Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome

Premise Outcomes of species interactions, especially mutualisms, are notoriously dependent on environmental context, and environments are changing rapidly. Studies have investigated how mutualisms respond to or ameliorate anthropogenic environmental changes, but most have focused on nutrient polluti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of botany 2020-02, Vol.107 (2), p.273-285
Hauptverfasser: O'Brien, Anna M., Yu, Zhu Hao, Luo, Dian‐ya, Laurich, Jason, Passeport, Elodie, Frederickson, Megan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 2
container_start_page 273
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 107
creator O'Brien, Anna M.
Yu, Zhu Hao
Luo, Dian‐ya
Laurich, Jason
Passeport, Elodie
Frederickson, Megan E.
description Premise Outcomes of species interactions, especially mutualisms, are notoriously dependent on environmental context, and environments are changing rapidly. Studies have investigated how mutualisms respond to or ameliorate anthropogenic environmental changes, but most have focused on nutrient pollution or climate change and tested stressors one at a time. Relatively little is known about how mutualisms may be altered by or buffer the effects of multiple chemical contaminants, which differ fundamentally from nutrient or climate stressors and are especially widespread in aquatic habitats. Methods We investigated the impacts of two contaminants on interactions between the duckweed Lemna minor and its microbiome. Sodium chloride (salt) and benzotriazole (a corrosion inhibitor) often co‐occur in runoff to water bodies where duckweeds reside. We tested three L. minor genotypes with and without the culturable portion of their microbiome across field‐realistic gradients of salt (3 levels) and benzotriazole (4 levels) in a fully factorial experiment (24 treatments, tested on each genotype) and measured plant and microbial growth. Results Stressors had conditional effects. Salt decreased both plant and microbial growth and decreased plant survival more as benzotriazole concentrations increased. In contrast, benzotriazole did not affect microbial abundance and even benefited plants when salt and microbes were absent, perhaps due to biotransformation into growth‐promoting compounds. Microbes did not ameliorate duckweed stressors; microbial inoculation increased plant growth, but not at high salt concentrations. Conclusions Our results suggest that multiple stressors matter when predicting responses of mutualisms to global change and that beneficial microbes may not always buffer hosts against stress.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajb2.1404
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331256630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2380036534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-1b8d40484b376dc15fb4156e203770c41822398d327eb7250c3ca0204a25ed483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlYPfgEJeNHDtskk2WSPWrQqBUH0HLLZFFL2Xze7SL-9qa0eBGFgmJkfjzcPoUtKppQQmJl1DlPKCT9CYyqYTIBm8hiNSTwmGQUYobMQ1nHMeAanaMSoklkmyBgt3lzwpXe1dbhvcDWUvW9Lh0PfuRCaLmBfYxNrM5jeW9yWpu7josC-D7jytmty31TuHJ2sTBncxaFP0Mfjw_v8KVm-Lp7nd8vEMqV4QnNVRJ-K50ymhaVilXMqUgeESUkspwqAZapgIF0uQRDLrCFAuAHhCq7YBN3sdduu2Qwu9Lrywboy2nLNEDQwRkGkKSMRvf6Drpuhq6O7SClCWCoYj9TtnoqfhNC5lW47X5luqynRu3T1Ll29SzeyVwfFIa9c8Uv-xBmB2R749KXb_q-k717u4VvyC95ogMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380036534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>O'Brien, Anna M. ; Yu, Zhu Hao ; Luo, Dian‐ya ; Laurich, Jason ; Passeport, Elodie ; Frederickson, Megan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Anna M. ; Yu, Zhu Hao ; Luo, Dian‐ya ; Laurich, Jason ; Passeport, Elodie ; Frederickson, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Premise Outcomes of species interactions, especially mutualisms, are notoriously dependent on environmental context, and environments are changing rapidly. Studies have investigated how mutualisms respond to or ameliorate anthropogenic environmental changes, but most have focused on nutrient pollution or climate change and tested stressors one at a time. Relatively little is known about how mutualisms may be altered by or buffer the effects of multiple chemical contaminants, which differ fundamentally from nutrient or climate stressors and are especially widespread in aquatic habitats. Methods We investigated the impacts of two contaminants on interactions between the duckweed Lemna minor and its microbiome. Sodium chloride (salt) and benzotriazole (a corrosion inhibitor) often co‐occur in runoff to water bodies where duckweeds reside. We tested three L. minor genotypes with and without the culturable portion of their microbiome across field‐realistic gradients of salt (3 levels) and benzotriazole (4 levels) in a fully factorial experiment (24 treatments, tested on each genotype) and measured plant and microbial growth. Results Stressors had conditional effects. Salt decreased both plant and microbial growth and decreased plant survival more as benzotriazole concentrations increased. In contrast, benzotriazole did not affect microbial abundance and even benefited plants when salt and microbes were absent, perhaps due to biotransformation into growth‐promoting compounds. Microbes did not ameliorate duckweed