Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time

Seminal doses used for cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination (CAI and PCAI, respectively) vary in volume, the number of spermatozoa and packaging. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes when there was use of routine processing procedures for CAI- and PCAI-doses. Two different types of sem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal reproduction science 2020-01, Vol.212, p.106236-106236, Article 106236
Hauptverfasser: Luongo, C., Garrappa, G., Llamas-López, P.J., Rodríguez-Tobón, E., López-Úbeda, R., Abril-Sánchez, S., García-Vázquez, F.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106236
container_issue
container_start_page 106236
container_title Animal reproduction science
container_volume 212
creator Luongo, C.
Garrappa, G.
Llamas-López, P.J.
Rodríguez-Tobón, E.
López-Úbeda, R.
Abril-Sánchez, S.
García-Vázquez, F.A.
description Seminal doses used for cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination (CAI and PCAI, respectively) vary in volume, the number of spermatozoa and packaging. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes when there was use of routine processing procedures for CAI- and PCAI-doses. Two different types of seminal doses were processed: 1) CAI: 2.7 × 109 sperm/80 ml; 2) PCAI: 1.5 × 109 sperm/45 ml. In Experiment 1, the cooling curve of seminal doses during processing occurred in two phases: 1st) At room temperature (23.4 ± 0.5 °C) from 0 (just after packaging) to 120 min; 2nd) At refrigeration (15.7 ± 0.8 °C) from 121−240 min. For the PCAI-doses, the time required to reach room temperature was 47 min compared to 107 min for CAI-doses (decreasing velocity of 0.093 °C/min and 0.048 °C/min, respectively). During refrigeration, for the PCAI-doses the time required to reach the desired preservation temperature was 20 min less than for CAI-doses (PCAI: 90 min, 0.074 °C/min; CAI: 110 min, 0.066 °C/min). In Experiment 2, sperm motility, kinetic parameters and acrosome damage for both types of doses were evaluated at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of refrigeration. Also, morphology, pH, and osmolality were assessed at 0 and 72 h. Values for all these did not differ between CAI- and PCAI-doses. In conclusion, PCAI-doses took less time than CAI-doses to reach the desired temperature, but sperm quality was similar for CAI- and PCAI-doses during storage. Nevertheless, the different cooling curves should be taken into consideration for further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106236
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330060102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378432019306888</els_id><sourcerecordid>2330060102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1c8f31e14a8043709cfd35081f2f6ce6d2d9b4f570a1344755b9cd3e3e547283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRCIDoVfQGZXJDL4kdjJEo3KQ6rEBtaWY18XjxI7tZ2p5gP4b1ylVCxZXene89A9B6F3lOwpoeLjca-DT7CkmI3fM0KHuheMi2doR3vJG8Y4e452hMu-aTkjF-hVzkdCiBRieIkuOO1F2_bDDv2-dg5MwdHhMeqEM8w-6AnbmAGX8wL4ykA6eVN3Js6LTmDxvS-_8BJzaZ5uPmzM4mN4j2Oo4Dj5cIvNmk7wAecF0ozvVj35csY6WJxLTPq2mvgZXqMXTk8Z3jzOS_Tz8_WPw9fm5vuXb4dPN43hUpZmpKZ3nAJtdU9aLslgnOUd6aljThgQltlhbF0niaa8bWXXjYOxHDh0rWQ9v0RXm26N7m6FXNTss4Fp0gHimhXjnBBBKGEVOmxQU1POCZxakp91OitK1EML6qj-aUE9tKC2Fir37aPNOs5gn5h_Y6-AwwaA-uzJQ1JVAoIBWwVNUTb6_7D5Azg6oKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2330060102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Luongo, C. ; Garrappa, G. ; Llamas-López, P.J. ; Rodríguez-Tobón, E. ; López-Úbeda, R. ; Abril-Sánchez, S. ; García-Vázquez, F.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luongo, C. ; Garrappa, G. ; Llamas-López, P.J. ; Rodríguez-Tobón, E. ; López-Úbeda, R. ; Abril-Sánchez, S. ; García-Vázquez, F.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Seminal doses used for cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination (CAI and PCAI, respectively) vary in volume, the number of spermatozoa and packaging. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes when there was use of routine processing procedures for CAI- and PCAI-doses. Two different types of seminal doses were processed: 1) CAI: 2.7 × 109 sperm/80 ml; 2) PCAI: 1.5 × 109 sperm/45 ml. In Experiment 1, the cooling curve of seminal doses during processing occurred in two phases: 1st) At room temperature (23.4 ± 0.5 °C) from 0 (just after packaging) to 120 min; 2nd) At refrigeration (15.7 ± 0.8 °C) from 121−240 min. For the PCAI-doses, the time required to reach room temperature was 47 min compared to 107 min for CAI-doses (decreasing velocity of 0.093 °C/min and 0.048 °C/min, respectively). During refrigeration, for the PCAI-doses the time required to reach the desired preservation temperature was 20 min less than for CAI-doses (PCAI: 90 min, 0.074 °C/min; CAI: 110 min, 0.066 °C/min). In Experiment 2, sperm motility, kinetic parameters and acrosome damage for both types of doses were evaluated at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of refrigeration. Also, morphology, pH, and osmolality were assessed at 0 and 72 h. Values for all these did not differ between CAI- and PCAI-doses. In conclusion, PCAI-doses took less time than CAI-doses to reach the desired temperature, but sperm quality was similar for CAI- and PCAI-doses during storage. Nevertheless, the different cooling curves should be taken into consideration for further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2232</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31864489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal production ; Boar semen ; Ejaculate ; Porcine ; Preservation</subject><ispartof>Animal reproduction science, 2020-01, Vol.212, p.106236-106236, Article 106236</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1c8f31e14a8043709cfd35081f2f6ce6d2d9b4f570a1344755b9cd3e3e547283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1c8f31e14a8043709cfd35081f2f6ce6d2d9b4f570a1344755b9cd3e3e547283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31864489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luongo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrappa, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llamas-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Tobón, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Úbeda, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abril-Sánchez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Vázquez, F.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time</title><title>Animal reproduction science</title><addtitle>Anim Reprod Sci</addtitle><description>Seminal doses used for cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination (CAI and PCAI, respectively) vary in volume, the number of spermatozoa and packaging. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes when there was use of routine processing procedures for CAI- and PCAI-doses. Two different types of seminal doses were processed: 1) CAI: 2.7 × 109 sperm/80 ml; 2) PCAI: 1.5 × 109 sperm/45 ml. In Experiment 1, the cooling curve of seminal doses during processing occurred in two phases: 1st) At room temperature (23.4 ± 0.5 °C) from 0 (just after packaging) to 120 min; 2nd) At refrigeration (15.7 ± 0.8 °C) from 121−240 min. For the PCAI-doses, the time required to reach room temperature was 47 min compared to 107 min for CAI-doses (decreasing velocity of 0.093 °C/min and 0.048 °C/min, respectively). During refrigeration, for the PCAI-doses the time required to reach the desired preservation temperature was 20 min less than for CAI-doses (PCAI: 90 min, 0.074 °C/min; CAI: 110 min, 0.066 °C/min). In Experiment 2, sperm motility, kinetic parameters and acrosome damage for both types of doses were evaluated at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of refrigeration. Also, morphology, pH, and osmolality were assessed at 0 and 72 h. Values for all these did not differ between CAI- and PCAI-doses. In conclusion, PCAI-doses took less time than CAI-doses to reach the desired temperature, but sperm quality was similar for CAI- and PCAI-doses during storage. Nevertheless, the different cooling curves should be taken into consideration for further investigation.</description><subject>Animal production</subject><subject>Boar semen</subject><subject>Ejaculate</subject><subject>Porcine</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><issn>0378-4320</issn><issn>1873-2232</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctu1DAUtRCIDoVfQGZXJDL4kdjJEo3KQ6rEBtaWY18XjxI7tZ2p5gP4b1ylVCxZXene89A9B6F3lOwpoeLjca-DT7CkmI3fM0KHuheMi2doR3vJG8Y4e452hMu-aTkjF-hVzkdCiBRieIkuOO1F2_bDDv2-dg5MwdHhMeqEM8w-6AnbmAGX8wL4ykA6eVN3Js6LTmDxvS-_8BJzaZ5uPmzM4mN4j2Oo4Dj5cIvNmk7wAecF0ozvVj35csY6WJxLTPq2mvgZXqMXTk8Z3jzOS_Tz8_WPw9fm5vuXb4dPN43hUpZmpKZ3nAJtdU9aLslgnOUd6aljThgQltlhbF0niaa8bWXXjYOxHDh0rWQ9v0RXm26N7m6FXNTss4Fp0gHimhXjnBBBKGEVOmxQU1POCZxakp91OitK1EML6qj-aUE9tKC2Fir37aPNOs5gn5h_Y6-AwwaA-uzJQ1JVAoIBWwVNUTb6_7D5Azg6oKg</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Luongo, C.</creator><creator>Garrappa, G.</creator><creator>Llamas-López, P.J.