Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction
Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials Science & Engineering C 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110229 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110229 |
container_title | Materials Science & Engineering C |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Munerato, Marcelo Salles Biguetti, Claudia Cristina Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina Lima da Silva, Jordan Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira Bossini, Paulo Sérgio Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi |
description | Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use.
•Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317965829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928493119324671</els_id><sourcerecordid>2328302576</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQxomgAeI6eYFMBLJ0kcs_sigCXQqjSQ0E6NLOBEUebRoSqZBSUecJ8tihoU4dOh1w9_u-I-9D6J6SDSW0-XzaDBnMhhEqN5QSxuQVWtFW8Kp06Ae0IpK1VS05vUEfcz4R0rRcsBV62wfX62HQU0xnnCCPMWTAOlg8aJPieNQHwGPsdfKvevIx4Dn7cMDWOwcJwoTH4zl7E80RBm90jzsfix0kr_uMXUw4ptJdHP_4vo9OmzIry0zZNaXZXGxv0bUrArj7W9fo1-O3n7vv1fOPp_3u63Nl6qaeqk7UlHRGOmaNBKtdJwizpOMdcCFJ45qudbKhQghpOipqyzl1eist4aRtNV-jT4vvmOLLDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWjFMhm23LZEEf_kFPcU6hvK5QrOWEbUVTKLZQ5Vo5J3BqTH7Q6awoUZdw1EldwlGXcNQSThF9WURQvvrbQ1LZeAgGrC9nmZSN_n_ydyMjnAo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2328302576</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creator><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use.
•Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-4931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Bone biomaterials ; Bone grafts ; Bone healing ; Bone histomorphometry ; Bone matrix ; Bone substitutes ; Calcium ; Calcium phosphates ; Calvaria ; Collagen ; Computed tomography ; Grafting ; Hydroxyapatite ; Immune system ; Inflammation ; Inflammatory response ; Intramembraneous bone ; Leukocytes ; Macrophages ; Materials science ; Maxillofacial ; Osteoblastogenesis ; Osteoimmunology ; Parietal bone ; Particulates ; Physicochemical properties ; Polarization ; Rats ; Rodents ; Substitute bone</subject><ispartof>Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 2020</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><title>Materials Science & Engineering C</title><description>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use.
•Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</description><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone biomaterials</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone healing</subject><subject>Bone histomorphometry</subject><subject>Bone matrix</subject><subject>Bone substitutes</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium phosphates</subject><subject>Calvaria</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inflammatory response</subject><subject>Intramembraneous bone</subject><subject>Leukocytes</subject><subject>Macrophages</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Maxillofacial</subject><subject>Osteoblastogenesis</subject><subject>Osteoimmunology</subject><subject>Parietal bone</subject><subject>Particulates</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><issn>0928-4931</issn><issn>1873-0191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb9u2zAQxomgAeI6eYFMBLJ0kcs_sigCXQqjSQ0E6NLOBEUebRoSqZBSUecJ8tihoU4dOh1w9_u-I-9D6J6SDSW0-XzaDBnMhhEqN5QSxuQVWtFW8Kp06Ae0IpK1VS05vUEfcz4R0rRcsBV62wfX62HQU0xnnCCPMWTAOlg8aJPieNQHwGPsdfKvevIx4Dn7cMDWOwcJwoTH4zl7E80RBm90jzsfix0kr_uMXUw4ptJdHP_4vo9OmzIry0zZNaXZXGxv0bUrArj7W9fo1-O3n7vv1fOPp_3u63Nl6qaeqk7UlHRGOmaNBKtdJwizpOMdcCFJ45qudbKhQghpOipqyzl1eist4aRtNV-jT4vvmOLLDHlSg88G-l4HiHNWjFMhm23LZEEf_kFPcU6hvK5QrOWEbUVTKLZQ5Vo5J3BqTH7Q6awoUZdw1EldwlGXcNQSThF9WURQvvrbQ1LZeAgGrC9nmZSN_n_ydyMjnAo</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creator><creator>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creator><creator>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creator><creator>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creator><creator>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creator><creator>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creator><creator>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creator><creator>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creator><creator>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creator><creator>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</title><author>Munerato, Marcelo Salles ; Biguetti, Claudia Cristina ; Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso ; Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia ; Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina ; Lima da Silva, Jordan ; Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina ; Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio ; Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira ; Bossini, Paulo Sérgio ; Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-b7410bc9f2dc9edafb702d0b3be37906f6b8f9617779cb174d331fa59d03088a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone