaging applications were analyzed and found to have several unsatisfactory characteristics. To address these deficiencies, three new scaffolds were designed to improve key properties through modulation of a combination of electronic, steric, and physiochemical features. One of these new systems, containing the 2,2′-biquinoline-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (2,2′-bicinchoninic acid) ligand, fulfills several of the requirements for an optimal photocage. Another complex, containing the 2-benzothiazol-2-yl-quinoline ligand, provides a scaffold for the creation of “dual action” agents.</description><issn>0020-1669</issn><issn>1520-510X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUcFO4zAUtFaLllL2E3blI0ik2LFjJ3uDqoVKSFRsV9pbZDtOY5TGxXaE-jt8KY5SuHLy02hm3hsPAL8wmmGU4muh_Mx01m1Vo3ezQqIUsewbmOAsRUmG0f_vYIIimGDGilNw5v0zQqgglP0ApwTnRcFwMQFvG_sqXAUf98HsRAuf-ovV6hKuGxusElvt_8Bb0YpOmW57ROM-44M7XMG_QUjTmhBH0VXw1lhld3sRzIjCTeNsv23g0nQabvpu8LB1lGln1BVctFoFZ7thHvTr5uDN6K_iKUstQu-0PwcntWi9_nl8p-DfcrGZ3ycPj3er-c1DIiijIcGcyTxDUjFSp7QSgkpZV0TymqCaUp5KXuFCSp4pRVOVy5xikmGuM65TwXIyBRej797Zl177UMacSrcxvba9L1NCCEMEcx6p2UhVznrvdF3uXfw-dygxKod6ylhP-VlPeawn6n4fV_Ryp6tP1UcfkYBHwqB_tr3rYuIvTN8B2J6jAg</recordid><startdate>20200121</startdate><enddate>20200121</enddate><creator>Havrylyuk, Dmytro</creator><creator>Stevens, Kimberly</creator><creator>Parkin, Sean</creator><creator>Glazer, Edith C</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-7742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200121</creationdate><title>Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features</title><author>Havrylyuk, Dmytro ; Stevens, Kimberly ; Parkin, Sean ; Glazer, Edith C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a464t-176b850bc63f24daa4bbfd3b7f30f4472b7d19bb75cc42c8b8413517e57e2a683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Havrylyuk, Dmytro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkin, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Edith C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Inorganic chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Havrylyuk, Dmytro</au><au>Stevens, Kimberly</au><au>Parkin, Sean</au><au>Glazer, Edith C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features</atitle><jtitle>Inorganic chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Inorg. Chem</addtitle><date>2020-01-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1006</spage><epage>1013</epage><pages>1006-1013</pages><issn>0020-1669</issn><eissn>1520-510X</eissn><abstract>Ru­(II) complex photocages are used in a variety of biological applications, but the thermal stability, photosubstitution quantum yield, and biological compatibility of the most commonly used Ru­(II) systems remain unoptimized. Here, multiple compounds used in photocaging applications were analyzed and found to have several unsatisfactory characteristics. To address these deficiencies, three new scaffolds were designed to improve key properties through modulation of a combination of electronic, steric, and physiochemical features. One of these new systems, containing the 2,2′-biquinoline-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (2,2′-bicinchoninic acid) ligand, fulfills several of the requirements for an optimal photocage. Another complex, containing the 2-benzothiazol-2-yl-quinoline ligand, provides a scaffold for the creation of “dual action” agents.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31899619</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-7742</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1669
ispartof Inorganic chemistry, 2020-01, Vol.59 (2), p.1006-1013
issn 0020-1669
1520-510X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2333603177
source ACS Publications
title Toward Optimal Ru(II) Photocages: Balancing Photochemistry, Stability, and Biocompatibility Through Fine Tuning of Steric, Electronic, and Physiochemical Features
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T23%3A28%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Optimal%20Ru(II)%20Photocages:%20Balancing%20Photochemistry,%20Stability,%20and%20Biocompatibility%20Through%20Fine%20Tuning%20of%20Steric,%20Electronic,%20and%20Physiochemical%20Features&rft.jtitle=Inorganic%20chemistry&rft.au=Havrylyuk,%20Dmytro&rft.date=2020-01-21&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1006&rft.epage=1013&rft.pages=1006-1013&rft.issn=0020-1669&rft.eissn=1520-510X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b02065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333603177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333603177&rft_id=info:pmid/31899619&rfr_iscdi=true