Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical site infection (SSI) post- caesarean section (CS) remains high, prophylactic adjunctive macrolides may reduce this. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether adjunctive prophylactic macrolides administered at CS reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection. MEDLINE,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2020-01, Vol.244, p.163-171
Hauptverfasser: Farmer, Nicola, Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria, Morris, Rachel K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 171
container_issue
container_start_page 163
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 244
creator Farmer, Nicola
Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria
Morris, Rachel K.
description Surgical site infection (SSI) post- caesarean section (CS) remains high, prophylactic adjunctive macrolides may reduce this. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether adjunctive prophylactic macrolides administered at CS reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to July-2018. Observational and randomised studies investigating women undergoing a CS receiving standard prophylactic antibiotics, adjunctive prophylactic macrolides and assessed any SSI outcome was included. Data was double-extracted. Studies were included in a meta-analysis if the same study design and SSI outcome was used. Risk ratios were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Five studies were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Two RCT’s (n = 2610) found that macrolides significantly reduce the risk of wound infection RR [0.34; 95 %, 0.22 0.53] P = 0.00001 and endometritis RR [0.66; 95 %, 0.52, 0.85] P = 0.001 with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %). Two cohort studies (n = 13,809) found that azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of endometritis RR [0.16; 95 %, 0.04–0.62] P = 0.008, however significant heterogeneity was seen. Macrolides significantly reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection post-CS. An effectiveness evaluation of post-cord clamping administration is needed to eliminate fetal antibiotic exposure and the long term infant implications this may have.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322752741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S030121151930541X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2322752741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bb4dc1e07ddb5bd250b65236b8ae18867c3827d985992df2c375dba8994a7ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAV3Rb-AUI-cknwRxwnHJBWVaFIlXqBs_VsvyyO8rHYSav9DfzpepXCEV-e9TTzRjNDyHvOSs54_akvsZ8P0ZaC8bbkvGSifkV2vNGi0LWqXpMdk4wXgnN1Sa5S6ll-UrZvyKXkDWdMiB35s49Ij3E-_joN4JbgKPh-nfLvEekILs5D8Jgodl1w4MK8JgoHCFNaqANMEBEmmjAT5jzXeMiwgaawIA1Tt-0_0z1Np7TgCGeFiI8BnyhMno64QAETDKcU0lty0cGQ8N3LvCY_v97-uLkr7h--fb_Z3xdO1mIplLWVdxyZ9t4q64VitlZC1rYB5E1TaycboX3bqLYVvhNOauUtNG1bgXYgr8nH7W72_XvFtJgxJIfDABNmf0ZIIbQSuuIZWm3QHERKETtzjGGEeDKcmXMNpjdbDeZcg-Hc5Boy7cOLwmpH9P9If3PPgC8bALPPnEY0yQWcHPoQc2bGz-H_Cs_WDZ5Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322752741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Farmer, Nicola ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, Rachel K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicola ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical site infection (SSI) post- caesarean section (CS) remains high, prophylactic adjunctive macrolides may reduce this. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether adjunctive prophylactic macrolides administered at CS reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to July-2018. Observational and randomised studies investigating women undergoing a CS receiving standard prophylactic antibiotics, adjunctive prophylactic macrolides and assessed any SSI outcome was included. Data was double-extracted. Studies were included in a meta-analysis if the same study design and SSI outcome was used. Risk ratios were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Five studies were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Two RCT’s (n = 2610) found that macrolides significantly reduce the risk of wound infection RR [0.34; 95 %, 0.22 0.53] P = 0.00001 and endometritis RR [0.66; 95 %, 0.52, 0.85] P = 0.001 with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %). Two cohort studies (n = 13,809) found that azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of endometritis RR [0.16; 95 %, 0.04–0.62] P = 0.008, however significant heterogeneity was seen. Macrolides significantly reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection post-CS. An effectiveness evaluation of post-cord clamping administration is needed to eliminate fetal antibiotic exposure and the long term infant implications this may have.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31810022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antibiotic ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Azithromycin ; Caesarean section ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Endometritis ; Endometritis - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Humans ; Macrolide ; Macrolides - therapeutic use ; Pregnancy ; Surgical site infection ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Wound infection</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2020-01, Vol.244, p.163-171</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bb4dc1e07ddb5bd250b65236b8ae18867c3827d985992df2c375dba8994a7ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bb4dc1e07ddb5bd250b65236b8ae18867c3827d985992df2c375dba8994a7ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1247-429X ; 0000-0002-0321-7868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121151930541X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><title>Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Surgical site infection (SSI) post- caesarean section (CS) remains high, prophylactic adjunctive macrolides may reduce this. