Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT
Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of haematology 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 389 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 383 |
container_title | European journal of haematology |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Pfahler, Vanessa D'Anastasi, Melvin Dürr, Hans‐Roland Schinner, Regina Ricke, Jens Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea |
description | Objective
Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT).
Materials and Methods
A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS).
Results
Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels.
Conclusion
Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ejh.13356 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317962062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390727675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAFkiQ0sAmM7cWJ2qOIpJDZlHdnJhKZy6hInVN0hTsBZOAiH4CQYCiyQ8GZk6ZtPM_MTssvgiIV3jJPxERMikStkwCRABBLUKhmAAh7Fccw2yKb3EwDgiqXrZEOwVHJI5YDYUd-4llqnS1pP6Ux3NU47T-d1N6ZNb7t6ZpE2C7Su0Sf07fX9-fn96aWpi9bdW2d6G7osPqL19BFb3_vgmgeidB7pfOwsho9x5YIOR9tkrdLW48533SJ352ej4WV0c3txNTy9iQouMxkJzrBgaWlEIkBnWWYSDhJloVSlECpTJTFUolAMeGp0oo3hRZahMBLiElFskYOld9a6hx59lze1L9BaPUXX-5yH_VU4gOQB3f-DTlzfTsN0gVKQ8lSmSaAOl1TY2vsWq3zW1o1uFzmD_DOCPESQf0UQ2L1vY28aLH_Jn5sH4HgJzGuLi_9N-dn15VL5ASQylOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390727675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT).
Materials and Methods
A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS).
Results
Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels.
Conclusion
Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31762076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; beta 2-Microglobulin - blood ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - blood ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Staging ; plasma cell neoplasms ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumor Burden ; Whole Body Imaging</subject><ispartof>European journal of haematology, 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fejh.13356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fejh.13356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinner, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><title>European journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Eur J Haematol</addtitle><description>Objective
Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT).
Materials and Methods
A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS).
Results
Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels.
Conclusion
Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>beta 2-Microglobulin - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - blood</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>plasma cell neoplasms</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging</subject><issn>0902-4441</issn><issn>1600-0609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAFkiQ0sAmM7cWJ2qOIpJDZlHdnJhKZy6hInVN0hTsBZOAiH4CQYCiyQ8GZk6ZtPM_MTssvgiIV3jJPxERMikStkwCRABBLUKhmAAh7Fccw2yKb3EwDgiqXrZEOwVHJI5YDYUd-4llqnS1pP6Ux3NU47T-d1N6ZNb7t6ZpE2C7Su0Sf07fX9-fn96aWpi9bdW2d6G7osPqL19BFb3_vgmgeidB7pfOwsho9x5YIOR9tkrdLW48533SJ352ej4WV0c3txNTy9iQouMxkJzrBgaWlEIkBnWWYSDhJloVSlECpTJTFUolAMeGp0oo3hRZahMBLiElFskYOld9a6hx59lze1L9BaPUXX-5yH_VU4gOQB3f-DTlzfTsN0gVKQ8lSmSaAOl1TY2vsWq3zW1o1uFzmD_DOCPESQf0UQ2L1vY28aLH_Jn5sH4HgJzGuLi_9N-dn15VL5ASQylOo</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Pfahler, Vanessa</creator><creator>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creator><creator>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creator><creator>Schinner, Regina</creator><creator>Ricke, Jens</creator><creator>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><author>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>beta 2-Microglobulin - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - blood</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>plasma cell neoplasms</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinner, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfahler, Vanessa</au><au>D'Anastasi, Melvin</au><au>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</au><au>Schinner, Regina</au><au>Ricke, Jens</au><au>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</atitle><jtitle>European journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Haematol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>383-389</pages><issn>0902-4441</issn><eissn>1600-0609</eissn><abstract>Objective
Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT).
Materials and Methods
A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS).
Results
Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels.
Conclusion
Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31762076</pmid><doi>10.1111/ejh.13356</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0902-4441 |
ispartof | European journal of haematology, 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389 |
issn | 0902-4441 1600-0609 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317962062 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over beta 2-Microglobulin - blood Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Multiple myeloma Multiple Myeloma - blood Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis Neoplasm Staging plasma cell neoplasms Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Prognosis Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tumor Burden Whole Body Imaging |
title | Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tumor%20load%20in%20patients%20with%20multiple%20myeloma:%20%CE%B2%E2%82%82%E2%80%90microglobulin%20levels%20versus%20low%E2%80%90dose%20whole%E2%80%90body%20CT&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=Pfahler,%20Vanessa&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=383-389&rft.issn=0902-4441&rft.eissn=1600-0609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejh.13356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390727675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390727675&rft_id=info:pmid/31762076&rfr_iscdi=true |