On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion

Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nephrology 2020-08, Vol.33 (4), p.859-865
Hauptverfasser: Rotondi, Silverio, De Martini, Natalia, Tartaglione, Lida, Muci, Maria Luisa, Petrozza, Vincenzo, Porta, Natale, Leopizzi, Martina, Proietti, Ilaria, Potenza, Concetta, Skroza, Nevena, Mazzaferro, Sandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 865
container_issue 4
container_start_page 859
container_title Journal of nephrology
container_volume 33
creator Rotondi, Silverio
De Martini, Natalia
Tartaglione, Lida
Muci, Maria Luisa
Petrozza, Vincenzo
Porta, Natale
Leopizzi, Martina
Proietti, Ilaria
Potenza, Concetta
Skroza, Nevena
Mazzaferro, Sandro
description Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320871793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2320871793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b0ebc1069b21ebe436a05dfd8d21e438953ebb7e5b8313e78ff0d98b52a4e11e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcMqRi2Ft5-FwQxUvqVIvcLbsZNO6pHHxJof263EJZy47u5qZ1e4kyS2Hew5QPlAGhQAGvGIARanY8SyZ8VJkrIC8Oo89F5ypTKjL5IpoCyDyXGSzpF316bDBNPgOU9-m9OX61Dq_p0PqJqpxZt17cnTia9PVrnV1OgbcRTBhwOB85_dm2BweUxMVhMzG0kQn1SOR8_11ctGajvDmD-fJ58vzx-KNLVev74unJaulyAZmAW3Noais4Ggxk4WBvGkb1cQ5k6rKJVpbYm6V5BJL1bbQVMrmwmTIOcp5cjft3Qf_PSINehdvwK4zPfqRtJACVMnLSkapmKR18EQBW70PbmfCQXPQp1D1FKqOoerfUPUxmuRkoiju1xj01o-hjy_95_oB9J58Fw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2320871793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rotondi, Silverio ; De Martini, Natalia ; Tartaglione, Lida ; Muci, Maria Luisa ; Petrozza, Vincenzo ; Porta, Natale ; Leopizzi, Martina ; Proietti, Ilaria ; Potenza, Concetta ; Skroza, Nevena ; Mazzaferro, Sandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Rotondi, Silverio ; De Martini, Natalia ; Tartaglione, Lida ; Muci, Maria Luisa ; Petrozza, Vincenzo ; Porta, Natale ; Leopizzi, Martina ; Proietti, Ilaria ; Potenza, Concetta ; Skroza, Nevena ; Mazzaferro, Sandro</creatorcontrib><description>Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1121-8428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6059</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Case Report ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of nephrology, 2020-08, Vol.33 (4), p.859-865</ispartof><rights>Italian Society of Nephrology 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b0ebc1069b21ebe436a05dfd8d21e438953ebb7e5b8313e78ff0d98b52a4e11e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b0ebc1069b21ebe436a05dfd8d21e438953ebb7e5b8313e78ff0d98b52a4e11e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3071-1893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rotondi, Silverio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martini, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartaglione, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muci, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozza, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porta, Natale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopizzi, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proietti, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potenza, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroza, Nevena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzaferro, Sandro</creatorcontrib><title>On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion</title><title>Journal of nephrology</title><addtitle>J Nephrol</addtitle><description>Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.</description><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1121-8428</issn><issn>1724-6059</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIPcMqRi2Ft5-FwQxUvqVIvcLbsZNO6pHHxJof263EJZy47u5qZ1e4kyS2Hew5QPlAGhQAGvGIARanY8SyZ8VJkrIC8Oo89F5ypTKjL5IpoCyDyXGSzpF316bDBNPgOU9-m9OX61Dq_p0PqJqpxZt17cnTia9PVrnV1OgbcRTBhwOB85_dm2BweUxMVhMzG0kQn1SOR8_11ctGajvDmD-fJ58vzx-KNLVev74unJaulyAZmAW3Noais4Ggxk4WBvGkb1cQ5k6rKJVpbYm6V5BJL1bbQVMrmwmTIOcp5cjft3Qf_PSINehdvwK4zPfqRtJACVMnLSkapmKR18EQBW70PbmfCQXPQp1D1FKqOoerfUPUxmuRkoiju1xj01o-hjy_95_oB9J58Fw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Rotondi, Silverio</creator><creator>De Martini, Natalia</creator><creator>Tartaglione, Lida</creator><creator>Muci, Maria Luisa</creator><creator>Petrozza, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Porta, Natale</creator><creator>Leopizzi, Martina</creator><creator>Proietti, Ilaria</creator><creator>Potenza, Concetta</creator><creator>Skroza, Nevena</creator><creator>Mazzaferro, Sandro</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3071-1893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion</title><author>Rotondi, Silverio ; De Martini, Natalia ; Tartaglione, Lida ; Muci, Maria Luisa ; Petrozza, Vincenzo ; Porta, Natale ; Leopizzi, Martina ; Proietti, Ilaria ; Potenza, Concetta ; Skroza, Nevena ; Mazzaferro, Sandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-b0ebc1069b21ebe436a05dfd8d21e438953ebb7e5b8313e78ff0d98b52a4e11e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rotondi, Silverio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Martini, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartaglione, Lida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muci, Maria Luisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozza, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porta, Natale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopizzi, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proietti, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potenza, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skroza, Nevena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzaferro, Sandro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rotondi, Silverio</au><au>De Martini, Natalia</au><au>Tartaglione, Lida</au><au>Muci, Maria Luisa</au><au>Petrozza, Vincenzo</au><au>Porta, Natale</au><au>Leopizzi, Martina</au><au>Proietti, Ilaria</au><au>Potenza, Concetta</au><au>Skroza, Nevena</au><au>Mazzaferro, Sandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nephrology</jtitle><stitle>J Nephrol</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>859-865</pages><issn>1121-8428</issn><eissn>1724-6059</eissn><abstract>Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3071-1893</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1121-8428
ispartof Journal of nephrology, 2020-08, Vol.33 (4), p.859-865
issn 1121-8428
1724-6059
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2320871793
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Case Report
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Urology
title On the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case-based discussion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20role%20of%20skin%20biopsy%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20calcific%20uremic%20arteriolopathy:%20a%20case-based%20discussion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nephrology&rft.au=Rotondi,%20Silverio&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=859-865&rft.issn=1121-8428&rft.eissn=1724-6059&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40620-019-00678-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2320871793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2320871793&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true