Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows

Wheat is the most common concentrate fed to grazing dairy cows in Australia, but no studies have examined the effects of wheat proportion in a pasture-based diet on milk production and methane emissions. In this 47-d experiment, 32 Holstein dairy cows were offered 1 of 4 diets during d 1 to 36. Cows...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2020-03, Vol.103 (3), p.2373-2386
Hauptverfasser: Moate, P.J., Deighton, M.H., Jacobs, J., Ribaux, B.E., Morris, G.L., Hannah, M.C., Mapleson, D., Islam, M.S., Wales, W.J., Williams, S.R.O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2386
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2373
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 103
creator Moate, P.J.
Deighton, M.H.
Jacobs, J.
Ribaux, B.E.
Morris, G.L.
Hannah, M.C.
Mapleson, D.
Islam, M.S.
Wales, W.J.
Williams, S.R.O.
description Wheat is the most common concentrate fed to grazing dairy cows in Australia, but no studies have examined the effects of wheat proportion in a pasture-based diet on milk production and methane emissions. In this 47-d experiment, 32 Holstein dairy cows were offered 1 of 4 diets during d 1 to 36. Cows in each of the dietary treatment groups were individually offered no wheat (W0) or wheat at 3 kg of dry matter (DM)/d (W3), 6 kg of DM/d (W6), or 9 kg of DM/d (W9). The remainder of the diet was 2.2 kg of DM of concentrate mix and freshly harvested perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) such that all individual cows were offered a total diet of approximately 20.2 kg of DM/d. From d 37 to 47 the diets of cows receiving treatments W0 and W3 remained unchanged, but cows in treatments W6 and W9 received the W3 diet. Individual cow feed intakes, milk yields, milk compositions, and methane emissions were measured for d 31 to 35 (period 1) and d 45 to 47 (period 2). During period 1, the mean intakes of cows offered the W0, W3, W6, and W9 diets were 19.2, 20.4, 20.2, and 19.8 kg of DM/d. Diet caused differences in energy-corrected milk, and means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 were 29.5, 32.4, 33.0, and 32.9 kg/d, respectively. Milk fat percentage differed with respective means of 3.93, 3.94, 3.69, and 3.17. Diets also caused differences in methane emissions, with means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 of 440, 431, 414, and 319 g/d. During period 1, the cows fed the W9 diet produced less methane and had lower methane yields (g/kg of DMI) and intensities (g/kg of energy-corrected milk) than cows fed the W3 diet. However, in period 2 when the wheat intake of cows in the W9 treatment was reduced to the same level as in the W3 treatment, their methane emissions, yields, and intensities were similar to those offered the W3 treatment, yet protozoa numbers in ruminal fluid were still much lower than those in cows offered the W3 treatment. Our research shows that for diets based on perennial ryegrass and crushed wheat, only the diet containing more than 30% crushed wheat resulted in substantially depressed milk fat concentration and reduced methane emissions, methane yield, and methane intensity. Thus, although feeding a diet with a high proportion of wheat can cause substantial methane mitigation, it can come at the cost of depression in milk fat concentration.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2019-17514
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331257628</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030219311294</els_id><sourcerecordid>2331257628</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-27623233bfbe09342fa9e88be5f4c39fe6e5a8d4b98735ceb5c36d1d28f0b78e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uGyEUhVGVqnHcbrOMWGaRcfkZbGYZWUkTyVI37RoxcJFxZwYHmETuM-Shy9RuusoKXfRxzrkchC4pWXC6lF93Ni0YoU1FV4LWH9CMCiYqTht5hmaEMFYRTtg5ukhpV0bKiPiEzjmVkjHazNDr4-C6EQYDODi8j2EfYvZhmKaXLeiM_YA13uuUxwhVqxNYbD1kXJjed7_wwUNnb3APeasHwND7lIpA-n91IvRgcRx7P-huMsrhd9CTjdU-HrAJL-kz-uh0l-DL6Zyjn_d3P9YP1eb7t8f17aYyXNa5Yqsl44zz1rVAGl4zpxuQsgXhasMbB0sQWtq6beSKCwOtMHxpqWXSkXYlgc_R9VG3xHgaIWVVQhvoupI2jEkVbcpEcZEFXRxRE0NKEZzaR9_reFCUqKkBVRpQUwPqbwPlwdVJe2x7sG_4vy8vgDwCUDZ89hBVMn4qwPoIJisb_HvafwDQMpa_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331257628</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Moate, P.J. ; Deighton, M.H. ; Jacobs, J. ; Ribaux, B.E. ; Morris, G.L. ; Hannah, M.C. ; Mapleson, D. ; Islam, M.S. ; Wales, W.J. ; Williams, S.R.O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moate, P.J. ; Deighton, M.H. ; Jacobs, J. ; Ribaux, B.E. ; Morris, G.L. ; Hannah, M.C. ; Mapleson, D. ; Islam, M.S. ; Wales, W.J. ; Williams, S.R.O.</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat is the most common concentrate fed to grazing dairy cows in Australia, but no studies have examined the effects of wheat proportion in a pasture-based diet on milk production and methane emissions. In this 47-d experiment, 32 Holstein dairy cows were offered 1 of 4 diets during d 1 to 36. Cows in each of the dietary treatment groups were individually offered no wheat (W0) or wheat at 3 kg of dry matter (DM)/d (W3), 6 kg of DM/d (W6), or 9 kg of DM/d (W9). The remainder of the diet was 2.2 kg of DM of concentrate mix and freshly harvested perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) such that all individual cows were offered a total diet of approximately 20.2 kg of DM/d. From d 37 to 47 the diets of cows receiving treatments W0 and W3 remained unchanged, but cows in treatments W6 and W9 received the W3 diet. Individual cow