Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples

Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including gener...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pain and symptom management 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723
Hauptverfasser: Hinz, Andreas, Benzing, Christian, Brähler, Elmar, Zenger, Markus, Herzberg, Philipp Y., Finck, Carolyn, Schmalbach, Bjarne, Petrowski, Katja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 723
container_issue 3
container_start_page 717
container_title Journal of pain and symptom management
container_volume 59
creator Hinz, Andreas
Benzing, Christian
Brähler, Elmar
Zenger, Markus
Herzberg, Philipp Y.
Finck, Carolyn
Schmalbach, Bjarne
Petrowski, Katja
description Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample. The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices. The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327381379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0885392419307080</els_id><sourcerecordid>2327381379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0c1q3DAUBWBRWpLJJK9QVLpJoHYka_TjZZh22oGEBtKuhSxfNTK25Ur2wLx9bSYtpauuBOK7uugchN5RklNCxW2TN4PxfTp2nenzgtAyp0VOCH-FVlRJlglO2Wu0IkrxjJXF5hxdpNSQWTDBztA5o4rJDScr5B7T0T6HDsboLX6MYYA4ekg4ODw-A36Y2tHXvoM--dCbFu_M6H9MgPf9AfoxxCO-ftjts4LcfMAfIfoD1HgXQ4efYAb4yXRDC-kSvXGmTXD1cq7R992nb9sv2f3Xz_vt3X1mN1yMmWI1k5WRBErqiOSEV0oAd7RSjltbc-IYdxVhxABdLqVQrJKilMYC1Jat0fXp3SGGnxOkUXc-WWhb00OYki5YIZmiTJYzff8PbcIU5y8uSlIpBGVqVuVJ2RhSiuD0EH1n4lFTopcydKP_KkMvZWha6CXqNXr7smGqOqj_TP5OfwbbE4A5koOHqJP10FuofQQ76jr4_1jzCxoioQs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2371766138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</creator><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><description>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample. The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices. The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31837450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Fatigue ; Medical screening ; psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; reliability ; Suffering ; wording effect</subject><ispartof>Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392419307080$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31837450$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzing, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brähler, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finck, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><title>Journal of pain and symptom management</title><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><description>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample. The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices. The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Suffering</subject><subject>wording effect</subject><issn>0885-3924</issn><issn>1873-6513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0c1q3DAUBWBRWpLJJK9QVLpJoHYka_TjZZh22oGEBtKuhSxfNTK25Ur2wLx9bSYtpauuBOK7uugchN5RklNCxW2TN4PxfTp2nenzgtAyp0VOCH-FVlRJlglO2Wu0IkrxjJXF5hxdpNSQWTDBztA5o4rJDScr5B7T0T6HDsboLX6MYYA4ekg4ODw-A36Y2tHXvoM--dCbFu_M6H9MgPf9AfoxxCO-ftjts4LcfMAfIfoD1HgXQ4efYAb4yXRDC-kSvXGmTXD1cq7R992nb9sv2f3Xz_vt3X1mN1yMmWI1k5WRBErqiOSEV0oAd7RSjltbc-IYdxVhxABdLqVQrJKilMYC1Jat0fXp3SGGnxOkUXc-WWhb00OYki5YIZmiTJYzff8PbcIU5y8uSlIpBGVqVuVJ2RhSiuD0EH1n4lFTopcydKP_KkMvZWha6CXqNXr7smGqOqj_TP5OfwbbE4A5koOHqJP10FuofQQ76jr4_1jzCxoioQs</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Hinz, Andreas</creator><creator>Benzing, Christian</creator><creator>Brähler, Elmar</creator><creator>Zenger, Markus</creator><creator>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creator><creator>Finck, Carolyn</creator><creator>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creator><creator>Petrowski, Katja</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</title><author>Hinz, Andreas ; Benzing, Christian ; Brähler, Elmar ; Zenger, Markus ; Herzberg, Philipp Y. ; Finck, Carolyn ; Schmalbach, Bjarne ; Petrowski, Katja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-83d37ba70e91f07505b86e5f1b8f5ccd50f35fb030ae11b8f7683b7697aceedc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Suffering</topic><topic>wording effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hinz, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzing, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brähler, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zenger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finck, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmalbach, Bjarne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrowski, Katja</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hinz, Andreas</au><au>Benzing, Christian</au><au>Brähler, Elmar</au><au>Zenger, Markus</au><au>Herzberg, Philipp Y.</au><au>Finck, Carolyn</au><au>Schmalbach, Bjarne</au><au>Petrowski, Katja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pain and symptom management</jtitle><addtitle>J Pain Symptom Manage</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>717</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>717-723</pages><issn>0885-3924</issn><eissn>1873-6513</eissn><abstract>Fatigue is a frequent symptom in patients suffering from chronic diseases. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) is often used to measure fatigue. The aim of this article was to test the scale structure of the questionnaire. The MFI-20 data were obtained from seven samples, including general population samples and samples of patients with different diseases (N between 122 and 1993). Five confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models were tested for each sample. The scale structure postulated by the original test authors could not be confirmed by the CFAs. The inclusion of a method factor which considers the positive versus the negative orientation of the items yielded a better model fit. Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for most of the samples and scales: the total score of the MFI-20 reached alpha coefficients above 0.89. A short form of the MFI-20 which is restricted to the 10 positively oriented items (MFI-10) showed relatively good CFA indices. The factorial validity of the MFI-20 is insufficient, an issue which is due, at least in part, to the inclusion of positively and negatively oriented items. Nevertheless, we recommend maintaining the scale structure of the MFI-20 and not searching for alternative structures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31837450</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3924
ispartof Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020-03, Vol.59 (3), p.717-723
issn 0885-3924
1873-6513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2327381379
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Chronic illnesses
Confirmatory factor analysis
Fatigue
Medical screening
psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Questionnaires
reliability
Suffering
wording effect
title Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Derived From Seven Samples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20the%20Multidimensional%20Fatigue%20Inventory%20(MFI-20),%20Derived%20From%20Seven%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pain%20and%20symptom%20management&rft.au=Hinz,%20Andreas&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=717&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=717-723&rft.issn=0885-3924&rft.eissn=1873-6513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2327381379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2371766138&rft_id=info:pmid/31837450&rft_els_id=S0885392419307080&rfr_iscdi=true