The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?

The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	European journal of internal medicine 2020-02, Vol.72, p.5-8
Hauptverfasser:	Manolis, A.J., Kallistratos, M.S., Poulimenos, L.Ε., Ambrosio, G., Dechend, R., Lopez-Sendon, J., Rosano, G., Collins, P.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Angina Angina Pectoris Guidelines Humans Medical therapy
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	8
container_issue
container_start_page	5
container_title	European journal of internal medicine
container_volume	72
creator	Manolis, A.J. Kallistratos, M.S. Poulimenos, L.Ε. Ambrosio, G. Dechend, R. Lopez-Sendon, J. Rosano, G. Collins, P.
description	The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are going to summarize and discuss the main points of disagreement.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.012
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331256754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0953620519304418</els_id><sourcerecordid>2331256754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-24e8c360e133f6272ec659ded8ef958668682cf7d81b1e00677173adfb38128d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOj7-gAvJ0k3rvck0TUUQKb5gwIWPbegkt5qh045NO-K_t3XUpavcxfkO5DB2jBAjoDpbxLTwy1gAZjGKGFBssQnqNItAC73NJpAlMlICkj22H8ICAFMAucv25EihTibs5emN-PVjzkcLz_NH_tp7R5WvKZzzu2JN_IN4RWXHm77lq6LzVHeBF7XjwY63L73ltB5GtSU-pzdfu8tDtlMWVaCjn_eAPd9cP-V30ezh9j6_mkV2CtBFYkraSgWEUpZKpIKsSjJHTlOZJVoprbSwZeo0zpEAVJpiKgtXzqVGoZ08YKcb76pt3nsKnVn6YKmqipqaPhghJYpEpcl0QMUGtW0TQkulWbV-WbSfBsGMPc3CjD3NWMKgMEPPYXTy4-_nS3J_k9-AA3CxAWj45dpTa76rWHK-JdsZ1_j__F8ovYPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331256754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Manolis, A.J. ; Kallistratos, M.S. ; Poulimenos, L.Ε. ; Ambrosio, G. ; Dechend, R. ; Lopez-Sendon, J. ; Rosano, G. ; Collins, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Manolis, A.J. ; Kallistratos, M.S. ; Poulimenos, L.Ε. ; Ambrosio, G. ; Dechend, R. ; Lopez-Sendon, J. ; Rosano, G. ; Collins, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are going to summarize and discuss the main points of disagreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-6205</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0828</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31879185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Angina ; Angina Pectoris ; Guidelines ; Humans ; Medical therapy</subject><ispartof>European journal of internal medicine, 2020-02, Vol.72, p.5-8</ispartof><rights>2019 European Federation of Internal Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-24e8c360e133f6272ec659ded8ef958668682cf7d81b1e00677173adfb38128d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-24e8c360e133f6272ec659ded8ef958668682cf7d81b1e00677173adfb38128d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8256-4218 ; 0000-0002-9525-0971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manolis, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallistratos, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulimenos, L.Ε.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosio, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechend, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Sendon, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosano, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?</title><title>European journal of internal medicine</title><addtitle>Eur J Intern Med</addtitle><description>The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are going to summarize and discuss the main points of disagreement.</description><subject>Angina</subject><subject>Angina Pectoris</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical therapy</subject><issn>0953-6205</issn><issn>1879-0828</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOj7-gAvJ0k3rvck0TUUQKb5gwIWPbegkt5qh045NO-K_t3XUpavcxfkO5DB2jBAjoDpbxLTwy1gAZjGKGFBssQnqNItAC73NJpAlMlICkj22H8ICAFMAucv25EihTibs5emN-PVjzkcLz_NH_tp7R5WvKZzzu2JN_IN4RWXHm77lq6LzVHeBF7XjwY63L73ltB5GtSU-pzdfu8tDtlMWVaCjn_eAPd9cP-V30ezh9j6_mkV2CtBFYkraSgWEUpZKpIKsSjJHTlOZJVoprbSwZeo0zpEAVJpiKgtXzqVGoZ08YKcb76pt3nsKnVn6YKmqipqaPhghJYpEpcl0QMUGtW0TQkulWbV-WbSfBsGMPc3CjD3NWMKgMEPPYXTy4-_nS3J_k9-AA3CxAWj45dpTa76rWHK-JdsZ1_j__F8ovYPn</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Manolis, A.J.</creator><creator>Kallistratos, M.S.</creator><creator>Poulimenos, L.Ε.</creator><creator>Ambrosio, G.</creator><creator>Dechend, R.</creator><creator>Lopez-Sendon, J.</creator><creator>Rosano, G.</creator><creator>Collins, P.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8256-4218</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-0971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?</title><author>Manolis, A.J. ; Kallistratos, M.S. ; Poulimenos, L.Ε. ; Ambrosio, G. ; Dechend, R. ; Lopez-Sendon, J. ; Rosano, G. ; Collins, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-24e8c360e133f6272ec659ded8ef958668682cf7d81b1e00677173adfb38128d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Angina</topic><topic>Angina Pectoris</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manolis, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallistratos, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulimenos, L.Ε.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosio, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dechend, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Sendon, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosano, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manolis, A.J.</au><au>Kallistratos, M.S.</au><au>Poulimenos, L.Ε.</au><au>Ambrosio, G.</au><au>Dechend, R.</au><au>Lopez-Sendon, J.</au><au>Rosano, G.</au><au>Collins, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of internal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Intern Med</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>5</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>5-8</pages><issn>0953-6205</issn><eissn>1879-0828</eissn><abstract>The ESC CCS 2019 guidelines recognize that successful management of anginal symptoms relies on effective therapy tailored to individual patient characteristics but do not provide any specific advice or clarity on how to utilize pharmacotherapy in order to achieve these goals. In this review, we are going to summarize and discuss the main points of disagreement.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31879185</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.012</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8256-4218</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-0971</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0953-6205
ispartof	European journal of internal medicine, 2020-02, Vol.72, p.5-8
issn	0953-6205 1879-0828
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331256754
source	MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects	Angina Angina Pectoris Guidelines Humans Medical therapy
title	The ESC 2019 CCS guidelines: Have we left our patients and scientific evidence behind?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A58%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20ESC%202019%20CCS%20guidelines:%20Have%20we%20left%20our%20patients%20and%20scientific%20evidence%20behind?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Manolis,%20A.J.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=5-8&rft.issn=0953-6205&rft.eissn=1879-0828&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2331256754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331256754&rft_id=info:pmid/31879185&rft_els_id=S0953620519304418&rfr_iscdi=true