Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction

Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials Science & Engineering C 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229
Hauptverfasser: Munerato, Marcelo Salles, Biguetti, Claudia Cristina, Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso, Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia, Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina, Lima da Silva, Jordan, Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina, Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio, Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira, Bossini, Paulo Sérgio, Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110229
container_issue
container_start_page 110229
container_title Materials Science & Engineering C
container_volume 107
creator Munerato, Marcelo Salles
Biguetti, Claudia Cristina
Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso
Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia
Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina
Lima da Silva, Jordan
Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina
Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio
Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira
Bossini, Paulo Sérgio
Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi
description Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use. •Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317965829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928493119324671</els_id><sourcerecordid>2328302576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQxomgAeI6eYFMBLJ0kcs_sigCXQqjSQ0E6NLOBEUebRoSqZBSUecJ8tihoU4dOh1w9_u-I-9D6J6SDSW0-XzaDBnMhhEqN5QSxuQVWtFW8Kp06Ae0IpK1VS05vUEfcz4R0rRcsBV62wfX62HQU0xnnCCPMWTAOlg8aJPieNQHwGPsdfKvevIx4Dn7cMDWOwcJwoTH4zl7E80RBm90jzsfix0kr_uMXUw4ptJdHP_4vo9OmzIry0zZNaXZXGxv0bUrArj7W9fo1-O3n7vv1fOPp_3u63Nl6qaeqk7UlHRGOmaNBKtdJwizpOMdcCFJ45qudbKhQghpOipqyzl1eist4aRtNV-jT4vvmOLLDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWjFMhm23LZEEf_kFPcU6hvK5QrOWEbUVTKLZQ5Vo5J3BqTH7Q6awoUZdw1EldwlGXcNQSThF9WURQvvrbQ1LZeAgGrC9nmZSN_n_ydyMjnAo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328302576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creator><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use. •Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-4931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone grafts ; Bone healing ; Bone histomorphometry ; Bone matrix ; Bone substitutes ; Calcium ; Calcium phosphates ; Calvaria ; Collagen ; Computed tomography ; Grafting ; Hydroxyapatite ; Immune system ; Inflammation ; Inflammatory response ; Intramembraneous bone ; Leukocytes ; Macrophages ; Materials science ; Maxillofacial ; Osteoblastogenesis ; Osteoimmunology ; Parietal bone ; Particulates ; Physicochemical properties ; Polarization ; Rats ; Rodents ; Substitute bone</subject><ispartof>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C, 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><title>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</title><description>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use. •Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</description><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone histomorphometry</subject><subject>Bone matrix</subject><subject>Bone substitutes</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium phosphates</subject><subject>Calvaria</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammatory response</subject><subject>Intramembraneous bone</subject><subject>Leukocytes</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Maxillofacial</subject><subject>Osteoblastogenesis</subject><subject>Osteoimmunology</subject><subject>Parietal bone</subject><subject>Particulates</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><issn>0928-4931</issn><issn>1873-0191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQxomgAeI6eYFMBLJ0kcs_sigCXQqjSQ0E6NLOBEUebRoSqZBSUecJ8tihoU4dOh1w9_u-I-9D6J6SDSW0-XzaDBnMhhEqN5QSxuQVWtFW8Kp06Ae0IpK1VS05vUEfcz4R0rRcsBV62wfX62HQU0xnnCCPMWTAOlg8aJPieNQHwGPsdfKvevIx4Dn7cMDWOwcJwoTH4zl7E80RBm90jzsfix0kr_uMXUw4ptJdHP_4vo9OmzIry0zZNaXZXGxv0bUrArj7W9fo1-O3n7vv1fOPp_3u63Nl6qaeqk7UlHRGOmaNBKtdJwizpOMdcCFJ45qudbKhQghpOipqyzl1eist4aRtNV-jT4vvmOLLDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWjFMhm23LZEEf_kFPcU6hvK5QrOWEbUVTKLZQ5Vo5J3BqTH7Q6awoUZdw1EldwlGXcNQSThF9WURQvvrbQ1LZeAgGrC9nmZSN_n_ydyMjnAo</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creator><creator>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creator><creator>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creator><creator>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creator><creator>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creator><creator>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creator><creator>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creator><creator>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creator><creator>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creator><creator>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><author>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone histomorphometry</topic><topic>Bone matrix</topic><topic>Bone substitutes</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium phosphates</topic><topic>Calvaria</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammatory response</topic><topic>Intramembraneous bone</topic><topic>Leukocytes</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Maxillofacial</topic><topic>Osteoblastogenesis</topic><topic>Osteoimmunology</topic><topic>Parietal bone</topic><topic>Particulates</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</au><au>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</au><au>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</au><au>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</au><au>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</au><au>Lima da Silva, Jordan</au><au>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</au><au>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</au><au>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</au><au>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</au><au>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>110229</spage><epage>110229</epage><pages>110229-110229</pages><artnum>110229</artnum><issn>0928-4931</issn><eissn>1873-0191</eissn><abstract>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use. •Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-4931
ispartof Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229
issn 0928-4931
1873-0191
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317965829
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biomaterials
Biomedical materials
Bone biomaterials
Bone grafts
Bone healing
Bone histomorphometry
Bone matrix
Bone substitutes
Calcium
Calcium phosphates
Calvaria
Collagen
Computed tomography
Grafting
Hydroxyapatite
Immune system
Inflammation
Inflammatory response
Intramembraneous bone
Leukocytes
Macrophages
Materials science
Maxillofacial
Osteoblastogenesis
Osteoimmunology
Parietal bone
Particulates
Physicochemical properties
Polarization
Rats
Rodents
Substitute bone
title Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A53%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inflammatory%20response%20and%20macrophage%20polarization%20using%20different%20physicochemical%20biomaterials%20for%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Materials%20Science%20&%20Engineering%20C&rft.au=Munerato,%20Marcelo%20Salles&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=110229&rft.epage=110229&rft.pages=110229-110229&rft.artnum=110229&rft.issn=0928-4931&rft.eissn=1873-0191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328302576%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328302576&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0928493119324671&rfr_iscdi=true