Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller

The objective of our study was to investigate the utility of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative staging of subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller. We retrospectively enrolled 855 patients with pathologically proven NSCLCs manifesting as subsolid nodul...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2020-03, Vol.214 (3), p.514-523
Hauptverfasser: Suh, Young Joo, Park, Chang Min, Han, Kyunghwa, Jeon, Sun Kyung, Kim, Hyungjin, Hwang, Eui Jin, Lee, Jong Hyuk, Paeng, Jin Chul, Lee, Chang Hoon, Kim, Young Tae, Goo, Jin Mo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 523
container_issue 3
container_start_page 514
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 214
creator Suh, Young Joo
Park, Chang Min
Han, Kyunghwa
Jeon, Sun Kyung
Kim, Hyungjin
Hwang, Eui Jin
Lee, Jong Hyuk
Paeng, Jin Chul
Lee, Chang Hoon
Kim, Young Tae
Goo, Jin Mo
description The objective of our study was to investigate the utility of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative staging of subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller. We retrospectively enrolled 855 patients with pathologically proven NSCLCs manifesting as subsolid nodules with a solid portion of 3 cm or smaller on CT. We then compared the diagnostic performances of FDG PET/CT and chest CT for detecting lymph node (LN), intrathoracic, or distant metastases in patients who underwent preoperative chest CT and FDG PET/CT. After propensity score matching, we compared the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both chest CT and FDG PET/CT with that of chest CT in patients who did not undergo FDG PET/CT. There were LN metastases in 25 of 765 patients (3.3%) who underwent surgical LN dissection or biopsy and intrathoracic or distant metastasis in two of 855 patients (0.2%). For LN staging, FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 44.0%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 9.6%, negative predictive value of 97.0%, and accuracy of 79.9%, which were lower than those of chest CT for accuracy ( < 0.0001). FDG PET/CT could not accurately detect any intrathoracic or distant metastasis. After propensity score matching, the diagnostic accuracy for LN staging of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both CT and FDG PET/CT was lower than that of chest CT in the group who did not undergo FDG PET/CT ( = 0.002), and the diagnostic accuracy for intrathoracic and distant metastases was not different ( > 0.999). FDG PET/CT has limited utility in preoperatively detecting LN or distant metastasis in patients with subsolid NSCLCs with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.19.21811
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328351983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2328351983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dfe6dc5b6c498c0286295ce7fcbe7c9065214cdbdfa85037ad51fe432904b8b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kclOwzAQhi0EgrLcOCMfOZDiLYl9RKFsKlDRIrhFjmODURIXO0HiQXhf3LJcZqTRN_8sPwCHGI0Jwez07OZhjMWYYI7xBhjhlGUJxQxvghGiGU44os87YDeEN4RQzkW-DXYo5iyjORuBr8feNrb_hM7Ai_NLOJssTosFNM7Dmdduqb3s7YeG816-2O5lhd25Lpm3smlgoWOYDrFcyE5pH-Ct7KzRoV-hMsD5UAXX2Dr21EOjA3yy_SuUcL4uzpzvretWmhSqFsaZa13t98GWkU3QB795DzxeTBbFVTK9v7wuzqaJIgL3SW10Vqu0yhQTXCHCMyJSpXOjKp0rgbI0PkjVVW0kTxHNZZ1ioxklArGKV4zugeMf3aV370Pcu2xtUPEq2Wk3hJJQwmmKBacRPflBlXcheG3Kpbet9J8lRuXKiDIaUWJRro2I-NGv8lC1uv6H_z5PvwE3Z4M6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328351983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Suh, Young Joo ; Park, Chang Min ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Jeon, Sun Kyung ; Kim, Hyungjin ; Hwang, Eui Jin ; Lee, Jong Hyuk ; Paeng, Jin Chul ; Lee, Chang Hoon ; Kim, Young Tae ; Goo, Jin Mo</creator><creatorcontrib>Suh, Young Joo ; Park, Chang Min ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Jeon, Sun Kyung ; Kim, Hyungjin ; Hwang, Eui Jin ; Lee, Jong Hyuk ; Paeng, Jin Chul ; Lee, Chang Hoon ; Kim, Young Tae ; Goo, Jin Mo</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of our study was to investigate the utility of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative staging of subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller. We retrospectively enrolled 855 patients with pathologically proven NSCLCs manifesting as subsolid nodules with a solid portion of 3 cm or smaller on CT. We then compared the diagnostic performances of FDG PET/CT and chest CT for detecting lymph node (LN), intrathoracic, or distant metastases in patients who underwent preoperative chest CT and FDG PET/CT. After