Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics

Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maternal and child health journal 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388
Hauptverfasser: Congdon, Jayme L., Trope, Lee A., Bruce, Janine S., Chung, Paul J., Dehlendorf, Christine, Chamberlain, Lisa J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 3
container_start_page 378
container_title Maternal and child health journal
container_volume 24
creator Congdon, Jayme L.
Trope, Lee A.
Bruce, Janine S.
Chung, Paul J.
Dehlendorf, Christine
Chamberlain, Lisa J.
description Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis. Results While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm. Conclusions for Practice Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A614578809</galeid><sourcerecordid>A614578809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJSTEJWUcx0nMrVQUkFpYIVCPluNMNq4Se7Edqb3z4Di7hVK0Qj54NPP9Y3v8Z9lzCscUoH4TKAjBc6Aih6IpRH79IDukvGZ5VRXNwxSDKPK6qflB9iSEK4Akg_JxdsBoSjLgh9nPC8Ro7JrEAclnxC4Q15OVC3GjfJwncukmtOTSxIEo220DN0eiyFfUaCNZeYzoJ_LO-Di8JSv0GjfROLttdKFS0aqRnKnJjDdkNSprl-OMTWhnVPRGh6fZo16NAZ_d7kfZ97P3304_5udfPnw6PTnPNac05oIj9D1oKJFSVpZ1W7GaKwodiEoVoumbQnfYtZRVyKsWSt4XqGgjgNFWcXaUvd713Xj3Y8YQ5WSCxjFdCt0cZMHSTERdcZbQl_-gV25eXrJQvKyg4UzcUWs1ojS2d9ErvTSVJxUted00sFD5HmqNFr0ancXepPQ9_ngPn1aHk9F7Ba_-EgyoxjgEN87bb7gPFjtQexeCx15uvJmUv5EU5OIpufOUTJ6SW0_J6yR6cTuKuZ2w-yP5baIEsB0QUsmu0d_N6j9tfwH4XNSt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2354608539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis. Results While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm. Conclusions for Practice Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-7875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31875305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Care and treatment ; Contraception - psychology ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services ; Female ; Gynecology ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Interviews as Topic ; Maternal and Child Health ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methods ; Pediatricians - psychology ; Pediatrics ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Population Economics ; Postnatal care ; Postpartum Period - psychology ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth ; Premature labor ; Public Health ; Quality management ; Reproductive health ; San Francisco ; Sociology ; Statistics ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Maternal and child health journal, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Maternal and Child Health Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31875305$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Janine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehlendorf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><title>Maternal and child health journal</title><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><description>Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis. Results While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm. Conclusions for Practice Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Contraception - psychology</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Maternal and Child Health</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatricians - psychology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Population Economics</subject><subject>Postnatal care</subject><subject>Postpartum Period - psychology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth</subject><subject>Premature labor</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>San Francisco</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1092-7875</issn><issn>1573-6628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJSTEJWUcx0nMrVQUkFpYIVCPluNMNq4Se7Edqb3z4Di7hVK0Qj54NPP9Y3v8Z9lzCscUoH4TKAjBc6Aih6IpRH79IDukvGZ5VRXNwxSDKPK6qflB9iSEK4Akg_JxdsBoSjLgh9nPC8Ro7JrEAclnxC4Q15OVC3GjfJwncukmtOTSxIEo220DN0eiyFfUaCNZeYzoJ_LO-Di8JSv0GjfROLttdKFS0aqRnKnJjDdkNSprl-OMTWhnVPRGh6fZo16NAZ_d7kfZ97P3304_5udfPnw6PTnPNac05oIj9D1oKJFSVpZ1W7GaKwodiEoVoumbQnfYtZRVyKsWSt4XqGgjgNFWcXaUvd713Xj3Y8YQ5WSCxjFdCt0cZMHSTERdcZbQl_-gV25eXrJQvKyg4UzcUWs1ojS2d9ErvTSVJxUted00sFD5HmqNFr0ancXepPQ9_ngPn1aHk9F7Ba_-EgyoxjgEN87bb7gPFjtQexeCx15uvJmUv5EU5OIpufOUTJ6SW0_J6yR6cTuKuZ2w-yP5baIEsB0QUsmu0d_N6j9tfwH4XNSt</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Congdon, Jayme L.</creator><creator>Trope, Lee A.</creator><creator>Bruce, Janine S.</creator><creator>Chung, Paul J.