Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training
ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 351 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Journal of strength and conditioning research |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Lasevicius, Thiago Schoenfeld, Brad J. Silva-Batista, Carla Barros, Talita de Souza Aihara, André Yui Brendon, Helderson Longo, Ariel Roberth Tricoli, Valmor Peres, Bergson de Almeida Teixeira, Emerson Luiz |
description | ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332082650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622741905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1ERUvhHyBkiQuXLeOxnfUeUdQ2VKGtaO-W1ztJtmzWwd5VlH-Po6QI9QC-2Bp_72n0HmMfBFwILaovNw_TC_jrSKXVK3YmtJSFQlO-zm-YqMKAEKfsbUpPAKi1lm_YqRSm0ljBGVt-H5PviF-5thsj8fsY1mGgxK8juYEiP_7PdhuKQwyb1Y63PZ-HbTEPruH1OPDbMOxns3a5Ogx_UGrT4HpP_DG6tm_75Tt2snBdovfH-5w9XF0-TmfF_O762_TrvPDKgCoqUWuvSYGvTG2qBpybNKDLRkOpTINSIYmFq733WGvjvIRqUZIBRE1CnrPPB9dNDL9GSoNdt8lT17mewpgsSolgcKIho59eoE9hjH3ezeIEsVSiAp0pdaB8DClFWthNbNcu7qwAu6_B5hrsyxqy7OPRfKzX1PwRPeeeAXMAtqHLKaef3bilaFfkumH1P2_1DymAQIWlKTBHAphFxV5p5G-UxKI7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622741905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31895290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Humans ; Hypertrophy ; Load ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Physical training ; Quadriceps Muscle ; Resistance Training ; Strength training</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the National Strength & Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Batista, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Talita de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aihara, André Yui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendon, Helderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricoli, Valmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertrophy</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Quadriceps Muscle</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1ERUvhHyBkiQuXLeOxnfUeUdQ2VKGtaO-W1ztJtmzWwd5VlH-Po6QI9QC-2Bp_72n0HmMfBFwILaovNw_TC_jrSKXVK3YmtJSFQlO-zm-YqMKAEKfsbUpPAKi1lm_YqRSm0ljBGVt-H5PviF-5thsj8fsY1mGgxK8juYEiP_7PdhuKQwyb1Y63PZ-HbTEPruH1OPDbMOxns3a5Ogx_UGrT4HpP_DG6tm_75Tt2snBdovfH-5w9XF0-TmfF_O762_TrvPDKgCoqUWuvSYGvTG2qBpybNKDLRkOpTINSIYmFq733WGvjvIRqUZIBRE1CnrPPB9dNDL9GSoNdt8lT17mewpgsSolgcKIho59eoE9hjH3ezeIEsVSiAp0pdaB8DClFWthNbNcu7qwAu6_B5hrsyxqy7OPRfKzX1PwRPeeeAXMAtqHLKaef3bilaFfkumH1P2_1DymAQIWlKTBHAphFxV5p5G-UxKI7</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Lasevicius, Thiago</creator><creator>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creator><creator>Silva-Batista, Carla</creator><creator>Barros, Talita de Souza</creator><creator>Aihara, André Yui</creator><creator>Brendon, Helderson</creator><creator>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creator><creator>Tricoli, Valmor</creator><creator>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creator><creator>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Copyright by the National Strength & Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><author>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertrophy</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Quadriceps Muscle</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Batista, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Talita de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aihara, André Yui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendon, Helderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricoli, Valmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasevicius, Thiago</au><au>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</au><au>Silva-Batista, Carla</au><au>Barros, Talita de Souza</au><au>Aihara, André Yui</au><au>Brendon, Helderson</au><au>Longo, Ariel Roberth</au><au>Tricoli, Valmor</au><au>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</au><au>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>31895290</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8011 |
ispartof | Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351 |
issn | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332082650 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Humans Hypertrophy Load Male Muscle Strength Muscle, Skeletal Physical training Quadriceps Muscle Resistance Training Strength training |
title | Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20Failure%20Promotes%20Greater%20Muscle%20Hypertrophy%20in%20Low-Load%20but%20Not%20in%20High-Load%20Resistance%20Training&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Lasevicius,%20Thiago&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622741905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622741905&rft_id=info:pmid/31895290&rfr_iscdi=true |