stressors; microbial inoculation increased plant growth, but not at high salt concentrations. Conclusions Our results suggest that multiple stressors matter when predicting responses of mutualisms to global change and that beneficial microbes may not always buffer hosts against stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1404</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31879950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Botanical Society of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic habitats ; Aquatic plants ; Araceae ; Bacterial corrosion ; Benzotriazole ; Biotransformation ; Buffers ; Chemical contaminants ; Chemical pollution ; Climate change ; Contaminants ; Corrosion inhibitors ; Duckweed ; Environmental changes ; Factorial experiments ; Floating plants ; freshwater salinization ; Genotypes ; Human influences ; Inoculation ; Lemna minor ; Lemnaceae ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Nutrient pollution ; Nutrients ; Plant Development ; Plant growth ; rhizosphere ; Runoff ; Salt ; Salts ; Sodium Chloride ; species interactions ; stress ; urban pollution ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 2020-02, Vol.107 (2), p.273-285</ispartof><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>2019 Botanical Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-1b8d40484b376dc15fb4156e203770c41822398d327eb7250c3ca0204a25ed483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-1b8d40484b376dc15fb4156e203770c41822398d327eb7250c3ca0204a25ed483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8455-8620</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajb2.1404$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajb2.1404$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhu Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Dian‐ya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurich, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederickson, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome</title><title>American journal of botany</title><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><description>Premise Outcomes of species interactions, especially mutualisms, are notoriously dependent on environmental context, and environments are changing rapidly. Studies have investigated how mutualisms respond to or ameliorate anthropogenic environmental changes, but most have focused on nutrient pollution or climate change and tested stressors one at a time. Relatively little is known about how mutualisms may be altered by or buffer the effects of multiple chemical contaminants, which differ fundamentally from nutrient or climate stressors and are especially widespread in aquatic habitats. Methods We investigated the impacts of two contaminants on interactions between the duckweed Lemna minor and its microbiome. Sodium chloride (salt) and benzotriazole (a corrosion inhibitor) often co‐occur in runoff to water bodies where duckweeds reside. We tested three L. minor genotypes with and without the culturable portion of their microbiome across field‐realistic gradients of salt (3 levels) and benzotriazole (4 levels) in a fully factorial experiment (24 treatments, tested on each genotype) and measured plant and microbial growth. Results Stressors had conditional effects. Salt decreased both plant and microbial growth and decreased plant survival more as benzotriazole concentrations increased. In contrast, benzotriazole did not affect microbial abundance and even benefited plants when salt and microbes were absent, perhaps due to biotransformation into growth‐promoting compounds. Microbes did not ameliorate duckweed stressors; microbial inoculation increased plant growth, but not at high salt concentrations. Conclusions Our results suggest that multiple stressors matter when predicting responses of mutualisms to global change and that beneficial microbes may not always buffer hosts against stress.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Araceae</subject><subject>Bacterial corrosion</subject><subject>Benzotriazole</subject><subject>Biotransformation</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Corrosion inhibitors</subject><subject>Duckweed</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Factorial experiments</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>freshwater salinization</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Lemna minor</subject><subject>Lemnaceae</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Nutrient pollution</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>rhizosphere</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride</subject><subject>species interactions</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>urban pollution</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMotlYPfgEJeNHDtskk2WSPWrQqBUH0HLLZFFL2Xze7SL-9qa0eBGFgmJkfjzcPoUtKppQQmJl1DlPKCT9CYyqYTIBm8hiNSTwmGQUYobMQ1nHMeAanaMSoklkmyBgt3lzwpXe1dbhvcDWUvW9Lh0PfuRCaLmBfYxNrM5jeW9yWpu7josC-D7jytmty31TuHJ2sTBncxaFP0Mfjw_v8KVm-Lp7nd8vEMqV4QnNVRJ-K50ymhaVilXMqUgeESUkspwqAZapgIF0uQRDLrCFAuAHhCq7YBN3sdduu2Qwu9Lrywboy2nLNEDQwRkGkKSMRvf6Drpuhq6O7SClCWCoYj9TtnoqfhNC5lW47X5luqynRu3T1Ll29SzeyVwfFIa9c8Uv-xBmB2R749KXb_q-k717u4VvyC95ogMU</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Anna M.