Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a well-established poor prognosticator and an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Identification of ENE on pretreatment imaging represents a diagnostic challenge that limits its clinical utility. W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 2020-04, Vol.38 (12), p.1304-1311
Hauptverfasser: Kann, Benjamin H, Hicks, Daniel F, Payabvash, Sam, Mahajan, Amit, Du, Justin, Gupta, Vishal, Park, Henry S, Yu, James B, Yarbrough, Wendell G, Burtness, Barbara A, Husain, Zain A, Aneja, Sanjay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1311
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1304
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 38
creator Kann, Benjamin H
Hicks, Daniel F
Payabvash, Sam
Mahajan, Amit
Du, Justin
Gupta, Vishal
Park, Henry S
Yu, James B
Yarbrough, Wendell G
Burtness, Barbara A
Husain, Zain A
Aneja, Sanjay
description Extranodal extension (ENE) is a well-established poor prognosticator and an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Identification of ENE on pretreatment imaging represents a diagnostic challenge that limits its clinical utility. We previously developed a deep learning algorithm that identifies ENE on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with HNSCC. We sought to validate our algorithm performance for patients from a diverse set of institutions and compare its diagnostic ability to that of expert diagnosticians. We obtained preoperative, contrast-enhanced CT scans and corresponding pathology results from two external data sets of patients with HNSCC: an external institution and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HNSCC imaging data. Lymph nodes were segmented and annotated as ENE-positive or ENE-negative on the basis of pathologic confirmation. Deep learning algorithm performance was evaluated and compared directly to two board-certified neuroradiologists. A total of 200 lymph nodes were examined in the external validation data sets. For lymph nodes from the external institution, the algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 (83.1% accuracy), outperforming radiologists' AUCs of 0.70 and 0.71 ( = .02 and = .01). Similarly, for lymph nodes from the TCGA, the algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.90 (88.6% accuracy), outperforming radiologist AUCs of 0.60 and 0.82 ( < .0001 and = .16). Radiologist diagnostic accuracy improved when receiving deep learning assistance. Deep learning successfully identified ENE on pretreatment imaging across multiple institutions, exceeding the diagnostic ability of radiologists with specialized head and neck experience. Our findings suggest that deep learning has utility in the identification of ENE in patients with HNSCC and has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.19.02031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2323487354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2323487354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-df06589aa5372423aa3dec3874fe4cf3ac1ce1eb463ff747fbfea7826d4873783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kcluFDEQhi0EIkPgxhn5yIGeeB33HFEnJIMmCRKLuLVq7DJy6LYntlsib8Ej00OWS2366tevKkLecrbkgrGTG5uWfL1kgkn-jCy4FqYxRuvnZMGMFA1v5c8j8qqUG8a4aqV-SY4kb7nWRi3I38tpqKHZxFJDnWpIEQb6A4bg4NDQ5Okp4p5uEXIM8Rf1KdMvGWtGqCPGSjdujsEH-7Rw9qdmiMnNSnOJsRzmIdILBEchOnqF9jf9ejvBmKZCOxwG2kG2IaYRXpMXHoaCbx7yMfn-6exbd9Fsr8833cdtY-Va18Z5ttLtGkBLI5SQANKhla1RHpX1Eiy3yHGnVtJ7o4zfeQTTipVTrZGmlcfk_b3uPqfbCUvtx1DsbAUizq56IYU8oFrN6Id71OZUSkbf73MYId_1nPWHH_Sfu-uer_v_P5jxdw_K025E9wQ_Hl3-A6IkhLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323487354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kann, Benjamin H ; Hicks, Daniel F ; Payabvash, Sam ; Mahajan, Amit ; Du, Justin ; Gupta, Vishal ; Park, Henry S ; Yu, James B ; Yarbrough, Wendell G ; Burtness, Barbara A ; Husain, Zain A ; Aneja, Sanjay</creator><creatorcontrib>Kann, Benjamin H ; Hicks, Daniel F ; Payabvash, Sam ; Mahajan, Amit ; Du, Justin ; Gupta, Vishal ; Park, Henry S ; Yu, James B ; Yarbrough, Wendell G ; Burtness, Barbara A ; Husain, Zain A ; Aneja, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><description>Extranodal extension (ENE) is a well-established poor prognosticator and an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Identification of ENE on pretreatment imaging represents a diagnostic challenge that limits its clinical utility. We previously developed a deep learning algorithm that identifies ENE on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with HNSCC. We sought to validate our algorithm performance for patients from a diverse set of institutions and compare its diagnostic ability to that of expert diagnosticians. We obtained preoperative, contrast-enhanced CT scans and corresponding pathology results from two external data sets of patients with HNSCC: an external institution and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HNSCC imaging data. Lymph nodes were segmented and annotated as ENE-positive or ENE-negative on the basis of pathologic confirmation. Deep learning algorithm performance was evaluated and compared directly to two board-certified neuroradiologists. A total of 200 lymph nodes were