The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome
Purpose To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS. Methods This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2020-03, Vol.277 (3), p.743-750 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 750 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 743 |
| container_title | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology |
| container_volume | 277 |
| creator | Demir, Berat Cesur, Sıdıka Incaz, Sefa Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz Ciprut, Ayca Batman, Caglar |
| description | Purpose
To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS.
Methods
This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants. VA diameter was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were assessed in all patients, and speech audiometry, including speech recognition thresholds (SRT) and word discrimination scores, was applied for all subjects who were able to perform these tests. All audiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without LVAS, and the relationship of these parameters with VA diameter was investigated.
Results
The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males, 13 females), ranging in age between 2 and 34 years (mean 13.17 ± 8.97 years). The research group consisted of 18 subjects (8 males, 10 females), ranging in age between 2 and 35 years (mean 13.28 ± 8.96 years). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SIR and CAP pre-post differences (Mann–Whitney
U
test,
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328347694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2328347694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fd8862460f5fe4939b6e6c413cbc02bd4b594f33850175e2dd9a87b4478d76f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhYnR6Pj4Ay4MSzdVWii0S2N8JZO40TWhcJlh0pYRqGaW_nNxRl264pJzzn18CJ2X5KokRFxHQhipC1K2BakFZwXdQ7OSUVYwUfF9NCMtFQVjQhyh4xhXhJCatfQQHdGyYY2g1Qx9viwBg7WgE_YWazWqHhunBkgQsB-xmozzvV84jQPEqU8RuxGvVXIw5vrDpSXWXi97UAG7Yd2rMWUxJ7dSr8IC8DvE5Lopf7B6m8BMeVrcjCb4AU7RgVV9hLOf9wS93t-93D4W8-eHp9ubeaEpE6mwpml4xTixtYV8Rdtx4JqVVHeaVJ1hXd0yS2lTk1LUUBnTqkZ0-frGCG45PUGXu77r4PMOMcnBRQ19Xhj8FGVFqyZP4i3L1mpn1cHHGMDKdXCDChtZEvmNXu7Qy4xebtFLmkMXP_2nbgDzF_llnQ10Z4hZGhcQ5MpPIfOO_7X9ArFnkYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328347694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Demir, Berat ; Cesur, Sıdıka ; Incaz, Sefa ; Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz ; Ciprut, Ayca ; Batman, Caglar</creator><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat ; Cesur, Sıdıka ; Incaz, Sefa ; Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz ; Ciprut, Ayca ; Batman, Caglar</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS.
Methods
This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants. VA diameter was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were assessed in all patients, and speech audiometry, including speech recognition thresholds (SRT) and word discrimination scores, was applied for all subjects who were able to perform these tests. All audiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without LVAS, and the relationship of these parameters with VA diameter was investigated.
Results
The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males, 13 females), ranging in age between 2 and 34 years (mean 13.17 ± 8.97 years). The research group consisted of 18 subjects (8 males, 10 females), ranging in age between 2 and 35 years (mean 13.28 ± 8.96 years). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SIR and CAP pre-post differences (Mann–Whitney
U
test,
p
< 0.05), with higher averages in the LVAS group. No statistically significant correlations were found between VA diameter on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and the audiologic variables collected.
Conclusions
Patients with LVAS benefit from cochlear implant surgery and VA parameters do not affect audiologic parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31848732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Audiometry, Speech ; Auditory Perception ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Female ; Head and Neck Surgery ; Hearing Loss - diagnosis ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss - surgery ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Otology ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Retrospective Studies ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Syndrome ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vestibular Aqueduct - abnormalities ; Vestibular Aqueduct - diagnostic imaging ; Vestibular Diseases - complications ; Vestibular Diseases - congenital ; Vestibular Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Vestibular Diseases - physiopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2020-03, Vol.277 (3), p.743-750</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fd8862460f5fe4939b6e6c413cbc02bd4b594f33850175e2dd9a87b4478d76f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fd8862460f5fe4939b6e6c413cbc02bd4b594f33850175e2dd9a87b4478d76f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8574-4927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesur, Sıdıka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incaz, Sefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprut, Ayca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batman, Caglar</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS.
Methods
This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants. VA diameter was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were assessed in all patients, and speech audiometry, including speech recognition thresholds (SRT) and word discrimination scores, was applied for all subjects who were able to perform these tests. All audiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without LVAS, and the relationship of these parameters with VA diameter was investigated.
Results
The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males, 13 females), ranging in age between 2 and 34 years (mean 13.17 ± 8.97 years). The research group consisted of 18 subjects (8 males, 10 females), ranging in age between 2 and 35 years (mean 13.28 ± 8.96 years). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SIR and CAP pre-post differences (Mann–Whitney
U
test,
p
< 0.05), with higher averages in the LVAS group. No statistically significant correlations were found between VA diameter on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and the audiologic variables collected.
