Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients

Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. The National Cancer Database was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2020-03, Vol.247, p.156-162
Hauptverfasser: Siegel, Emily, Tseng, Joshua, Giuliano, Armando, Amersi, Farin, Alban, Rodrigo F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 247
creator Siegel, Emily
Tseng, Joshua
Giuliano, Armando
Amersi, Farin
Alban, Rodrigo F.
description Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. The National Cancer Database was queried for BC patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2014. Clinical characteristics and type of reconstruction were compared between treatment at AC or CH. A total of 860,509 patients were included. Patients treated at AC were younger (58.7 ± 12 y AC versus 61.6 ± 13 y CH; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317969800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480419307577</els_id><sourcerecordid>2317969800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-63bbd2c38b36c3f1e4b38d3236cb556213e08612a1cb7234416ab36901d975463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u2zAQhImiReykeYBeAh57kcsfiZKQk2O0TQAXLYrkTFDUCqFjiQ6XLuC3zxpOcuyJmN2ZwfJj7IsUCymk-bZZbBAXSsiW9EKo5gObS9FWRWNq_ZHNhVCqKBtRztg54kaQbmt9xmZa1lVrlJyz3X0Cl0eYMneZL73rYQyer2gACfnd5GmPgHwdnmAbHmPseRz4X_Bxwpz2Poc48eVAbv7LYQaf43jgQ0z85pjMfOUmT8s_Lgcqxc_s0-C2CJev7wV7-PH9fnVbrH__vFst14XXlc6F0V3XK6-bThuvBwllp5teK1JdVdHpGkRjpHLSd7XSZSmNI2srZN_WVWn0Bft66t2l-LwHzHYM6GG7dRPEPVpFDFrTNkKQVZ6sPkXEBIPdpTC6dLBS2CNou7EE2h5BH0cEmjJXr_X7boT-PfFGlgzXJwPQJ_8FSBY9AfDQh0SQbB_Df-pfAOtUjnU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2317969800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Siegel, Emily ; Tseng, Joshua ; Giuliano, Armando ; Amersi, Farin ; Alban, Rodrigo F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Emily ; Tseng, Joshua ; Giuliano, Armando ; Amersi, Farin ; Alban, Rodrigo F.</creatorcontrib><description>Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. The National Cancer Database was queried for BC patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2014. Clinical characteristics and type of reconstruction were compared between treatment at AC or CH. A total of 860,509 patients were included. Patients treated at AC were younger (58.7 ± 12 y AC versus 61.6 ± 13 y CH; P &lt; 0.001) and traveled farther to their treatment center (33.1 ± 122.8 miles AC versus 20 ± 75.3 miles CH; P &lt; 0.001). Patients undergoing surgery at AC were more likely to have reconstruction than those at CH (43.7% AC versus 32.5% CH; P &lt; 0.001). This trend remained across all reconstruction types including expander/implant-based reconstruction (immediate breast reconstruction) (14.4% AC versus 9.9% CH), autologous reconstruction (14.9% AC versus 11.7% CH), mixed reconstruction (5.2% AC versus 3.6% CH), and other reconstructions (9.2% AC versus 7.3% CH) (all P &lt; 0.001). Patients in all age categories, across insurance statuses, and with comorbidities were more likely to receive reconstruction if treated at AC compared with CH. In multivariate analysis, having a mastectomy at AC was an independent predictor of reconstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.51; P &lt; 0.001). Undergoing mastectomy at AC results in higher rate of reconstruction compared with CH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31759621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic center ; Breast cancer ; Community hospital ; Mastectomy ; National Cancer Database ; Reconstruction</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2020-03, Vol.247, p.156-162</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-63bbd2c38b36c3f1e4b38d3236cb556213e08612a1cb7234416ab36901d975463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-63bbd2c38b36c3f1e4b38d3236cb556213e08612a1cb7234416ab36901d975463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480419307577$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31759621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliano, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amersi, Farin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alban, Rodrigo F.</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. The National Cancer Database was queried for BC patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2014. Clinical characteristics and type of reconstruction were compared between treatment at AC or CH. A total of 860,509 patients were included. Patients treated at AC were younger (58.7 ± 12 y AC versus 61.6 ± 13 y CH; P &lt; 0.001) and traveled farther to their treatment center (33.1 ± 122.8 miles AC versus 20 ± 75.3 miles CH; P &lt; 0.001). Patients undergoing surgery at AC were more likely to have reconstruction than those at CH (43.7% AC versus 32.5% CH; P &lt; 0.001). This trend remained across all reconstruction types including expander/implant-based reconstruction (immediate breast reconstruction) (14.4% AC versus 9.9% CH), autologous reconstruction (14.9% AC versus 11.7% CH), mixed reconstruction (5.2% AC versus 3.6% CH), and other reconstructions (9.2% AC versus 7.3% CH) (all P &lt; 0.001). Patients in all age categories, across insurance statuses, and with comorbidities were more likely to receive reconstruction if treated at AC compared with CH. In multivariate analysis, having a mastectomy at AC was an independent predictor of reconstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.51; P &lt; 0.001). Undergoing mastectomy at AC results in higher rate of reconstruction compared with CH.