Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study
Background The number of bariatric surgeries for the treatment of morbid obesity has increased, and there is growing demand for postbariatric abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of Scarpa’s fascia preservation on total drainage volume, time to drain removal, and seroma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aesthetic plastic surgery 2020-04, Vol.44 (2), p.445-452 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 452 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 445 |
container_title | Aesthetic plastic surgery |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges Garcia, Elvio Bueno Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos Rossetto, Luiz Antonio Ferreira, Lydia Masako |
description | Background
The number of bariatric surgeries for the treatment of morbid obesity has increased, and there is growing demand for postbariatric abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of Scarpa’s fascia preservation on total drainage volume, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in anchor-line abdominoplasty.
Methods
A total of 42 postbariatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups and underwent anchor-line abdominoplasty. Scarpa’s fascia was not preserved during abdominoplasty in one group (
n
= 21) but was preserved in the other group (
n
= 21). A suction drain was left in place until the drainage volume was less than 30 ml/24 h. Seroma formation was assessed by abdominal ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day; only fluid collections greater than 30 ml were considered seromas.
Results
The time to drain removal was shorter, and the total drainage volume was lower in the fascial preservation group than in the fascial dissection group. However, no difference in the seroma formation rate was observed between the groups.
Conclusion
Scarpa’s fascia preservation decreased the drainage volume and the time to drain removal but not the rate of seroma formation.
Level of Evidence II
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2319495553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2377614176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9c18273f2a9d240e0d4f82c7863f2c37a98c67d9220aeeb5b3b4cf25ce1fd9b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYh4NU7Lb6BTxIoJdeRvNvkh1vy9JWYcHFKngLmcw7bcpOMiaZLeunb9ZdK3jwEAK_PO8vIQ9Cbyl5TwlRHxIhTMqK0KasWqhKvUAzKjiraiboCZoRLkXFqPxxis5SeiCEMqXEK3TKqVJSEjFDeeHtfYjVynnAi7YLg_Nh3JiUd_jR5Xt8a00cDb42yTqD1xESxK3JLnjsPF6HlFsTncnRWbwuOficPuIFXoZhNLEEW8Bfjd8X_4IO3-ap271GL3uzSfDmuJ-j79dX35afqtWXm8_LxaqyXNW5aiydM8V7ZpqOCQKkE_2cWTWXJSuIaeZWqq5hjBiAtm55K2zPagu075qW8HN0eegdY_g5Qcp6cMnCZmM8hClpxmkjmrqueUEv_kEfwhR9eV2hymdRQZUsFDtQNoaUIvR6jG4wcacp0Xsn-uBEFyf6txOtytC7Y_XUDtA9j_yRUAB-AFI58ncQ_979n9onuIWYJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2377614176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges ; Garcia, Elvio Bueno ; Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos ; Rossetto, Luiz Antonio ; Ferreira, Lydia Masako</creator><creatorcontrib>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges ; Garcia, Elvio Bueno ; Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos ; Rossetto, Luiz Antonio ; Ferreira, Lydia Masako</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The number of bariatric surgeries for the treatment of morbid obesity has increased, and there is growing demand for postbariatric abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of Scarpa’s fascia preservation on total drainage volume, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in anchor-line abdominoplasty.
Methods
A total of 42 postbariatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups and underwent anchor-line abdominoplasty. Scarpa’s fascia was not preserved during abdominoplasty in one group (
n
= 21) but was preserved in the other group (
n
= 21). A suction drain was left in place until the drainage volume was less than 30 ml/24 h. Seroma formation was assessed by abdominal ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day; only fluid collections greater than 30 ml were considered seromas.
Results
The time to drain removal was shorter, and the total drainage volume was lower in the fascial preservation group than in the fascial dissection group. However, no difference in the seroma formation rate was observed between the groups.
Conclusion
Scarpa’s fascia preservation decreased the drainage volume and the time to drain removal but not the rate of seroma formation.
Level of Evidence II
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31776604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominoplasty ; Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects ; Drainage ; Fascia ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Plastic Surgery ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Seroma - etiology ; Seroma - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2020-04, Vol.44 (2), p.445-452</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2019</rights><rights>Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9c18273f2a9d240e0d4f82c7863f2c37a98c67d9220aeeb5b3b4cf25ce1fd9b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9c18273f2a9d240e0d4f82c7863f2c37a98c67d9220aeeb5b3b4cf25ce1fd9b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0392-7894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31776604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Elvio Bueno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, Luiz Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Lydia Masako</creatorcontrib><title>Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background
The number of bariatric surgeries for the treatment of morbid obesity has increased, and there is growing demand for postbariatric abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of Scarpa’s fascia preservation on total drainage volume, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in anchor-line abdominoplasty.
