Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study

Objectives Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement betw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2020, Vol.30 (1), p.328-336
Hauptverfasser: Domachevsky, Liran, Bernstine, Hanna, Goldberg, Natalia, Nidam, Meital, Catalano, Onofrio A., Groshar, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 1
container_start_page 328
container_title European radiology
container_volume 30
creator Domachevsky, Liran
Bernstine, Hanna
Goldberg, Natalia
Nidam, Meital
Catalano, Onofrio A.
Groshar, David
description Objectives Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement between PSMA-PET/MR and PSMA-PET/CT in patients undergoing initial evaluation of prostate cancer. Methods This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pelvic PSMA-PET/MR followed by whole-body PSMA-PET/CT. All conspicuous PSMA-avid foci were counted on PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR with CT or MR correlation. Analysis was performed for intra-prostatic lesions, capsular invasion, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node and bone involvement. Incidental and significant findings seen on PSMA-PET/CT outside the PSMA-PET/MR field of view were also analysed. Agreements between PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR findings were performed using Cohen’s kappa test. Results Image analysis was performed on 140 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.2 years). Agreement between PSMA PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR was very good for intra-prostatic PSMA-avid foci ( K  = 0.85) and pelvic lymph nodes ( K  = 0.98), good for PSMA-avid bone metastases ( K  = 0.76) and fair for prostatic capsular invasion ( K  = 0.25) and seminal vesicle involvement ( K  = 0.31). Twelve patients (8.5%) had incidental findings and two patients (1.4%) had clinically significant findings. Conclusion Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR has very good agreement with PET/CT regarding PSMA-avid prostatic, regional lymph nodes and bone lesions, and is superior to PET/CT with regard to capsular invasion and seminal vesicle involvement. Key Points • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR is superior to whole-body PSMA-PET/CT in detecting extensions of localised disease, mainly due to the high soft tissue resolution of MR. • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR may be useful for initial evaluation of histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer. • Further studies are warranted to evaluate limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR for screening and active surveillance in selected populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321666694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2321666694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-281efb832dee1d919430daed66de09dae77f9c8e145d4f6ab31eb458770b9d773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRAVXRZ-gAOyxIWL6dhO4phbtSq0UisqWM6WE09oqmwcbKdV_qCfXZctrcQBy5JH8948z8wj5B2HTxxAHUUAKYEB1wwqWUq2vCArXkjBONTFS7ICLWumtC4OyesYrwFA80K9IoeSSynKUq_I3cbvJhv66EfaYLpFHOmEw03f0ssfF8fs8mR7dPGd2tHR2ys_IGu8W56hzZZ2PtB0hbQf-9TbgeKNHWab-izoOzoFH5NNSFs7thg-U_uQykC-rc-pKdGYZre8IQedHSK-fXzX5OeXk-3mlJ1_-3q2OT5nrVRlYqLm2DW1FA6RO811IcFZdFXlEHSOlOp0WyMvSld0lW0kx6Yoa6Wg0U4puSYf97q5jd8zxmR2fWxxGOyIfo5GSMGrfLLwmnz4h3rt5zDm7owQFde1ygvOLLFntXnUGLAzU-h3NiyGg3nwyex9Mtkn88cns-Si94_Sc7ND91Ty15hMkHtCzND4C8Pz3_-RvQffJZ4F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261987093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Domachevsky, Liran ; Bernstine, Hanna ; Goldberg, Natalia ; Nidam, Meital ; Catalano, Onofrio A. ; Groshar, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Domachevsky, Liran ; Bernstine, Hanna ; Goldberg, Natalia ; Nidam, Meital ; Catalano, Onofrio A. ; Groshar, David</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement between PSMA-PET/MR and PSMA-PET/CT in patients undergoing initial evaluation of prostate cancer. Methods This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pelvic PSMA-PET/MR followed by whole-body PSMA-PET/CT. All conspicuous PSMA-avid foci were counted on PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR with CT or MR correlation. Analysis was performed for intra-prostatic lesions, capsular invasion, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node and bone involvement. Incidental and significant findings seen on PSMA-PET/CT outside the PSMA-PET/MR field of view were also analysed. Agreements between PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR findings were performed using Cohen’s kappa test. Results Image analysis was performed on 140 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.2 years). Agreement between PSMA PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR was very good for intra-prostatic PSMA-avid foci ( K  = 0.85) and pelvic lymph nodes ( K  = 0.98), good for PSMA-avid bone metastases ( K  = 0.76) and fair for prostatic capsular invasion ( K  = 0.25) and seminal vesicle involvement ( K  = 0.31). Twelve patients (8.5%) had incidental findings and two patients (1.4%) had clinically significant findings. Conclusion Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR has very good agreement with PET/CT regarding PSMA-avid prostatic, regional lymph nodes and bone lesions, and is superior to PET/CT with regard to capsular invasion and seminal vesicle involvement. Key Points • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR is superior to whole-body PSMA-PET/CT in detecting extensions of localised disease, mainly due to the high soft tissue resolution of MR. • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR