The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of the medical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). However, extraesophageal symptoms of LPRD, such as globus, are often refractory to PPI treatment. Many kinds of adjunctive medications have been attempted to address those refractory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.618-624
Hauptverfasser: Jo, Yong Seok, Choi, Ick Soo, So, Yoon Kyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 4
container_start_page 618
container_title Journal of voice
container_volume 35
creator Jo, Yong Seok
Choi, Ick Soo
So, Yoon Kyoung
description Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of the medical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). However, extraesophageal symptoms of LPRD, such as globus, are often refractory to PPI treatment. Many kinds of adjunctive medications have been attempted to address those refractory cases. We aimed to study whether inhaled N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a mucolytic agent, has additive effects for the treatment of LPRD when used in conjunction with PPIs. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) greater than 13 and reflux finding scores (RFS) greater than 7 were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to control or study group. Patients were treated with oral rabeprazole in the control group and with oral rabeprazole and inhaled NAC in the study group. Patients were followed once a month for 2 months with questionnaires and stroboscopic examination. At every follow-up, RSI and RFS were checked. The extent of improvements of RSI and RFS were evaluated and compared between two groups. With treatment, the mean RSI changed from 21.0 to 7.6 (P < 0.001) in control group and from 19.7 to 4.5 (P < 0.001) in study group. The mean RFS also changed from 12.9 to 7.1 (P < 0.001) in control group and from 13.5 to 6.9 (P < 0.001) in study group. For both RSI and RFS, the extents of improvement were not significantly different between two groups. In patients whose RSI improved less than nine at the first follow-up (poor early responders), RSI became significantly lower in the study group (4.6 ± 2.0) than in the control group (9.5 ± 4.6) at second follow-up (P = 0.019). In good early responders, however, RSI was not significantly different between the two groups in the second follow-up. In this study, there were no significant differences in the overall outcome between patients treated with inhaled NAC and PPI and those with PPI alone. Interestingly, some additional therapeutic effect of NAC appeared late for the patients with poor early response. Further studies are required to investigate the underlying mechanism for this.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328345434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0892199719304667</els_id><sourcerecordid>2328345434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-44bbf1ee0c2f02b836a22bd5d8d8ed26e9eedf7cc13efacd7e43b3e396c2fa9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhq2qqKS0b1BVXnYzU98y4-kCKQoUkCKQUFhbHvuYOHLGwZ4g0qfHaWiXrP7F-S86H0LfKKkpoc3Pdb1-jt5AzQjtakprQtsPaEJlyysxlfIjmhDZsYp2XXuKPue8JoSwcv2ETjmVQpKGTdDjcgX4IQOODt8MKx3A4ttqZmDcB7PPI_gBsIsJL3TaD49xu_qroAO-Bxd2L_jCZ9AZfuEZvteDjRv_p3TM4zCmGA51y-R1-IJOnA4Zvr7pGXr4fbmcX1eLu6ub-WxRGU55WwnR944CEMMcYb3kjWast1MrrQTLGugArGuNoRycNrYFwXsOvGtKQHeWn6Efx95tik87yKPa-GwgBD1A3GXFOJNcTAUXxSqOVpNizgmc2ia_Ke8pStQBsVqrI2J1QKwoVQVxiX1_W9j1G7D_Q_-YFsP50QDlz2cPSWXjYTBgfQIzKhv9-wuvOXuQvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328345434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jo, Yong Seok ; Choi, Ick Soo ; So, Yoon Kyoung</creator><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yong Seok ; Choi, Ick Soo ; So, Yoon Kyoung</creatorcontrib><description>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of the medical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). However, extraesophageal symptoms of LPRD, such as globus, are often refractory to PPI treatment. Many kinds of adjunctive medications have been attempted to address those refractory cases. We aimed to study whether inhaled N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a mucolytic agent, has additive effects for the treatment of LPRD when used in conjunction with PPIs. