Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System

A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second ch...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343
Hauptverfasser: Jorga, Spiro D, Kaltsonoudis, Christos, Liangou, Aikaterini, Pandis, Spyros N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1343
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1336
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 54
creator Jorga, Spiro D
Kaltsonoudis, Christos
Liangou, Aikaterini
Pandis, Spyros N
description A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.9b03479
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330328914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2330328914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9r2zAUx8VYWbJs592GYJfBcKofliwdQ7p0hZTC0kBvRrafGxfLyiT50P--Mkl7GPT04PH5ft_j-0XoGyVLShi9NHVYQohLXRGeF_oDmlPBSCaUoB_RnBDKM83lwwx9DuGJEMI4UZ_QjFMlNaN8juItmDB6sDBE7Fq8cd6a2LkB_zURwrTaQe2GxvhnvALvgutxN-B4ALyyVTfJ9r4yA15F68LxAB7wPnTDIzb4ajQ93ln3iNcHYyvwePccItgv6KI1fYCv57lA-83v-_WfbHt3fbNebTPDtYqZ1kxy0wqt8oIXDSkoZ3ldS9kyqHMgkuWaKaVbbYpcMtI2QvBKV03dSqoKzRfo58n36N2_MeVU2i7U0PdmADeGknFOOFOa5gn98R_65EY_pO8SJZjQUiieqMsTVacggoe2PPrOpmhKSsqpkDIVUk7qcyFJ8f3sO1YWmjf-tYEE_DoBk_Lt5nt2Lx2BlQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352596583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Chemical Society Journals</source><creator>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</creator><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><description>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03479</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31869213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air Pollutants ; Atmosphere ; Free radicals ; Hydroxyl radicals ; Nucleation ; Organic compounds ; Outdoor air quality ; Perturbation ; Photolysis ; Smog ; Sulfates ; Urban atmosphere ; Urban environments ; VOCs ; Volatile Organic Compounds ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Feb 4, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2766,27077,27925,27926,56739,56789</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31869213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liangou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air Pollutants</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Free radicals</subject><subject>Hydroxyl radicals</subject><subject>Nucleation</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Perturbation</subject><subject>Photolysis</subject><subject>Smog</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Urban atmosphere</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9r2zAUx8VYWbJs592GYJfBcKofliwdQ7p0hZTC0kBvRrafGxfLyiT50P--Mkl7GPT04PH5ft_j-0XoGyVLShi9NHVYQohLXRGeF_oDmlPBSCaUoB_RnBDKM83lwwx9DuGJEMI4UZ_QjFMlNaN8juItmDB6sDBE7Fq8cd6a2LkB_zURwrTaQe2GxvhnvALvgutxN-B4ALyyVTfJ9r4yA15F68LxAB7wPnTDIzb4ajQ93ln3iNcHYyvwePccItgv6KI1fYCv57lA-83v-_WfbHt3fbNebTPDtYqZ1kxy0wqt8oIXDSkoZ3ldS9kyqHMgkuWaKaVbbYpcMtI2QvBKV03dSqoKzRfo58n36N2_MeVU2i7U0PdmADeGknFOOFOa5gn98R_65EY_pO8SJZjQUiieqMsTVacggoe2PPrOpmhKSsqpkDIVUk7qcyFJ8f3sO1YWmjf-tYEE_DoBk_Lt5nt2Lx2BlQ0</recordid><startdate>20200204</startdate><enddate>20200204</enddate><creator>Jorga, Spiro D</creator><creator>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creator><creator>Liangou, Aikaterini</creator><creator>Pandis, Spyros N</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200204</creationdate><title>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</title><author>Jorga, Spiro D ; Kaltsonoudis, Christos ; Liangou, Aikaterini ; Pandis, Spyros N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a398t-99263af5984737d071324cc66f2ec4e062492889f9a74620fd553b9bdcf618793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air Pollutants</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Free radicals</topic><topic>Hydroxyl radicals</topic><topic>Nucleation</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Perturbation</topic><topic>Photolysis</topic><topic>Smog</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Urban atmosphere</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jorga, Spiro D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liangou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandis, Spyros N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jorga, Spiro D</au><au>Kaltsonoudis, Christos</au><au>Liangou, Aikaterini</au><au>Pandis, Spyros N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2020-02-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1336</spage><epage>1343</epage><pages>1336-1343</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>A dual smog chamber system was used to quantify the formation rates of secondary organic and inorganic aerosol in an urban environment (Pittsburgh, US). Ambient air was introduced in both chambers, and HONO photolysis was used to produce hydroxyl radicals (OH) in the perturbed chamber. The second chamber was used as a reference. The production rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) under typical noon-time OH concentrations ranged from 0.2 to 0.8 μg m–3 h–1. The production rate of sulfate was approximately five times less than that of the SOA. Nucleation and growth of new particles were observed in the perturbation chamber. The produced SOA had a similar composition with the preexisting oxygenated ambient OA. The reacted amounts of the measured VOCs were able to explain 5–50% of the formed SOA in the perturbed chamber. Intermediate volatility organic compounds could be responsible for the rest. The oxygen to carbon ratio (O:C) in the perturbed chamber remained approximately the same during SOA production, while an increase was observed in the control chamber. A possible explanation could be the loss of less oxidized species to the chamber walls. After 2 h, the OA increased by 70% on average and the sulfate by 40%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31869213</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b03479</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8085-9795</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2020-02, Vol.54 (3), p.1336-1343
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330328914
source MEDLINE; American Chemical Society Journals
subjects Aerosols
Air Pollutants
Atmosphere
Free radicals
Hydroxyl radicals
Nucleation
Organic compounds
Outdoor air quality
Perturbation
Photolysis
Smog
Sulfates
Urban atmosphere
Urban environments
VOCs
Volatile Organic Compounds
Volatility
title Measurement of Formation Rates of Secondary Aerosol in the Ambient Urban Atmosphere Using a Dual Smog Chamber System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T13%3A22%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20of%20Formation%20Rates%20of%20Secondary%20Aerosol%20in%20the%20Ambient%20Urban%20Atmosphere%20Using%20a%20Dual%20Smog%20Chamber%20System&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Jorga,%20Spiro%20D&rft.date=2020-02-04&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1336&rft.epage=1343&rft.pages=1336-1343&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b03479&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330328914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352596583&rft_id=info:pmid/31869213&rfr_iscdi=true