Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures

Rationale Characterization of complex samples remains a challenging task due to the high number of compounds present. Matrix effects, ion discrimination and suppression are limiting factors which force the use of different methods for the same sample to gain a broad understanding of complex mixtures...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2020-04, Vol.34 (8), p.e8676-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Kondyli, Aikaterini, Schrader, Wolfgang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page e8676
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 34
creator Kondyli, Aikaterini
Schrader, Wolfgang
description Rationale Characterization of complex samples remains a challenging task due to the high number of compounds present. Matrix effects, ion discrimination and suppression are limiting factors which force the use of different methods for the same sample to gain a broad understanding of complex mixtures. Methods Various ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) have been used in various problems for complex mixture analysis. Especially demanding is the analysis of energy‐related hydrocarbon mixtures, such as crude oil. Here, the different ionization sources alone and in combination with each other have been used on an ultrahigh resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer to study a light crude oil. Results Despite the great variety of the available ionization sources, there is no single technique which can fully characterize the crude oil. Each ionization technique shows a selectivity towards specific types of compounds. While ESI is the method of choice for the detection of polar compounds, APPI and APCI favor the detection of nonpolar and low‐to‐medium polar compounds, respectively. The combination of ESI/APPI favors hydrocarbons and oxygen‐containing species. Conclusions Combining different ionization methods can be used as an alternative in order to gain more information about compounds present in a complex mixture although a combination of different ion sources could enhance suppression effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcm.8676
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2319196764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2373926006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-83cd78fa4dbe3fea7eeca935f482a0bb30356aa52e581a62d3e4e8c91417a9ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LxDAURYMoOo6Cv0AKbtx0TJq2aZYyjB-gCKLrkqYvGEmbmrQ6485_buroCIKrB4_DgXsvQkcEzwjGyZmTzazIWb6FJgRzFuOEkm00wTwjcUp4sYf2vX_GmJAswbtojxLGKON0gj4Wr8IMote2jayK-ieIpG0q3W5etVYKHLR9JPrG-u4JnJZR58D7wUEUKP2-hr0dnAQfKeu-RKIVZuW1Hy2w7B00YFajvjOwjBq97IPAH6AdJYyHw-87RY8Xi4f5VXxzd3k9P7-JJS1oHhdU1qxQIq0roAoEA5CC00ylRSJwVVFMs1yILIGsICJPagopFJKTlDDBlaJTdLr2ds6-DOD7stFegjGiBTv4MlTGCQ8lpgE9-YM-h2ghzUgxypMc4_xXKJ313oEqO6cb4VYlweU4SxlmKcdZAnr8LRyqBuoN-LNDAOI18KYNrP4Vlffz2y_hJwIameg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2373926006</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kondyli, Aikaterini ; Schrader, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Kondyli, Aikaterini ; Schrader, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Characterization of complex samples remains a challenging task due to the high number of compounds present. Matrix effects, ion discrimination and suppression are limiting factors which force the use of different methods for the same sample to gain a broad understanding of complex mixtures. Methods Various ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) have been used in various problems for complex mixture analysis. Especially demanding is the analysis of energy‐related hydrocarbon mixtures, such as crude oil. Here, the different ionization sources alone and in combination with each other have been used on an ultrahigh resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer to study a light crude oil. Results Despite the great variety of the available ionization sources, there is no single technique which can fully characterize the crude oil. Each ionization technique shows a selectivity towards specific types of compounds. While ESI is the method of choice for the detection of polar compounds, APPI and APCI favor the detection of nonpolar and low‐to‐medium polar compounds, respectively. The combination of ESI/APPI favors hydrocarbons and oxygen‐containing species. Conclusions Combining different ionization methods can be used as an alternative in order to gain more information about compounds present in a complex mixture although a combination of different ion sources could enhance suppression effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8676</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31773793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric pressure ; Crude oil ; Hydrocarbons ; Ion sources ; Ionization ; Ions ; Photoionization ; Selectivity</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2020-04, Vol.34 (8), p.e8676-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-83cd78fa4dbe3fea7eeca935f482a0bb30356aa52e581a62d3e4e8c91417a9ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-83cd78fa4dbe3fea7eeca935f482a0bb30356aa52e581a62d3e4e8c91417a9ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7342-1776</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.8676$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.8676$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31773793$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kondyli, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Rationale Characterization of complex samples remains a challenging task due to the high number of compounds present. Matrix effects, ion discrimination and suppression are limiting