Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews
The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications. To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of nursing studies 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103486 |
container_title | International journal of nursing studies |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Gillespie, Brigid M. Walker, Rachel M. McInnes, Elizabeth Moore, Zena Eskes, Anne M. O'Connor, Tom Harbeck, Emma White, Codi Scott, Ian A. Vermeulen, Hester Chaboyer, Wendy |
description | The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications.
To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses.
Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The Cochrane Library database.
All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews.
The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322749918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020748919302937</els_id><sourcerecordid>2380036387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFr1BZ4sIlW_8jsTlRrQqtVAkOIHGzHGcMjjb2Yjtb9dhvjsO2IHHpyfKb37wZzUPojJINJbQ9Hzd-DHPKZd4wQlUVuZDtM7SisuONUPT7c7QihJGmE1KdoNOcR0IIlUS-RCecSroUV-j-S4K4h2SKPwA2YcD7mMs_JYGN0wRhqN8YMi4R5zn98Nbs8G2cK29NAuxDgXSA8Ad6jy9wvssFptpk8QTFNAkOHm5xdHgb7c9kwmK9SPkVeuHMLsPrh3eNvn28_Lq9am4-f7reXtw0VghRGkbeCd4pw8UgzMCY6omzptY65yRVVsqeWqaI7DvmnKDQS9V2rldCul4Mlq_R26PvPsVfM-SiJ58t7HZ1lzhnzThjnVCKyoq--Q8d45xC3a5SkhDe8nrlNWqPlE0x5wRO75OfTLrTlOglJD3qx5D0EpI-hlQbzx7s536C4W_bYyoV-HAEoN6jHinpbD0EC4OveRQ9RP_UjN-XWanN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2380036387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</creator><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications.
To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses.
Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The Cochrane Library database.
All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews.
The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31810020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>High risk ; Humans ; Infections ; Intervention ; Measurement ; Methodological problems ; Nurse led care ; Nurse led services ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Patients ; Perioperative care ; Postoperative Care ; Preoperative Care ; Professional practice ; Surgery ; Surgical Wound ; Surgical Wound Infection - nursing ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; Systematic review ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5948-0975 ; 0000-0002-6089-8225 ; 0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748919302937$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,30978,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31810020$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Zena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications.
To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses.
Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The Cochrane Library database.
All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews.
The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</description><subject>High risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Methodological problems</subject><subject>Nurse led care</subject><subject>Nurse led services</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perioperative care</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Wound</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - nursing</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EotuFr1BZ4sIlW_8jsTlRrQqtVAkOIHGzHGcMjjb2Yjtb9dhvjsO2IHHpyfKb37wZzUPojJINJbQ9Hzd-DHPKZd4wQlUVuZDtM7SisuONUPT7c7QihJGmE1KdoNOcR0IIlUS-RCecSroUV-j-S4K4h2SKPwA2YcD7mMs_JYGN0wRhqN8YMi4R5zn98Nbs8G2cK29NAuxDgXSA8Ad6jy9wvssFptpk8QTFNAkOHm5xdHgb7c9kwmK9SPkVeuHMLsPrh3eNvn28_Lq9am4-f7reXtw0VghRGkbeCd4pw8UgzMCY6omzptY65yRVVsqeWqaI7DvmnKDQS9V2rldCul4Mlq_R26PvPsVfM-SiJ58t7HZ1lzhnzThjnVCKyoq--Q8d45xC3a5SkhDe8nrlNWqPlE0x5wRO75OfTLrTlOglJD3qx5D0EpI-hlQbzx7s536C4W_bYyoV-HAEoN6jHinpbD0EC4OveRQ9RP_UjN-XWanN</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creator><creator>Walker, Rachel M.</creator><creator>McInnes, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Moore, Zena</creator><creator>Eskes, Anne M.</creator><creator>O'Connor, Tom</creator><creator>Harbeck, Emma</creator><creator>White, Codi</creator><creator>Scott, Ian A.</creator><creator>Vermeulen, Hester</creator><creator>Chaboyer, Wendy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</title><author>Gillespie, Brigid M. ; Walker, Rachel M. ; McInnes, Elizabeth ; Moore, Zena ; Eskes, Anne M. ; O'Connor, Tom ; Harbeck, Emma ; White, Codi ; Scott, Ian A. ; Vermeulen, Hester ; Chaboyer, Wendy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-2054379a34d4ad229b0fcac447ff819c88b1c2908b72ff41eb8967fb948fb4dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>High risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Methodological problems</topic><topic>Nurse led care</topic><topic>Nurse led services</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perioperative care</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Wound</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - nursing</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gillespie, Brigid M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Rachel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McInnes, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Zena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskes, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harbeck, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Codi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Ian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermeulen, Hester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaboyer, Wendy</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gillespie, Brigid M.</au><au>Walker, Rachel M.</au><au>McInnes, Elizabeth</au><au>Moore, Zena</au><au>Eskes, Anne M.</au><au>O'Connor, Tom</au><au>Harbeck, Emma</au><au>White, Codi</au><au>Scott, Ian A.</au><au>Vermeulen, Hester</au><au>Chaboyer, Wendy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>102</volume><spage>103486</spage><pages>103486-</pages><artnum>103486</artnum><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>The increasing numbers of surgeries involving high risk, multi-morbid patients, coupled with inconsistencies in the practice of perioperative surgical wound care, increases patients’ risk of surgical site infection and other wound complications.
To synthesise and evaluate the recommendations for nursing practice and research from published systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library on nurse-led preoperative prophylaxis and postoperative surgical wound care interventions used or initiated by nurses.
Meta-review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
The Cochrane Library database.
All Cochrane Systematic Reviews were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected the reviews and extracted data. One reviewer appraised the methodological quality of the included reviews using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist. A second reviewer independently verified these appraisals. The review protocol was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.
Twenty-two Cochrane reviews met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 11 reviews focused on preoperative interventions to prevent infection, while 12 focused on postoperative interventions (one review assessed both pre-postoperative interventions). Across all reviews, 14 (63.6%) made at least one recommendation to undertake a specific practice, while two reviews (9.1%) made at least one specific recommendation not to undertake a practice. In relation to recommendations for further research, insufficient sample size was the most predominant methodological issue (12/22) identified across reviews.
The limited number of recommendations for pre-and-postoperative interventions reflects the paucity of high-quality evidence, suggesting a need for rigorous trials to address these evidence gaps in fundamentals of nursing care.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31810020</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-0975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9528-7814</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7489 |
ispartof | International journal of nursing studies, 2020-02, Vol.102, p.103486, Article 103486 |
issn | 0020-7489 1873-491X 1873-491X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2322749918 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | High risk Humans Infections Intervention Measurement Methodological problems Nurse led care Nurse led services Nursing Nursing care Patients Perioperative care Postoperative Care Preoperative Care Professional practice Surgery Surgical Wound Surgical Wound Infection - nursing Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control Systematic review Wound healing |
title | Preoperative and postoperative recommendations to surgical wound care interventions: A systematic meta-review of Cochrane reviews |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A30%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20and%20postoperative%20recommendations%20to%20surgical%20wound%20care%20interventions:%20A%20systematic%20meta-review%20of%20Cochrane%20reviews&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Gillespie,%20Brigid%20M.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=102&rft.spage=103486&rft.pages=103486-&rft.artnum=103486&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2380036387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2380036387&rft_id=info:pmid/31810020&rft_els_id=S0020748919302937&rfr_iscdi=true |