Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients

Introduction: Despite mounting evidence that increased frequency and duration of hemodialysis (HD) improves outcomes, less than 1% of HD patients worldwide receive nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD). Many perceived barriers exist to providing NHD and increasing its provision. Methods: A retrospective anal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hemodialysis international 2020-04, Vol.24 (2), p.175-181
Hauptverfasser: Gangaram, Venkat, Vilpakka, Mari, Goffin, Eric, Weinhandl, Eric D., Kubisiak, Kristine M., Borman, Natalie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue 2
container_start_page 175
container_title Hemodialysis international
container_volume 24
creator Gangaram, Venkat
Vilpakka, Mari
Goffin, Eric
Weinhandl, Eric D.
Kubisiak, Kristine M.
Borman, Natalie
description Introduction: Despite mounting evidence that increased frequency and duration of hemodialysis (HD) improves outcomes, less than 1% of HD patients worldwide receive nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD). Many perceived barriers exist to providing NHD and increasing its provision. Methods: A retrospective analysis of nocturnal therapy using a low‐flow dialysate system in 4 European centers for a minimum of 12 months, with data collected on patient demographics, training times, safety features, medications, and biochemical parameters at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Findings: Data were collected on 21 patients, with 12‐month analysis available for 20 patients. Mean dialysis duration was 28 hours per week, with most dialysis on an alternate night regimen using 50–60 L of dialysate per session. All vascular access types were represented, and low molecular weight heparin was used as a bolus. All biochemical parameters met European standards, with a trend for improvement in standardized Kt/V, phosphate, hemoglobin, and albumin. There was a significant reduction in phosphate binder usage and a reduction in blood pressure medication. Training time was 9.6 sessions for independence at home, with 2 additional sessions to transition to NHD. Additional safety features included an alarmed drip tray under the cycler and moisture sensors under the venous needle (all patients used dual‐cannulation technique). No patient safety events were reported. Discussion: These data support the use of a low‐flow dialysate system for provision of NHD at home. Biochemical parameters were good, medication burden was reduced at 12 months, and all patients received more than double the duration of HD provided in standard in‐center units. While patient numbers were small, low‐flow dialysis in this cohort was both effective and safe. Use of this alternative HD system could reduce some of the barriers to NHD, increasing the uptake of therapy in Europe, and improving long‐term patient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hdi.12808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2323468953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2323468953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-60819a8efd7175367c3fb6ba90d128cadd6e2891e8b8643da06b2b27272d5bf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOxDAMhiME4jGw4AIoS1gU8mjalB0aHoOEQEKwrtLGVYPapjQpo9lxBM7ISQh0YIe9sCV__mX_CB1SckpDnNXanFImidxAu1TELIpTITdDH2csSgUXO2jPuRdCGCUk2UY7nEpGhEh3UXNvSz8OnWpwbVvANbRWG9WsnHF4aXyNG7v8fP-oQsHTQHk4x4_gB-t6KL15A6y69YatsK8BV2ZwHl-Ng-1BdbhX3kDn3T7aqlTj4GBdZ-j5-uppvojuHm5u5xd3UcmZkFFCJM2UhEqnNFyfpCWviqRQGdHhy1JpnQCTGQVZyCTmWpGkYAVLQ2pRVJLP0PGk2w_2dQTn89a4EppGdWBHlzPOeJzITPCAnkxoGd5xA1R5P5hWDauckvzb3DyYm_-YG9ijtexYtKD_yF83A3A2AUvTwOp_pXxxeTtJfgFjo4Y1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2323468953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gangaram, Venkat ; Vilpakka, Mari ; Goffin, Eric ; Weinhandl, Eric D. ; Kubisiak, Kristine M. ; Borman, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Gangaram, Venkat ; Vilpakka, Mari ; Goffin, Eric ; Weinhandl, Eric D. ; Kubisiak, Kristine M. ; Borman, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Despite mounting evidence that increased frequency and duration of hemodialysis (HD) improves outcomes, less than 1% of HD patients worldwide receive nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD). Many perceived barriers exist to providing NHD and increasing its provision. Methods: A retrospective analysis of nocturnal therapy using a low‐flow dialysate system in 4 European centers for a minimum of 12 months, with data collected on patient demographics, training times, safety features, medications, and biochemical parameters at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Findings: Data were collected on 21 patients, with 12‐month analysis available for 20 patients. Mean dialysis duration was 28 hours per week, with most dialysis on an alternate night regimen using 50–60 L of dialysate per session. All vascular access types were