“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm

Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychophysiology 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Luck, Camilla C., Patterson, Rachel R., Lipp, Ottmar V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page e13516
container_title Psychophysiology
container_volume 57
creator Luck, Camilla C.
Patterson, Rachel R.
Lipp, Ottmar V.
description Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects. Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/psyp.13516
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2325299833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375617619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7uzqxQeQgBdZ7DV_Jt3JSWRxVVhwQD14atJJ9Zi1J2mTNOvc5hF8AH0fn2OexLSzCnowlyJVv_rqgw-hB5Sc0fKejmk7nlEuaH0LLeiyVpVUsr6NFoQsZSWahh2h45SuCCGKMnYXHXEqmZRULNCP_e7bKsKoI9j97jvuQUccIk7BuLDffTXTkKeoBzyUgXd-_QxfzIgJ3rrsggeLc8DryacnOHn9CUrV3uI0OgsxYZcwDG7jvM4F7bbY-ZTjZOYffMnOm1mldLHG1y5_dL5cLXayM27UPmPr-h4i-OyKi_6v28UOLqi2br25h-70ekhw_6aeoPcXL96dv6ou37x8ff78sjJc8bqyulMdlSCksqYHw4Eva9CMk1pbS0Sv-o4wDbYX0AjNOt40eqmlbago-5afoMcH3TGGzxOk3G5cMjAM2kOYUss4E0wpyXlBH_2DXoUp-uKuUI2oaVNTVajTA2ViSClC347RbXTctpS0c77tnG_7K98CP7yRnLoN2D_o70ALQA_AtRtg-x-pdvX2w-og-hNsH7o-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375617619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><description>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects. Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13516</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31828815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Culture ; electrodermal responding ; Experiments ; Extinction behavior ; Extinction, Psychological - physiology ; Fear - physiology ; Fear conditioning ; Female ; Firearms ; Galvanic Skin Response - physiology ; Humans ; instructed extinction ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ontogenetic fear‐relevant ; Ontogeny ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; phylogenetic fear‐relevant ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; preparedness theory ; Social Learning - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><rights>2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9364-1418 ; 0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpsyp.13516$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpsyp.13516$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects. Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>electrodermal responding</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Extinction behavior</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Fear conditioning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instructed extinction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ontogenetic fear‐relevant</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>phylogenetic fear‐relevant</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>preparedness theory</subject><subject>Social Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7uzqxQeQgBdZ7DV_Jt3JSWRxVVhwQD14atJJ9Zi1J2mTNOvc5hF8AH0fn2OexLSzCnowlyJVv_rqgw-hB5Sc0fKejmk7nlEuaH0LLeiyVpVUsr6NFoQsZSWahh2h45SuCCGKMnYXHXEqmZRULNCP_e7bKsKoI9j97jvuQUccIk7BuLDffTXTkKeoBzyUgXd-_QxfzIgJ3rrsggeLc8DryacnOHn9CUrV3uI0OgsxYZcwDG7jvM4F7bbY-ZTjZOYffMnOm1mldLHG1y5_dL5cLXayM27UPmPr-h4i-OyKi_6v28UOLqi2br25h-70ekhw_6aeoPcXL96dv6ou37x8ff78sjJc8bqyulMdlSCksqYHw4Eva9CMk1pbS0Sv-o4wDbYX0AjNOt40eqmlbago-5afoMcH3TGGzxOk3G5cMjAM2kOYUss4E0wpyXlBH_2DXoUp-uKuUI2oaVNTVajTA2ViSClC347RbXTctpS0c77tnG_7K98CP7yRnLoN2D_o70ALQA_AtRtg-x-pdvX2w-og-hNsH7o-</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Luck, Camilla C.</creator><creator>Patterson, Rachel R.</creator><creator>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-1418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><author>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>electrodermal responding</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Extinction behavior</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Fear conditioning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instructed extinction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ontogenetic fear‐relevant</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>phylogenetic fear‐relevant</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>preparedness theory</topic><topic>Social Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luck, Camilla C.</au><au>Patterson, Rachel R.</au><au>Lipp, Ottmar V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e13516</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13516-n/a</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><abstract>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects. Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31828815</pmid><doi>10.1111/psyp.13516</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-1418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-5772
ispartof Psychophysiology, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a
issn 0048-5772
1469-8986
1540-5958
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2325299833
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Conditioning, Classical - physiology
Culture
electrodermal responding
Experiments
Extinction behavior
Extinction, Psychological - physiology
Fear - physiology
Fear conditioning
Female
Firearms
Galvanic Skin Response - physiology
Humans
instructed extinction
Male
Middle Aged
ontogenetic fear‐relevant
Ontogeny
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
phylogenetic fear‐relevant
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
preparedness theory
Social Learning - physiology
Young Adult
title “Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CPrepared%E2%80%9D%20fear%20or%20socio%E2%80%90cultural%20learning?%20Fear%20conditioned%20to%20guns,%20snakes,%20and%20spiders%20is%20eliminated%20by%20instructed%20extinction%20in%20a%20within%E2%80%90participant%20differential%20fear%20conditioning%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Luck,%20Camilla%20C.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e13516&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13516-n/a&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/psyp.13516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375617619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375617619&rft_id=info:pmid/31828815&rfr_iscdi=true