Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits
Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers. Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of palliative medicine 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.641-649 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 649 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 641 |
| container_title | Journal of palliative medicine |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Weaver, Meaghann S Robinson, Jacob E Shostrom, Valerie K Hinds, Pamela S |
| description | Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers.
Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-trained home hospice nurses in rural settings.
Case series.
Home hospice in rural Midwest.
Patients |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1089/jpm.2019.0450 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322761197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2322761197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-5518021c871accba171de97c2374528bab37328505503b8ae6d95fa65634c3f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctu2zAQRYmiQfNolt0WXHZhOXyYorQ0jLo2YCRGmjZLgSJHEQPqUZIy4L_qJ5ZG3GzIi8GZIQcHoS-UzCkpyrvXsZszQss5WQjyAV1RIWQm5YJ8TJmUeZYzWlyi6xBeCUkNRHxCl5wWpJCMXaG_T-CgBeVii5dawxhVbZ2NR9wMHq9a64yHfobXqrPuOMOqN3hpJhfxZgij1YDvJx8g4OcWerztI7x4FW3_gmMLeA_GquitxnvlXIr2AAkaU4A-4r0fDtaAx2byp5af8GdKdascfpx8OjdDB-8P_bbBxvAZXTTKBbg93zfo1_r702qT7R5-bFfLXaZZyWMmRFqRUV1IqrSuFZXUQCk143IhWFGrmkvOCkGEILwuFOSmFI3KRc4XmjeM36Bvb3NHP6RfhVh1NmhwTvUwTKFinDGZU1rKhGZvqPZDCB6aavS2U_5YUVKdJFVJUnWSVJ0kJf7refRUd2De6f9W-D_eko_S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322761197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Weaver, Meaghann S ; Robinson, Jacob E ; Shostrom, Valerie K ; Hinds, Pamela S</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Meaghann S ; Robinson, Jacob E ; Shostrom, Valerie K ; Hinds, Pamela S</creatorcontrib><description>Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers.
Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-trained home hospice nurses in rural settings.
Case series.
Home hospice in rural Midwest.
Patients <18 years of age enrolling in home hospice for end-of-life care.
The acceptability of telehealth inclusion of a hospital-based pediatric palliative care provider in home hospice visits to the family caregiver and home hospice nurse was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model Questionnaires with the inclusion of the child perspective when possible.
Fifteen patients mean age of seven years enrolled. Family caregiver included 11 mothers (73%), 2 grandmothers (13%), and 2 fathers (13%). Fifteen nurses from nine hospice agencies participated. Twelve families (80%) included additional relatives by telehealth modality. Home distance averaged 172 miles with mean eight hours saved by accessing telehealth encounter. Visit content was primarily caregiver support, quality of life, goals of care, symptom management, and medication review. Telehealth acceptability improved between time points and was higher in family caregivers (4.3-4.9 on 5-point scale;
= 0.001) than hospice nurses (3.2-3.8 on 5-point scale;
= 0.05). All children able to self-report stated a "like" for telehealth, citing six reasons such as "being remembered" and "medical knowledge and care planning."
Pediatric palliative telehealth visits partnered with in-person hospice nurse offer acceptable access to services, while extending support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-7740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31808722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of palliative medicine, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.641-649</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-5518021c871accba171de97c2374528bab37328505503b8ae6d95fa65634c3f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-5518021c871accba171de97c2374528bab37328505503b8ae6d95fa65634c3f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31808722$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Meaghann S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jacob E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shostrom, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinds, Pamela S</creatorcontrib><title>Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits</title><title>Journal of palliative medicine</title><addtitle>J Palliat Med</addtitle><description>Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers.
Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-trained home hospice nurses in rural settings.
Case series.
Home hospice in rural Midwest.
Patients <18 years of age enrolling in home hospice for end-of-life care.
The acceptability of telehealth inclusion of a hospital-based pediatric palliative care provider in home hospice visits to the family caregiver and home hospice nurse was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model Questionnaires with the inclusion of the child perspective when possible.
Fifteen patients mean age of seven years enrolled. Family caregiver included 11 mothers (73%), 2 grandmothers (13%), and 2 fathers (13%). Fifteen nurses from nine hospice agencies participated. Twelve families (80%) included additional relatives by telehealth modality. Home distance averaged 172 miles with mean eight hours saved by accessing telehealth encounter. Visit content was primarily caregiver support, quality of life, goals of care, symptom management, and medication review. Telehealth acceptability improved between time points and was higher in family caregivers (4.3-4.9 on 5-point scale;
= 0.001) than hospice nurses (3.2-3.8 on 5-point scale;
= 0.05). All children able to self-report stated a "like" for telehealth, citing six reasons such as "being remembered" and "medical knowledge and care planning."
