Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis

Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as ther...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of avian medicine and surgery 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250
Hauptverfasser: Poleschinski, Julia M, Straub, Jens U, Schmidt, Volker
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue 3
container_start_page 245
container_title Journal of avian medicine and surgery
container_volume 33
creator Poleschinski, Julia M
Straub, Jens U
Schmidt, Volker
description Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.
doi_str_mv 10.1647/2018-358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A601436588</galeid><jstor_id>26908194</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A601436588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoNYbK1C_0BLQBBvpuZjNh-Xy9JqoaVF1uuQyZxoysxkTbJK_70Zdi0tWHKRcM6Tc96XF6ETSs6paOVnRqhq-EK9QkdUc9UwJenr-iaKNUK27BC9zfmeECoYUW_QIadKc0H1EepWcdzYFHKccPR4_SfidQJbRpgKvom9HUIJkLGdeny3-oZLxMucIecn2IX34Er4DdNcDxO-sS7F9NN2fcwhv0MH3g4Z3u_vY_T98mK9-tpc3365Wi2vm67KKY0QjjHnpRdkIT3jvaRMy1Zr2QnXe-c1sUoAd21Hmey51MpbsbAta4FzAvwYfdrN3aT4awu5mDFkB8NgJ4jbbBjn1T1XrK3ohx36ww5gwuRjSdbNuFkKQlsuFkpV6vw_VD09jMHFCXyo9Wcf9gqq_ZwTeLNJYbTpwVBi5qDMHJSpQVX0bC92243QP4L_kqnA6Q64zyWmxz4TmiiqZwsfd_0uxCrl5U1_AfJioMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2332083824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</creator><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><description>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-6742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1647/2018-358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31893619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Association of Avian Veterinarians</publisher><subject>amphotericin B ; Amphotericin B - administration &amp; dosage ; Amphotericin B - therapeutic use ; Animals ; Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use ; avian ; Bird Diseases - diagnosis ; Bird Diseases - pathology ; Bird Diseases - therapy ; budgerigar ; cockatiel ; Cockatoos ; Comparative analysis ; Drinking Water ; Female ; macrorhabdosis ; Macrorhabdus ornithogaster ; Male ; Melopsittacus ; Melopsittacus undulatus ; Microscopy ; Mycoses - diagnosis ; Mycoses - drug therapy ; Mycoses - veterinary ; Nymphicus hollandicus ; PCR ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES ; Retrospective Study ; Saccharomycetales - isolation &amp; purification ; Therapeutics ; Water</subject><ispartof>Journal of avian medicine and surgery, 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Association of Avian Veterinarians</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Association of Avian Veterinarians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26908194$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26908194$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Jens U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><title>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</title><addtitle>J Avian Med Surg</addtitle><description>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</description><subject>amphotericin B</subject><subject>Amphotericin B - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Amphotericin B - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>avian</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Bird Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>budgerigar</subject><subject>cockatiel</subject><subject>Cockatoos</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drinking Water</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>macrorhabdosis</subject><subject>Macrorhabdus ornithogaster</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melopsittacus</subject><subject>Melopsittacus undulatus</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Mycoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Mycoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mycoses - veterinary</subject><subject>Nymphicus hollandicus</subject><subject>PCR</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES</subject><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><subject>Saccharomycetales - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1082-6742</issn><issn>1938-2871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rFDEUhoNYbK1C_0BLQBBvpuZjNh-Xy9JqoaVF1uuQyZxoysxkTbJK_70Zdi0tWHKRcM6Tc96XF6ETSs6paOVnRqhq-EK9QkdUc9UwJenr-iaKNUK27BC9zfmeECoYUW_QIadKc0H1EepWcdzYFHKccPR4_SfidQJbRpgKvom9HUIJkLGdeny3-oZLxMucIecn2IX34Er4DdNcDxO-sS7F9NN2fcwhv0MH3g4Z3u_vY_T98mK9-tpc3365Wi2vm67KKY0QjjHnpRdkIT3jvaRMy1Zr2QnXe-c1sUoAd21Hmey51MpbsbAta4FzAvwYfdrN3aT4awu5mDFkB8NgJ4jbbBjn1T1XrK3ohx36ww5gwuRjSdbNuFkKQlsuFkpV6vw_VD09jMHFCXyo9Wcf9gqq_ZwTeLNJYbTpwVBi5qDMHJSpQVX0bC92243QP4L_kqnA6Q64zyWmxz4TmiiqZwsfd_0uxCrl5U1_AfJioMg</recordid><startdate>20190909</startdate><enddate>20190909</enddate><creator>Poleschinski, Julia M</creator><creator>Straub, Jens U</creator><creator>Schmidt, Volker</creator><general>Association of Avian Veterinarians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190909</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</title><author>Poleschinski, Julia M ; Straub, Jens U ; Schmidt, Volker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b318t-66c22cf7f6057f23d712974997b6cdfcf90a86e3c4b127d3798fa65a424e330e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>amphotericin B</topic><topic>Amphotericin B - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Amphotericin B - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>avian</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Bird Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>budgerigar</topic><topic>cockatiel</topic><topic>Cockatoos</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drinking Water</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>macrorhabdosis</topic><topic>Macrorhabdus ornithogaster</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melopsittacus</topic><topic>Melopsittacus undulatus</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Mycoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Mycoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mycoses - veterinary</topic><topic>Nymphicus hollandicus</topic><topic>PCR</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES</topic><topic>Retrospective Study</topic><topic>Saccharomycetales - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Poleschinski, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Jens U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Volker</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Poleschinski, Julia M</au><au>Straub, Jens U</au><au>Schmidt, Volker</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of avian medicine and surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Avian Med Surg</addtitle><date>2019-09-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>245-250</pages><issn>1082-6742</issn><eissn>1938-2871</eissn><abstract>Macrorhabdosis is a debilitating disease condition that affects budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus), and many other bird species worldwide. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster is a pathogen which leads to nonspecific clinical signs, and to date, diagnosis as well as therapy are still challenging. In this study, medical histories of 32 budgerigars and 7 cockatiels with macrorhabdosis diagnosed clinically and by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) within a period of 24 months (from January 2016 to January 2018) were retrospectively analyzed. Macrorhabdus ornithogaster was diagnosed through fecal samples collected over several days and analyzed by microscopic examination or PCR. The effectiveness of 2 different amphotericin B treatment regimens were investigated by PCR. In 23 cases, treatment was performed with amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. For the remaining 16 birds, an alternative treatment regimen of amphotericin B at 100 mg/kg PO q12h for 10 days was combined with administration of amphotericin B via drinking water at 0.1 mg/mL for 28 days. Fecal samples of all treated flocks were reexamined by PCR 10–14 days post-amphotericin B treatment. More than half (56.4%) of the treated birds tested negative for M ornithogaster irrespective of the treatment regimen. In addition to clinical improvement and microscopic examination of droppings, PCR was used for the first time to evaluate treatment response in birds diagnosed with M ornithogaster. Administration of amphotericin B via drinking water proved to be effective in more than 50% of cases, indicating a less stressful alternative to the oral administration of amphotericin B twice daily.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Association of Avian Veterinarians</pub><pmid>31893619</pmid><doi>10.1647/2018-358</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1082-6742
ispartof Journal of avian medicine and surgery, 2019-09, Vol.33 (3), p.245-250
issn 1082-6742
1938-2871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083824
source MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects amphotericin B
Amphotericin B - administration & dosage
Amphotericin B - therapeutic use
Animals
Antifungal Agents - therapeutic use
avian
Bird Diseases - diagnosis
Bird Diseases - pathology
Bird Diseases - therapy
budgerigar
cockatiel
Cockatoos
Comparative analysis
Drinking Water
Female
macrorhabdosis
Macrorhabdus ornithogaster
Male
Melopsittacus
Melopsittacus undulatus
Microscopy
Mycoses - diagnosis
Mycoses - drug therapy
Mycoses - veterinary
Nymphicus hollandicus
PCR
Polymerase Chain Reaction
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES
Retrospective Study
Saccharomycetales - isolation & purification
Therapeutics
Water
title Comparison of Two Treatment Modalities and PCR to Assess Treatment Effectiveness in Macrorhabdosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Treatment%20Modalities%20and%20PCR%20to%20Assess%20Treatment%20Effectiveness%20in%20Macrorhabdosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20avian%20medicine%20and%20surgery&rft.au=Poleschinski,%20Julia%20M&rft.date=2019-09-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=245-250&rft.issn=1082-6742&rft.eissn=1938-2871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1647/2018-358&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA601436588%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2332083824&rft_id=info:pmid/31893619&rft_galeid=A601436588&rft_jstor_id=26908194&rfr_iscdi=true