Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study
The selection of suitable landfill locations for municipal solid waste has become a top priority, especially in developed countries as a result of rapid population growth, unplanned urbanisation, increasing waste production and the limited area available. However, determining the location of landfil...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management & research 2020-05, Vol.38 (1_suppl), p.45-64 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 64 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1_suppl |
| container_start_page | 45 |
| container_title | Waste management & research |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Unal, Muge Cilek, Ahmet Guner, Esra Deniz |
| description | The selection of suitable landfill locations for municipal solid waste has become a top priority, especially in developed countries as a result of rapid population growth, unplanned urbanisation, increasing waste production and the limited area available. However, determining the location of landfill sites is a complex decision-making problem for municipalities and depends on social, environmental, technical and economic factors and regulations. In this study, we combined a geographic information system (GIS), multi-criteria decision-analysis techniques and fuzzy logic to determine the best location for landfill sites in Adana, Turkey, in four steps. Firstly, the threshold values and the coefficient weights of 15 criteria, grouped into environmental and socio-economic factors, were determined by a literature review and expert opinion to select suitable landfill locations. Secondly, selection criteria were standardised using fuzzy logic. Thirdly, we assessed the criteria weights based on their effectiveness on the selection of potential landfill sites using the Simos method. According to the weight coefficients, environmental factors are more important than socio-economic factors. Final maps for each criterion were calculated and overlaid by a GIS. As a result, the final suitability results were divided into four discrete categories: very high, high, moderate and low suitability areas, representing 1%, 76%, 17% and 6% of the location options, respectively. Finally, four different alternative areas were identified as being very highly suitable for landfill locations, which were evaluated in detail using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis. Three key aspects affect the final decision of a landfill site, in decreasing order of importance: environmental protection, minimising the negative impact on urban life quality and economic issues. Consequently, these results can guide decision-makers (ministries, municipalities, planners, etc.) during the selection of suitable landfill sites in both national and international studies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0734242X19893111 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327934246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0734242X19893111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2327934246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-237ab701bfee4568999efec5f037e4bdd1b48050abf8541460c9031b6d29aee63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS3Uqlxo96yQpW5YkNaOnR93h65Ki4TURUHqLnKSMRicOHgcofA-fc86utBKSF157PPNGduHkCPOPnFeVZ9ZJWQu819c1UpwzvfIhjNVZqIs1RuyWeVs1ffJAeIdY0zWkr0j-4LXsqiF3JDfF8PkYIAx6mj9SL2hZn56Wk7pTzt4pHrsKcYA4028xVP6CPp-BERItZ8mH-I82mhhB8bbADqutXYLWqTGBzokorOTdhS9sz191BiBusQb69KhTTsEB906_ws961M33dq40E5jkuLcL-_JW6Mdwofn9ZBcn3-92n7PLn98u9ieXWadLIuY5aLSbcV4awBkUdZKKTDQFYaJCmTb97yVNSuYbk1dSC5L1ikmeFv2udIApTgkJzvfKfiHGTA2g8UOXLot-BmbXOSVWr98RT--Qu_8HNLDEyUZr0ShapEotqO64BEDmGYKdtBhaThr1gib1xGmluNn47kdoP_b8JJZArIdgPoG_k39r-Efuomm3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2401735983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Unal, Muge ; Cilek, Ahmet ; Guner, Esra Deniz</creator><creatorcontrib>Unal, Muge ; Cilek, Ahmet ; Guner, Esra Deniz</creatorcontrib><description>The selection of suitable landfill locations for municipal solid waste has become a top priority, especially in developed countries as a result of rapid population growth, unplanned urbanisation, increasing waste production and the limited area available. However, determining the location of landfill sites is a complex decision-making problem for municipalities and depends on social, environmental, technical and economic factors and regulations. In this study, we combined a geographic information system (GIS), multi-criteria decision-analysis techniques and fuzzy logic to determine the best location for landfill sites in Adana, Turkey, in four steps. Firstly, the threshold values and the coefficient weights of 15 criteria, grouped into environmental and socio-economic factors, were determined by a literature review and expert opinion to select suitable landfill locations. Secondly, selection criteria were standardised using fuzzy logic. Thirdly, we assessed the criteria weights based on their effectiveness on the selection of potential landfill sites using the Simos method. According to the weight coefficients, environmental factors are more important than socio-economic factors. Final maps for each criterion were calculated and overlaid by a GIS. As a result, the final suitability results were divided into four discrete categories: very high, high, moderate and low suitability areas, representing 1%, 76%, 17% and 6% of the location options, respectively. Finally, four different alternative areas were identified as being very highly suitable for landfill locations, which were evaluated in detail using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis. Three key aspects affect the final decision of a landfill site, in decreasing order of