propensity score matching, we compared the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both chest CT and FDG PET/CT with that of chest CT in patients who did not undergo FDG PET/CT. There were LN metastases in 25 of 765 patients (3.3%) who underwent surgical LN dissection or biopsy and intrathoracic or distant metastasis in two of 855 patients (0.2%). For LN staging, FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 44.0%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 9.6%, negative predictive value of 97.0%, and accuracy of 79.9%, which were lower than those of chest CT for accuracy ( &lt; 0.0001). FDG PET/CT could not accurately detect any intrathoracic or distant metastasis. After propensity score matching, the diagnostic accuracy for LN staging of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both CT and FDG PET/CT was lower than that of chest CT in the group who did not undergo FDG PET/CT ( = 0.002), and the diagnostic accuracy for intrathoracic and distant metastases was not different ( &gt; 0.999). FDG PET/CT has limited utility in preoperatively detecting LN or distant metastasis in patients with subsolid NSCLCs with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21811</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31846374</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging ; Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - pathology ; Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Preoperative Care ; Propensity Score ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2020-03, Vol.214 (3), p.514-523</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dfe6dc5b6c498c0286295ce7fcbe7c9065214cdbdfa85037ad51fe432904b8b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dfe6dc5b6c498c0286295ce7fcbe7c9065214cdbdfa85037ad51fe432904b8b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4120,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31846374$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suh, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Sun Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Eui Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paeng, Jin Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goo, Jin Mo</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The objective of our study was to investigate the utility of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative staging of subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller. We retrospectively enrolled 855 patients with pathologically proven NSCLCs manifesting as subsolid nodules with a solid portion of 3 cm or smaller on CT. We then compared the diagnostic performances of FDG PET/CT and chest CT for detecting lymph node (LN), intrathoracic, or distant metastases in patients who underwent preoperative chest CT and FDG PET/CT. After propensity score matching, we compared the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both chest CT and FDG PET/CT with that of chest CT in patients who did not undergo FDG PET/CT. There were LN metastases in 25 of 765 patients (3.3%) who underwent surgical LN dissection or biopsy and intrathoracic or distant metastasis in two of 855 patients (0.2%). For LN staging, FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 44.0%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 9.6%, negative predictive value of 97.0%, and accuracy of 79.9%, which were lower than those of chest CT for accuracy ( &lt; 0.0001). FDG PET/CT could not accurately detect any intrathoracic or distant metastasis. After propensity score matching, the diagnostic accuracy for LN staging of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both CT and FDG PET/CT was lower than that of chest CT in the group who did not undergo FDG PET/CT ( = 0.002), and the diagnostic accuracy for intrathoracic and distant metastases was not different ( &gt; 0.999). FDG PET/CT has limited utility in preoperatively detecting LN or distant metastasis in patients with subsolid NSCLCs with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kclOwzAQhi0EgrLcOCMfOZDiLYl9RKFsKlDRIrhFjmODURIXO0HiQXhf3LJcZqTRN_8sPwCHGI0Jwez07OZhjMWYYI7xBhjhlGUJxQxvghGiGU44os87YDeEN4RQzkW-DXYo5iyjORuBr8feNrb_hM7Ai_NLOJssTosFNM7Dmdduqb3s7YeG816-2O5lhd25Lpm3smlgoWOYDrFcyE5pH-Ct7KzRoV-hMsD5UAXX2Dr21EOjA3yy_SuUcL4uzpzvretWmhSqFsaZa13t98GWkU3QB795DzxeTBbFVTK9v7wuzqaJIgL3SW10Vqu0yhQTXCHCMyJSpXOjKp0rgbI0PkjVVW0kTxHNZZ1ioxklArGKV4zugeMf3aV370Pcu2xtUPEq2Wk3hJJQwmmKBacRPflBlXcheG3Kpbet9J8lRuXKiDIaUWJRro2I-NGv8lC1uv6H_z5PvwE3Z4M6</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Suh, Young Joo</creator><creator>Park, Chang Min</creator><creator>Han, Kyunghwa</creator><creator>Jeon, Sun