represented, and low molecular weight heparin was used as a bolus. All biochemical parameters met European standards, with a trend for improvement in standardized Kt/V, phosphate, hemoglobin, and albumin. There was a significant reduction in phosphate binder usage and a reduction in blood pressure medication. Training time was 9.6 sessions for independence at home, with 2 additional sessions to transition to NHD. Additional safety features included an alarmed drip tray under the cycler and moisture sensors under the venous needle (all patients used dual‐cannulation technique). No patient safety events were reported. Discussion: These data support the use of a low‐flow dialysate system for provision of NHD at home. Biochemical parameters were good, medication burden was reduced at 12 months, and all patients received more than double the duration of HD provided in standard in‐center units. While patient numbers were small, low‐flow dialysis in this cohort was both effective and safe. Use of this alternative HD system could reduce some of the barriers to NHD, increasing the uptake of therapy in Europe, and improving long‐term patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1492-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31820557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>home hemodialysis ; Nocturnal hemodialysis ; ow‐flow dialysate</subject><ispartof>Hemodialysis international, 2020-04, Vol.24 (2), p.175-181</ispartof><rights>2019 International Society for Hemodialysis</rights><rights>2019 International Society for Hemodialysis.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-60819a8efd7175367c3fb6ba90d128cadd6e2891e8b8643da06b2b27272d5bf83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-60819a8efd7175367c3fb6ba90d128cadd6e2891e8b8643da06b2b27272d5bf83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhdi.12808$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhdi.12808$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31820557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gangaram, Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilpakka, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goffin, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinhandl, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubisiak, Kristine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients</title><title>Hemodialysis international</title><addtitle>Hemodial Int</addtitle><description>Introduction: Despite mounting evidence that increased frequency and duration of hemodialysis (HD) improves outcomes, less than 1% of HD patients worldwide receive nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD). Many perceived barriers exist to providing NHD and increasing its provision. Methods: A retrospective analysis of nocturnal therapy using a low‐flow dialysate system in 4 European centers for a minimum of 12 months, with data collected on patient demographics, training times, safety features, medications, and biochemical parameters at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Findings: Data were collected on 21 patients, with 12‐month analysis available for 20 patients. Mean dialysis duration was 28 hours per week, with most dialysis on an alternate night regimen using 50–60 L of dialysate per session. All vascular access types were represented, and low molecular weight heparin was used as a bolus. All biochemical parameters met European standards, with a trend for improvement in standardized Kt/V, phosphate, hemoglobin, and albumin. There was a significant reduction in phosphate binder usage and a reduction in blood pressure medication. Training time was 9.6 sessions for independence at home, with 2 additional sessions to transition to NHD. Additional safety features included an alarmed drip tray under the cycler and moisture sensors under the venous needle (all patients used dual‐cannulation technique). No patient safety events were reported. Discussion: These data support the use of a low‐flow dialysate system for provision of NHD at home. Biochemical parameters were good, medication burden was reduced at 12 months, and all patients received more than double the duration of HD provided in standard in‐center units. While patient numbers were small, low‐flow dialysis in this cohort was both effective and safe. Use of this alternative HD system could reduce some of the barriers to NHD, increasing the uptake of therapy in Europe, and improving long‐term patient outcomes.</description><subject>home hemodialysis</subject><subject>Nocturnal hemodialysis</subject><subject>ow‐flow dialysate</subject><issn>1492-7535</issn><issn>1542-4758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOxDAMhiME4jGw4AIoS1gU8mjalB0aHoOEQEKwrtLGVYPapjQpo9lxBM7ISQh0YIe9sCV__mX_CB1SckpDnNXanFImidxAu1TELIpTITdDH2csSgUXO2jPuRdCGCUk2UY7nEpGhEh3UXNvSz8OnWpwbVvANbRWG9WsnHF4aXyNG7v8fP-oQsHTQHk4x4_gB-t6KL15A6y69YatsK8BV2ZwHl-Ng-1BdbhX3kDn3T7aqlTj4GBdZ-j5-uppvojuHm5u5xd3UcmZkFFCJM2UhEqnNFyfpCWviqRQGdHhy1JpnQCTGQVZyCTmWpGkYAVLQ2pRVJLP0PGk2w_2dQTn89a4EppGdWBHlzPOeJzITPCAnkxoGd5xA1R5P5hWDauckvzb3DyYm_-YG9ijtexYtKD_yF83A3A2AUvTwOp_pXxxeTtJfgFjo4Y1</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Gangaram, Venkat</creator><creator>Vilpakka, Mari</creator><creator>Goffin, Eric</creator><creator>Weinhandl, Eric D.