Conclusions
Patients with LVAS benefit from cochlear implant surgery and VA parameters do not affect audiologic parameters.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Vestibular Aqueduct - abnormalities</subject><subject>Vestibular Aqueduct - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vestibular Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Vestibular Diseases - congenital</subject><subject>Vestibular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vestibular Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhYnR6Pj4Ay4MSzdVWii0S2N8JZO40TWhcJlh0pYRqGaW_nNxRl264pJzzn18CJ2X5KokRFxHQhipC1K2BakFZwXdQ7OSUVYwUfF9NCMtFQVjQhyh4xhXhJCatfQQHdGyYY2g1Qx9viwBg7WgE_YWazWqHhunBkgQsB-xmozzvV84jQPEqU8RuxGvVXIw5vrDpSXWXi97UAG7Yd2rMWUxJ7dSr8IC8DvE5Lopf7B6m8BMeVrcjCb4AU7RgVV9hLOf9wS93t-93D4W8-eHp9ubeaEpE6mwpml4xTixtYV8Rdtx4JqVVHeaVJ1hXd0yS2lTk1LUUBnTqkZ0-frGCG45PUGXu77r4PMOMcnBRQ19Xhj8FGVFqyZP4i3L1mpn1cHHGMDKdXCDChtZEvmNXu7Qy4xebtFLmkMXP_2nbgDzF_llnQ10Z4hZGhcQ5MpPIfOO_7X9ArFnkYA</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Demir, Berat</creator><creator>Cesur, Sıdıka</creator><creator>Incaz, Sefa</creator><creator>Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz</creator><creator>Ciprut, Ayca</creator><creator>Batman, Caglar</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-4927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome</title><author>Demir, Berat ; Cesur, Sıdıka ; Incaz, Sefa ; Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz ; Ciprut, Ayca ; Batman, Caglar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-fd8862460f5fe4939b6e6c413cbc02bd4b594f33850175e2dd9a87b4478d76f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Vestibular Aqueduct - abnormalities</topic><topic>Vestibular Aqueduct - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vestibular Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Vestibular Diseases - congenital</topic><topic>Vestibular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vestibular Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demir, Berat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesur, Sıdıka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Incaz, Sefa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciprut, Ayca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batman, Caglar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demir, Berat</au><au>Cesur, Sıdıka</au><au>Incaz, Sefa</au><au>Alberalar, Nilufer Deniz</au><au>Ciprut, Ayca</au><au>Batman, Caglar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>277</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>743-750</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To compare audiologic results according to vestibular aqueduct (VA) diameter in patients who have undergone cochlear implantation and were diagnosed with LVAS.
Methods
This was a retrospective study detailing the outcomes of 18 patients with LVAS and 18 patients undergone cochlear implants. VA diameter was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) were assessed in all patients, and speech audiometry, including speech recognition thresholds (SRT) and word discrimination scores, was applied for all subjects who were able to perform these tests. All audiologic parameters were compared between patients with and without LVAS, and the relationship of these parameters with VA diameter was investigated.
Results
The control group consisted of 18 subjects (5 males, 13 females), ranging in age between 2 and 34 years (mean 13.17 ± 8.97 years). The research group consisted of 18 subjects (8 males, 10 females), ranging in age between 2 and 35 years (mean 13.28 ± 8.96 years). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SIR and CAP pre-post differences (Mann–Whitney
U
test,
p
< 0.05), with higher averages in the LVAS group. No statistically significant correlations were found between VA diameter on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging and the audiologic variables collected.
Conclusions
Patients with LVAS benefit from cochlear implant surgery and VA parameters do not affect audiologic parameters.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31848732</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8574-4927</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0937-4477 |
| ispartof | European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2020-03, Vol.277 (3), p.743-750 |
| issn | 0937-4477 1434-4726 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328347694 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Audiometry, Speech Auditory Perception Child Child, Preschool Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Female Head and Neck Surgery Hearing Loss - diagnosis Hearing Loss - physiopathology Hearing Loss - surgery Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Otology Otorhinolaryngology Retrospective Studies Speech Intelligibility Speech Perception Syndrome Tomography, X-Ray Computed Vestibular Aqueduct - abnormalities Vestibular Aqueduct - diagnostic imaging Vestibular Diseases - complications Vestibular Diseases - congenital Vestibular Diseases - diagnostic imaging Vestibular Diseases - physiopathology Young Adult |
| title | The effect of canal diameter on audiologic results in patients with cochlear implantation with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A28%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20canal%20diameter%20on%20audiologic%20results%20in%20patients%20with%20cochlear%20implantation%20with%20large%20vestibular%20aqueduct%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Demir,%20Berat&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=277&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=743-750&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-019-05764-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328347694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328347694&rft_id=info:pmid/31848732&rfr_iscdi=true |