Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews

The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing studies 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486
Hauptverfasser: Gillespie, Brigid M., Walker, Rachel M., McInnes, Elizabeth, Moore, Zena, Eskes, Anne M., O'Connor, Tom, Harbeck, Emma, White, Codi, Scott, Ian A., Vermeulen, Hester, Chaboyer, Wendy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103486
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 102
creator Gillespie, Brigid M.
Walker, Rachel M.
McInnes, Elizabeth
Moore, Zena
Eskes, Anne M.
O'Connor, Tom
Harbeck, Emma
White, Codi
Scott, Ian A.
Vermeulen, Hester
Chaboyer, Wendy
description The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses. Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Library database. All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews. The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322749918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748919302937</els_id><sourcerecordid>2380036387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFr1BZ4sIlW_8jsTlRrQqtVAkOIHGzHGcMjjb2Yjtb9dhvjsO2IHHpyfKb37wZzUPojJINJbQ9Hzd-DHPKZd4wQlUVuZDtM7SisuONUPT7c7QihJGmE1KdoNOcR0IIlUS-RCecSroUV-j-S4K4h2SKPwA2YcD7mMs_JYGN0wRhqN8YMi4R5zn98Nbs8G2cK29NAuxDgXSA8Ad6jy9wvssFptpk8QTFNAkOHm5xdHgb7c9kwmK9SPkVeuHMLsPrh3eNvn28_Lq9am4-f7reXtw0VghRGkbeCd4pw8UgzMCY6omzptY65yRVVsqeWqaI7DvmnKDQS9V2rldCul4Mlq_R26PvPsVfM-SiJ58t7HZ1lzhnzThjnVCKyoq--Q8d45xC3a5SkhDe8nrlNWqPlE0x5wRO75OfTLrTlOglJD3qx5D0EpI-hlQbzx7s536C4W_bYyoV-HAEoN6jHinpbD0EC4OveRQ9RP_UjN-XWanN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380036387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses. Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Library database. All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews. The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31810020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>High risk ; Humans ; Infections ; Intervention ; Measurement ; Methodological problems ; Nurse led care ; Nurse led services ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Patients ; Perioperative care ; Postoperative Care ; Preoperative Care ; Professional practice ; Surgery ; Surgical Wound ; Surgical Wound Infection - nursing ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Systematic review ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5948-0975 ; 0000-0002-6089-8225 ; 0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748919302937$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30978,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Zena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses. Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Library database. All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews. The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</description><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodological problems</subject><subject>Nurse led care</subject><subject>Nurse led services</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perioperative care</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Wound</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - nursing</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFr1BZ4sIlW_8jsTlRrQqtVAkOIHGzHGcMjjb2Yjtb9dhvjsO2IHHpyfKb37wZzUPojJINJbQ9Hzd-DHPKZd4wQlUVuZDtM7SisuONUPT7c7QihJGmE1KdoNOcR0IIlUS-RCecSroUV-j-S4K4h2SKPwA2YcD7mMs_JYGN0wRhqN8YMi4R5zn98Nbs8G2cK29NAuxDgXSA8Ad6jy9wvssFptpk8QTFNAkOHm5xdHgb7c9kwmK9SPkVeuHMLsPrh3eNvn28_Lq9am4-f7reXtw0VghRGkbeCd4pw8UgzMCY6omzptY65yRVVsqeWqaI7DvmnKDQS9V2rldCul4Mlq_R26PvPsVfM-SiJ58t7HZ1lzhnzThjnVCKyoq--Q8d45xC3a5SkhDe8nrlNWqPlE0x5wRO75OfTLrTlOglJD3qx5D0EpI-hlQbzx7s536C4W_bYyoV-HAEoN6jHinpbD0EC4OveRQ9RP_UjN-XWanN</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creator><creator>Walker, Rachel M.</creator><creator>McInnes, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Moore, Zena</creator><creator>Eskes, Anne M.</creator><creator>O'Connor, Tom</creator><creator>Harbeck, Emma</creator><creator>White, Codi</creator><creator>Scott, Ian A.</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Hester</creator><creator>Chaboyer, Wendy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><author>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodological problems</topic><topic>Nurse led care</topic><topic>Nurse led services</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perioperative care</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Wound</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - nursing</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Zena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillespie, Brigid M.</au><au>Walker, Rachel M.</au><au>McInnes, Elizabeth</au><au>Moore, Zena</au><au>Eskes, Anne M.</au><au>O'Connor, Tom</au><au>Harbeck, Emma</au><au>White, Codi</au><au>Scott, Ian A.</au><au>Vermeulen, Hester</au><au>Chaboyer, Wendy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>103486</spage><pages>103486-</pages><artnum>103486</artnum><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses. Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Cochrane Library database. All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews. The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31810020</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486
issn 0020-7489
1873-491X
1873-491X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322749918
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects High risk
Humans
Infections
Intervention
Measurement
Methodological problems
Nurse led care
Nurse led services
Nursing
Nursing care
Patients
Perioperative care
Postoperative Care
Preoperative Care
Professional practice
Surgery
Surgical Wound
Surgical Wound Infection - nursing
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Systematic review
Wound healing
title Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20and%20postoperative%20recommendations%20to%20surgical%20wound%20care%20interventions:%20A%20systematic%20meta-review%20of%20Cochrane%20reviews&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Gillespie,%20Brigid%20M.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=103486&rft.pages=103486-&rft.artnum=103486&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2380036387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380036387&rft_id=info:pmid/31810020&rft_els_id=S0020748919302937&rfr_iscdi=true