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) greater than 13 and reflux finding scores (RFS) greater than 7 were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to control or study group. Patients were treated with oral rabeprazole in the control group and with oral rabeprazole and inhaled NAC in the study group. Patients were followed once a month for 2 months with questionnaires and stroboscopic examination. At every follow-up, RSI and RFS were checked. The extent of improvements of RSI and RFS were evaluated and compared between two groups. With treatment, the mean RSI changed from 21.0 to 7.6 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 19.7 to 4.5 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. The mean RFS also changed from 12.9 to 7.1 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 13.5 to 6.9 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. For both RSI and RFS, the extents of improvement were not significantly different between two groups. In patients whose RSI improved less than nine at the first follow-up (poor early responders), RSI became significantly lower in the study group (4.6 ± 2.0) than in the control group (9.5 ± 4.6) at second follow-up (P = 0.019). In good early responders, however, RSI was not significantly different between the two groups in the second follow-up. In this study, there were no significant differences in the overall outcome between patients treated with inhaled NAC and PPI and those with PPI alone. Interestingly, some additional therapeutic effect of NAC appeared late for the patients with poor early response. Further studies are required to investigate the underlying mechanism for this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-1997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4588</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31848062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>GERD ; Globus ; Laryngopharyngeal reflux ; Mucolytics ; N-acetylcysteine ; Proton pump inhibitors ; Reflux</subject><ispartof>Journal of voice, 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.618-624</ispartof><rights>2019 The Voice Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-44bbf1ee0c2f02b836a22bd5d8d8ed26e9eedf7cc13efacd7e43b3e396c2fa9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-44bbf1ee0c2f02b836a22bd5d8d8ed26e9eedf7cc13efacd7e43b3e396c2fa9d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892199719304667$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31848062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yong Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ick Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Yoon Kyoung</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Journal of voice</title><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><description>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of the medical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). However, extraesophageal symptoms of LPRD, such as globus, are often refractory to PPI treatment. Many kinds of adjunctive medications have been attempted to address those refractory cases. We aimed to study whether inhaled N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a mucolytic agent, has additive effects for the treatment of LPRD when used in conjunction with PPIs. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) greater than 13 and reflux finding scores (RFS) greater than 7 were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to control or study group. Patients were treated with oral rabeprazole in the control group and with oral rabeprazole and inhaled NAC in the study group. Patients were followed once a month for 2 months with questionnaires and stroboscopic examination. At every follow-up, RSI and RFS were checked. The extent of improvements of RSI and RFS were evaluated and compared between two groups. With treatment, the mean RSI changed from 21.0 to 7.6 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 19.7 to 4.5 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. The mean RFS also changed from 12.9 to 7.1 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 13.5 to 6.9 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. For both RSI and RFS, the extents of improvement were not significantly different between two groups. In patients whose RSI improved less than nine at the first follow-up (poor early responders), RSI became significantly lower in the study group (4.6 ± 2.0) than in the control group (9.5 ± 4.6) at second follow-up (P = 0.019). In good early responders, however, RSI was not significantly different between the two groups in the second follow-up. In this study, there were no significant differences in the overall outcome between patients treated with inhaled NAC and PPI and those with PPI alone. Interestingly, some additional therapeutic effect of NAC appeared late for the patients with poor early response. Further studies are required to investigate the underlying mechanism for this.