“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm
Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychophysiology 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e13516 |
container_title | Psychophysiology |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Luck, Camilla C. Patterson, Rachel R. Lipp, Ottmar V. |
description | Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.
Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/psyp.13516 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2325299833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2375617619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7uzqxQeQgBdZ7DV_Jt3JSWRxVVhwQD14atJJ9Zi1J2mTNOvc5hF8AH0fn2OexLSzCnowlyJVv_rqgw-hB5Sc0fKejmk7nlEuaH0LLeiyVpVUsr6NFoQsZSWahh2h45SuCCGKMnYXHXEqmZRULNCP_e7bKsKoI9j97jvuQUccIk7BuLDffTXTkKeoBzyUgXd-_QxfzIgJ3rrsggeLc8DryacnOHn9CUrV3uI0OgsxYZcwDG7jvM4F7bbY-ZTjZOYffMnOm1mldLHG1y5_dL5cLXayM27UPmPr-h4i-OyKi_6v28UOLqi2br25h-70ekhw_6aeoPcXL96dv6ou37x8ff78sjJc8bqyulMdlSCksqYHw4Eva9CMk1pbS0Sv-o4wDbYX0AjNOt40eqmlbago-5afoMcH3TGGzxOk3G5cMjAM2kOYUss4E0wpyXlBH_2DXoUp-uKuUI2oaVNTVajTA2ViSClC347RbXTctpS0c77tnG_7K98CP7yRnLoN2D_o70ALQA_AtRtg-x-pdvX2w-og-hNsH7o-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2375617619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><description>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.
Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-5772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13516</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31828815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Culture ; electrodermal responding ; Experiments ; Extinction behavior ; Extinction, Psychological - physiology ; Fear - physiology ; Fear conditioning ; Female ; Firearms ; Galvanic Skin Response - physiology ; Humans ; instructed extinction ; Male ; Middle Aged ; ontogenetic fear‐relevant ; Ontogeny ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; phylogenetic fear‐relevant ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; preparedness theory ; Social Learning - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychophysiology, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><rights>2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Society for Psychophysiological Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9364-1418 ; 0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpsyp.13516$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpsyp.13516$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><title>Psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><description>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.
Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>electrodermal responding</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Extinction behavior</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Fear - physiology</subject><subject>Fear conditioning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>instructed extinction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>ontogenetic fear‐relevant</subject><subject>Ontogeny</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>phylogenetic fear‐relevant</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>preparedness theory</subject><subject>Social Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0048-5772</issn><issn>1469-8986</issn><issn>1540-5958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7uzqxQeQgBdZ7DV_Jt3JSWRxVVhwQD14atJJ9Zi1J2mTNOvc5hF8AH0fn2OexLSzCnowlyJVv_rqgw-hB5Sc0fKejmk7nlEuaH0LLeiyVpVUsr6NFoQsZSWahh2h45SuCCGKMnYXHXEqmZRULNCP_e7bKsKoI9j97jvuQUccIk7BuLDffTXTkKeoBzyUgXd-_QxfzIgJ3rrsggeLc8DryacnOHn9CUrV3uI0OgsxYZcwDG7jvM4F7bbY-ZTjZOYffMnOm1mldLHG1y5_dL5cLXayM27UPmPr-h4i-OyKi_6v28UOLqi2br25h-70ekhw_6aeoPcXL96dv6ou37x8ff78sjJc8bqyulMdlSCksqYHw4Eva9CMk1pbS0Sv-o4wDbYX0AjNOt40eqmlbago-5afoMcH3TGGzxOk3G5cMjAM2kOYUss4E0wpyXlBH_2DXoUp-uKuUI2oaVNTVajTA2ViSClC347RbXTctpS0c77tnG_7K98CP7yRnLoN2D_o70ALQA_AtRtg-x-pdvX2w-og-hNsH7o-</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Luck, Camilla C.</creator><creator>Patterson, Rachel R.</creator><creator>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-1418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</title><author>Luck, Camilla C. ; Patterson, Rachel R. ; Lipp, Ottmar V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3936-dab9b18e589dcfec3e346ea2306add05f9fb02aedf5e75a2b377a4a8d715936d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Conditioning, Classical - physiology</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>electrodermal responding</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Extinction behavior</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Fear - physiology</topic><topic>Fear conditioning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>instructed extinction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>ontogenetic fear‐relevant</topic><topic>Ontogeny</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>phylogenetic fear‐relevant</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>preparedness theory</topic><topic>Social Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luck, Camilla C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Rachel R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipp, Ottmar V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luck, Camilla C.