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether adjunctive prophylactic macrolides administered at CS reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to July-2018. Observational and randomised studies investigating women undergoing a CS receiving standard prophylactic antibiotics, adjunctive prophylactic macrolides and assessed any SSI outcome was included. Data was double-extracted. Studies were included in a meta-analysis if the same study design and SSI outcome was used. Risk ratios were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Five studies were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Two RCT’s (n = 2610) found that macrolides significantly reduce the risk of wound infection RR [0.34; 95 %, 0.22 0.53] P = 0.00001 and endometritis RR [0.66; 95 %, 0.52, 0.85] P = 0.001 with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %). Two cohort studies (n = 13,809) found that azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of endometritis RR [0.16; 95 %, 0.04–0.62] P = 0.008, however significant heterogeneity was seen. Macrolides significantly reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection post-CS. An effectiveness evaluation of post-cord clamping administration is needed to eliminate fetal antibiotic exposure and the long term infant implications this may have.</description><subject>Antibiotic</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Azithromycin</subject><subject>Caesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Endometritis</subject><subject>Endometritis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macrolide</subject><subject>Macrolides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Surgical site infection</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Wound infection</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBAV3Rb-AUI-cknwRxwnHJBWVaFIlXqBs_VsvyyO8rHYSav9DfzpepXCEV-e9TTzRjNDyHvOSs54_akvsZ8P0ZaC8bbkvGSifkV2vNGi0LWqXpMdk4wXgnN1Sa5S6ll-UrZvyKXkDWdMiB35s49Ij3E-_joN4JbgKPh-nfLvEekILs5D8Jgodl1w4MK8JgoHCFNaqANMEBEmmjAT5jzXeMiwgaawIA1Tt-0_0z1Np7TgCGeFiI8BnyhMno64QAETDKcU0lty0cGQ8N3LvCY_v97-uLkr7h--fb_Z3xdO1mIplLWVdxyZ9t4q64VitlZC1rYB5E1TaycboX3bqLYVvhNOauUtNG1bgXYgr8nH7W72_XvFtJgxJIfDABNmf0ZIIbQSuuIZWm3QHERKETtzjGGEeDKcmXMNpjdbDeZcg-Hc5Boy7cOLwmpH9P9If3PPgC8bALPPnEY0yQWcHPoQc2bGz-H_Cs_WDZ5Z</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Farmer, Nicola</creator><creator>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creator><creator>Morris, Rachel K.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-429X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-7868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Farmer, Nicola ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, Rachel K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5bb4dc1e07ddb5bd250b65236b8ae18867c3827d985992df2c375dba8994a7ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Azithromycin</topic><topic>Caesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Endometritis</topic><topic>Endometritis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macrolide</topic><topic>Macrolides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Surgical site infection</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Wound infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farmer, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Rachel K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farmer, Nicola</au><au>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</au><au>Morris, Rachel K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>244</volume><spage>163</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>163-171</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Surgical site infection (SSI) post- caesarean section (CS) remains high, prophylactic adjunctive macrolides may reduce this. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether adjunctive prophylactic macrolides administered at CS reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to July-2018. Observational and randomised studies investigating women undergoing a CS receiving standard prophylactic antibiotics, adjunctive prophylactic macrolides and assessed any SSI outcome was included. Data was double-extracted. Studies were included in a meta-analysis if the same study design and SSI outcome was used. Risk ratios were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Five studies were included in the systematic review and four in the meta-analysis. Two RCT’s (n = 2610) found that macrolides significantly reduce the risk of wound infection RR [0.34; 95 %, 0.22 0.53] P = 0.00001 and endometritis RR [0.66; 95 %, 0.52, 0.85] P = 0.001 with no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0 %). Two cohort studies (n = 13,809) found that azithromycin significantly reduces the risk of endometritis RR [0.16; 95 %, 0.04–0.62] P = 0.008, however significant heterogeneity was seen. Macrolides significantly reduce the risk of endometritis and wound infection post-CS. An effectiveness evaluation of post-cord clamping administration is needed to eliminate fetal antibiotic exposure and the long term infant implications this may have.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31810022</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.026</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-429X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-7868</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2020-01, Vol.244, p.163-171
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322752741
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antibiotic
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Azithromycin
Caesarean section
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Endometritis
Endometritis - prevention & control
Female
Humans
Macrolide
Macrolides - therapeutic use
Pregnancy
Surgical site infection
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Wound infection
title Are prophylactic adjunctive macrolides efficacious against caesarean section surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A40%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20prophylactic%20adjunctive%20macrolides%20efficacious%20against%20caesarean%20section%20surgical%20site%20infection:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Farmer,%20Nicola&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=244&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=163-171&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2322752741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322752741&rft_id=info:pmid/31810022&rft_els_id=S030121151930541X&rfr_iscdi=true