importance: environmental protection, minimising the negative impact on urban life quality and economic issues. Consequently, these results can guide decision-makers (ministries, municipalities, planners, etc.) during the selection of suitable landfill sites in both national and international studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-242X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-3669</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0734242X19893111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31845834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cities ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Developed countries ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Environmental factors ; Environmental protection ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy systems ; Geographic Information Systems ; Impact analysis ; International studies ; Landfill ; Landfills ; Literature reviews ; Mathematical analysis ; Multiple criterion ; Municipal landfills ; Municipal solid waste ; Municipal waste management ; Municipalities ; Population growth ; Quality of life ; Refuse Disposal ; Remote sensing ; Satellite navigation systems ; Site selection ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Solid Waste ; Solid waste management ; Threat evaluation ; Turkey ; Urbanization ; Waste Disposal Facilities ; Waste disposal sites</subject><ispartof>Waste management & research, 2020-05, Vol.38 (1_suppl), p.45-64</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-237ab701bfee4568999efec5f037e4bdd1b48050abf8541460c9031b6d29aee63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-237ab701bfee4568999efec5f037e4bdd1b48050abf8541460c9031b6d29aee63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1147-9729</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0734242X19893111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0734242X19893111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31845834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unal, Muge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilek, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guner, Esra Deniz</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study</title><title>Waste management & research</title><addtitle>Waste Manag Res</addtitle><description>The selection of suitable landfill locations for municipal solid waste has become a top priority, especially in developed countries as a result of rapid population growth, unplanned urbanisation, increasing waste production and the limited area available. However, determining the location of landfill sites is a complex decision-making problem for municipalities and depends on social, environmental, technical and economic factors and regulations. In this study, we combined a geographic information system (GIS), multi-criteria decision-analysis techniques and fuzzy logic to determine the best location for landfill sites in Adana, Turkey, in four steps. Firstly, the threshold values and the coefficient weights of 15 criteria, grouped into environmental and socio-economic factors, were determined by a literature review and expert opinion to select suitable landfill locations. Secondly, selection criteria were standardised using fuzzy logic. Thirdly, we assessed the criteria weights based on their effectiveness on the selection of potential landfill sites using the Simos method. According to the weight coefficients, environmental factors are more important than socio-economic factors. Final maps for each criterion were calculated and overlaid by a GIS. As a result, the final suitability results were divided into four discrete categories: very high, high, moderate and low suitability areas, representing 1%, 76%, 17% and 6% of the location options, respectively. Finally, four different alternative areas were identified as being very highly suitable for landfill locations, which were evaluated in detail using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis. Three key aspects affect the final decision of a landfill site, in decreasing order of importance: environmental protection, minimising the negative impact on urban life quality and economic issues. Consequently, these results can guide decision-makers (ministries, municipalities, planners, etc.) during the selection of suitable landfill sites in both national and international studies.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy systems</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>International studies</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Landfills</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Municipal landfills</subject><subject>Municipal solid waste</subject><subject>Municipal waste management</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Satellite navigation systems</subject><subject>Site selection</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Solid Waste</subject><subject>Solid waste management</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Waste Disposal Facilities</subject><subject>Waste disposal sites</subject><issn>0734-242X</issn><issn>1096-3669</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1O3TAQhS3Uqlxo96yQpW5YkNaOnR93h65Ki4TURUHqLnKSMRicOHgcofA-fc86utBKSF157PPNGduHkCPOPnFeVZ9ZJWQu819c1UpwzvfIhjNVZqIs1RuyWeVs1ffJAeIdY0zWkr0j-4LXsqiF3JDfF8PkYIAx6mj9SL2hZn56Wk7pTzt4pHrsKcYA4028xVP6CPp-BERItZ8mH-I82mhhB8bbADqutXYLWqTGBzokorOTdhS9sz191BiBusQb69KhTTsEB906_ws961M33dq40E5jkuLcL-_JW6Mdwofn9ZBcn3-92n7PLn98u9ieXWadLIuY5aLSbcV4awBkUdZKKTDQFYaJCmTb97yVNSuYbk1dSC5L1ikmeFv2udIApTgkJzvfKfiHGTA2g8UOXLot-BmbXOSVWr98RT--Qu_8HNLDEyUZr0ShapEotqO64BEDmGYKdtBhaThr1gib1xGmluNn47kdoP_b8JJZArIdgPoG_k39r-Efuomm3g</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Unal, Muge</creator><creator>Cilek, Ahmet</creator><creator>Guner, Esra