Pediatric palliative telehealth visits partnered with in-person hospice nurse offer acceptable access to services, while extending support.</description><issn>1096-6218</issn><issn>1557-7740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kctu2zAQRYmiQfNolt0WXHZhOXyYorQ0jLo2YCRGmjZLgSJHEQPqUZIy4L_qJ5ZG3GzIi8GZIQcHoS-UzCkpyrvXsZszQss5WQjyAV1RIWQm5YJ8TJmUeZYzWlyi6xBeCUkNRHxCl5wWpJCMXaG_T-CgBeVii5dawxhVbZ2NR9wMHq9a64yHfobXqrPuOMOqN3hpJhfxZgij1YDvJx8g4OcWerztI7x4FW3_gmMLeA_GquitxnvlXIr2AAkaU4A-4r0fDtaAx2byp5af8GdKdascfpx8OjdDB-8P_bbBxvAZXTTKBbg93zfo1_r702qT7R5-bFfLXaZZyWMmRFqRUV1IqrSuFZXUQCk143IhWFGrmkvOCkGEILwuFOSmFI3KRc4XmjeM36Bvb3NHP6RfhVh1NmhwTvUwTKFinDGZU1rKhGZvqPZDCB6aavS2U_5YUVKdJFVJUnWSVJ0kJf7refRUd2De6f9W-D_eko_S</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Weaver, Meaghann S</creator><creator>Robinson, Jacob E</creator><creator>Shostrom, Valerie K</creator><creator>Hinds, Pamela S</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits</title><author>Weaver, Meaghann S ; Robinson, Jacob E ; Shostrom, Valerie K ; Hinds, Pamela S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-5518021c871accba171de97c2374528bab37328505503b8ae6d95fa65634c3f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Meaghann S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Jacob E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shostrom, Valerie K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinds, Pamela S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Meaghann S</au><au>Robinson, Jacob E</au><au>Shostrom, Valerie K</au><au>Hinds, Pamela S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits</atitle><jtitle>Journal of palliative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Palliat Med</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>641-649</pages><issn>1096-6218</issn><eissn>1557-7740</eissn><abstract>Children in rural geographies are not universally able to access pediatric-trained palliative or hospice providers.
Determine whether telehealth inclusion of a familiar pediatric palliative care provider during the first two home-based hospice visits was acceptable to children, families, and adult-trained home hospice nurses in rural settings.
Case series.
Home hospice in rural Midwest.
Patients <18 years of age enrolling in home hospice for end-of-life care.
The acceptability of telehealth inclusion of a hospital-based pediatric palliative care provider in home hospice visits to the family caregiver and home hospice nurse was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model Questionnaires with the inclusion of the child perspective when possible.
Fifteen patients mean age of seven years enrolled. Family caregiver included 11 mothers (73%), 2 grandmothers (13%), and 2 fathers (13%). Fifteen nurses from nine hospice agencies participated. Twelve families (80%) included additional relatives by telehealth modality. Home distance averaged 172 miles with mean eight hours saved by accessing telehealth encounter. Visit content was primarily caregiver support, quality of life, goals of care, symptom management, and medication review. Telehealth acceptability improved between time points and was higher in family caregivers (4.3-4.9 on 5-point scale;
= 0.001) than hospice nurses (3.2-3.8 on 5-point scale;
= 0.05). All children able to self-report stated a "like" for telehealth, citing six reasons such as "being remembered" and "medical knowledge and care planning."
Pediatric palliative telehealth visits partnered with in-person hospice nurse offer acceptable access to services, while extending support.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31808722</pmid><doi>10.1089/jpm.2019.0450</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1096-6218 |
| ispartof | Journal of palliative medicine, 2020-05, Vol.23 (5), p.641-649 |
| issn | 1096-6218 1557-7740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322761197 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | Telehealth Acceptability for Children, Family, and Adult Hospice Nurses When Integrating the Pediatric Palliative Inpatient Provider during Sequential Rural Home Hospice Visits |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T08%3A19%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telehealth%20Acceptability%20for%20Children,%20Family,%20and%20Adult%20Hospice%20Nurses%20When%20Integrating%20the%20Pediatric%20Palliative%20Inpatient%20Provider%20during%20Sequential%20Rural%20Home%20Hospice%20Visits&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Weaver,%20Meaghann%20S&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=641-649&rft.issn=1096-6218&rft.eissn=1557-7740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/jpm.2019.0450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2322761197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322761197&rft_id=info:pmid/31808722&rfr_iscdi=true |