feed intakes, milk yields, milk compositions, and methane emissions were measured for d 31 to 35 (period 1) and d 45 to 47 (period 2). During period 1, the mean intakes of cows offered the W0, W3, W6, and W9 diets were 19.2, 20.4, 20.2, and 19.8 kg of DM/d. Diet caused differences in energy-corrected milk, and means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 were 29.5, 32.4, 33.0, and 32.9 kg/d, respectively. Milk fat percentage differed with respective means of 3.93, 3.94, 3.69, and 3.17. Diets also caused differences in methane emissions, with means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 of 440, 431, 414, and 319 g/d. During period 1, the cows fed the W9 diet produced less methane and had lower methane yields (g/kg of DMI) and intensities (g/kg of energy-corrected milk) than cows fed the W3 diet. However, in period 2 when the wheat intake of cows in the W9 treatment was reduced to the same level as in the W3 treatment, their methane emissions, yields, and intensities were similar to those offered the W3 treatment, yet protozoa numbers in ruminal fluid were still much lower than those in cows offered the W3 treatment. Our research shows that for diets based on perennial ryegrass and crushed wheat, only the diet containing more than 30% crushed wheat resulted in substantially depressed milk fat concentration and reduced methane emissions, methane yield, and methane intensity. Thus, although feeding a diet with a high proportion of wheat can cause substantial methane mitigation, it can come at the cost of depression in milk fat concentration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17514</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31882219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>dose response ; greenhouse gas</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2020-03, Vol.103 (3), p.2373-2386</ispartof><rights>2020 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-27623233bfbe09342fa9e88be5f4c39fe6e5a8d4b98735ceb5c36d1d28f0b78e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-27623233bfbe09342fa9e88be5f4c39fe6e5a8d4b98735ceb5c36d1d28f0b78e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0663-738X ; 0000-0003-4598-2047 ; 0000-0003-1321-6487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17514$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31882219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moate, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deighton, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribaux, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, G.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapleson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, S.R.O.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>Wheat is the most common concentrate fed to grazing dairy cows in Australia, but no studies have examined the effects of wheat proportion in a pasture-based diet on milk production and methane emissions. In this 47-d experiment, 32 Holstein dairy cows were offered 1 of 4 diets during d 1 to 36. Cows in each of the dietary treatment groups were individually offered no wheat (W0) or wheat at 3 kg of dry matter (DM)/d (W3), 6 kg of DM/d (W6), or 9 kg of DM/d (W9). The remainder of the diet was 2.2 kg of DM of concentrate mix and freshly harvested perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) such that all individual cows were offered a total diet of approximately 20.2 kg of DM/d. From d 37 to 47 the diets of cows receiving treatments W0 and W3 remained unchanged, but cows in treatments W6 and W9 received the W3 diet. Individual cow feed intakes, milk yields, milk compositions, and methane emissions were measured for d 31 to 35 (period 1) and d 45 to 47 (period 2). During period 1, the mean intakes of cows offered the W0, W3, W6, and W9 diets were 19.2, 20.4, 20.2, and 19.8 kg of DM/d. Diet caused differences in energy-corrected milk, and means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 were 29.5, 32.4, 33.0, and 32.9 kg/d, respectively. Milk fat percentage differed with respective means of 3.93, 3.94, 3.69, and 3.17. Diets also caused differences in methane emissions, with means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 of 440, 431, 414, and 319 g/d. During period 1, the cows fed the W9 diet produced less methane and had lower methane yields (g/kg of DMI) and intensities (g/kg of energy-corrected milk) than cows fed the W3 diet. However, in period 2 when the wheat intake of cows in the W9 treatment was reduced to the same level as in the W3 treatment, their methane emissions, yields, and intensities were similar to those offered the W3 treatment, yet protozoa numbers in ruminal fluid were still much lower than those in cows offered the W3 treatment. Our research shows that for diets based on perennial ryegrass and crushed wheat, only the diet containing more than 30% crushed wheat resulted in substantially depressed milk fat concentration and reduced methane emissions, methane yield, and methane intensity. Thus, although feeding a diet with a high proportion of wheat can cause substantial methane mitigation, it can come at the cost of depression in milk fat concentration.</description><subject>dose response</subject><subject>greenhouse gas</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1uGyEUhVGVqnHcbrOMWGaRcfkZbGYZWUkTyVI37RoxcJFxZwYHmETuM-Shy9RuusoKXfRxzrkchC4pWXC6lF93Ni0YoU1FV4LWH9CMCiYqTht5hmaEMFYRTtg5ukhpV0bKiPiEzjmVkjHazNDr4-C6EQYDODi8j2EfYvZhmKaXLeiM_YA13uuUxwhVqxNYbD1kXJjed7_wwUNnb3APeasHwND7lIpA-n91IvRgcRx7P-huMsrhd9CTjdU-HrAJL-kz-uh0l-DL6Zyjn_d3P9YP1eb7t8f17aYyXNa5Yqsl44zz1rVAGl4zpxuQsgXhasMbB0sQWtq6beSKCwOtMHxpqWXSkXYlgc_R9VG3xHgaIWVVQhvoupI2jEkVbcpEcZEFXRxRE0NKEZzaR9_reFCUqKkBVRpQUwPqbwPlwdVJe2x7sG_4vy8vgDwCUDZ89hBVMn4qwPoIJisb_HvafwDQMpa_</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Moate, P.J.