</description><subject>GERD</subject><subject>Globus</subject><subject>Laryngopharyngeal reflux</subject><subject>Mucolytics</subject><subject>N-acetylcysteine</subject><subject>Proton pump inhibitors</subject><subject>Reflux</subject><issn>0892-1997</issn><issn>1873-4588</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOGzEUhq2qqKS0b1BVXnYzU98y4-kCKQoUkCKQUFhbHvuYOHLGwZ4g0qfHaWiXrP7F-S86H0LfKKkpoc3Pdb1-jt5AzQjtakprQtsPaEJlyysxlfIjmhDZsYp2XXuKPue8JoSwcv2ETjmVQpKGTdDjcgX4IQOODt8MKx3A4ttqZmDcB7PPI_gBsIsJL3TaD49xu_qroAO-Bxd2L_jCZ9AZfuEZvteDjRv_p3TM4zCmGA51y-R1-IJOnA4Zvr7pGXr4fbmcX1eLu6ub-WxRGU55WwnR944CEMMcYb3kjWast1MrrQTLGugArGuNoRycNrYFwXsOvGtKQHeWn6Efx95tik87yKPa-GwgBD1A3GXFOJNcTAUXxSqOVpNizgmc2ia_Ke8pStQBsVqrI2J1QKwoVQVxiX1_W9j1G7D_Q_-YFsP50QDlz2cPSWXjYTBgfQIzKhv9-wuvOXuQvw</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Jo, Yong Seok</creator><creator>Choi, Ick Soo</creator><creator>So, Yoon Kyoung</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Jo, Yong Seok ; Choi, Ick Soo ; So, Yoon Kyoung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3137-44bbf1ee0c2f02b836a22bd5d8d8ed26e9eedf7cc13efacd7e43b3e396c2fa9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>GERD</topic><topic>Globus</topic><topic>Laryngopharyngeal reflux</topic><topic>Mucolytics</topic><topic>N-acetylcysteine</topic><topic>Proton pump inhibitors</topic><topic>Reflux</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yong Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Ick Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>So, Yoon Kyoung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jo, Yong Seok</au><au>Choi, Ick Soo</au><au>So, Yoon Kyoung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of voice</jtitle><addtitle>J Voice</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>618</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>618-624</pages><issn>0892-1997</issn><eissn>1873-4588</eissn><abstract>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of the medical treatment for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). However, extraesophageal symptoms of LPRD, such as globus, are often refractory to PPI treatment. Many kinds of adjunctive medications have been attempted to address those refractory cases. We aimed to study whether inhaled N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a mucolytic agent, has additive effects for the treatment of LPRD when used in conjunction with PPIs. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) greater than 13 and reflux finding scores (RFS) greater than 7 were prospectively enrolled and were randomly assigned to control or study group. Patients were treated with oral rabeprazole in the control group and with oral rabeprazole and inhaled NAC in the study group. Patients were followed once a month for 2 months with questionnaires and stroboscopic examination. At every follow-up, RSI and RFS were checked. The extent of improvements of RSI and RFS were evaluated and compared between two groups. With treatment, the mean RSI changed from 21.0 to 7.6 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 19.7 to 4.5 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. The mean RFS also changed from 12.9 to 7.1 (P &lt; 0.001) in control group and from 13.5 to 6.9 (P &lt; 0.001) in study group. For both RSI and RFS, the extents of improvement were not significantly different between two groups. In patients whose RSI improved less than nine at the first follow-up (poor early responders), RSI became significantly lower in the study group (4.6 ± 2.0) than in the control group (9.5 ± 4.6) at second follow-up (P = 0.019). In good early responders, however, RSI was not significantly different between the two groups in the second follow-up. In this study, there were no significant differences in the overall outcome between patients treated with inhaled NAC and PPI and those with PPI alone. Interestingly, some additional therapeutic effect of NAC appeared late for the patients with poor early response. Further studies are required to investigate the underlying mechanism for this.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31848062</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.017</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-1997
ispartof Journal of voice, 2021-07, Vol.35 (4), p.618-624
issn 0892-1997
1873-4588
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2328345434
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects GERD
Globus
Laryngopharyngeal reflux
Mucolytics
N-acetylcysteine
Proton pump inhibitors
Reflux
title The Use of Inhaled N-Acetylcysteine for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20Inhaled%20N-Acetylcysteine%20for%20Laryngopharyngeal%20Reflux%20Disease:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20voice&rft.au=Jo,%20Yong%20Seok&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=618&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=618-624&rft.issn=0892-1997&rft.eissn=1873-4588&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.11.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328345434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328345434&rft_id=info:pmid/31848062&rft_els_id=S0892199719304667&rfr_iscdi=true