factors which force the use of different methods for the same sample to gain a broad understanding of complex mixtures. Methods Various ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) have been used in various problems for complex mixture analysis. Especially demanding is the analysis of energy‐related hydrocarbon mixtures, such as crude oil. Here, the different ionization sources alone and in combination with each other have been used on an ultrahigh resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer to study a light crude oil. Results Despite the great variety of the available ionization sources, there is no single technique which can fully characterize the crude oil. Each ionization technique shows a selectivity towards specific types of compounds. While ESI is the method of choice for the detection of polar compounds, APPI and APCI favor the detection of nonpolar and low‐to‐medium polar compounds, respectively. The combination of ESI/APPI favors hydrocarbons and oxygen‐containing species. Conclusions Combining different ionization methods can be used as an alternative in order to gain more information about compounds present in a complex mixture although a combination of different ion sources could enhance suppression effects.</description><subject>Atmospheric pressure</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Ion sources</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Photoionization</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LxDAURYMoOo6Cv0AKbtx0TJq2aZYyjB-gCKLrkqYvGEmbmrQ6485_buroCIKrB4_DgXsvQkcEzwjGyZmTzazIWb6FJgRzFuOEkm00wTwjcUp4sYf2vX_GmJAswbtojxLGKON0gj4Wr8IMote2jayK-ieIpG0q3W5etVYKHLR9JPrG-u4JnJZR58D7wUEUKP2-hr0dnAQfKeu-RKIVZuW1Hy2w7B00YFajvjOwjBq97IPAH6AdJYyHw-87RY8Xi4f5VXxzd3k9P7-JJS1oHhdU1qxQIq0roAoEA5CC00ylRSJwVVFMs1yILIGsICJPagopFJKTlDDBlaJTdLr2ds6-DOD7stFegjGiBTv4MlTGCQ8lpgE9-YM-h2ghzUgxypMc4_xXKJ313oEqO6cb4VYlweU4SxlmKcdZAnr8LRyqBuoN-LNDAOI18KYNrP4Vlffz2y_hJwIameg</recordid><startdate>20200430</startdate><enddate>20200430</enddate><creator>Kondyli, Aikaterini</creator><creator>Schrader, Wolfgang</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7342-1776</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200430</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures</title><author>Kondyli, Aikaterini ; Schrader, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-83cd78fa4dbe3fea7eeca935f482a0bb30356aa52e581a62d3e4e8c91417a9ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric pressure</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Ion sources</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Photoionization</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kondyli, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schrader, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kondyli, Aikaterini</au><au>Schrader, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2020-04-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e8676</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e8676-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale Characterization of complex samples remains a challenging task due to the high number of compounds present. Matrix effects, ion discrimination and suppression are limiting factors which force the use of different methods for the same sample to gain a broad understanding of complex mixtures. Methods Various ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) have been used in various problems for complex mixture analysis. Especially demanding is the analysis of energy‐related hydrocarbon mixtures, such as crude oil. Here, the different ionization sources alone and in combination with each other have been used on an ultrahigh resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer to study a light crude oil. Results Despite the great variety of the available ionization sources, there is no single technique which can fully characterize the crude oil. Each ionization technique shows a selectivity towards specific types of compounds. While ESI is the method of choice for the detection of polar compounds, APPI and APCI favor the detection of nonpolar and low‐to‐medium polar compounds, respectively. The combination of ESI/APPI favors hydrocarbons and oxygen‐containing species. Conclusions Combining different ionization methods can be used as an alternative in order to gain more information about compounds present in a complex mixture although a combination of different ion sources could enhance suppression effects.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31773793</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcm.8676</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7342-1776</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2020-04, Vol.34 (8), p.e8676-n/a
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2319196764
source Wiley Journals
subjects Atmospheric pressure
Crude oil
Hydrocarbons
Ion sources
Ionization
Ions
Photoionization
Selectivity
title Evaluation of the combination of different atmospheric pressure ionization sources for the analysis of extremely complex mixtures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A02%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20combination%20of%20different%20atmospheric%20pressure%20ionization%20sources%20for%20the%20analysis%20of%20extremely%20complex%20mixtures&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Kondyli,%20Aikaterini&rft.date=2020-04-30&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e8676&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e8676-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.8676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2373926006%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2373926006&rft_id=info:pmid/31773793&rfr_iscdi=true