</creator><creator>Kubisiak, Kristine M.</creator><creator>Borman, Natalie</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients</title><author>Gangaram, Venkat ; Vilpakka, Mari ; Goffin, Eric ; Weinhandl, Eric D. ; Kubisiak, Kristine M. ; Borman, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-60819a8efd7175367c3fb6ba90d128cadd6e2891e8b8643da06b2b27272d5bf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>home hemodialysis</topic><topic>Nocturnal hemodialysis</topic><topic>ow‐flow dialysate</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gangaram, Venkat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilpakka, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goffin, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinhandl, Eric D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubisiak, Kristine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borman, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hemodialysis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gangaram, Venkat</au><au>Vilpakka, Mari</au><au>Goffin, Eric</au><au>Weinhandl, Eric D.</au><au>Kubisiak, Kristine M.</au><au>Borman, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients</atitle><jtitle>Hemodialysis international</jtitle><addtitle>Hemodial Int</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>175-181</pages><issn>1492-7535</issn><eissn>1542-4758</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Despite mounting evidence that increased frequency and duration of hemodialysis (HD) improves outcomes, less than 1% of HD patients worldwide receive nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD). Many perceived barriers exist to providing NHD and increasing its provision. Methods: A retrospective analysis of nocturnal therapy using a low‐flow dialysate system in 4 European centers for a minimum of 12 months, with data collected on patient demographics, training times, safety features, medications, and biochemical parameters at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Findings: Data were collected on 21 patients, with 12‐month analysis available for 20 patients. Mean dialysis duration was 28 hours per week, with most dialysis on an alternate night regimen using 50–60 L of dialysate per session. All vascular access types were represented, and low molecular weight heparin was used as a bolus. All biochemical parameters met European standards, with a trend for improvement in standardized Kt/V, phosphate, hemoglobin, and albumin. There was a significant reduction in phosphate binder usage and a reduction in blood pressure medication. Training time was 9.6 sessions for independence at home, with 2 additional sessions to transition to NHD. Additional safety features included an alarmed drip tray under the cycler and moisture sensors under the venous needle (all patients used dual‐cannulation technique). No patient safety events were reported. Discussion: These data support the use of a low‐flow dialysate system for provision of NHD at home. Biochemical parameters were good, medication burden was reduced at 12 months, and all patients received more than double the duration of HD provided in standard in‐center units. While patient numbers were small, low‐flow dialysis in this cohort was both effective and safe. Use of this alternative HD system could reduce some of the barriers to NHD, increasing the uptake of therapy in Europe, and improving long‐term patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31820557</pmid><doi>10.1111/hdi.12808</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1492-7535
ispartof Hemodialysis international, 2020-04, Vol.24 (2), p.175-181
issn 1492-7535
1542-4758
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2323468953
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects home hemodialysis
Nocturnal hemodialysis
ow‐flow dialysate
title Nocturnal home hemodialysis with low‐flow dialysate: Retrospective analysis of the first European patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A34%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nocturnal%20home%20hemodialysis%20with%20low%E2%80%90flow%20dialysate:%20Retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20first%20European%20patients&rft.jtitle=Hemodialysis%20international&rft.au=Gangaram,%20Venkat&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=175-181&rft.issn=1492-7535&rft.eissn=1542-4758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hdi.12808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2323468953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2323468953&rft_id=info:pmid/31820557&rfr_iscdi=true