may be useful for initial evaluation of histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer. • Further studies are warranted to evaluate limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR for screening and active surveillance in selected populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31332559</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Agreements ; Antigens ; Antigens, Surface ; Attenuation ; Biopsy ; Bone lesions ; Bone Neoplasms - secondary ; Computed tomography ; Correlation analysis ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Disease control ; Evaluation ; Field of view ; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Image processing ; Imaging ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Lesions ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic Resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastases ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neuroradiology ; Nodes ; Pelvis - diagnostic imaging ; Pelvis - pathology ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Positron-Emission Tomography - methods ; Proof of Concept Study ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiology ; Seminal vesicle ; Seminal Vesicles - pathology ; Soft tissues ; Tomography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2020, Vol.30 (1), p.328-336</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2019</rights><rights>European Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-281efb832dee1d919430daed66de09dae77f9c8e145d4f6ab31eb458770b9d773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-281efb832dee1d919430daed66de09dae77f9c8e145d4f6ab31eb458770b9d773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4675-0750</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31332559$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domachevsky, Liran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstine, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nidam, Meital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Onofrio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groshar, David</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement between PSMA-PET/MR and PSMA-PET/CT in patients undergoing initial evaluation of prostate cancer. Methods This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pelvic PSMA-PET/MR followed by whole-body PSMA-PET/CT. All conspicuous PSMA-avid foci were counted on PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR with CT or MR correlation. Analysis was performed for intra-prostatic lesions, capsular invasion, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node and bone involvement. Incidental and significant findings seen on PSMA-PET/CT outside the PSMA-PET/MR field of view were also analysed. Agreements between PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR findings were performed using Cohen’s kappa test. Results Image analysis was performed on 140 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.2 years). Agreement between PSMA PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR was very good for intra-prostatic PSMA-avid foci ( K  = 0.85) and pelvic lymph nodes ( K  = 0.98), good for PSMA-avid bone metastases ( K  = 0.76) and fair for prostatic capsular invasion ( K  = 0.25) and seminal vesicle involvement ( K  = 0.31). Twelve patients (8.5%) had incidental findings and two patients (1.4%) had clinically significant findings. Conclusion Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR has very good agreement with PET/CT regarding PSMA-avid prostatic, regional lymph nodes and bone lesions, and is superior to PET/CT with regard to capsular invasion and seminal vesicle involvement. Key Points • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR is superior to whole-body PSMA-PET/CT in detecting extensions of localised disease, mainly due to the high soft tissue resolution of MR. • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR may be useful for initial evaluation of histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer. • Further studies are warranted to evaluate limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR for screening and active surveillance in selected populations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Surface</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone lesions</subject><subject>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Field of view</subject><subject>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pelvis - pathology</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Proof of Concept Study</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Seminal vesicle</subject><subject>Seminal Vesicles - pathology</subject><subject>Soft tissues</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcFu1DAQtRAVXRZ-gAOyxIWL6dhO4phbtSq0UisqWM6WE09oqmwcbKdV_qCfXZctrcQBy5JH8948z8wj5B2HTxxAHUUAKYEB1wwqWUq2vCArXkjBONTFS7ICLWumtC4OyesYrwFA80K9IoeSSynKUq_I3cbvJhv66EfaYLpFHOmEw03f0ssfF8fs8mR7dPGd2tHR2ys_IGu8W56hzZZ2PtB0hbQf-9TbgeKNHWab-izoOzoFH5NNSFs7thg-U_uQykC-rc-pKdGYZre8IQedHSK-fXzX5OeXk-3mlJ1_-3q2OT5nrVRlYqLm2DW1FA6RO811IcFZdFXlEHSOlOp0WyMvSld0lW0kx6Yoa6Wg0U4puSYf97q5jd8zxmR2fWxxGOyIfo5GSMGrfLLwmnz4h3rt5zDm7owQFde1ygvOLLFntXnUGLAzU-h3NiyGg3nwyex9Mtkn88cns-Si94_Sc7ND91Ty15hMkHtCzND4C8Pz3_-RvQffJZ4F</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Domachevsky, Liran</creator><creator>Bernstine, Hanna</creator><creator>Goldberg, Natalia</creator><creator>Nidam, Meital</creator><creator>Catalano, Onofrio A.