</creator><creator>Deighton, M.H.</creator><creator>Jacobs, J.</creator><creator>Ribaux, B.E.</creator><creator>Morris, G.L.</creator><creator>Hannah, M.C.</creator><creator>Mapleson, D.</creator><creator>Islam, M.S.</creator><creator>Wales, W.J.</creator><creator>Williams, S.R.O.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-738X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-6487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows</title><author>Moate, P.J. ; Deighton, M.H. ; Jacobs, J. ; Ribaux, B.E. ; Morris, G.L. ; Hannah, M.C. ; Mapleson, D. ; Islam, M.S. ; Wales, W.J. ; Williams, S.R.O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-27623233bfbe09342fa9e88be5f4c39fe6e5a8d4b98735ceb5c36d1d28f0b78e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>dose response</topic><topic>greenhouse gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moate, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deighton, M.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribaux, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, G.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapleson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islam, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, S.R.O.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moate, P.J.</au><au>Deighton, M.H.</au><au>Jacobs, J.</au><au>Ribaux, B.E.</au><au>Morris, G.L.</au><au>Hannah, M.C.</au><au>Mapleson, D.</au><au>Islam, M.S.</au><au>Wales, W.J.</au><au>Williams, S.R.O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2373</spage><epage>2386</epage><pages>2373-2386</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>Wheat is the most common concentrate fed to grazing dairy cows in Australia, but no studies have examined the effects of wheat proportion in a pasture-based diet on milk production and methane emissions. In this 47-d experiment, 32 Holstein dairy cows were offered 1 of 4 diets during d 1 to 36. Cows in each of the dietary treatment groups were individually offered no wheat (W0) or wheat at 3 kg of dry matter (DM)/d (W3), 6 kg of DM/d (W6), or 9 kg of DM/d (W9). The remainder of the diet was 2.2 kg of DM of concentrate mix and freshly harvested perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) such that all individual cows were offered a total diet of approximately 20.2 kg of DM/d. From d 37 to 47 the diets of cows receiving treatments W0 and W3 remained unchanged, but cows in treatments W6 and W9 received the W3 diet. Individual cow feed intakes, milk yields, milk compositions, and methane emissions were measured for d 31 to 35 (period 1) and d 45 to 47 (period 2). During period 1, the mean intakes of cows offered the W0, W3, W6, and W9 diets were 19.2, 20.4, 20.2, and 19.8 kg of DM/d. Diet caused differences in energy-corrected milk, and means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 were 29.5, 32.4, 33.0, and 32.9 kg/d, respectively. Milk fat percentage differed with respective means of 3.93, 3.94, 3.69, and 3.17. Diets also caused differences in methane emissions, with means for W0, W3, W6, and W9 of 440, 431, 414, and 319 g/d. During period 1, the cows fed the W9 diet produced less methane and had lower methane yields (g/kg of DMI) and intensities (g/kg of energy-corrected milk) than cows fed the W3 diet. However, in period 2 when the wheat intake of cows in the W9 treatment was reduced to the same level as in the W3 treatment, their methane emissions, yields, and intensities were similar to those offered the W3 treatment, yet protozoa numbers in ruminal fluid were still much lower than those in cows offered the W3 treatment. Our research shows that for diets based on perennial ryegrass and crushed wheat, only the diet containing more than 30% crushed wheat resulted in substantially depressed milk fat concentration and reduced methane emissions, methane yield, and methane intensity. Thus, although feeding a diet with a high proportion of wheat can cause substantial methane mitigation, it can come at the cost of depression in milk fat concentration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31882219</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2019-17514</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-738X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1321-6487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2020-03, Vol.103 (3), p.2373-2386
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331257628
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects dose response
greenhouse gas
title Influence of proportion of wheat in a pasture-based diet on milk yield, methane emissions, methane yield, and ruminal protozoa of dairy cows
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20proportion%20of%20wheat%20in%20a%20pasture-based%20diet%20on%20milk%20yield,%20methane%20emissions,%20methane%20yield,%20and%20ruminal%20protozoa%20of%20dairy%20cows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Moate,%20P.J.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2373&rft.epage=2386&rft.pages=2373-2386&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2019-17514&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2331257628%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331257628&rft_id=info:pmid/31882219&rft_els_id=S0022030219311294&rfr_iscdi=true