Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital

Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral 2020-02, Vol.37 (1), p.80-85
Hauptverfasser: Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion, Puig Cepero, Cèlia, Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel, Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina, Simó Guerrero, Olga, Pérez Giménez, Gemma, Navarro Alé, Olga, Pujol Martín, Gemma, Castells Fuster, Ignasi, Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; spa
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 80
container_title Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral
container_volume 37
creator Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion
Puig Cepero, Cèlia
Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel
Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina
Simó Guerrero, Olga
Pérez Giménez, Gemma
Navarro Alé, Olga
Pujol Martín, Gemma
Castells Fuster, Ignasi
Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve
description Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6% of patients and malnutrition was present in 19%. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8%. In 41.9% of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40% of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1% of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report.
doi_str_mv 10.20960/nh.02778
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330792018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2330792018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-c71dfeba0be1a82e511e581d289a8e16cc1c46cb52fdfd1334ba938eb9df6433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AeQRxhSfHab2GNVPqUilu6RY1-oUWKH2B3Y-eGkHzCdTnr3dHqEXAObcqZydu83U8aLQp6QMeRKZXNQ8pSMGQeeQQ4wIhcxfjLGFZP5ORkJkEU-48WY_CxixBid_6Bpg9S1XYMt-qSTC56Gmmrqt6l3u1U3NJoe0e_org8pmNBQ52k30MNNpNq2LiW0NIW97g2tM84jfcBO92knPjibYAbbJsTOJd1ckrNaNxGvjnNC1k-P6-VLtnp_fl0uVpnhwFJmCrA1VppVCFpynAPgXILlUmmJkBsDZpabas5rW1sQYlZpJSRWytb5TIgJuT1oh9-_thhT2bposGm0x7CNJReCFYozkAN6d0BNH2LssS673rW6_y6Blfvmpd-U--YDe3PUbqsW7T_5F1n8AmbSf8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330792018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion ; Puig Cepero, Cèlia ; Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel ; Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina ; Simó Guerrero, Olga ; Pérez Giménez, Gemma ; Navarro Alé, Olga ; Pujol Martín, Gemma ; Castells Fuster, Ignasi ; Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</creator><creatorcontrib>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion ; Puig Cepero, Cèlia ; Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel ; Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina ; Simó Guerrero, Olga ; Pérez Giménez, Gemma ; Navarro Alé, Olga ; Pujol Martín, Gemma ; Castells Fuster, Ignasi ; Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</creatorcontrib><description>Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6% of patients and malnutrition was present in 19%. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8%. In 41.9% of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40% of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1% of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0212-1611</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1699-5198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20960/nh.02778</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31876427</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Diagnosis-Related Groups ; Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospital Records ; Humans ; Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Internal Medicine ; Malnutrition - diagnosis ; Malnutrition - epidemiology ; Mass Screening - organization &amp; administration ; Middle Aged ; Nursing Diagnosis ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Support ; Nutritionists ; Observer Variation ; Patient Discharge ; Program Evaluation ; Prospective Studies ; Secondary Care Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spain - epidemiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral, 2020-02, Vol.37 (1), p.80-85</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-c71dfeba0be1a82e511e581d289a8e16cc1c46cb52fdfd1334ba938eb9df6433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876427$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig Cepero, Cèlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simó Guerrero, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Giménez, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Alé, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol Martín, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells Fuster, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital</title><title>Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral</title><addtitle>Nutr Hosp</addtitle><description>Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6% of patients and malnutrition was present in 19%. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8%. In 41.9% of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40% of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1% of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Diagnosis-Related Groups</subject><subject>Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospital Records</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Malnutrition - diagnosis</subject><subject>Malnutrition - epidemiology</subject><subject>Mass Screening - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing Diagnosis</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutritional Support</subject><subject>Nutritionists</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Secondary Care Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0212-1611</issn><issn>1699-5198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AeQRxhSfHab2GNVPqUilu6RY1-oUWKH2B3Y-eGkHzCdTnr3dHqEXAObcqZydu83U8aLQp6QMeRKZXNQ8pSMGQeeQQ4wIhcxfjLGFZP5ORkJkEU-48WY_CxixBid_6Bpg9S1XYMt-qSTC56Gmmrqt6l3u1U3NJoe0e_org8pmNBQ52k30MNNpNq2LiW0NIW97g2tM84jfcBO92knPjibYAbbJsTOJd1ckrNaNxGvjnNC1k-P6-VLtnp_fl0uVpnhwFJmCrA1VppVCFpynAPgXILlUmmJkBsDZpabas5rW1sQYlZpJSRWytb5TIgJuT1oh9-_thhT2bposGm0x7CNJReCFYozkAN6d0BNH2LssS673rW6_y6Blfvmpd-U--YDe3PUbqsW7T_5F1n8AmbSf8A</recordid><startdate>20200217</startdate><enddate>20200217</enddate><creator>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion</creator><creator>Puig