Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT

Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of haematology 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389
Hauptverfasser: Pfahler, Vanessa, D'Anastasi, Melvin, Dürr, Hans‐Roland, Schinner, Regina, Ricke, Jens, Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 5
container_start_page 383
container_title European journal of haematology
container_volume 104
creator Pfahler, Vanessa
D'Anastasi, Melvin
Dürr, Hans‐Roland
Schinner, Regina
Ricke, Jens
Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea
description Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS). Results Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels. Conclusion Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ejh.13356
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317962062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2390727675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAFkiQ0sAmM7cWJ2qOIpJDZlHdnJhKZy6hInVN0hTsBZOAiH4CQYCiyQ8GZk6ZtPM_MTssvgiIV3jJPxERMikStkwCRABBLUKhmAAh7Fccw2yKb3EwDgiqXrZEOwVHJI5YDYUd-4llqnS1pP6Ux3NU47T-d1N6ZNb7t6ZpE2C7Su0Sf07fX9-fn96aWpi9bdW2d6G7osPqL19BFb3_vgmgeidB7pfOwsho9x5YIOR9tkrdLW48533SJ352ej4WV0c3txNTy9iQouMxkJzrBgaWlEIkBnWWYSDhJloVSlECpTJTFUolAMeGp0oo3hRZahMBLiElFskYOld9a6hx59lze1L9BaPUXX-5yH_VU4gOQB3f-DTlzfTsN0gVKQ8lSmSaAOl1TY2vsWq3zW1o1uFzmD_DOCPESQf0UQ2L1vY28aLH_Jn5sH4HgJzGuLi_9N-dn15VL5ASQylOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390727675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS). Results Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels. Conclusion Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0902-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31762076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; beta 2-Microglobulin - blood ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple myeloma ; Multiple Myeloma - blood ; Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Staging ; plasma cell neoplasms ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumor Burden ; Whole Body Imaging</subject><ispartof>European journal of haematology, 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fejh.13356$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fejh.13356$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31762076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinner, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><title>European journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Eur J Haematol</addtitle><description>Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS). Results Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels. Conclusion Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>beta 2-Microglobulin - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple myeloma</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - blood</subject><subject>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>plasma cell neoplasms</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging</subject><issn>0902-4441</issn><issn>1600-0609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAFkiQ0sAmM7cWJ2qOIpJDZlHdnJhKZy6hInVN0hTsBZOAiH4CQYCiyQ8GZk6ZtPM_MTssvgiIV3jJPxERMikStkwCRABBLUKhmAAh7Fccw2yKb3EwDgiqXrZEOwVHJI5YDYUd-4llqnS1pP6Ux3NU47T-d1N6ZNb7t6ZpE2C7Su0Sf07fX9-fn96aWpi9bdW2d6G7osPqL19BFb3_vgmgeidB7pfOwsho9x5YIOR9tkrdLW48533SJ352ej4WV0c3txNTy9iQouMxkJzrBgaWlEIkBnWWYSDhJloVSlECpTJTFUolAMeGp0oo3hRZahMBLiElFskYOld9a6hx59lze1L9BaPUXX-5yH_VU4gOQB3f-DTlzfTsN0gVKQ8lSmSaAOl1TY2vsWq3zW1o1uFzmD_DOCPESQf0UQ2L1vY28aLH_Jn5sH4HgJzGuLi_9N-dn15VL5ASQylOo</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Pfahler, Vanessa</creator><creator>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creator><creator>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creator><creator>Schinner, Regina</creator><creator>Ricke, Jens</creator><creator>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</title><author>Pfahler, Vanessa ; D'Anastasi, Melvin ; Dürr, Hans‐Roland ; Schinner, Regina ; Ricke, Jens ; Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2686-321ec17db3530a888b5206e6c99f9e0fbf540f3c91027ba5abb2c88e3b604dee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>beta 2-Microglobulin - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple myeloma</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - blood</topic><topic>Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>plasma cell neoplasms</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfahler, Vanessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Anastasi, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schinner, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricke, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfahler, Vanessa</au><au>D'Anastasi, Melvin</au><au>Dürr, Hans‐Roland</au><au>Schinner, Regina</au><au>Ricke, Jens</au><au>Baur‐Melnyk, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT</atitle><jtitle>European journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Haematol</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>383-389</pages><issn>0902-4441</issn><eissn>1600-0609</eissn><abstract>Objective Beta‐2‐microglobulin is a serum marker of tumor burden in multiple myeloma (MM). Our aim was to correlate serum β₂‐microglobulin levels in patients with MM to tumor burden determined by low‐dose whole‐body CT (LDWBCT). Materials and Methods A total of 52 patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MM who underwent LDWBCT were included. LDWBCT scans were assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus for focal lesions. The Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system was used for staging patients in stages I‐III. β₂‐microglobulin was also subdivided into stages I‐III on the basis of the multiple myeloma International Staging System (ISS). Results Using the Durie and Salmon PLUS staging system criteria for image evaluation, we were able to identify stage I MM in 17 patients, stage II MM in nine patients, and stage III MM in 26 patients. Eight of nine patients with stage II MM and 16 of 26 patients with stage III MM had normal β₂‐microglobulin levels. Thus, 24 of 35 patients (68.6%) had 5 or more focal lesions and false‐negative β₂‐microglobulin levels. Conclusion Serum β₂‐microglobulin levels alone may not indicate the full extent of tumor burden in a significant subset of myeloma patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31762076</pmid><doi>10.1111/ejh.13356</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4574-8229</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0902-4441
ispartof European journal of haematology, 2020-05, Vol.104 (5), p.383-389
issn 0902-4441
1600-0609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2317962062
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
beta 2-Microglobulin - blood
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple myeloma
Multiple Myeloma - blood
Multiple Myeloma - diagnosis
Neoplasm Staging
plasma cell neoplasms
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumor Burden
Whole Body Imaging
title Tumor load in patients with multiple myeloma: β₂‐microglobulin levels versus low‐dose whole‐body CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A33%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tumor%20load%20in%20patients%20with%20multiple%20myeloma:%20%CE%B2%E2%82%82%E2%80%90microglobulin%20levels%20versus%20low%E2%80%90dose%20whole%E2%80%90body%20CT&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=Pfahler,%20Vanessa&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=383-389&rft.issn=0902-4441&rft.eissn=1600-0609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejh.13356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2390727675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390727675&rft_id=info:pmid/31762076&rfr_iscdi=true