Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies

Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cancer survivorship 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134
Hauptverfasser: Butow, Phyllis, Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah, Konings, Stephanie, Lim, Chloe Yi Shing, Koczwara, Bogda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 114
container_title Journal of cancer survivorship
container_volume 14
creator Butow, Phyllis
Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah
Konings, Stephanie
Lim, Chloe Yi Shing
Koczwara, Bogda
description Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW. Method A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each. Results Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables. Conclusions We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2329739048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394489593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovv-ACwm4cVNNcptJ4k4GXyAIouuQZm61OtNqkir66412RsGFrnLI-e65IYeQHc4OOGPqMHKuRmXBuCkY00IX70tknRsQhRAjtfytpVkjGzE-MCaF4WKVrAHXUoMy6yRdY-pDS1NHX7vwSF2dMFBHvWt9FpPG3bVdbOJRvpthckXAlwZfaVfTQUXq2snCjG9tuseMD77HNtHn3k2b5FLzgjSmftJg3CIrtZtG3J6fm-T29ORmfF5cXp1djI8vC1-OTCoUGhQcSokKoXSacScqoyvNKglonJRas1pVFTD0nimvlAbjsXIVADiATbI_5D6F7rnHmOysiR6nU9di10crQBgFhpU6o3u_0Icu_0t-nQU2KpWEfygBpiy1keZzrRgoH7oYA9b2KTQzF94sZ_azOTs0Z3Nz9qs5-56HdufRfTXDyffIoqoMwADEbLV3GH52_xH7AUl4pCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394489593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</creator><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW. Method A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each. Results Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables. Conclusions We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer Survivors - psychology ; Cancer therapies ; Female ; Health Informatics ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Oncology ; Primary Care Medicine ; Public Health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of Life Research ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Return to Work - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Review ; Reviews ; Social factors ; Survival ; Synthesis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer survivorship, 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><title>Journal of cancer survivorship</title><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><description>Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW. Method A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each. Results Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables. Conclusions We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-2259</issn><issn>1932-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovv-ACwm4cVNNcptJ4k4GXyAIouuQZm61OtNqkir66412RsGFrnLI-e65IYeQHc4OOGPqMHKuRmXBuCkY00IX70tknRsQhRAjtfytpVkjGzE-MCaF4WKVrAHXUoMy6yRdY-pDS1NHX7vwSF2dMFBHvWt9FpPG3bVdbOJRvpthckXAlwZfaVfTQUXq2snCjG9tuseMD77HNtHn3k2b5FLzgjSmftJg3CIrtZtG3J6fm-T29ORmfF5cXp1djI8vC1-OTCoUGhQcSokKoXSacScqoyvNKglonJRas1pVFTD0nimvlAbjsXIVADiATbI_5D6F7rnHmOysiR6nU9di10crQBgFhpU6o3u_0Icu_0t-nQU2KpWEfygBpiy1keZzrRgoH7oYA9b2KTQzF94sZ_azOTs0Z3Nz9qs5-56HdufRfTXDyffIoqoMwADEbLV3GH52_xH7AUl4pCc</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Butow, Phyllis</creator><creator>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creator><creator>Konings, Stephanie</creator><creator>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creator><creator>Koczwara, Bogda</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><author>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butow, Phyllis</au><au>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</au><au>Konings, Stephanie</au><au>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</au><au>Koczwara, Bogda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Surviv</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>114-134</pages><issn>1932-2259</issn><eissn>1932-2267</eissn><abstract>Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW. Method A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each. Results Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables. Conclusions We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations. Implications for Cancer Survivors Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31858379</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-2259
ispartof Journal of cancer survivorship, 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134
issn 1932-2259
1932-2267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2329739048
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer Survivors - psychology
Cancer therapies
Female
Health Informatics
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Humans
Literature reviews
Male
Medical diagnosis
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - epidemiology
Oncology
Primary Care Medicine
Public Health
Qualitative Research
Quality of Life Research
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Return to Work - statistics & numerical data
Review
Reviews
Social factors
Survival
Synthesis
Systematic review
title Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A34%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20work%20after%20a%20cancer%20diagnosis:%20a%20meta-review%20of%20reviews%20and%20a%20meta-synthesis%20of%20recent%20qualitative%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20survivorship&rft.au=Butow,%20Phyllis&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=114-134&rft.issn=1932-2259&rft.eissn=1932-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394489593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394489593&rft_id=info:pmid/31858379&rfr_iscdi=true