Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning

Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) ident...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The knee 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542
Hauptverfasser: Yi, Paul H., Wei, Jinchi, Kim, Tae Kyung, Sair, Haris I., Hui, Ferdinand K., Hager, Gregory D., Fritz, Jan, Oni, Julius K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 542
container_issue 2
container_start_page 535
container_title The knee
container_volume 27
creator Yi, Paul H.
Wei, Jinchi
Kim, Tae Kyung
Sair, Haris I.
Hui, Ferdinand K.
Hager, Gregory D.
Fritz, Jan
Oni, Julius K.
description Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models. We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making. DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape. DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331430550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016019303102</els_id><sourcerecordid>2417015343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa2qqAzT_gALFKlSxSbhvThOHKkbhFpAArGha8uxX8BDJp7aSaX5ezwdYMECbyzb595nHcaOEQoErM9WxdNIVJSAbYFYQAmf2AJlw3MhAT6zBbS1zBMJh-woxhUA1G0lvrBDjlLypoYFuz2fJ7_WE9nM0kRmcn7MfmRm0DG63hn9_8L32W5UpsP0GPwmPU7bbI5ufEgp2mQD6TCm01d20Osh0reXfcn-_P51f3GV39xdXl-c3-SGy2rKsdVpdaKUiD21sm6saMuu6mokA2RMh5Jkba3kFq3USI3oRS9LlLyluuJLdrrv3QT_d6Y4qbWLhoZBj-TnqErOseIgBCT0-zt05ecwpt-pssIGUPCKJ6rcUyb4GAP1ahPcWoetQlA72WqldgbUTrZCVEl2Cp28VM_dmuxb5NVuAn7uAUou_jkKKhpHoyHrQlKtrHcf9T8D1WCPzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417015343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated detection &amp; classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models. We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making. DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape. DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31883760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Bone surgery ; Classification ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Deep learning ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Identification ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee Arthroplasty ; Knee prosthesis ; Neural networks ; Personal computers ; Prostheses ; Radiography ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sair, Haris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><title>Automated detection &amp; classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models. We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making. DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape. DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Knee prosthesis</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Personal computers</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa2qqAzT_gALFKlSxSbhvThOHKkbhFpAArGha8uxX8BDJp7aSaX5ezwdYMECbyzb595nHcaOEQoErM9WxdNIVJSAbYFYQAmf2AJlw3MhAT6zBbS1zBMJh-woxhUA1G0lvrBDjlLypoYFuz2fJ7_WE9nM0kRmcn7MfmRm0DG63hn9_8L32W5UpsP0GPwmPU7bbI5ufEgp2mQD6TCm01d20Osh0reXfcn-_P51f3GV39xdXl-c3-SGy2rKsdVpdaKUiD21sm6saMuu6mokA2RMh5Jkba3kFq3USI3oRS9LlLyluuJLdrrv3QT_d6Y4qbWLhoZBj-TnqErOseIgBCT0-zt05ecwpt-pssIGUPCKJ6rcUyb4GAP1ahPcWoetQlA72WqldgbUTrZCVEl2Cp28VM_dmuxb5NVuAn7uAUou_jkKKhpHoyHrQlKtrHcf9T8D1WCPzg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Yi, Paul H.</creator><creator>Wei, Jinchi</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Kyung</creator><creator>Sair, Haris I.</creator><creator>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creator><creator>Hager, Gregory D.</creator><creator>Fritz, Jan</creator><creator>Oni, Julius K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Automated detection &amp; classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><author>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Knee prosthesis</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Personal computers</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sair, Haris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Paul H.</au><au>Wei, Jinchi</au><au>Kim, Tae Kyung</au><au>Sair, Haris I.</au><au>Hui, Ferdinand K.</au><au>Hager, Gregory D.</au><au>Fritz, Jan</au><au>Oni, Julius K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated detection &amp; classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>535-542</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models. We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making. DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape. DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31883760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0160
ispartof The knee, 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542
issn 0968-0160
1873-5800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331430550
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Algorithms
Arthroplasty (knee)
Artificial intelligence
Automation
Bone surgery
Classification
Datasets
Decision making
Deep learning
Diabetic retinopathy
Identification
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Knee Arthroplasty
Knee prosthesis
Neural networks
Personal computers
Prostheses
Radiography
Surgeons
Surgery
Transplants & implants
title Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20detection%20&%20classification%20of%20knee%20arthroplasty%20using%20deep%20learning&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Yi,%20Paul%20H.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=535-542&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2417015343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417015343&rft_id=info:pmid/31883760&rft_els_id=S0968016019303102&rfr_iscdi=true