Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis
Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as ther...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of avian medicine and surgery 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 250 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 245 |
container_title | Journal of avian medicine and surgery |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Poleschinski, Julia M Straub, Jens U Schmidt, Volker |
description | Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1647/2018-358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A601436588</galeid><jstor_id>26908194</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A601436588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoNYbK1C_0BLQBBvpuZjNh-Xy9JqoaVF1uuQyZxoysxkTbJK_70Zdi0tWHKRcM6Tc96XF6ETSs6paOVnRqhq-EK9QkdUc9UwJenr-iaKNUK27BC9zfmeECoYUW_QIadKc0H1EepWcdzYFHKccPR4_SfidQJbRpgKvom9HUIJkLGdeny3-oZLxMucIecn2IX34Er4DdNcDxO-sS7F9NN2fcwhv0MH3g4Z3u_vY_T98mK9-tpc3365Wi2vm67KKY0QjjHnpRdkIT3jvaRMy1Zr2QnXe-c1sUoAd21Hmey51MpbsbAta4FzAvwYfdrN3aT4awu5mDFkB8NgJ4jbbBjn1T1XrK3ohx36ww5gwuRjSdbNuFkKQlsuFkpV6vw_VD09jMHFCXyo9Wcf9gqq_ZwTeLNJYbTpwVBi5qDMHJSpQVX0bC92243QP4L_kqnA6Q64zyWmxz4TmiiqZwsfd_0uxCrl5U1_AfJioMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2332083824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</creator><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><description>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-6742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1647/2018-358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31893619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Association of Avian Veterinarians</publisher><subject>amphotericin B ; Amphotericin B - administration & dosage ; Amphotericin B - therapeutic use ; Animals ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; avian ; Bird Diseases - diagnosis ; Bird Diseases - pathology ; Bird Diseases - therapy ; budgerigar ; cockatiel ; Cockatoos ; Comparative analysis ; Drinking Water ; Female ; macrorhabdosis ; Macrorhabdus ornithogaster ; Male ; Melopsittacus ; Melopsittacus undulatus ; Microscopy ; Mycoses - diagnosis ; Mycoses - drug therapy ; Mycoses - veterinary ; Nymphicus hollandicus ; PCR ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES ; Retrospective Study ; Saccharomycetales - isolation & purification ; Therapeutics ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of avian medicine and surgery, 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Association of Avian Veterinarians</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Association of Avian Veterinarians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26908194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26908194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Jens U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><title>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Avian Med Surg</addtitle><description>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</description><subject>amphotericin B</subject><subject>Amphotericin B - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Amphotericin B - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>avian</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>budgerigar</subject><subject>cockatiel</subject><subject>Cockatoos</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drinking Water</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>macrorhabdosis</subject><subject>Macrorhabdus ornithogaster</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melopsittacus</subject><subject>Melopsittacus undulatus</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Mycoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mycoses - veterinary</subject><subject>Nymphicus hollandicus</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES</subject><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><subject>Saccharomycetales - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1082-6742</issn><issn>1938-2871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoNYbK1C_0BLQBBvpuZjNh-Xy9JqoaVF1uuQyZxoysxkTbJK_70Zdi0tWHKRcM6Tc96XF6ETSs6paOVnRqhq-EK9QkdUc9UwJenr-iaKNUK27BC9zfmeECoYUW_QIadKc0H1EepWcdzYFHKccPR4_SfidQJbRpgKvom9HUIJkLGdeny3-oZLxMucIecn2IX34Er4DdNcDxO-sS7F9NN2fcwhv0MH3g4Z3u_vY_T98mK9-tpc3365Wi2vm67KKY0QjjHnpRdkIT3jvaRMy1Zr2QnXe-c1sUoAd21Hmey51MpbsbAta4FzAvwYfdrN3aT4awu5mDFkB8NgJ4jbbBjn1T1XrK3ohx36ww5gwuRjSdbNuFkKQlsuFkpV6vw_VD09jMHFCXyo9Wcf9gqq_ZwTeLNJYbTpwVBi5qDMHJSpQVX0bC92243QP4L_kqnA6Q64zyWmxz4TmiiqZwsfd_0uxCrl5U1_AfJioMg</recordid><startdate>20190909</startdate><enddate>20190909</enddate><creator>Poleschinski, Julia M</creator><creator>Straub, Jens U</creator><creator>Schmidt, Volker</creator><general>Association of Avian Veterinarians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190909</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><author>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>amphotericin B</topic><topic>Amphotericin B - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Amphotericin B - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>avian</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>budgerigar</topic><topic>cockatiel</topic><topic>Cockatoos</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drinking Water</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>macrorhabdosis</topic><topic>Macrorhabdus ornithogaster</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melopsittacus</topic><topic>Melopsittacus undulatus</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Mycoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mycoses - veterinary</topic><topic>Nymphicus hollandicus</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES</topic><topic>Retrospective Study</topic><topic>Saccharomycetales - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Jens U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poleschinski, Julia M</au><au>Straub, Jens U</au><au>Schmidt, Volker</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Avian Med Surg</addtitle><date>2019-09-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>245-250</pages><issn>1082-6742</issn><eissn>1938-2871</eissn><abstract>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Association of Avian Veterinarians</pub><pmid>31893619</pmid><doi>10.1647/2018-358</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1082-6742 |
ispartof | Journal of avian medicine and surgery, 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250 |
issn | 1082-6742 1938-2871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083824 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | amphotericin B Amphotericin B - administration & dosage Amphotericin B - therapeutic use Animals Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use avian Bird Diseases - diagnosis Bird Diseases - pathology Bird Diseases - therapy budgerigar cockatiel Cockatoos Comparative analysis Drinking Water Female macrorhabdosis Macrorhabdus ornithogaster Male Melopsittacus Melopsittacus undulatus Microscopy Mycoses - diagnosis Mycoses - drug therapy Mycoses - veterinary Nymphicus hollandicus PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES Retrospective Study Saccharomycetales - isolation & purification Therapeutics Water |
title | Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Treatment%20Modalities%20and%20PCR%20to%20Assess%20Treatment%20Effectiveness%20in%20Macrorhabdosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20avian%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Poleschinski,%20Julia%20M&rft.date=2019-09-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=245-250&rft.issn=1082-6742&rft.eissn=1938-2871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1647/2018-358&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA601436588%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2332083824&rft_id=info:pmid/31893619&rft_galeid=A601436588&rft_jstor_id=26908194&rfr_iscdi=true |