Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL

Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicology and applied pharmacology 2020-01, Vol.387, p.114856-114856, Article 114856
Hauptverfasser: Bernstein, D.M., Toth, B., Rogers, R.A., Kling, D.E., Kunzendorf, P., Phillips, J.I., Ernst, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114856
container_issue
container_start_page 114856
container_title Toxicology and applied pharmacology
container_volume 387
creator Bernstein, D.M.
Toth, B.
Rogers, R.A.
Kling, D.E.
Kunzendorf, P.
Phillips, J.I.
Ernst, H.
description
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114856
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328350188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2328350188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-37bb23f51593b46517ef5c2d18c65e1c847dc75b134a86398c5f11fc6d557f563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUsGO0zAQDQgkysIPcJojh6bYcZw63JZVF1aqtBwWiVvk2JPWxbWztrNqbvwDf8iXkLQc9jSj0ZuZ955eln2gZEUJrT4dVknKflUQWq8oLQWvXmYLSuoqJ4yxV9mCkJLmhIifb7K3MR4IIXVZ0sULsXmSdpDJeAe-g7RHwFPv4xBwCdpHzAPG3ruIIJ2GTiYE4844O7jdedhbHIKc19U-jNEnYzFX3iVpnJkwbZC_EPQQEyh_7GVADcnDg7kvls9Wpj54ZbS3ZnriA8ijj3MrY4sx-Tg_llCTXMsRHgfpkkkT86eZ0V7ai4jkT0Z563cjxDToEf7-_gN3LmEwR5i0DDZF-C5DAvoZNqd-nuNE1YLGaHZuCRKDj94-8-GstB2CRhfPir9cb99lrztpI77_X6-yH7ebh5tv-fb-693N9TZXhSApZ-u2LVjHKa9ZW1acrrHjqtBUqIojVaJca7XmLWWlFBWrheIdpZ2qNOfrjlfsKvt4udsH_zhMPjRHExVaKx36ITYFKwTjhAoxQYsLdPIxxoBd00_iZBgbSpo5Js2hmWPSzDFpLjFh_wA8vbm2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328350188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bernstein, D.M. ; Toth, B. ; Rogers, R.A. ; Kling, D.E. ; Kunzendorf, P. ; Phillips, J.I. ; Ernst, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, D.M. ; Toth, B. ; Rogers, R.A. ; Kling, D.E. ; Kunzendorf, P. ; Phillips, J.I. ; Ernst, H.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0041-008X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114856</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2020-01, Vol.387, p.114856-114856, Article 114856</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-37bb23f51593b46517ef5c2d18c65e1c847dc75b134a86398c5f11fc6d557f563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-37bb23f51593b46517ef5c2d18c65e1c847dc75b134a86398c5f11fc6d557f563</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3913-2823</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunzendorf, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL</title><title>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</title><issn>0041-008X</issn><issn>1096-0333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUsGO0zAQDQgkysIPcJojh6bYcZw63JZVF1aqtBwWiVvk2JPWxbWztrNqbvwDf8iXkLQc9jSj0ZuZ955eln2gZEUJrT4dVknKflUQWq8oLQWvXmYLSuoqJ4yxV9mCkJLmhIifb7K3MR4IIXVZ0sULsXmSdpDJeAe-g7RHwFPv4xBwCdpHzAPG3ruIIJ2GTiYE4844O7jdedhbHIKc19U-jNEnYzFX3iVpnJkwbZC_EPQQEyh_7GVADcnDg7kvls9Wpj54ZbS3ZnriA8ijj3MrY4sx-Tg_llCTXMsRHgfpkkkT86eZ0V7ai4jkT0Z563cjxDToEf7-_gN3LmEwR5i0DDZF-C5DAvoZNqd-nuNE1YLGaHZuCRKDj94-8-GstB2CRhfPir9cb99lrztpI77_X6-yH7ebh5tv-fb-693N9TZXhSApZ-u2LVjHKa9ZW1acrrHjqtBUqIojVaJca7XmLWWlFBWrheIdpZ2qNOfrjlfsKvt4udsH_zhMPjRHExVaKx36ITYFKwTjhAoxQYsLdPIxxoBd00_iZBgbSpo5Js2hmWPSzDFpLjFh_wA8vbm2</recordid><startdate>20200115</startdate><enddate>20200115</enddate><creator>Bernstein, D.M.</creator><creator>Toth, B.</creator><creator>Rogers, R.A.</creator><creator>Kling, D.E.</creator><creator>Kunzendorf, P.</creator><creator>Phillips, J.I.</creator><creator>Ernst, H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-2823</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200115</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL</title><author>Bernstein, D.M. ; Toth, B. ; Rogers, R.A. ; Kling, D.E. ; Kunzendorf, P. ; Phillips, J.I. ; Ernst, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-37bb23f51593b46517ef5c2d18c65e1c847dc75b134a86398c5f11fc6d557f563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernstein, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kling, D.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunzendorf, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, J.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ernst, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernstein, D.M.</au><au>Toth, B.</au><au>Rogers, R.A.</au><au>Kling, D.E.</au><au>Kunzendorf, P.</au><au>Phillips, J.I.</au><au>Ernst, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL</atitle><jtitle>Toxicology and applied pharmacology</jtitle><date>2020-01-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>387</volume><spage>114856</spage><epage>114856</epage><pages>114856-114856</pages><artnum>114856</artnum><issn>0041-008X</issn><eissn>1096-0333</eissn><doi>10.1016/j.taap.2019.114856</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-2823</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-008X
ispartof Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2020-01, Vol.387, p.114856-114856, Article 114856
issn 0041-008X
1096-0333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328350188
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Evaluation of the exposure, dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to TiO2, chrysotile, crocidolite or amosite asbestos in a 90-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study – Interim results Part 1: Experimental design, aerosol exposure, lung burdens and BAL
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T19%3A41%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20exposure,%20dose-response%20and%20fate%20in%20the%20lung%20and%20pleura%20of%20chrysotile-containing%20brake%20dust%20compared%20to%20TiO2,%20chrysotile,%20crocidolite%20or%20amosite%20asbestos%20in%20a%2090-day%20quantitative%20inhalation%20toxicology%20study%20%E2%80%93%20Interim%20results%20Part%201:%20Experimental%20design,%20aerosol%20exposure,%20lung%20burdens%20and%20BAL&rft.jtitle=Toxicology%20and%20applied%20pharmacology&rft.au=Bernstein,%20D.M.&rft.date=2020-01-15&rft.volume=387&rft.spage=114856&rft.epage=114856&rft.pages=114856-114856&rft.artnum=114856&rft.issn=0041-008X&rft.eissn=1096-0333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.taap.2019.114856&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328350188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328350188&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true