Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme

The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zoonoses and public health 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192
Hauptverfasser: Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda, Alencar, Carlos Henrique, Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa, Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira, Romijn, Phyllis Catharina, Araujo, Danielle Bastos, Favoretto, Silvana Regina, Heukelbach, Jorg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 192
container_issue 2
container_start_page 186
container_title Zoonoses and public health
container_volume 67
creator Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda
Alencar, Carlos Henrique
Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa
Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira
Romijn, Phyllis Catharina
Araujo, Danielle Bastos
Favoretto, Silvana Regina
Heukelbach, Jorg
description The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/zph.12670
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321670616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2321670616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EorwWXABZYlMWBT_iOFlCxUtCgARs2ESOM6FGeWE7Re0FOAdn4WIYWlgg4c1Y1udvRvMjtEvJIQ3naN5NDimLJVlBGzSJ-Yhxmawu7zQV6QBtOvdMiBApketowKlMpZBiA71dNtqCclDgAjxob9oGtyW2Kjfg8NTY3mHT4Fz57zoGZT_e8Z1XHvDwurV-En57fGLV3FQHWJUeLDZ1V0ENTaCWPoU75ZyZAna9nYKpKtVowJ1tn6yqa9hGa6WqHOws6xZ6ODu9H1-Mrm7OL8fHVyPNBSejmEvOWMlyQqJcJ7oID5oVSS5ARQlNSApQJpEAxouSxmEPKcQykjkFzqKk5FtouPCGzi89OJ_Vxmn4Ggfa3mWMMxoWGdM4oPt_0Oe2t02YLlCCCUYZEYE6WFDats5ZKLPOmlrZWUZJ9pVOFtLJvtMJ7N7S2Oc1FL_kTxwBOFoAr6aC2f-m7PH2YqH8BEbsmk8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352521205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</creator><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><description>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12670</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31797575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal health ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Animals, Wild ; Bats ; Brazil ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Chiroptera ; Chiroptera - virology ; Dogs ; Domestic animals ; Foxes ; Goats ; Herbivores ; Human populations ; Livestock ; Lyssavirus ; Municipalities ; Population Surveillance ; Primates ; Procyonidae ; Rabies ; Rabies - epidemiology ; Rabies - veterinary ; Rabies - virology ; Rabies virus - isolation &amp; purification ; Sheep ; Surveillance ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Vaccination ; Viruses ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2987-7466 ; 0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.12670$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.12670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</description><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Chiroptera - virology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Lyssavirus</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Procyonidae</subject><subject>Rabies</subject><subject>Rabies - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rabies - veterinary</subject><subject>Rabies - virology</subject><subject>Rabies virus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EorwWXABZYlMWBT_iOFlCxUtCgARs2ESOM6FGeWE7Re0FOAdn4WIYWlgg4c1Y1udvRvMjtEvJIQ3naN5NDimLJVlBGzSJ-Yhxmawu7zQV6QBtOvdMiBApketowKlMpZBiA71dNtqCclDgAjxob9oGtyW2Kjfg8NTY3mHT4Fz57zoGZT_e8Z1XHvDwurV-En57fGLV3FQHWJUeLDZ1V0ENTaCWPoU75ZyZAna9nYKpKtVowJ1tn6yqa9hGa6WqHOws6xZ6ODu9H1-Mrm7OL8fHVyPNBSejmEvOWMlyQqJcJ7oID5oVSS5ARQlNSApQJpEAxouSxmEPKcQykjkFzqKk5FtouPCGzi89OJ_Vxmn4Ggfa3mWMMxoWGdM4oPt_0Oe2t02YLlCCCUYZEYE6WFDats5ZKLPOmlrZWUZJ9pVOFtLJvtMJ7N7S2Oc1FL_kTxwBOFoAr6aC2f-m7PH2YqH8BEbsmk8</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creator><creator>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creator><creator>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creator><creator>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creator><creator>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creator><creator>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creator><creator>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creator><creator>Heukelbach, Jorg</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><author>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Chiroptera - virology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Lyssavirus</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Procyonidae</topic><topic>Rabies</topic><topic>Rabies - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rabies - veterinary</topic><topic>Rabies - virology</topic><topic>Rabies virus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</au><au>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</au><au>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</au><au>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</au><au>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</au><au>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</au><au>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</au><au>Heukelbach, Jorg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>186-192</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31797575</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12670</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-1959
ispartof Zoonoses and public health, 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192
issn 1863-1959
1863-2378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321670616
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal health
Animals
Animals, Domestic
Animals, Wild
Bats
Brazil
Brazil - epidemiology
Chiroptera
Chiroptera - virology
Dogs
Domestic animals
Foxes
Goats
Herbivores
Human populations
Livestock
Lyssavirus
Municipalities
Population Surveillance
Primates
Procyonidae
Rabies
Rabies - epidemiology
Rabies - veterinary
Rabies - virology
Rabies virus - isolation & purification
Sheep
Surveillance
Swine
Time Factors
Vaccination
Viruses
Zoonoses
title Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A35%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20detection%20of%20rabies%20virus%20in%20bats%20in%20Cear%C3%A1%20State%20(Northeast%20Brazil)%20after%20implementation%20of%20a%20passive%20surveillance%20programme&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Duarte,%20Nayl%C3%AA%20Francelino%20Holanda&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=186-192&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2321670616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352521205&rft_id=info:pmid/31797575&rfr_iscdi=true