biomaterials</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone healing</topic><topic>Bone histomorphometry</topic><topic>Bone matrix</topic><topic>Bone substitutes</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium phosphates</topic><topic>Calvaria</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inflammatory response</topic><topic>Intramembraneous bone</topic><topic>Leukocytes</topic><topic>Macrophages</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Maxillofacial</topic><topic>Osteoblastogenesis</topic><topic>Osteoimmunology</topic><topic>Parietal bone</topic><topic>Particulates</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima da Silva, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Materials Science & Engineering C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munerato, Marcelo Salles</au><au>Biguetti, Claudia Cristina</au><au>Parra da Silva, Raquel Barroso</au><au>Rodrigues da Silva, Ana Claudia</au><au>Zucon Bacelar, Ana Carolina</au><au>Lima da Silva, Jordan</au><au>Rondina Couto, Maira Cristina</au><au>Húngaro Duarte, Marco Antônio</au><au>Santiago-Junior, Joel Ferreira</au><au>Bossini, Paulo Sérgio</au><au>Matsumoto, Mariza Akemi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Materials Science & Engineering C</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>107</volume><spage>110229</spage><epage>110229</epage><pages>110229-110229</pages><artnum>110229</artnum><issn>0928-4931</issn><eissn>1873-0191</eissn><abstract>Knowledge about the action of immune system in the recognition of biomaterials has been extremely helpful when it comes about understanding host response and biomaterials' fate in human body. This study aimed to investigate inflammatory response and macrophage polarization during bone healing process of rat's calvaria critical defects using different bone materials in order to evaluate their influence on bone repair and on the quality of the newly formed bone tissue. Eighty male albinus Wistar rats underwent surgical procedure for the confectioning of a 5-mm diameter bone defect in their right parietal bone, and divided in four groups (n = 20 each), according the biomaterial: AG – Control, particulate intramembranous autogenous bone graft, HA/TCP – particulate biphasic calcium phosphate with HA/TCP (60/40), DBB – particulate deproteinized bovine bone, VC – particulate bioactive vitroceramic. After 3, 7, 21, and 45 days, the specimens were removed and prepared for microcomputed tomography (microCT), light and polarized microscopy, immunohistochemical analysis, and histomorphometry. No significant differences were detected considering percentage of leukocytes among the groups and periods, as well as in relation to immunolabeling for inflammatory (M1) and reparative (M2) macrophages. However, immunolabeling for bone marker indicated a delayed osteoblast differentiation in VC group, resulting in a decrease in mineralized bone matrix parameters in this group, revealed by microCT. In addition, AG and HA/TCP presented a satisfactory bone collagenous content. Despite the distinct origins and physicochemical properties of the tested biomaterials, they presented similar immune-inflammatory responses in the present experimental model, influencing bone-related proteins and bone quality, which must be considered according to their use.
•Biomaterials’ physicochemical properties did not lead to significant inflammatory response and macrophage polarization.•Experimental animal model has to be considered when it comes to biomaterial behavior.•Bone formation can be influenced by the type of bone substitute.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0928-4931 |
ispartof | Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-02, Vol.107, p.110229-110229, Article 110229 |
issn | 0928-4931 1873-0191 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317965829 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biomaterials Biomedical materials Bone biomaterials Bone grafts Bone healing Bone histomorphometry Bone matrix Bone substitutes Calcium Calcium phosphates Calvaria Collagen Computed tomography Grafting Hydroxyapatite Immune system Inflammation Inflammatory response Intramembraneous bone Leukocytes Macrophages Materials science Maxillofacial Osteoblastogenesis Osteoimmunology Parietal bone Particulates Physicochemical properties Polarization Rats Rodents Substitute bone |
title | Inflammatory response and macrophage polarization using different physicochemical biomaterials for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A53%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inflammatory%20response%20and%20macrophage%20polarization%20using%20different%20physicochemical%20biomaterials%20for%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Materials%20Science%20&%20Engineering%20C&rft.au=Munerato,%20Marcelo%20Salles&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=107&rft.spage=110229&rft.epage=110229&rft.pages=110229-110229&rft.artnum=110229&rft.issn=0928-4931&rft.eissn=1873-0191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2328302576%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2328302576&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0928493119324671&rfr_iscdi=true |