Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System
A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1343 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1336 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Jorga, Spiro D Kaltsonoudis, Christos Liangou, Aikaterini Pandis, Spyros N |
description | A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.est.9b03479 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330328914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2330328914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9r2zAUx8VYWbJs592GYJfBcKofliwdQ7p0hZTC0kBvRrafGxfLyiT50P--Mkl7GPT04PH5ft_j-0XoGyVLShi9NHVYQohLXRGeF_oDmlPBSCaUoB_RnBDKM83lwwx9DuGJEMI4UZ_QjFMlNaN8juItmDB6sDBE7Fq8cd6a2LkB_zURwrTaQe2GxvhnvALvgutxN-B4ALyyVTfJ9r4yA15F68LxAB7wPnTDIzb4ajQ93ln3iNcHYyvwePccItgv6KI1fYCv57lA-83v-_WfbHt3fbNebTPDtYqZ1kxy0wqt8oIXDSkoZ3ldS9kyqHMgkuWaKaVbbYpcMtI2QvBKV03dSqoKzRfo58n36N2_MeVU2i7U0PdmADeGknFOOFOa5gn98R_65EY_pO8SJZjQUiieqMsTVacggoe2PPrOpmhKSsqpkDIVUk7qcyFJ8f3sO1YWmjf-tYEE_DoBk_Lt5nt2Lx2BlQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352596583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</creator><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><description>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31869213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air Pollutants ; Atmosphere ; Free radicals ; Hydroxyl radicals ; Nucleation ; Organic compounds ; Outdoor air quality ; Perturbation ; Photolysis ; Smog ; Sulfates ; Urban atmosphere ; Urban environments ; VOCs ; Volatile Organic Compounds ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 4, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2766,27077,27925,27926,56739,56789</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liangou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air Pollutants</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Free radicals</subject><subject>Hydroxyl radicals</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Photolysis</subject><subject>Smog</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Urban atmosphere</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9r2zAUx8VYWbJs592GYJfBcKofliwdQ7p0hZTC0kBvRrafGxfLyiT50P--Mkl7GPT04PH5ft_j-0XoGyVLShi9NHVYQohLXRGeF_oDmlPBSCaUoB_RnBDKM83lwwx9DuGJEMI4UZ_QjFMlNaN8juItmDB6sDBE7Fq8cd6a2LkB_zURwrTaQe2GxvhnvALvgutxN-B4ALyyVTfJ9r4yA15F68LxAB7wPnTDIzb4ajQ93ln3iNcHYyvwePccItgv6KI1fYCv57lA-83v-_WfbHt3fbNebTPDtYqZ1kxy0wqt8oIXDSkoZ3ldS9kyqHMgkuWaKaVbbYpcMtI2QvBKV03dSqoKzRfo58n36N2_MeVU2i7U0PdmADeGknFOOFOa5gn98R_65EY_pO8SJZjQUiieqMsTVacggoe2PPrOpmhKSsqpkDIVUk7qcyFJ8f3sO1YWmjf-tYEE_DoBk_Lt5nt2Lx2BlQ0</recordid><startdate>20200204</startdate><enddate>20200204</enddate><creator>Jorga, Spiro D</creator><creator>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creator><creator>Liangou, Aikaterini</creator><creator>Pandis, Spyros N</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200204</creationdate><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><author>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air Pollutants</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Free radicals</topic><topic>Hydroxyl radicals</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Photolysis</topic><topic>Smog</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Urban atmosphere</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liangou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jorga, Spiro D</au><au>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</au><au>Liangou, Aikaterini</au><au>Pandis, Spyros N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2020-02-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1336</spage><epage>1343</epage><pages>1336-1343</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31869213</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b03479</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330328914 |
source | MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals |
subjects | Aerosols Air Pollutants Atmosphere Free radicals Hydroxyl radicals Nucleation Organic compounds Outdoor air quality Perturbation Photolysis Smog Sulfates Urban atmosphere Urban environments VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds Volatility |
title | Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20Formation%20Rates%20of%20Secondary%20Aerosol%20in%20the%20Ambient%20Urban%20Atmosphere%20Using%20a%20Dual%20Smog%20Chamber%20System&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Jorga,%20Spiro%20D&rft.date=2020-02-04&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1336&rft.epage=1343&rft.pages=1336-1343&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330328914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352596583&rft_id=info:pmid/31869213&rfr_iscdi=true |