Kyung</creator><creator>Kim, Hyungjin</creator><creator>Hwang, Eui Jin</creator><creator>Lee, Jong Hyuk</creator><creator>Paeng, Jin Chul</creator><creator>Lee, Chang Hoon</creator><creator>Kim, Young Tae</creator><creator>Goo, Jin Mo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller</title><author>Suh, Young Joo ; Park, Chang Min ; Han, Kyunghwa ; Jeon, Sun Kyung ; Kim, Hyungjin ; Hwang, Eui Jin ; Lee, Jong Hyuk ; Paeng, Jin Chul ; Lee, Chang Hoon ; Kim, Young Tae ; Goo, Jin Mo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-dfe6dc5b6c498c0286295ce7fcbe7c9065214cdbdfa85037ad51fe432904b8b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suh, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeon, Sun Kyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyungjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Eui Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jong Hyuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paeng, Jin Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goo, Jin Mo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suh, Young Joo</au><au>Park, Chang Min</au><au>Han, Kyunghwa</au><au>Jeon, Sun Kyung</au><au>Kim, Hyungjin</au><au>Hwang, Eui Jin</au><au>Lee, Jong Hyuk</au><au>Paeng, Jin Chul</au><au>Lee, Chang Hoon</au><au>Kim, Young Tae</au><au>Goo, Jin Mo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>514</spage><epage>523</epage><pages>514-523</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>The objective of our study was to investigate the utility of FDG PET/CT for the preoperative staging of subsolid non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller. We retrospectively enrolled 855 patients with pathologically proven NSCLCs manifesting as subsolid nodules with a solid portion of 3 cm or smaller on CT. We then compared the diagnostic performances of FDG PET/CT and chest CT for detecting lymph node (LN), intrathoracic, or distant metastases in patients who underwent preoperative chest CT and FDG PET/CT. After propensity score matching, we compared the diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both chest CT and FDG PET/CT with that of chest CT in patients who did not undergo FDG PET/CT. There were LN metastases in 25 of 765 patients (3.3%) who underwent surgical LN dissection or biopsy and intrathoracic or distant metastasis in two of 855 patients (0.2%). For LN staging, FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 44.0%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 9.6%, negative predictive value of 97.0%, and accuracy of 79.9%, which were lower than those of chest CT for accuracy ( &lt; 0.0001). FDG PET/CT could not accurately detect any intrathoracic or distant metastasis. After propensity score matching, the diagnostic accuracy for LN staging of FDG PET/CT in the group who underwent both CT and FDG PET/CT was lower than that of chest CT in the group who did not undergo FDG PET/CT ( = 0.002), and the diagnostic accuracy for intrathoracic and distant metastases was not different ( &gt; 0.999). FDG PET/CT has limited utility in preoperatively detecting LN or distant metastasis in patients with subsolid NSCLCs with a solid portion size of 3 cm or smaller.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31846374</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.19.21811</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2020-03, Vol.214 (3), p.514-523
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328351983
source American Roentgen Ray Society; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - diagnostic imaging
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - pathology
Multiple Pulmonary Nodules - surgery
Neoplasm Staging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Preoperative Care
Propensity Score
Radiopharmaceuticals
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Utility of FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Manifesting as Subsolid Nodules With a Solid Portion of 3 cm or Smaller
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20FDG%20PET/CT%20for%20Preoperative%20Staging%20of%20Non-Small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancers%20Manifesting%20as%20Subsolid%20Nodules%20With%20a%20Solid%20Portion%20of%203%20cm%20or%20Smaller&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Suh,%20Young%20Joo&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=514&rft.epage=523&rft.pages=514-523&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.19.21811&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328351983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328351983&rft_id=info:pmid/31846374&rfr_iscdi=true