</creator><creator>Dehlendorf, Christine</creator><creator>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</title><author>Congdon, Jayme L. ; Trope, Lee A. ; Bruce, Janine S. ; Chung, Paul J. ; Dehlendorf, Christine ; Chamberlain, Lisa J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-95e0ff0c04e113447b6375a10d096a298f82cdedb136e56b045f2ea189031ba53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Contraception - psychology</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Maternal and Child Health</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatricians - psychology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Population Economics</topic><topic>Postnatal care</topic><topic>Postpartum Period - psychology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth</topic><topic>Premature labor</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>San Francisco</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Jayme L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trope, Lee A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce, Janine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehlendorf, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Congdon, Jayme L.</au><au>Trope, Lee A.</au><au>Bruce, Janine S.</au><au>Chung, Paul J.</au><au>Dehlendorf, Christine</au><au>Chamberlain, Lisa J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics</atitle><jtitle>Maternal and child health journal</jtitle><stitle>Matern Child Health J</stitle><addtitle>Matern Child Health J</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>378-388</pages><issn>1092-7875</issn><eissn>1573-6628</eissn><abstract>Objectives Women face distinct barriers to meeting their reproductive health needs postpartum, especially women who deliver preterm. Pediatric encounters present unique opportunities to address women’s family planning, particularly within 18 months of a prior pregnancy, when pregnancy has an elevated risk of an adverse outcome, such as preterm birth. To ensure maternal family planning initiatives are designed in a patient-centered manner, we explored perspectives on addressing reproductive health in a pediatric setting among women with and without a recent preterm delivery. Methods We conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 41 women (66% delivered preterm). Women who delivered at any gestational age were interviewed at a pediatric primary care clinic. We also interviewed women whose infants were either in a level II intensive care nursery or attending a high-risk infant follow-up clinic, all of whom had delivered preterm. Data were analyzed using team-based coding and theme analysis. Results While women’s preferred timing and setting for addressing peripartum contraception varied, they largely considered pediatric settings to be an acceptable place to discuss family planning. A few women felt family planning fell outside of the pediatric scope or distracted from the child focus. Women discussed various barriers to accessing family planning care postpartum, including circumstances unique to women who delivered preterm. Conclusions for Practice Family planning interventions in pediatric settings were overall an acceptable approach to reducing barriers to care among our sample of women who predominantly delivered preterm. These exploratory findings justify further investigation to assess their generalizability and to develop maternal family planning interventions for pediatric settings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31875305</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2189</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-7875
ispartof Maternal and child health journal, 2020-03, Vol.24 (3), p.378-388
issn 1092-7875
1573-6628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330597653
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Care and treatment
Contraception - psychology
Family planning
Family Planning Services
Female
Gynecology
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Interviews as Topic
Maternal and Child Health
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Pediatricians - psychology
Pediatrics
Physician-Patient Relations
Population Economics
Postnatal care
Postpartum Period - psychology
Pregnancy
Premature Birth
Premature labor
Public Health
Quality management
Reproductive health
San Francisco
Sociology
Statistics
Womens health
Young Adult
title Meeting the Needs of Postpartum Women With and Without a Recent Preterm Birth: Perceptions of Maternal Family Planning in Pediatrics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A59%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meeting%20the%20Needs%20of%20Postpartum%20Women%20With%20and%20Without%20a%20Recent%20Preterm%20Birth:%20Perceptions%20of%20Maternal%20Family%20Planning%20in%20Pediatrics&rft.jtitle=Maternal%20and%20child%20health%20journal&rft.au=Congdon,%20Jayme%20L.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=378-388&rft.issn=1092-7875&rft.eissn=1573-6628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10995-019-02829-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA614578809%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2354608539&rft_id=info:pmid/31875305&rft_galeid=A614578809&rfr_iscdi=true