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Tobón, E.</creator><creator>López-Úbeda, R.</creator><creator>Abril-Sánchez, S.</creator><creator>García-Vázquez, F.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time</title><author>Luongo, C. ; Garrappa, G. ; Llamas-López, P.J. ; Rodríguez-Tobón, E. ; López-Úbeda, R. ; Abril-Sánchez, S. ; García-Vázquez, F.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-b1c8f31e14a8043709cfd35081f2f6ce6d2d9b4f570a1344755b9cd3e3e547283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal production</topic><topic>Boar semen</topic><topic>Ejaculate</topic><topic>Porcine</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luongo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrappa, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Llamas-López, P.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Tobón, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Úbeda, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abril-Sánchez, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Vázquez, F.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal reproduction science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luongo, C.</au><au>Garrappa, G.</au><au>Llamas-López, P.J.</au><au>Rodríguez-Tobón, E.</au><au>López-Úbeda, R.</au><au>Abril-Sánchez, S.</au><au>García-Vázquez, F.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time</atitle><jtitle>Animal reproduction science</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Reprod Sci</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>212</volume><spage>106236</spage><epage>106236</epage><pages>106236-106236</pages><artnum>106236</artnum><issn>0378-4320</issn><eissn>1873-2232</eissn><abstract>Seminal doses used for cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination (CAI and PCAI, respectively) vary in volume, the number of spermatozoa and packaging. The aim was to evaluate the outcomes when there was use of routine processing procedures for CAI- and PCAI-doses. Two different types of seminal doses were processed: 1) CAI: 2.7 × 109 sperm/80 ml; 2) PCAI: 1.5 × 109 sperm/45 ml. In Experiment 1, the cooling curve of seminal doses during processing occurred in two phases: 1st) At room temperature (23.4 ± 0.5 °C) from 0 (just after packaging) to 120 min; 2nd) At refrigeration (15.7 ± 0.8 °C) from 121−240 min. For the PCAI-doses, the time required to reach room temperature was 47 min compared to 107 min for CAI-doses (decreasing velocity of 0.093 °C/min and 0.048 °C/min, respectively). During refrigeration, for the PCAI-doses the time required to reach the desired preservation temperature was 20 min less than for CAI-doses (PCAI: 90 min, 0.074 °C/min; CAI: 110 min, 0.066 °C/min). In Experiment 2, sperm motility, kinetic parameters and acrosome damage for both types of doses were evaluated at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of refrigeration. Also, morphology, pH, and osmolality were assessed at 0 and 72 h. Values for all these did not differ between CAI- and PCAI-doses. In conclusion, PCAI-doses took less time than CAI-doses to reach the desired temperature, but sperm quality was similar for CAI- and PCAI-doses during storage. Nevertheless, the different cooling curves should be taken into consideration for further investigation.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31864489</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106236</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4320
ispartof Animal reproduction science, 2020-01, Vol.212, p.106236-106236, Article 106236
issn 0378-4320
1873-2232
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2330060102
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animal production
Boar semen
Ejaculate
Porcine
Preservation
title Effect of boar seminal dose type (cervical compared with post-cervical insemination) on cooling curve, sperm quality and storage time
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T15%3A32%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20boar%20seminal%20dose%20type%20(cervical%20compared%20with%20post-cervical%20insemination)%20on%20cooling%20curve,%20sperm%20quality%20and%20storage%20time&rft.jtitle=Animal%20reproduction%20science&rft.au=Luongo,%20C.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=212&rft.spage=106236&rft.epage=106236&rft.pages=106236-106236&rft.artnum=106236&rft.issn=0378-4320&rft.eissn=1873-2232&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2330060102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2330060102&rft_id=info:pmid/31864489&rft_els_id=S0378432019306888&rfr_iscdi=true