</au><au>Patterson, Rachel R.</au><au>Lipp, Ottmar V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm</atitle><jtitle>Psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Psychophysiology</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e13516</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13516-n/a</pages><issn>0048-5772</issn><eissn>1469-8986</eissn><eissn>1540-5958</eissn><abstract>Across three experiments, we investigated whether electrodermal responses conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant (pointed guns) and phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli (snakes and spiders) would resist instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm. Instructed extinction involves informing participants before extinction that the unconditional stimulus (US) will no longer be presented. This manipulation has been shown to abolish fear conditioned to fear‐irrelevant conditional stimuli, but is said to leave fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders intact. The latter finding, however, has only been demonstrated when fear‐relevance is manipulated between‐groups. It is also not known whether instructed extinction affects fear conditioned to ontogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli, such as pointed guns. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that fear conditioned to images of pointed guns does not resist instructed extinction. In Experiment 2, we detected some evidence to suggest that fear conditioned to images of snakes and spiders survives instructed extinction but this evidence was not conclusive. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the effects of instructed extinction on fear conditioned to snakes and spiders and to guns and provide strong evidence that fear conditioned to both classes of stimuli is reduced after instructed extinction with no differences between ontogenetic and phylogenetic stimuli. The current results suggest that when fear relevance is manipulated within‐participants fear conditioned to both phylogenetic and ontogenetic, fear‐relevant stimuli responds to instructed extinction providing evidence in favor of a socio‐cultural explanation for “preparedness” effects.
Our research challenges Seligman's preparedness theory which proposes that humans are biologically predisposed to associate phylogenetic fear‐relevant stimuli with aversive outcomes. We provide strong evidence against the notion that prepared fear associations are “encapsulated from cognition” by demonstrating that fear conditioned to phylogenetic (snakes and spiders) and ontogenetic (pointed guns) fear‐relevant stimuli is immediately removed by instructed extinction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31828815</pmid><doi>10.1111/psyp.13516</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-1418</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8608</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-5772 |
ispartof | Psychophysiology, 2020-04, Vol.57 (4), p.e13516-n/a |
issn | 0048-5772 1469-8986 1540-5958 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2325299833 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Conditioning, Classical - physiology Culture electrodermal responding Experiments Extinction behavior Extinction, Psychological - physiology Fear - physiology Fear conditioning Female Firearms Galvanic Skin Response - physiology Humans instructed extinction Male Middle Aged ontogenetic fear‐relevant Ontogeny Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology phylogenetic fear‐relevant Phylogenetics Phylogeny preparedness theory Social Learning - physiology Young Adult |
title | “Prepared” fear or socio‐cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within‐participant differential fear conditioning paradigm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T10%3A56%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CPrepared%E2%80%9D%20fear%20or%20socio%E2%80%90cultural%20learning?%20Fear%20conditioned%20to%20guns,%20snakes,%20and%20spiders%20is%20eliminated%20by%20instructed%20extinction%20in%20a%20within%E2%80%90participant%20differential%20fear%20conditioning%20paradigm&rft.jtitle=Psychophysiology&rft.au=Luck,%20Camilla%20C.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e13516&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13516-n/a&rft.issn=0048-5772&rft.eissn=1469-8986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/psyp.13516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2375617619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2375617619&rft_id=info:pmid/31828815&rfr_iscdi=true |