examined in the external validation data sets. For lymph nodes from the external institution, the algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 (83.1% accuracy), outperforming radiologists' AUCs of 0.70 and 0.71 ( = .02 and = .01). Similarly, for lymph nodes from the TCGA, the algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.90 (88.6% accuracy), outperforming radiologist AUCs of 0.60 and 0.82 ( &lt; .0001 and = .16). Radiologist diagnostic accuracy improved when receiving deep learning assistance. Deep learning successfully identified ENE on pretreatment imaging across multiple institutions, exceeding the diagnostic ability of radiologists with specialized head and neck experience. Our findings suggest that deep learning has utility in the identification of ENE in patients with HNSCC and has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31815574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Deep Learning ; Extranodal Extension - diagnostic imaging ; Extranodal Extension - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - diagnostic imaging ; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - pathology ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 2020-04, Vol.38 (12), p.1304-1311</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-df06589aa5372423aa3dec3874fe4cf3ac1ce1eb463ff747fbfea7826d4873783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-df06589aa5372423aa3dec3874fe4cf3ac1ce1eb463ff747fbfea7826d4873783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3730,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31815574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kann, Benjamin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Daniel F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payabvash, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Henry S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, James B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarbrough, Wendell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burtness, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Zain A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aneja, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Extranodal extension (ENE) is a well-established poor prognosticator and an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Identification of ENE on pretreatment imaging represents a diagnostic challenge that limits its clinical utility. We previously developed a deep learning algorithm that identifies ENE on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with HNSCC. We sought to validate our algorithm performance for patients from a diverse set of institutions and compare its diagnostic ability to that of expert diagnosticians. We obtained preoperative, contrast-enhanced CT scans and corresponding pathology results from two external data sets of patients with HNSCC: an external institution and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HNSCC imaging data. Lymph nodes were segmented and annotated as ENE-positive or ENE-negative on the basis of pathologic confirmation. Deep learning algorithm performance was evaluated and compared directly to two board-certified neuroradiologists. A total of 200 lymph nodes were examined in the external validation data sets. For lymph nodes from the external institution, the algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 (83.1% accuracy), outperforming radiologists' AUCs of 0.70 and 0.71 ( = .02 and = .01). Similarly, for lymph nodes from the TCGA, the algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.90 (88.6% accuracy), outperforming radiologist AUCs of 0.60 and 0.82 ( &lt; .0001 and = .16). Radiologist diagnostic accuracy improved when receiving deep learning assistance. Deep learning successfully identified ENE on pretreatment imaging across multiple institutions, exceeding the diagnostic ability of radiologists with specialized head and neck experience. Our findings suggest that deep learning has utility in the identification of ENE in patients with HNSCC and has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision making.</description><subject>Deep Learning</subject><subject>Extranodal Extension - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Extranodal Extension - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - pathology</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kcluFDEQhi0EIkPgxhn5yIGeeB33HFEnJIMmCRKLuLVq7DJy6LYntlsib8Ej00OWS2366tevKkLecrbkgrGTG5uWfL1kgkn-jCy4FqYxRuvnZMGMFA1v5c8j8qqUG8a4aqV-SY4kb7nWRi3I38tpqKHZxFJDnWpIEQb6A4bg4NDQ5Okp4p5uEXIM8Rf1KdMvGWtGqCPGSjdujsEH-7Rw9qdmiMnNSnOJsRzmIdILBEchOnqF9jf9ejvBmKZCOxwG2kG2IaYRXpMXHoaCbx7yMfn-6exbd9Fsr8833cdtY-Va18Z5ttLtGkBLI5SQANKhla1RHpX1Eiy3yHGnVtJ7o4zfeQTTipVTrZGmlcfk_b3uPqfbCUvtx1DsbAUizq56IYU8oFrN6Id71OZUSkbf73MYId_1nPWHH_Sfu-uer_v_P5jxdw_K025E9wQ_Hl3-A6IkhLo</recordid><startdate>20200420</startdate><enddate>20200420</enddate><creator>Kann, Benjamin H</creator><creator>Hicks, Daniel F</creator><creator>Payabvash, Sam</creator><creator>Mahajan, Amit</creator><creator>Du, Justin</creator><creator>Gupta, Vishal</creator><creator>Park, Henry S</creator><creator>Yu, James B</creator><creator>Yarbrough, Wendell G</creator><creator>Burtness, Barbara