Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning
Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) ident...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The knee 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 542 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 535 |
container_title | The knee |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Yi, Paul H. Wei, Jinchi Kim, Tae Kyung Sair, Haris I. Hui, Ferdinand K. Hager, Gregory D. Fritz, Jan Oni, Julius K. |
description | Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models.
We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making.
DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape.
DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331430550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0968016019303102</els_id><sourcerecordid>2417015343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa2qqAzT_gALFKlSxSbhvThOHKkbhFpAArGha8uxX8BDJp7aSaX5ezwdYMECbyzb595nHcaOEQoErM9WxdNIVJSAbYFYQAmf2AJlw3MhAT6zBbS1zBMJh-woxhUA1G0lvrBDjlLypoYFuz2fJ7_WE9nM0kRmcn7MfmRm0DG63hn9_8L32W5UpsP0GPwmPU7bbI5ufEgp2mQD6TCm01d20Osh0reXfcn-_P51f3GV39xdXl-c3-SGy2rKsdVpdaKUiD21sm6saMuu6mokA2RMh5Jkba3kFq3USI3oRS9LlLyluuJLdrrv3QT_d6Y4qbWLhoZBj-TnqErOseIgBCT0-zt05ecwpt-pssIGUPCKJ6rcUyb4GAP1ahPcWoetQlA72WqldgbUTrZCVEl2Cp28VM_dmuxb5NVuAn7uAUou_jkKKhpHoyHrQlKtrHcf9T8D1WCPzg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2417015343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models.
We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making.
DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape.
DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0160</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31883760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Artificial intelligence ; Automation ; Bone surgery ; Classification ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Deep learning ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Identification ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee Arthroplasty ; Knee prosthesis ; Neural networks ; Personal computers ; Prostheses ; Radiography ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>The knee, 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31883760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sair, Haris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><title>Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><title>The knee</title><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><description>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models.
We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making.
DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape.
DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee Arthroplasty</subject><subject>Knee prosthesis</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Personal computers</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0968-0160</issn><issn>1873-5800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAURa2qqAzT_gALFKlSxSbhvThOHKkbhFpAArGha8uxX8BDJp7aSaX5ezwdYMECbyzb595nHcaOEQoErM9WxdNIVJSAbYFYQAmf2AJlw3MhAT6zBbS1zBMJh-woxhUA1G0lvrBDjlLypoYFuz2fJ7_WE9nM0kRmcn7MfmRm0DG63hn9_8L32W5UpsP0GPwmPU7bbI5ufEgp2mQD6TCm01d20Osh0reXfcn-_P51f3GV39xdXl-c3-SGy2rKsdVpdaKUiD21sm6saMuu6mokA2RMh5Jkba3kFq3USI3oRS9LlLyluuJLdrrv3QT_d6Y4qbWLhoZBj-TnqErOseIgBCT0-zt05ecwpt-pssIGUPCKJ6rcUyb4GAP1ahPcWoetQlA72WqldgbUTrZCVEl2Cp28VM_dmuxb5NVuAn7uAUou_jkKKhpHoyHrQlKtrHcf9T8D1WCPzg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Yi, Paul H.</creator><creator>Wei, Jinchi</creator><creator>Kim, Tae Kyung</creator><creator>Sair, Haris I.</creator><creator>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creator><creator>Hager, Gregory D.</creator><creator>Fritz, Jan</creator><creator>Oni, Julius K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</title><author>Yi, Paul H. ; Wei, Jinchi ; Kim, Tae Kyung ; Sair, Haris I. ; Hui, Ferdinand K. ; Hager, Gregory D. ; Fritz, Jan ; Oni, Julius K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-19aaaab52811fe9867d592b4b61ec0eccb18e86dd83d1d8a1e75f5f821839e643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee Arthroplasty</topic><topic>Knee prosthesis</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Personal computers</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yi, Paul H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Jinchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sair, Haris I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Ferdinand K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Gregory D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fritz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oni, Julius K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The knee</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yi, Paul H.</au><au>Wei, Jinchi</au><au>Kim, Tae Kyung</au><au>Sair, Haris I.</au><au>Hui, Ferdinand K.</au><au>Hager, Gregory D.</au><au>Fritz, Jan</au><au>Oni, Julius K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning</atitle><jtitle>The knee</jtitle><addtitle>Knee</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>535-542</pages><issn>0968-0160</issn><eissn>1873-5800</eissn><abstract>Preoperative identification of knee arthroplasty is important for planning revision surgery. However, up to 10% of implants are not identified prior to surgery. The purposes of this study were to develop and test the performance of a deep learning system (DLS) for the automated radiographic 1) identification of the presence or absence of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA); 2) classification of TKA vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA); and 3) differentiation between two different primary TKA models.
We collected 237 anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs with equal proportions of native knees, TKA, and UKA and 274 AP knee radiographs with equal proportions of two TKA models. Data augmentation was used to increase the number of images for deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) training. A DLS based on DCNNs was trained on these images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC) were generated. Heatmaps were created using class activation mapping (CAM) to identify image features most important for DCNN decision-making.
DCNNs trained to detect TKA and distinguish between TKA and UKA both achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps demonstrated appropriate emphasis of arthroplasty components in decision-making. The DCNN trained to distinguish between the two TKA models achieved AUC of 1. Heatmaps showed emphasis of specific unique features of the TKA model designs, such as the femoral component anterior flange shape.
DCNNs can accurately identify presence of TKA and distinguish between specific arthroplasty designs. This proof-of-concept could be applied towards identifying other prosthesis models and prosthesis-related complications.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31883760</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0160 |
ispartof | The knee, 2020-03, Vol.27 (2), p.535-542 |
issn | 0968-0160 1873-5800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331430550 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Algorithms Arthroplasty (knee) Artificial intelligence Automation Bone surgery Classification Datasets Decision making Deep learning Diabetic retinopathy Identification Joint replacement surgery Joint surgery Knee Arthroplasty Knee prosthesis Neural networks Personal computers Prostheses Radiography Surgeons Surgery Transplants & implants |
title | Automated detection & classification of knee arthroplasty using deep learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20detection%20&%20classification%20of%20knee%20arthroplasty%20using%20deep%20learning&rft.jtitle=The%20knee&rft.au=Yi,%20Paul%20H.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=535-542&rft.issn=0968-0160&rft.eissn=1873-5800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2417015343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2417015343&rft_id=info:pmid/31883760&rft_els_id=S0968016019303102&rfr_iscdi=true |