</creator><creator>Yu, Zhu Hao</creator><creator>Luo, Dian‐ya</creator><creator>Laurich, Jason</creator><creator>Passeport, Elodie</creator><creator>Frederickson, Megan E.</creator><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-8620</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome</title><author>O'Brien, Anna M. ; Yu, Zhu Hao ; Luo, Dian‐ya ; Laurich, Jason ; Passeport, Elodie ; Frederickson, Megan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-1b8d40484b376dc15fb4156e203770c41822398d327eb7250c3ca0204a25ed483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Araceae</topic><topic>Bacterial corrosion</topic><topic>Benzotriazole</topic><topic>Biotransformation</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Corrosion inhibitors</topic><topic>Duckweed</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Factorial experiments</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>freshwater salinization</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Lemna minor</topic><topic>Lemnaceae</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Nutrient pollution</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>rhizosphere</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride</topic><topic>species interactions</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>urban pollution</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhu Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Dian‐ya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurich, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Passeport, Elodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederickson, Megan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Anna M.</au><au>Yu, Zhu Hao</au><au>Luo, Dian‐ya</au><au>Laurich, Jason</au><au>Passeport, Elodie</au><au>Frederickson, Megan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Bot</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>273-285</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><abstract>Premise Outcomes of species interactions, especially mutualisms, are notoriously dependent on environmental context, and environments are changing rapidly. Studies have investigated how mutualisms respond to or ameliorate anthropogenic environmental changes, but most have focused on nutrient pollution or climate change and tested stressors one at a time. Relatively little is known about how mutualisms may be altered by or buffer the effects of multiple chemical contaminants, which differ fundamentally from nutrient or climate stressors and are especially widespread in aquatic habitats. Methods We investigated the impacts of two contaminants on interactions between the duckweed Lemna minor and its microbiome. Sodium chloride (salt) and benzotriazole (a corrosion inhibitor) often co‐occur in runoff to water bodies where duckweeds reside. We tested three L. minor genotypes with and without the culturable portion of their microbiome across field‐realistic gradients of salt (3 levels) and benzotriazole (4 levels) in a fully factorial experiment (24 treatments, tested on each genotype) and measured plant and microbial growth. Results Stressors had conditional effects. Salt decreased both plant and microbial growth and decreased plant survival more as benzotriazole concentrations increased. In contrast, benzotriazole did not affect microbial abundance and even benefited plants when salt and microbes were absent, perhaps due to biotransformation into growth‐promoting compounds. Microbes did not ameliorate duckweed stressors; microbial inoculation increased plant growth, but not at high salt concentrations. Conclusions Our results suggest that multiple stressors matter when predicting responses of mutualisms to global change and that beneficial microbes may not always buffer hosts against stress.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Botanical Society of America, Inc</pub><pmid>31879950</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajb2.1404</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8455-8620</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 2020-02, Vol.107 (2), p.273-285
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2331256630
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic habitats
Aquatic plants
Araceae
Bacterial corrosion
Benzotriazole
Biotransformation
Buffers
Chemical contaminants
Chemical pollution
Climate change
Contaminants
Corrosion inhibitors
Duckweed
Environmental changes
Factorial experiments
Floating plants
freshwater salinization
Genotypes
Human influences
Inoculation
Lemna minor
Lemnaceae
Microbiomes
Microbiota
Nutrient pollution
Nutrients
Plant Development
Plant growth
rhizosphere
Runoff
Salt
Salts
Sodium Chloride
species interactions
stress
urban pollution
Water pollution
title Resilience to multiple stressors in an aquatic plant and its microbiome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A28%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resilience%20to%20multiple%20stressors%20in%20an%20aquatic%20plant%20and%20its%20microbiome&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Anna%20M.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=273-285&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajb2.1404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2380036534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380036534&rft_id=info:pmid/31879950&rfr_iscdi=true