Methods
A total of 42 postbariatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups and underwent anchor-line abdominoplasty. Scarpa’s fascia was not preserved during abdominoplasty in one group (
n
= 21) but was preserved in the other group (
n
= 21). A suction drain was left in place until the drainage volume was less than 30 ml/24 h. Seroma formation was assessed by abdominal ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day; only fluid collections greater than 30 ml were considered seromas.
Results
The time to drain removal was shorter, and the total drainage volume was lower in the fascial preservation group than in the fascial dissection group. However, no difference in the seroma formation rate was observed between the groups.
Conclusion
Scarpa’s fascia preservation decreased the drainage volume and the time to drain removal but not the rate of seroma formation.
Level of Evidence II
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</description><subject>Abdominoplasty</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Fascia</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Seroma - etiology</subject><subject>Seroma - prevention & control</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFDEYh4NU7Lb6BTxIoJdeRvNvkh1vy9JWYcHFKngLmcw7bcpOMiaZLeunb9ZdK3jwEAK_PO8vIQ9Cbyl5TwlRHxIhTMqK0KasWqhKvUAzKjiraiboCZoRLkXFqPxxis5SeiCEMqXEK3TKqVJSEjFDeeHtfYjVynnAi7YLg_Nh3JiUd_jR5Xt8a00cDb42yTqD1xESxK3JLnjsPF6HlFsTncnRWbwuOficPuIFXoZhNLEEW8Bfjd8X_4IO3-ap271GL3uzSfDmuJ-j79dX35afqtWXm8_LxaqyXNW5aiydM8V7ZpqOCQKkE_2cWTWXJSuIaeZWqq5hjBiAtm55K2zPagu075qW8HN0eegdY_g5Qcp6cMnCZmM8hClpxmkjmrqueUEv_kEfwhR9eV2hymdRQZUsFDtQNoaUIvR6jG4wcacp0Xsn-uBEFyf6txOtytC7Y_XUDtA9j_yRUAB-AFI58ncQ_979n9onuIWYJg</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges</creator><creator>Garcia, Elvio Bueno</creator><creator>Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Rossetto, Luiz Antonio</creator><creator>Ferreira, Lydia Masako</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-7894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study</title><author>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges ; Garcia, Elvio Bueno ; Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos ; Rossetto, Luiz Antonio ; Ferreira, Lydia Masako</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9c18273f2a9d240e0d4f82c7863f2c37a98c67d9220aeeb5b3b4cf25ce1fd9b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdominoplasty</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Fascia</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Seroma - etiology</topic><topic>Seroma - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, Elvio Bueno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetto, Luiz Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Lydia Masako</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Inforzato, Heraldo Carlos Borges</au><au>Garcia, Elvio Bueno</au><au>Montano-Pedroso, Juan Carlos</au><au>Rossetto, Luiz Antonio</au><au>Ferreira, Lydia Masako</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>445</spage><epage>452</epage><pages>445-452</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background
The number of bariatric surgeries for the treatment of morbid obesity has increased, and there is growing demand for postbariatric abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impacts of Scarpa’s fascia preservation on total drainage volume, time to drain removal, and seroma formation in anchor-line abdominoplasty.
Methods
A total of 42 postbariatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups and underwent anchor-line abdominoplasty. Scarpa’s fascia was not preserved during abdominoplasty in one group (
n
= 21) but was preserved in the other group (
n
= 21). A suction drain was left in place until the drainage volume was less than 30 ml/24 h. Seroma formation was assessed by abdominal ultrasound on the twentieth postoperative day; only fluid collections greater than 30 ml were considered seromas.
Results
The time to drain removal was shorter, and the total drainage volume was lower in the fascial preservation group than in the fascial dissection group. However, no difference in the seroma formation rate was observed between the groups.
Conclusion
Scarpa’s fascia preservation decreased the drainage volume and the time to drain removal but not the rate of seroma formation.
Level of Evidence II
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors
www.springer.com/00266
.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31776604</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-7894</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-216X |
ispartof | Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2020-04, Vol.44 (2), p.445-452 |
issn | 0364-216X 1432-5241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2319495553 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abdominoplasty Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects Drainage Fascia Gastrointestinal surgery Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Otorhinolaryngology Plastic Surgery Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Seroma - etiology Seroma - prevention & control |
title | Anchor-Line Abdominoplasty with Scarpa Fascia Preservation in Postbariatric Patients: A Comparative Randomized Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A09%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anchor-Line%20Abdominoplasty%20with%20Scarpa%20Fascia%20Preservation%20in%20Postbariatric%20Patients:%20A%20Comparative%20Randomized%20Study&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Inforzato,%20Heraldo%20Carlos%20Borges&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=445&rft.epage=452&rft.pages=445-452&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-019-01547-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2377614176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2377614176&rft_id=info:pmid/31776604&rfr_iscdi=true |