Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme
The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Zoonoses and public health 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 186 |
container_title | Zoonoses and public health |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda Alencar, Carlos Henrique Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira Romijn, Phyllis Catharina Araujo, Danielle Bastos Favoretto, Silvana Regina Heukelbach, Jorg |
description | The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/zph.12670 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321670616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2321670616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EorwWXABZYlMWBT_iOFlCxUtCgARs2ESOM6FGeWE7Re0FOAdn4WIYWlgg4c1Y1udvRvMjtEvJIQ3naN5NDimLJVlBGzSJ-Yhxmawu7zQV6QBtOvdMiBApketowKlMpZBiA71dNtqCclDgAjxob9oGtyW2Kjfg8NTY3mHT4Fz57zoGZT_e8Z1XHvDwurV-En57fGLV3FQHWJUeLDZ1V0ENTaCWPoU75ZyZAna9nYKpKtVowJ1tn6yqa9hGa6WqHOws6xZ6ODu9H1-Mrm7OL8fHVyPNBSejmEvOWMlyQqJcJ7oID5oVSS5ARQlNSApQJpEAxouSxmEPKcQykjkFzqKk5FtouPCGzi89OJ_Vxmn4Ggfa3mWMMxoWGdM4oPt_0Oe2t02YLlCCCUYZEYE6WFDats5ZKLPOmlrZWUZJ9pVOFtLJvtMJ7N7S2Oc1FL_kTxwBOFoAr6aC2f-m7PH2YqH8BEbsmk8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352521205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</creator><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><description>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/zph.12670</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31797575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal health ; Animals ; Animals, Domestic ; Animals, Wild ; Bats ; Brazil ; Brazil - epidemiology ; Chiroptera ; Chiroptera - virology ; Dogs ; Domestic animals ; Foxes ; Goats ; Herbivores ; Human populations ; Livestock ; Lyssavirus ; Municipalities ; Population Surveillance ; Primates ; Procyonidae ; Rabies ; Rabies - epidemiology ; Rabies - veterinary ; Rabies - virology ; Rabies virus - isolation & purification ; Sheep ; Surveillance ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Vaccination ; Viruses ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192</ispartof><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2987-7466 ; 0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fzph.12670$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fzph.12670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31797575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</description><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Domestic</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Brazil - epidemiology</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Chiroptera - virology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Lyssavirus</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Procyonidae</subject><subject>Rabies</subject><subject>Rabies - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rabies - veterinary</subject><subject>Rabies - virology</subject><subject>Rabies virus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EorwWXABZYlMWBT_iOFlCxUtCgARs2ESOM6FGeWE7Re0FOAdn4WIYWlgg4c1Y1udvRvMjtEvJIQ3naN5NDimLJVlBGzSJ-Yhxmawu7zQV6QBtOvdMiBApketowKlMpZBiA71dNtqCclDgAjxob9oGtyW2Kjfg8NTY3mHT4Fz57zoGZT_e8Z1XHvDwurV-En57fGLV3FQHWJUeLDZ1V0ENTaCWPoU75ZyZAna9nYKpKtVowJ1tn6yqa9hGa6WqHOws6xZ6ODu9H1-Mrm7OL8fHVyPNBSejmEvOWMlyQqJcJ7oID5oVSS5ARQlNSApQJpEAxouSxmEPKcQykjkFzqKk5FtouPCGzi89OJ_Vxmn4Ggfa3mWMMxoWGdM4oPt_0Oe2t02YLlCCCUYZEYE6WFDats5ZKLPOmlrZWUZJ9pVOFtLJvtMJ7N7S2Oc1FL_kTxwBOFoAr6aC2f-m7PH2YqH8BEbsmk8</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creator><creator>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creator><creator>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creator><creator>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creator><creator>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creator><creator>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creator><creator>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creator><creator>Heukelbach, Jorg</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</title><author>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda ; Alencar, Carlos Henrique ; Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa ; Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira ; Romijn, Phyllis Catharina ; Araujo, Danielle Bastos ; Favoretto, Silvana Regina ; Heukelbach, Jorg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3530-637322f2b004bc8cd637c2d8b5ea481809eef845e23df162379e6747b1e3248f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Domestic</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Brazil - epidemiology</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Chiroptera - virology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Lyssavirus</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Procyonidae</topic><topic>Rabies</topic><topic>Rabies - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rabies - veterinary</topic><topic>Rabies - virology</topic><topic>Rabies virus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heukelbach, Jorg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duarte, Naylê Francelino Holanda</au><au>Alencar, Carlos Henrique</au><au>Cavalcante, Kellyn Kessiene de Sousa</au><au>Correia, Francisco Gustavo Silveira</au><au>Romijn, Phyllis Catharina</au><au>Araujo, Danielle Bastos</au><au>Favoretto, Silvana Regina</au><au>Heukelbach, Jorg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>186-192</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>The intensification of dog, cat and livestock vaccination campaigns significantly reduced rabies cases in humans and domestic animals in Ceará State, Brazil. However, sylvatic animals—bats (order Chiroptera), wild canids, raccoons and non‐human primates— remain as reservoirs for the virus. Our hypothesis is that surveillance and monitoring of rabies virus in bats, especially passive surveillance, is of fundamental importance, besides the implementation of health education and strengthening of surveillance actions in humans exposed to aggressions. Thus, we assessed the occurrence of rabies virus in animals focusing on bats, before and after launching of the Sylvatic Rabies Surveillance Program in 2010. Surveillance data from the 184 municipalities of Ceará State were analysed, collected during the periods 2003–2010 (active surveillance) and 2011–2016 (passive surveillance), respectively. A total of 13,543 mammalian samples were received for rabies diagnosis from 2003 to 2016. Of these, 10,960 were from dogs or cats (80.9%), 1,180 from bats (8.7%), 806 from other sylvatic animals (foxes, marmosets, raccoons; 6.0%) and 597 from herbivores (cattle, goats, sheep, equines, pigs; 4.4%). A total of 588 (4.3%) samples were positive for rabies. About 8.4% (99/1,180) of the bat samples were infected with rabies virus, 92 (92.9%) of these were from non‐haematophagous bat species and 7 (7.1%) from haematophagous species. The number of bat samples received and infection rates increased considerably, after a shift from active surveillance (9/355 [2.5%] samples positive), to passive surveillance (90/825 [10.9%] samples positive). Surveillance of rabies virus in bats is fundamental for human and domestic animal health in Ceará State. Bats have to be considered as targets in surveillance and control programmes. Virus lineages should be characterized to increase knowledge on transmission dynamics of sylvatic rabies virus to domestic animals and the human population, and to provide additional evidence for planning and implementation of improved control measures.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>31797575</pmid><doi>10.1111/zph.12670</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-7466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7845-5510</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-1959 |
ispartof | Zoonoses and public health, 2020-03, Vol.67 (2), p.186-192 |
issn | 1863-1959 1863-2378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321670616 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal health Animals Animals, Domestic Animals, Wild Bats Brazil Brazil - epidemiology Chiroptera Chiroptera - virology Dogs Domestic animals Foxes Goats Herbivores Human populations Livestock Lyssavirus Municipalities Population Surveillance Primates Procyonidae Rabies Rabies - epidemiology Rabies - veterinary Rabies - virology Rabies virus - isolation & purification Sheep Surveillance Swine Time Factors Vaccination Viruses Zoonoses |
title | Increased detection of rabies virus in bats in Ceará State (Northeast Brazil) after implementation of a passive surveillance programme |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A35%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20detection%20of%20rabies%20virus%20in%20bats%20in%20Cear%C3%A1%20State%20(Northeast%20Brazil)%20after%20implementation%20of%20a%20passive%20surveillance%20programme&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Duarte,%20Nayl%C3%AA%20Francelino%20Holanda&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=186-192&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/zph.12670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2321670616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352521205&rft_id=info:pmid/31797575&rfr_iscdi=true |