Cepero, Cèlia</creator><creator>Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel</creator><creator>Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina</creator><creator>Simó Guerrero, Olga</creator><creator>Pérez Giménez, Gemma</creator><creator>Navarro Alé, Olga</creator><creator>Pujol Martín, Gemma</creator><creator>Castells Fuster, Ignasi</creator><creator>Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200217</creationdate><title>Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital</title><author>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion ; Puig Cepero, Cèlia ; Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel ; Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina ; Simó Guerrero, Olga ; Pérez Giménez, Gemma ; Navarro Alé, Olga ; Pujol Martín, Gemma ; Castells Fuster, Ignasi ; Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c210t-c71dfeba0be1a82e511e581d289a8e16cc1c46cb52fdfd1334ba938eb9df6433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Diagnosis-Related Groups</topic><topic>Hospital Departments - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospital Records</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Malnutrition - diagnosis</topic><topic>Malnutrition - epidemiology</topic><topic>Mass Screening - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing Diagnosis</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutritional Support</topic><topic>Nutritionists</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Secondary Care Centers - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puig Cepero, Cèlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simó Guerrero, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Giménez, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Alé, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pujol Martín, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castells Fuster, Ignasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Recasens Gracia, M ª Asuncion</au><au>Puig Cepero, Cèlia</au><au>Giménez-Pérez, Gabriel</au><au>Soldevilla Barbosa, Cristina</au><au>Simó Guerrero, Olga</au><au>Pérez Giménez, Gemma</au><au>Navarro Alé, Olga</au><au>Pujol Martín, Gemma</au><au>Castells Fuster, Ignasi</au><au>Llargués Rocabruna, Esteve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital</atitle><jtitle>Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr Hosp</addtitle><date>2020-02-17</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>80-85</pages><issn>0212-1611</issn><eissn>1699-5198</eissn><abstract>Background: the techniques for screening and nutritional intervention in hospitalized patients are a cost-effective measure. In clinical practice the problem lies in their administration. Objective: to evaluate the implementation of a nutritional screening tool in patients admitted to our Medicine Ward (M). Material and methods: a single-center, prospective, observational study in patients admitted to M. Exclusion criteria: end-stage cancer patients, inpatient stay less than 72 h, and hospital readmission of previously included patients. One out of every 2 hospital admissions was selected. We assessed the following: whether nurses performed the screening test, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ); the score obtained; consultations with dieticians (ICD); prescribed nutritional support; and coding of malnutrition in the discharge report. Dieticians repeated the SNAQ for one in every 3 patients. Results: during the study period 726 patients were admitted, 377 were selected, and 315 were included. The nursing staff administered the SNAQ to 93.6% of patients and malnutrition was present in 19%. Dieticians detected malnutrition in 37.8%. In 41.9% of patients with severe malnutrition an ICD was performed, whereas in 40% of them no nutritional intervention was implemented. The diagnosis of malnutrition was recorded in the discharge report of 42.1% of our cases. Conclusion: Compliance with screening test administration was good, but there is disagreement with the assessment made by dieticians. For most malnourished patients nutritional support fals to be prescribed, no ICDs are performed, and a malnutrition diagnosis is not included in the discharge report.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>31876427</pmid><doi>10.20960/nh.02778</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0212-1611
ispartof Nutrición hospitalaria : organo oficial de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral, 2020-02, Vol.37 (1), p.80-85
issn 0212-1611
1699-5198
language eng ; spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330792018
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Hospital Departments - statistics & numerical data
Hospital Records
Humans
Inpatients - statistics & numerical data
Internal Medicine
Malnutrition - diagnosis
Malnutrition - epidemiology
Mass Screening - organization & administration
Middle Aged
Nursing Diagnosis
Nutrition Assessment
Nutritional Support
Nutritionists
Observer Variation
Patient Discharge
Program Evaluation
Prospective Studies
Secondary Care Centers - statistics & numerical data
Severity of Illness Index
Spain - epidemiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Assessing the implementation of a nutritional screening protocol in patients admitted to the Medicine Department of a local hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A45%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20implementation%20of%20a%20nutritional%20screening%20protocol%20in%20patients%20admitted%20to%20the%20Medicine%20Department%20of%20a%20local%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Nutrici%C3%B3n%20hospitalaria%20:%20organo%20oficial%20de%20la%20Sociedad%20Espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20Nutrici%C3%B3n%20Parenteral%20y%20Enteral&rft.au=Recasens%20Gracia,%20M%20%C2%AA%20Asuncion&rft.date=2020-02-17&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=80-85&rft.issn=0212-1611&rft.eissn=1699-5198&rft_id=info:doi/10.20960/nh.02778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330792018%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330792018&rft_id=info:pmid/31876427&rfr_iscdi=true