</creator><creator>Groshar, David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-0750</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study</title><author>Domachevsky, Liran ; Bernstine, Hanna ; Goldberg, Natalia ; Nidam, Meital ; Catalano, Onofrio A. ; Groshar, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-281efb832dee1d919430daed66de09dae77f9c8e145d4f6ab31eb458770b9d773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Surface</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone lesions</topic><topic>Bone Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Field of view</topic><topic>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Pelvis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pelvis - pathology</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Proof of Concept Study</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Seminal vesicle</topic><topic>Seminal Vesicles - pathology</topic><topic>Soft tissues</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domachevsky, Liran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernstine, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldberg, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nidam, Meital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catalano, Onofrio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groshar, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domachevsky, Liran</au><au>Bernstine, Hanna</au><au>Goldberg, Natalia</au><au>Nidam, Meital</au><au>Catalano, Onofrio A.</au><au>Groshar, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>328-336</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives Despite the advantages of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/MR over PSMA-PET/CT, its relatively long scanning time and suboptimal PET attenuation correction necessitate careful assessment of the most appropriate setting for this type of study. We assessed lesion agreement between PSMA-PET/MR and PSMA-PET/CT in patients undergoing initial evaluation of prostate cancer. Methods This was a prospective study of consecutive patients with histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent pelvic PSMA-PET/MR followed by whole-body PSMA-PET/CT. All conspicuous PSMA-avid foci were counted on PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR with CT or MR correlation. Analysis was performed for intra-prostatic lesions, capsular invasion, seminal vesicle involvement and lymph node and bone involvement. Incidental and significant findings seen on PSMA-PET/CT outside the PSMA-PET/MR field of view were also analysed. Agreements between PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR findings were performed using Cohen’s kappa test. Results Image analysis was performed on 140 patients (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.2 years). Agreement between PSMA PET/CT and PSMA-PET/MR was very good for intra-prostatic PSMA-avid foci ( K  = 0.85) and pelvic lymph nodes ( K  = 0.98), good for PSMA-avid bone metastases ( K  = 0.76) and fair for prostatic capsular invasion ( K  = 0.25) and seminal vesicle involvement ( K  = 0.31). Twelve patients (8.5%) had incidental findings and two patients (1.4%) had clinically significant findings. Conclusion Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR has very good agreement with PET/CT regarding PSMA-avid prostatic, regional lymph nodes and bone lesions, and is superior to PET/CT with regard to capsular invasion and seminal vesicle involvement. Key Points • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR is superior to whole-body PSMA-PET/CT in detecting extensions of localised disease, mainly due to the high soft tissue resolution of MR. • Limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR may be useful for initial evaluation of histological biopsy-proven prostate cancer. • Further studies are warranted to evaluate limited pelvic PSMA-PET/MR for screening and active surveillance in selected populations.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31332559</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4675-0750</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0938-7994
ispartof European radiology, 2020, Vol.30 (1), p.328-336
issn 0938-7994
1432-1084
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2321666694
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aged
Agreements
Antigens
Antigens, Surface
Attenuation
Biopsy
Bone lesions
Bone Neoplasms - secondary
Computed tomography
Correlation analysis
Diagnostic Radiology
Disease control
Evaluation
Field of view
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II
Humans
Image analysis
Image processing
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Lesions
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic system
Magnetic Resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastases
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neuroradiology
Nodes
Pelvis - diagnostic imaging
Pelvis - pathology
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Positron-Emission Tomography - methods
Proof of Concept Study
Prospective Studies
Prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Radiology
Seminal vesicle
Seminal Vesicles - pathology
Soft tissues
Tomography
Ultrasound
title Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A49%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20pelvic%20PSMA-PET/MR%20and%20whole-body%20PSMA-PET/CT%20for%20the%20initial%20evaluation%20of%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20proof%20of%20concept%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Domachevsky,%20Liran&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=328-336&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-019-06353-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2321666694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261987093&rft_id=info:pmid/31332559&rfr_iscdi=true