Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment

Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal health research reviews 2019-06, Vol.20 (1), p.86-97
Hauptverfasser: Dufour, Simon, Wellemans, Vincent, Roy, Jean-Philippe, Lacasse, Pierre, Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo, Francoz, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 86
container_title Animal health research reviews
container_volume 20
creator Dufour, Simon
Wellemans, Vincent
Roy, Jean-Philippe
Lacasse, Pierre
Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo
Francoz, David
description Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1466252319000070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2332083193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-198d190f437d55013592accb522a7746ab6954757a2b9f1c4bf8c6fcf8c3bfe43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUctu1TAQtVAr-uID2CBLbNjk1o84jyWqCq1U2krQdTRxbOoqiS-2w9X92v5Kx70FCeqFPTM-c848CHnP2YozXp9-52VVCSUkbxmemr0hh7ysVSEqVe5lu6qK_H9AjmJ8YJgjmvItOZC8aRUT8pA8Xvu5gDm5yengewcjhfU6eND3JlJIdAhbN_8svLXU-kBTMJAwQGEe6DqY32Z-dt2cAkwwTRC26Fijk_NzRJMO4DCm_Sau6C2ERPmKfjMJUBbGbUQZb6mx1mnQ22wvcSeQSU1AEE0oSqOBESulG5fu_ZIoIOes_eRSjv7bw3OZE9Z2QvYtjNG8e3mPyd2X8x9nF8XVzdfLs89XhZaiTQVvmwGHaEtZD0oxLlUrQOteCQF1XVbQV63CydYg-tZyXfa20ZXVeMvemlIek087Xpzdr8XE1E0uajNixcYvsRNSCtbgoiRCP_4HffBLbjOjRN00rVQNovgOhS3FGIzt1sHl6XacdXn73avtY86HF-aln8zwN-PPuuUTHdyvRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2327889358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Dufour, Simon ; Wellemans, Vincent ; Roy, Jean-Philippe ; Lacasse, Pierre ; Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo ; Francoz, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Simon ; Wellemans, Vincent ; Roy, Jean-Philippe ; Lacasse, Pierre ; Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo ; Francoz, David</creatorcontrib><description>Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-2523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31895023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Animal lactation ; Animals ; Antacids - pharmacology ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Antiinfectives and antibacterials ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bias ; Bismuth ; Bismuth - pharmacology ; Cattle ; Dairy cattle ; Drying ; Female ; Lactation ; Mammary Glands, Animal ; Mastitis, Bovine - drug therapy ; Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control ; Meta-analysis ; Milk ; Pathogens ; Prevention ; Reviews ; Risk management ; Sealants ; Studies ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Animal health research reviews, 2019-06, Vol.20 (1), p.86-97</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Jun 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-198d190f437d55013592accb522a7746ab6954757a2b9f1c4bf8c6fcf8c3bfe43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-198d190f437d55013592accb522a7746ab6954757a2b9f1c4bf8c6fcf8c3bfe43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellemans, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacasse, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francoz, David</creatorcontrib><title>Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment</title><title>Animal health research reviews</title><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><description>Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.</description><subject>Animal lactation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antacids - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bismuth</subject><subject>Bismuth - pharmacology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dairy cattle</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Animal</subject><subject>Mastitis, Bovine - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sealants</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1466-2523</issn><issn>1475-2654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplUctu1TAQtVAr-uID2CBLbNjk1o84jyWqCq1U2krQdTRxbOoqiS-2w9X92v5Kx70FCeqFPTM-c848CHnP2YozXp9-52VVCSUkbxmemr0hh7ysVSEqVe5lu6qK_H9AjmJ8YJgjmvItOZC8aRUT8pA8Xvu5gDm5yengewcjhfU6eND3JlJIdAhbN_8svLXU-kBTMJAwQGEe6DqY32Z-dt2cAkwwTRC26Fijk_NzRJMO4DCm_Sau6C2ERPmKfjMJUBbGbUQZb6mx1mnQ22wvcSeQSU1AEE0oSqOBESulG5fu_ZIoIOes_eRSjv7bw3OZE9Z2QvYtjNG8e3mPyd2X8x9nF8XVzdfLs89XhZaiTQVvmwGHaEtZD0oxLlUrQOteCQF1XVbQV63CydYg-tZyXfa20ZXVeMvemlIek087Xpzdr8XE1E0uajNixcYvsRNSCtbgoiRCP_4HffBLbjOjRN00rVQNovgOhS3FGIzt1sHl6XacdXn73avtY86HF-aln8zwN-PPuuUTHdyvRQ</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Dufour, Simon</creator><creator>Wellemans, Vincent</creator><creator>Roy, Jean-Philippe</creator><creator>Lacasse, Pierre</creator><creator>Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo</creator><creator>Francoz, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment</title><author>Dufour, Simon ; Wellemans, Vincent ; Roy, Jean-Philippe ; Lacasse, Pierre ; Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo ; Francoz, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-198d190f437d55013592accb522a7746ab6954757a2b9f1c4bf8c6fcf8c3bfe43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal lactation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antacids - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antiinfectives and antibacterials</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bismuth</topic><topic>Bismuth - pharmacology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dairy cattle</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Animal</topic><topic>Mastitis, Bovine - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mastitis, Bovine - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sealants</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dufour, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellemans, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacasse, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francoz, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medicine (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dufour, Simon</au><au>Wellemans, Vincent</au><au>Roy, Jean-Philippe</au><au>Lacasse, Pierre</au><au>Ordonez-Iturriaga, Alfredo</au><au>Francoz, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment</atitle><jtitle>Animal health research reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Health Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>86-97</pages><issn>1466-2523</issn><eissn>1475-2654</eissn><abstract>Use of antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for preventing new intramammary infections (IMI) during the dry period in dairy cows could be replaced by non-antimicrobial approaches. Such approaches would be of interest not only for organic but also for conventional dairy producers. The objective of the current review was to quantify the effect of non-antimicrobial internal teat sealant (ITS)-based approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing IMI, when compared with no treatment or with an antimicrobial-based approach. The protocol for this review was published before initiating the review. A total of 18 trials from 16 articles could be used to investigate the effect of an ITS-based approach. With the available results, we conclude with a high level of confidence that non-antimicrobial ITS-based dry-off approaches are efficient for preventing new IMI during the dry period when compared with no treatment, and would reduce risk of new IMI by 52%. Moreover, we are relatively confident that a bismuth subnitrate-based ITS performed better than an antimicrobial for preventing new IMI during the dry period (a risk reduction of 23%). Similarly, we are relatively confident that an ITS-based approach would only slightly or not at all reduce the prevalence of IMI at calving compared with untreated quarters.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>31895023</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1466252319000070</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1466-2523
ispartof Animal health research reviews, 2019-06, Vol.20 (1), p.86-97
issn 1466-2523
1475-2654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332083193
source Cambridge Journals Online; MEDLINE
subjects Animal lactation
Animals
Antacids - pharmacology
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Antimicrobial agents
Bias
Bismuth
Bismuth - pharmacology
Cattle
Dairy cattle
Drying
Female
Lactation
Mammary Glands, Animal
Mastitis, Bovine - drug therapy
Mastitis, Bovine - prevention & control
Meta-analysis
Milk
Pathogens
Prevention
Reviews
Risk management
Sealants
Studies
Systematic review
title Non-antimicrobial approaches at drying-off for treating and preventing intramammary infections in dairy cows. Part 1. Meta-analyses of efficacy of using an internal teat sealant without a concomitant antimicrobial treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A35%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-antimicrobial%20approaches%20at%20drying-off%20for%20treating%20and%20preventing%20intramammary%20infections%20in%20dairy%20cows.%20Part%201.%20Meta-analyses%20of%20efficacy%20of%20using%20an%20internal%20teat%20sealant%20without%20a%20concomitant%20antimicrobial%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Animal%20health%20research%20reviews&rft.au=Dufour,%20Simon&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=86-97&rft.issn=1466-2523&rft.eissn=1475-2654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1466252319000070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332083193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2327889358&rft_id=info:pmid/31895023&rfr_iscdi=true