</description><subject>Academic center</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Community hospital</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>National Cancer Database</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u2zAQhImiReykeYBeAh57kcsfiZKQk2O0TQAXLYrkTFDUCqFjiQ6XLuC3zxpOcuyJmN2ZwfJj7IsUCymk-bZZbBAXSsiW9EKo5gObS9FWRWNq_ZHNhVCqKBtRztg54kaQbmt9xmZa1lVrlJyz3X0Cl0eYMneZL73rYQyer2gACfnd5GmPgHwdnmAbHmPseRz4X_Bxwpz2Poc48eVAbv7LYQaf43jgQ0z85pjMfOUmT8s_Lgcqxc_s0-C2CJev7wV7-PH9fnVbrH__vFst14XXlc6F0V3XK6-bThuvBwllp5teK1JdVdHpGkRjpHLSd7XSZSmNI2srZN_WVWn0Bft66t2l-LwHzHYM6GG7dRPEPVpFDFrTNkKQVZ6sPkXEBIPdpTC6dLBS2CNou7EE2h5BH0cEmjJXr_X7boT-PfFGlgzXJwPQJ_8FSBY9AfDQh0SQbB_Df-pfAOtUjnU</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Siegel, Emily</creator><creator>Tseng, Joshua</creator><creator>Giuliano, Armando</creator><creator>Amersi, Farin</creator><creator>Alban, Rodrigo F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><author>Siegel, Emily ; Tseng, Joshua ; Giuliano, Armando ; Amersi, Farin ; Alban, Rodrigo F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-63bbd2c38b36c3f1e4b38d3236cb556213e08612a1cb7234416ab36901d975463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic center</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Community hospital</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>National Cancer Database</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giuliano, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amersi, Farin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alban, Rodrigo F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siegel, Emily</au><au>Tseng, Joshua</au><au>Giuliano, Armando</au><au>Amersi, Farin</au><au>Alban, Rodrigo F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>247</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>156-162</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Mastectomy rates continue to increase in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). There are limited data regarding reconstruction rates at academic centers (AC) versus community hospitals (CH). We aim to determine the effect of facility type on reconstruction rates. The National Cancer Database was queried for BC patients treated with mastectomy from 2004 to 2014. Clinical characteristics and type of reconstruction were compared between treatment at AC or CH. A total of 860,509 patients were included. Patients treated at AC were younger (58.7 ± 12 y AC versus 61.6 ± 13 y CH; P &lt; 0.001) and traveled farther to their treatment center (33.1 ± 122.8 miles AC versus 20 ± 75.3 miles CH; P &lt; 0.001). Patients undergoing surgery at AC were more likely to have reconstruction than those at CH (43.7% AC versus 32.5% CH; P &lt; 0.001). This trend remained across all reconstruction types including expander/implant-based reconstruction (immediate breast reconstruction) (14.4% AC versus 9.9% CH), autologous reconstruction (14.9% AC versus 11.7% CH), mixed reconstruction (5.2% AC versus 3.6% CH), and other reconstructions (9.2% AC versus 7.3% CH) (all P &lt; 0.001). Patients in all age categories, across insurance statuses, and with comorbidities were more likely to receive reconstruction if treated at AC compared with CH. In multivariate analysis, having a mastectomy at AC was an independent predictor of reconstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-1.51; P &lt; 0.001). Undergoing mastectomy at AC results in higher rate of reconstruction compared with CH.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31759621</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.028</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2020-03, Vol.247, p.156-162
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317969800
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic center
Breast cancer
Community hospital
Mastectomy
National Cancer Database
Reconstruction
title Treatment at Academic Centers Increases Likelihood of Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A26%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20at%20Academic%20Centers%20Increases%20Likelihood%20of%20Reconstruction%20After%20Mastectomy%20for%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Siegel,%20Emily&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=247&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=156-162&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2317969800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2317969800&rft_id=info:pmid/31759621&rft_els_id=S0022480419307577&rfr_iscdi=true