Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training

ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351
Hauptverfasser: Lasevicius, Thiago, Schoenfeld, Brad J., Silva-Batista, Carla, Barros, Talita de Souza, Aihara, André Yui, Brendon, Helderson, Longo, Ariel Roberth, Tricoli, Valmor, Peres, Bergson de Almeida, Teixeira, Emerson Luiz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 351
container_issue 2
container_start_page 346
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 36
creator Lasevicius, Thiago
Schoenfeld, Brad J.
Silva-Batista, Carla
Barros, Talita de Souza
Aihara, André Yui
Brendon, Helderson
Longo, Ariel Roberth
Tricoli, Valmor
Peres, Bergson de Almeida
Teixeira, Emerson Luiz
description ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332082650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622741905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1ERUvhHyBkiQuXLeOxnfUeUdQ2VKGtaO-W1ztJtmzWwd5VlH-Po6QI9QC-2Bp_72n0HmMfBFwILaovNw_TC_jrSKXVK3YmtJSFQlO-zm-YqMKAEKfsbUpPAKi1lm_YqRSm0ljBGVt-H5PviF-5thsj8fsY1mGgxK8juYEiP_7PdhuKQwyb1Y63PZ-HbTEPruH1OPDbMOxns3a5Ogx_UGrT4HpP_DG6tm_75Tt2snBdovfH-5w9XF0-TmfF_O762_TrvPDKgCoqUWuvSYGvTG2qBpybNKDLRkOpTINSIYmFq733WGvjvIRqUZIBRE1CnrPPB9dNDL9GSoNdt8lT17mewpgsSolgcKIho59eoE9hjH3ezeIEsVSiAp0pdaB8DClFWthNbNcu7qwAu6_B5hrsyxqy7OPRfKzX1PwRPeeeAXMAtqHLKaef3bilaFfkumH1P2_1DymAQIWlKTBHAphFxV5p5G-UxKI7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622741905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31895290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Humans ; Hypertrophy ; Load ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Muscle, Skeletal ; Physical training ; Quadriceps Muscle ; Resistance Training ; Strength training</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31895290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Batista, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Talita de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aihara, André Yui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendon, Helderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricoli, Valmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertrophy</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Quadriceps Muscle</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFvEzEQhS1ERUvhHyBkiQuXLeOxnfUeUdQ2VKGtaO-W1ztJtmzWwd5VlH-Po6QI9QC-2Bp_72n0HmMfBFwILaovNw_TC_jrSKXVK3YmtJSFQlO-zm-YqMKAEKfsbUpPAKi1lm_YqRSm0ljBGVt-H5PviF-5thsj8fsY1mGgxK8juYEiP_7PdhuKQwyb1Y63PZ-HbTEPruH1OPDbMOxns3a5Ogx_UGrT4HpP_DG6tm_75Tt2snBdovfH-5w9XF0-TmfF_O762_TrvPDKgCoqUWuvSYGvTG2qBpybNKDLRkOpTINSIYmFq733WGvjvIRqUZIBRE1CnrPPB9dNDL9GSoNdt8lT17mewpgsSolgcKIho59eoE9hjH3ezeIEsVSiAp0pdaB8DClFWthNbNcu7qwAu6_B5hrsyxqy7OPRfKzX1PwRPeeeAXMAtqHLKaef3bilaFfkumH1P2_1DymAQIWlKTBHAphFxV5p5G-UxKI7</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Lasevicius, Thiago</creator><creator>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creator><creator>Silva-Batista, Carla</creator><creator>Barros, Talita de Souza</creator><creator>Aihara, André Yui</creator><creator>Brendon, Helderson</creator><creator>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creator><creator>Tricoli, Valmor</creator><creator>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creator><creator>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</title><author>Lasevicius, Thiago ; Schoenfeld, Brad J. ; Silva-Batista, Carla ; Barros, Talita de Souza ; Aihara, André Yui ; Brendon, Helderson ; Longo, Ariel Roberth ; Tricoli, Valmor ; Peres, Bergson de Almeida ; Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4804-91b5c5e40c98b89d0aa6d057d50748d2342e1fabccc2b58ac309f7e80225e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertrophy</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Quadriceps Muscle</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lasevicius, Thiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva-Batista, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Talita de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aihara, André Yui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brendon, Helderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Ariel Roberth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricoli, Valmor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lasevicius, Thiago</au><au>Schoenfeld, Brad J.</au><au>Silva-Batista, Carla</au><au>Barros, Talita de Souza</au><au>Aihara, André Yui</au><au>Brendon, Helderson</au><au>Longo, Ariel Roberth</au><au>Tricoli, Valmor</au><au>Peres, Bergson de Almeida</au><au>Teixeira, Emerson Luiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>346-351</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTLasevicius, T, Schoenfeld, BJ, Silva-Batista, C, Barros, TdS, Aihara, AY, Brendon, H, Longo, AR, Tricoli, V, Peres, BdA, and Teixeira, EL. Muscle failure promotes greater muscle hypertrophy in low-load but not in high-load resistance training. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2019—The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of an 8-week resistance training program at low and high loads performed with and without achieving muscle failure on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Twenty-five untrained men participated in the 8-week study. Each lower limb was allocated to 1 of 4 unilateral knee extension protocolsrepetitions to failure with low load (LL-RF; ∼34.4 repetitions); repetitions to failure with high load (HL-RF; ∼12.4 repetitions); repetitions not to failure with low load (LL-RNF; ∼19.6 repetitions); and repetitions not to failure with high load (HL-RNF; ∼6.7 repetitions). All conditions performed 3 sets with total training volume equated between conditions. The HL-RF and HL-RNF protocols used a load corresponding to 80% 1 repetition maximum (RM), while LL-RF and LL-RNF trained at 30% 1RM. Muscle strength (1RM) and quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) were assessed before and after intervention. Results showed that 1RM changes were significantly higher for HL-RF (33.8%, effect size [ES]1.24) and HL-RNF (33.4%, ES1.25) in the post-test when compared with the LL-RF and LL-RNF protocols (17.7%, ES0.82 and 15.8%, ES0.89, respectively). Quadriceps CSA increased significantly for HL-RF (8.1%, ES0.57), HL-RNF (7.7%, ES0.60), and LL-RF (7.8%, ES0.45), whereas no significant changes were observed in the LL-RNF (2.8%, ES0.15). We conclude that when training with low loads, training with a high level of effort seems to have greater importance than total training volume in the accretion of muscle mass, whereas for high load training, muscle failure does not promote any additional benefits. Consistent with previous research, muscle strength gains are superior when using heavier loads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>31895290</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2022-02, Vol.36 (2), p.346-351
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2332082650
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Humans
Hypertrophy
Load
Male
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal
Physical training
Quadriceps Muscle
Resistance Training
Strength training
title Muscle Failure Promotes Greater Muscle Hypertrophy in Low-Load but Not in High-Load Resistance Training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T01%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20Failure%20Promotes%20Greater%20Muscle%20Hypertrophy%20in%20Low-Load%20but%20Not%20in%20High-Load%20Resistance%20Training&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Lasevicius,%20Thiago&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=346-351&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622741905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622741905&rft_id=info:pmid/31895290&rfr_iscdi=true