Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples
Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including gener...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pain and symptom management 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 717 |
container_title | Journal of pain and symptom management |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Hinz, Andreas Benzing, Christian Brähler, Elmar Zenger, Markus Herzberg, Philipp Y. Finck, Carolyn Schmalbach, Bjarne Petrowski, Katja |
description | Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire.
The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample.
The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices.
The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327381379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392419307080</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327381379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1q3DAUBWBRWpLJJK9QVLpJoHYka_TjZZh22oGEBtKuhSxfNTK25Ur2wLx9bSYtpauuBOK7uugchN5RklNCxW2TN4PxfTp2nenzgtAyp0VOCH-FVlRJlglO2Wu0IkrxjJXF5hxdpNSQWTDBztA5o4rJDScr5B7T0T6HDsboLX6MYYA4ekg4ODw-A36Y2tHXvoM--dCbFu_M6H9MgPf9AfoxxCO-ftjts4LcfMAfIfoD1HgXQ4efYAb4yXRDC-kSvXGmTXD1cq7R992nb9sv2f3Xz_vt3X1mN1yMmWI1k5WRBErqiOSEV0oAd7RSjltbc-IYdxVhxABdLqVQrJKilMYC1Jat0fXp3SGGnxOkUXc-WWhb00OYki5YIZmiTJYzff8PbcIU5y8uSlIpBGVqVuVJ2RhSiuD0EH1n4lFTopcydKP_KkMvZWha6CXqNXr7smGqOqj_TP5OfwbbE4A5koOHqJP10FuofQQ76jr4_1jzCxoioQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371766138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><description>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire.
The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample.
The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices.
The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31837450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Fatigue ; Medical screening ; psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; reliability ; Suffering ; wording effect</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392419307080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31837450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzing, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brähler, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finck, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire.
The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample.
The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices.
The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Suffering</subject><subject>wording effect</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1q3DAUBWBRWpLJJK9QVLpJoHYka_TjZZh22oGEBtKuhSxfNTK25Ur2wLx9bSYtpauuBOK7uugchN5RklNCxW2TN4PxfTp2nenzgtAyp0VOCH-FVlRJlglO2Wu0IkrxjJXF5hxdpNSQWTDBztA5o4rJDScr5B7T0T6HDsboLX6MYYA4ekg4ODw-A36Y2tHXvoM--dCbFu_M6H9MgPf9AfoxxCO-ftjts4LcfMAfIfoD1HgXQ4efYAb4yXRDC-kSvXGmTXD1cq7R992nb9sv2f3Xz_vt3X1mN1yMmWI1k5WRBErqiOSEV0oAd7RSjltbc-IYdxVhxABdLqVQrJKilMYC1Jat0fXp3SGGnxOkUXc-WWhb00OYki5YIZmiTJYzff8PbcIU5y8uSlIpBGVqVuVJ2RhSiuD0EH1n4lFTopcydKP_KkMvZWha6CXqNXr7smGqOqj_TP5OfwbbE4A5koOHqJP10FuofQQ76jr4_1jzCxoioQs</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Hinz, Andreas</creator><creator>Benzing, Christian</creator><creator>Brähler, Elmar</creator><creator>Zenger, Markus</creator><creator>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creator><creator>Finck, Carolyn</creator><creator>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creator><creator>Petrowski, Katja</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><author>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Suffering</topic><topic>wording effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzing, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brähler, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finck, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinz, Andreas</au><au>Benzing, Christian</au><au>Brähler, Elmar</au><au>Zenger, Markus</au><au>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</au><au>Finck, Carolyn</au><au>Schmalbach, Bjarne</au><au>Petrowski, Katja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>717-723</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire.
The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample.
The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices.
The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31837450</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3924 |
ispartof | Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723 |
issn | 0885-3924 1873-6513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327381379 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Chronic illnesses Confirmatory factor analysis Fatigue Medical screening psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires reliability Suffering wording effect |
title | Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20the%20Multidimensional%20Fatigue%20Inventory%20(MFI-20),%20Derived%20From%20Seven%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Hinz,%20Andreas&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=717-723&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327381379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371766138&rft_id=info:pmid/31837450&rft_els_id=S0885392419307080&rfr_iscdi=true |