Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population
Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Foot and ankle specialist 2020-12, Vol.13 (6), p.494-501 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 501 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 494 |
container_title | Foot and ankle specialist |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Thomas, James L. Kopiec, Adam Mark, Kunkel Chandler, L. Mae |
description | Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared.
Level of Evidence: Level IV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1938640019890738 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320873886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1938640019890738</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2320873886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-623897d5d48752013dde3a20f2ead5e354d756be3b8fb1ddb5c7b3b1471d70ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtPwzAQhy0EoqWwMyGPLAE7jh8ZUXlKlUC81ugSX1pXaVzsZIC_nlQtDEhMd7r77ifdR8gpZxeca33Jc2FUxhjPTc60MHtkvBklWgm1v-s3-xE5inHJmGIqU4dkJLjOOZdyTB6ewTo_D7BeuIq-Q9Mj9TXtFkhnLtYB2opeO4gdRBepaynQlw5aC8G6L7T0ya_7Bjrn22NyUEMT8WRXJ-Tt9uZ1ep_MHu8eplezpBJCd4lKhcm1lTYzWqaMC2tRQMrqFMFKFDKzWqoSRWnqkltbykqXouSZ5lYztGJCzre56-A_eoxdsXKxwqaBFn0fi1SkzAwujBpQtkWr4GMMWBfr4FYQPgvOio3A4q_A4eRsl96XK7S_Bz_GBiDZAhHmWCx9H9rh2_8DvwHppned</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2320873886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Thomas, James L. ; Kopiec, Adam ; Mark, Kunkel ; Chandler, L. Mae</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James L. ; Kopiec, Adam ; Mark, Kunkel ; Chandler, L. Mae</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared.
Level of Evidence: Level IV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-6400</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1938640019890738</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31791155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Diastasis, Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Diastasis, Bone - etiology ; Female ; Foot Injuries - complications ; Foot Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Forefoot, Human - diagnostic imaging ; Forefoot, Human - injuries ; Humans ; Male ; Metatarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Metatarsal Bones - injuries ; Middle Aged ; Radiography - standards ; Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Tarsal Bones - injuries ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Foot and ankle specialist, 2020-12, Vol.13 (6), p.494-501</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-623897d5d48752013dde3a20f2ead5e354d756be3b8fb1ddb5c7b3b1471d70ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-623897d5d48752013dde3a20f2ead5e354d756be3b8fb1ddb5c7b3b1471d70ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4346-4924</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1938640019890738$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1938640019890738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31791155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopiec, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Kunkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, L. Mae</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population</title><title>Foot and ankle specialist</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><description>Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared.
Level of Evidence: Level IV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Diastasis, Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diastasis, Bone - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foot Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Foot Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Forefoot, Human - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Forefoot, Human - injuries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metatarsal Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiography - standards</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - injuries</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1938-6400</issn><issn>1938-7636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtPwzAQhy0EoqWwMyGPLAE7jh8ZUXlKlUC81ugSX1pXaVzsZIC_nlQtDEhMd7r77ifdR8gpZxeca33Jc2FUxhjPTc60MHtkvBklWgm1v-s3-xE5inHJmGIqU4dkJLjOOZdyTB6ewTo_D7BeuIq-Q9Mj9TXtFkhnLtYB2opeO4gdRBepaynQlw5aC8G6L7T0ya_7Bjrn22NyUEMT8WRXJ-Tt9uZ1ep_MHu8eplezpBJCd4lKhcm1lTYzWqaMC2tRQMrqFMFKFDKzWqoSRWnqkltbykqXouSZ5lYztGJCzre56-A_eoxdsXKxwqaBFn0fi1SkzAwujBpQtkWr4GMMWBfr4FYQPgvOio3A4q_A4eRsl96XK7S_Bz_GBiDZAhHmWCx9H9rh2_8DvwHppned</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Thomas, James L.</creator><creator>Kopiec, Adam</creator><creator>Mark, Kunkel</creator><creator>Chandler, L. Mae</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-4924</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population</title><author>Thomas, James L. ; Kopiec, Adam ; Mark, Kunkel ; Chandler, L. Mae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-623897d5d48752013dde3a20f2ead5e354d756be3b8fb1ddb5c7b3b1471d70ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Diastasis, Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diastasis, Bone - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foot Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Foot Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Forefoot, Human - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Forefoot, Human - injuries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metatarsal Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiography - standards</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - injuries</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopiec, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mark, Kunkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandler, L. Mae</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, James L.</au><au>Kopiec, Adam</au><au>Mark, Kunkel</au><au>Chandler, L. Mae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle specialist</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Spec</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>494</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>494-501</pages><issn>1938-6400</issn><eissn>1938-7636</eissn><abstract>Introduction. Injury to the Lisfranc’s joint, in particular to the second metatarsal–medial cuneiform (second MMC) joint, can be difficult to evaluate, especially in subtle Lisfranc injuries. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of the Lisfranc joint width (diastasis) of the adult foot in a standardized population thereby establishing a potential reference range when investigating this area for potential injury. Methods. The 2nd MMC joint in 50 men and 50 women was evaluated. Individuals with a history of foot/ankle pain, previous foot/ankle operation or fracture, or a history of systemic disease were excluded from the study. Bilateral weightbearing digital anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were taken using a standardized method. Results. The mean 2nd MMC diastasis in 200 feet was 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.39-5.81). In the female population, the mean 2nd MMC diastasis was 5.8 mm (95% CI 5.51-6.09) as compared with 5.6 mm (95% CI 5.31-5.89) in males. The mean distance between the fifth metatarsal base and first cuneiform in the entire study population was 16.3 mm (95% CI 15.57-17.03). Conclusion. This study helps define baseline measurements of the Lisfranc joint for the general population, which can provide a standard measurement against which suspected foot injuries can be compared.
Level of Evidence: Level IV.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31791155</pmid><doi>10.1177/1938640019890738</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-4924</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1938-6400 |
ispartof | Foot and ankle specialist, 2020-12, Vol.13 (6), p.494-501 |
issn | 1938-6400 1938-7636 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320873886 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Diastasis, Bone - diagnostic imaging Diastasis, Bone - etiology Female Foot Injuries - complications Foot Injuries - diagnostic imaging Forefoot, Human - diagnostic imaging Forefoot, Human - injuries Humans Male Metatarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging Metatarsal Bones - injuries Middle Aged Radiography - standards Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging Tarsal Bones - injuries Young Adult |
title | Radiographic Value of the Lisfranc Diastasis in a Standardized Population |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20Value%20of%20the%20Lisfranc%20Diastasis%20in%20a%20Standardized%20Population&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20specialist&rft.au=Thomas,%20James%20L.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=494&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=494-501&rft.issn=1938-6400&rft.eissn=1938-7636&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1938640019890738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2320873886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2320873886&rft_id=info:pmid/31791155&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1938640019890738&rfr_iscdi=true |