A</creator><creator>Husain, Zain A</creator><creator>Aneja, Sanjay</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200420</creationdate><title>Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Kann, Benjamin H ; Hicks, Daniel F ; Payabvash, Sam ; Mahajan, Amit ; Du, Justin ; Gupta, Vishal ; Park, Henry S ; Yu, James B ; Yarbrough, Wendell G ; Burtness, Barbara A ; Husain, Zain A ; Aneja, Sanjay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-df06589aa5372423aa3dec3874fe4cf3ac1ce1eb463ff747fbfea7826d4873783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Deep Learning</topic><topic>Extranodal Extension - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Extranodal Extension - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - pathology</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kann, Benjamin H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Daniel F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payabvash, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajan, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Vishal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Henry S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, James B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yarbrough, Wendell G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burtness, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Zain A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aneja, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kann, Benjamin H</au><au>Hicks, Daniel F</au><au>Payabvash, Sam</au><au>Mahajan, Amit</au><au>Du, Justin</au><au>Gupta, Vishal</au><au>Park, Henry S</au><au>Yu, James B</au><au>Yarbrough, Wendell G</au><au>Burtness, Barbara A</au><au>Husain, Zain A</au><au>Aneja, Sanjay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-04-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1304</spage><epage>1311</epage><pages>1304-1311</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>Extranodal extension (ENE) is a well-established poor prognosticator and an indication for adjuvant treatment escalation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Identification of ENE on pretreatment imaging represents a diagnostic challenge that limits its clinical utility. We previously developed a deep learning algorithm that identifies ENE on pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with HNSCC. We sought to validate our algorithm performance for patients from a diverse set of institutions and compare its diagnostic ability to that of expert diagnosticians. We obtained preoperative, contrast-enhanced CT scans and corresponding pathology results from two external data sets of patients with HNSCC: an external institution and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) HNSCC imaging data. Lymph nodes were segmented and annotated as ENE-positive or ENE-negative on the basis of pathologic confirmation. Deep learning algorithm performance was evaluated and compared directly to two board-certified neuroradiologists. A total of 200 lymph nodes were examined in the external validation data sets. For lymph nodes from the external institution, the algorithm achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84 (83.1% accuracy), outperforming radiologists' AUCs of 0.70 and 0.71 ( = .02 and = .01). Similarly, for lymph nodes from the TCGA, the algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.90 (88.6% accuracy), outperforming radiologist AUCs of 0.60 and 0.82 ( &lt; .0001 and = .16). Radiologist diagnostic accuracy improved when receiving deep learning assistance. Deep learning successfully identified ENE on pretreatment imaging across multiple institutions, exceeding the diagnostic ability of radiologists with specialized head and neck experience. Our findings suggest that deep learning has utility in the identification of ENE in patients with HNSCC and has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31815574</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.19.02031</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 2020-04, Vol.38 (12), p.1304-1311
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2323487354
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Deep Learning
Extranodal Extension - diagnostic imaging
Extranodal Extension - pathology
Head and Neck Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Humans
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - diagnostic imaging
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - pathology
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Multi-Institutional Validation of Deep Learning for Pretreatment Identification of Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Institutional%20Validation%20of%20Deep%20Learning%20for%20Pretreatment%20Identification%20of%20Extranodal%20Extension%20in%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Kann,%20Benjamin%20H&rft.date=2020-04-20&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1304&rft.epage=1311&rft.pages=1304-1311&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.19.02031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2323487354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323487354&rft_id=info:pmid/31815574&rfr_iscdi=true