Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies
Purpose Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer survivorship 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 114 |
container_title | Journal of cancer survivorship |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Butow, Phyllis Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah Konings, Stephanie Lim, Chloe Yi Shing Koczwara, Bogda |
description | Purpose
Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW.
Method
A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each.
Results
Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables.
Conclusions
We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2329739048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2394489593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovv-ACwm4cVNNcptJ4k4GXyAIouuQZm61OtNqkir66412RsGFrnLI-e65IYeQHc4OOGPqMHKuRmXBuCkY00IX70tknRsQhRAjtfytpVkjGzE-MCaF4WKVrAHXUoMy6yRdY-pDS1NHX7vwSF2dMFBHvWt9FpPG3bVdbOJRvpthckXAlwZfaVfTQUXq2snCjG9tuseMD77HNtHn3k2b5FLzgjSmftJg3CIrtZtG3J6fm-T29ORmfF5cXp1djI8vC1-OTCoUGhQcSokKoXSacScqoyvNKglonJRas1pVFTD0nimvlAbjsXIVADiATbI_5D6F7rnHmOysiR6nU9di10crQBgFhpU6o3u_0Icu_0t-nQU2KpWEfygBpiy1keZzrRgoH7oYA9b2KTQzF94sZ_azOTs0Z3Nz9qs5-56HdufRfTXDyffIoqoMwADEbLV3GH52_xH7AUl4pCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2394489593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</creator><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW.
Method
A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each.
Results
Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables.
Conclusions
We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2259</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31858379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer Survivors - psychology ; Cancer therapies ; Female ; Health Informatics ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Oncology ; Primary Care Medicine ; Public Health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of Life Research ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Return to Work - statistics & numerical data ; Review ; Reviews ; Social factors ; Survival ; Synthesis ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer survivorship, 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31858379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><title>Journal of cancer survivorship</title><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><description>Purpose
Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW.
Method
A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each.
Results
Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables.
Conclusions
We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Informatics</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Primary Care Medicine</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1932-2259</issn><issn>1932-2267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAUhYMovv-ACwm4cVNNcptJ4k4GXyAIouuQZm61OtNqkir66412RsGFrnLI-e65IYeQHc4OOGPqMHKuRmXBuCkY00IX70tknRsQhRAjtfytpVkjGzE-MCaF4WKVrAHXUoMy6yRdY-pDS1NHX7vwSF2dMFBHvWt9FpPG3bVdbOJRvpthckXAlwZfaVfTQUXq2snCjG9tuseMD77HNtHn3k2b5FLzgjSmftJg3CIrtZtG3J6fm-T29ORmfF5cXp1djI8vC1-OTCoUGhQcSokKoXSacScqoyvNKglonJRas1pVFTD0nimvlAbjsXIVADiATbI_5D6F7rnHmOysiR6nU9di10crQBgFhpU6o3u_0Icu_0t-nQU2KpWEfygBpiy1keZzrRgoH7oYA9b2KTQzF94sZ_azOTs0Z3Nz9qs5-56HdufRfTXDyffIoqoMwADEbLV3GH52_xH7AUl4pCc</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Butow, Phyllis</creator><creator>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creator><creator>Konings, Stephanie</creator><creator>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creator><creator>Koczwara, Bogda</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</title><author>Butow, Phyllis ; Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ; Konings, Stephanie ; Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ; Koczwara, Bogda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-7e9e21345e7e34a801a2b98b80b53e9a55880f7bb30ecc07c77839cebab333a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Informatics</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Primary Care Medicine</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butow, Phyllis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konings, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koczwara, Bogda</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butow, Phyllis</au><au>Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah</au><au>Konings, Stephanie</au><au>Lim, Chloe Yi Shing</au><au>Koczwara, Bogda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer survivorship</jtitle><stitle>J Cancer Surviv</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Surviv</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>114-134</pages><issn>1932-2259</issn><eissn>1932-2267</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors’ experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors’ motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW.
Method
A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each.
Results
Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables.
Conclusions
We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations.
Implications for Cancer Survivors
Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31858379</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-6954</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-2259 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer survivorship, 2020-04, Vol.14 (2), p.114-134 |
issn | 1932-2259 1932-2267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2329739048 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adult Breast cancer Cancer Cancer Survivors - psychology Cancer therapies Female Health Informatics Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Humans Literature reviews Male Medical diagnosis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasms - epidemiology Oncology Primary Care Medicine Public Health Qualitative Research Quality of Life Research Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Return to Work - statistics & numerical data Review Reviews Social factors Survival Synthesis Systematic review |
title | Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A34%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20work%20after%20a%20cancer%20diagnosis:%20a%20meta-review%20of%20reviews%20and%20a%20meta-synthesis%20of%20recent%20qualitative%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20survivorship&rft.au=Butow,%20Phyllis&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=114-134&rft.issn=1932-2259&rft.eissn=1932-2267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2394489593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2394489593&rft_id=info:pmid/31858379&rfr_iscdi=true |