Deniz</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1147-9729</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study</title><author>Unal, Muge ; Cilek, Ahmet ; Guner, Esra Deniz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-237ab701bfee4568999efec5f037e4bdd1b48050abf8541460c9031b6d29aee63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy systems</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>International studies</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Landfills</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Municipal landfills</topic><topic>Municipal solid waste</topic><topic>Municipal waste management</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Satellite navigation systems</topic><topic>Site selection</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Solid Waste</topic><topic>Solid waste management</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Waste Disposal Facilities</topic><topic>Waste disposal sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unal, Muge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cilek, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guner, Esra Deniz</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Waste management & research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unal, Muge</au><au>Cilek, Ahmet</au><au>Guner, Esra Deniz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study</atitle><jtitle>Waste management & research</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag Res</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1_suppl</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>45-64</pages><issn>0734-242X</issn><eissn>1096-3669</eissn><abstract>The selection of suitable landfill locations for municipal solid waste has become a top priority, especially in developed countries as a result of rapid population growth, unplanned urbanisation, increasing waste production and the limited area available. However, determining the location of landfill sites is a complex decision-making problem for municipalities and depends on social, environmental, technical and economic factors and regulations. In this study, we combined a geographic information system (GIS), multi-criteria decision-analysis techniques and fuzzy logic to determine the best location for landfill sites in Adana, Turkey, in four steps. Firstly, the threshold values and the coefficient weights of 15 criteria, grouped into environmental and socio-economic factors, were determined by a literature review and expert opinion to select suitable landfill locations. Secondly, selection criteria were standardised using fuzzy logic. Thirdly, we assessed the criteria weights based on their effectiveness on the selection of potential landfill sites using the Simos method. According to the weight coefficients, environmental factors are more important than socio-economic factors. Final maps for each criterion were calculated and overlaid by a GIS. As a result, the final suitability results were divided into four discrete categories: very high, high, moderate and low suitability areas, representing 1%, 76%, 17% and 6% of the location options, respectively. Finally, four different alternative areas were identified as being very highly suitable for landfill locations, which were evaluated in detail using a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis. Three key aspects affect the final decision of a landfill site, in decreasing order of importance: environmental protection, minimising the negative impact on urban life quality and economic issues. Consequently, these results can guide decision-makers (ministries, municipalities, planners, etc.) during the selection of suitable landfill sites in both national and international studies.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31845834</pmid><doi>10.1177/0734242X19893111</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1147-9729</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0734-242X |
| ispartof | Waste management & research, 2020-05, Vol.38 (1_suppl), p.45-64 |
| issn | 0734-242X 1096-3669 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327934246 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Cities Decision analysis Decision making Developed countries Economic factors Economics Environmental factors Environmental protection Fuzzy logic Fuzzy systems Geographic Information Systems Impact analysis International studies Landfill Landfills Literature reviews Mathematical analysis Multiple criterion Municipal landfills Municipal solid waste Municipal waste management Municipalities Population growth Quality of life Refuse Disposal Remote sensing Satellite navigation systems Site selection Social factors Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomics Solid Waste Solid waste management Threat evaluation Turkey Urbanization Waste Disposal Facilities Waste disposal sites |
| title | Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A48%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20fuzzy,%20Simos%20and%20strengths,%20weaknesses,%20opportunities%20and%20threats%20analysis%20for%20municipal%20solid%20waste%20landfill%20site%20selection:%20Adana%20City%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20&%20research&rft.au=Unal,%20Muge&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1_suppl&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=45-64&rft.issn=0734-242X&rft.eissn=1096-3669&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0734242X19893111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327934246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2401735983&rft_id=info:pmid/31845834&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0734242X19893111&rfr_iscdi=true |