Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics
Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maternal and child health journal 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Maternal and child health journal |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Congdon, Jayme L. Trope, Lee A. Bruce, Janine S. Chung, Paul J. Dehlendorf, Christine Chamberlain, Lisa J. |
description | Objectives
Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis.
Results
While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm.
Conclusions for Practice
Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A614578809</galeid><sourcerecordid>A614578809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJSTEJWUcx0nMrVQUkFpYIVCPluNMNq4Se7Edqb3z4Di7hVK0Qj54NPP9Y3v8Z9lzCscUoH4TKAjBc6Aih6IpRH79IDukvGZ5VRXNwxSDKPK6qflB9iSEK4Akg_JxdsBoSjLgh9nPC8Ro7JrEAclnxC4Q15OVC3GjfJwncukmtOTSxIEo220DN0eiyFfUaCNZeYzoJ_LO-Di8JSv0GjfROLttdKFS0aqRnKnJjDdkNSprl-OMTWhnVPRGh6fZo16NAZ_d7kfZ97P3304_5udfPnw6PTnPNac05oIj9D1oKJFSVpZ1W7GaKwodiEoVoumbQnfYtZRVyKsWSt4XqGgjgNFWcXaUvd713Xj3Y8YQ5WSCxjFdCt0cZMHSTERdcZbQl_-gV25eXrJQvKyg4UzcUWs1ojS2d9ErvTSVJxUted00sFD5HmqNFr0ancXepPQ9_ngPn1aHk9F7Ba_-EgyoxjgEN87bb7gPFjtQexeCx15uvJmUv5EU5OIpufOUTJ6SW0_J6yR6cTuKuZ2w-yP5baIEsB0QUsmu0d_N6j9tfwH4XNSt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354608539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis.
Results
While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm.
Conclusions for Practice
Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31875305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Care and treatment ; Contraception - psychology ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Interviews as Topic ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Pediatricians - psychology ; Pediatrics ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Population Economics ; Postnatal care ; Postpartum Period - psychology ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth ; Premature labor ; Public Health ; Quality management ; Reproductive health ; San Francisco ; Sociology ; Statistics ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Maternal and Child Health Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Janine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehlendorf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Objectives
Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis.
Results
While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm.
Conclusions for Practice
Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Contraception - psychology</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatricians - psychology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Postnatal care</subject><subject>Postpartum Period - psychology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Premature labor</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>San Francisco</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJSTEJWUcx0nMrVQUkFpYIVCPluNMNq4Se7Edqb3z4Di7hVK0Qj54NPP9Y3v8Z9lzCscUoH4TKAjBc6Aih6IpRH79IDukvGZ5VRXNwxSDKPK6qflB9iSEK4Akg_JxdsBoSjLgh9nPC8Ro7JrEAclnxC4Q15OVC3GjfJwncukmtOTSxIEo220DN0eiyFfUaCNZeYzoJ_LO-Di8JSv0GjfROLttdKFS0aqRnKnJjDdkNSprl-OMTWhnVPRGh6fZo16NAZ_d7kfZ97P3304_5udfPnw6PTnPNac05oIj9D1oKJFSVpZ1W7GaKwodiEoVoumbQnfYtZRVyKsWSt4XqGgjgNFWcXaUvd713Xj3Y8YQ5WSCxjFdCt0cZMHSTERdcZbQl_-gV25eXrJQvKyg4UzcUWs1ojS2d9ErvTSVJxUted00sFD5HmqNFr0ancXepPQ9_ngPn1aHk9F7Ba_-EgyoxjgEN87bb7gPFjtQexeCx15uvJmUv5EU5OIpufOUTJ6SW0_J6yR6cTuKuZ2w-yP5baIEsB0QUsmu0d_N6j9tfwH4XNSt</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Congdon, Jayme L.</creator><creator>Trope, Lee A.</creator><creator>Bruce, Janine S.</creator><creator>Chung, Paul J.</creator><creator>Dehlendorf, Christine</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><author>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Contraception - psychology</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatricians - psychology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Postnatal care</topic><topic>Postpartum Period - psychology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Premature labor</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>San Francisco</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Janine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehlendorf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Jayme L.</au><au>Trope, Lee A.</au><au>Bruce, Janine S.</au><au>Chung, Paul J.</au><au>Dehlendorf, Christine</au><au>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>378-388</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis.
Results
While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm.
Conclusions for Practice
Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31875305</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-7875 |
ispartof | Maternal and child health journal, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388 |
issn | 1092-7875 1573-6628 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597653 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Care and treatment Contraception - psychology Family planning Family Planning Services Female Gynecology Health Services Accessibility Humans Infant, Newborn Infants Interviews as Topic Maternal and Child Health Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Pediatricians - psychology Pediatrics Physician-Patient Relations Population Economics Postnatal care Postpartum Period - psychology Pregnancy Premature Birth Premature labor Public Health Quality management Reproductive health San Francisco Sociology Statistics Womens health Young Adult |
title | Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meeting%20the%20Needs%20of%20Postpartum%20Women%20With%20and%20Without%20a%20Recent%20Preterm%20Birth:%20Perceptions%20of%20Maternal%20Family%20Planning%20in%20Pediatrics&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Congdon,%20Jayme%20L.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=378-388&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA614578809%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354608539&rft_id=info:pmid/31875305&rft_galeid=A614578809&rfr_iscdi=true |