Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies
A library of 17 nanoparticles made of acrylate and methacrylate copolymers is prepared, characterized, and screened against six epitopes of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV)‐neutralizing antibodies to assess their affinity and specificity. Peptide epitopes are immobilized onto the surface of glass bead...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular recognition 2020-04, Vol.33 (4), p.e2824-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e2824 |
container_title | Journal of molecular recognition |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Piletska, Elena V. Mirkes, Eugeny Piletsky, Stanislav S. Abosoglu, Hasan Cassim, Alfeshani Chu, Edmund Doughty, Simon Eganda, Shaun‐Jones Fuchigami, Hikari Hussein, Aleah Olickal, Meedhu Parmar, Neelay Sebastian, Akhil Piletsky, Sergey A. |
description | A library of 17 nanoparticles made of acrylate and methacrylate copolymers is prepared, characterized, and screened against six epitopes of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV)‐neutralizing antibodies to assess their affinity and specificity. Peptide epitopes are immobilized onto the surface of glass beads, packed in filtration microplates, and incubated with fluorescein‐labelled nanoparticles. Following intense washing, the affinity of nanoparticles to immobilized epitopes is assessed by measuring the fluorescence of captured nanoparticles. The results show that polar monomers, acrylic acid in particular, have a positive impact on polymer affinity towards all peptides used in this study. The presence of hydrophobic monomers, on other hand, has a negative impact on polymer binding. The composition of peptides used in this study has no noticeable impact on the affinity of synthesized nanoparticles. The affinity of nanoparticles with the highest affinity to peptide targets does not exceed millimolar level. Overall, it is found that the synthesized library showed modest affinity but lacked specificity, which should be further “tuned,” for example, by using molecular imprinting to achieve an acceptable level of affinity and specificity for practical application.
A small combinatorial library of polymeric nanoparticles was prepared and screened against six peptide epitopes of the variable regions of the AAV‐neutralizing antibodies following a protocol developed by the leader in this field, Prof Ken J. Shea. It addresses previously unanswered questions, particularly in relation to whether synthesized nanoparticles have not only affinity but also specificity to different peptide/protein modalities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmr.2824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315974046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2315974046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-cfa4c8af210342a319740f4fc5b6430339db4cca73b9189a3572f4d98328c9a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9KHDEUh4ModWsLPkEJeNOb0fybncnlstjaYhFK29shkz3RLJlkTDKU8aqP0Gf0ScxWbUHo1YFzPj5-nB9Cx5ScUkLY2XaIp6xlYg8tKJGyorxm-2hBZM0qLqQ8RK9T2hJSbjV5hQ45bQRrKVmgeR2G3nqVQ7TK4aQjgLf-GgeDx-DmASL2yodRxWy1g4RNiDjfgI1Y9dbZPOMccAQdrr29AwyjzWEsXBGsVj_uf_32MOWonL3baZXPtg8bC-kNOjDKJXj7NI_Q9w_n39YX1eXVx0_r1WWlS3JRaaOEbpVhlHDBFKeyEcQIo-t-KTjhXG56obVqeC9pKxWvG2bERractVqW9RF6_-gdY7idIOVusEmDc8pDmFLHOK13TrEs6MkLdBum6Eu6Qi3lUjDRyH9CHUNKEUw3RjuoOHeUdLs6ulJHt6ujoO-ehFM_wOYv-Pz_AlSPwE_rYP6vqPv85esf4QPXSZXu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2369642479</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Piletska, Elena V. ; Mirkes, Eugeny ; Piletsky, Stanislav S. ; Abosoglu, Hasan ; Cassim, Alfeshani ; Chu, Edmund ; Doughty, Simon ; Eganda, Shaun‐Jones ; Fuchigami, Hikari ; Hussein, Aleah ; Olickal, Meedhu ; Parmar, Neelay ; Sebastian, Akhil ; Piletsky, Sergey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piletska, Elena V. ; Mirkes, Eugeny ; Piletsky, Stanislav S. ; Abosoglu, Hasan ; Cassim, Alfeshani ; Chu, Edmund ; Doughty, Simon ; Eganda, Shaun‐Jones ; Fuchigami, Hikari ; Hussein, Aleah ; Olickal, Meedhu ; Parmar, Neelay ; Sebastian, Akhil ; Piletsky, Sergey A.</creatorcontrib><description>A library of 17 nanoparticles made of acrylate and methacrylate copolymers is prepared, characterized, and screened against six epitopes of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV)‐neutralizing antibodies to assess their affinity and specificity. Peptide epitopes are immobilized onto the surface of glass beads, packed in filtration microplates, and incubated with fluorescein‐labelled nanoparticles. Following intense washing, the affinity of nanoparticles to immobilized epitopes is assessed by measuring the fluorescence of captured nanoparticles. The results show that polar monomers, acrylic acid in particular, have a positive impact on polymer affinity towards all peptides used in this study. The presence of hydrophobic monomers, on other hand, has a negative impact on polymer binding. The composition of peptides used in this study has no noticeable impact on the affinity of synthesized nanoparticles. The affinity of nanoparticles with the highest affinity to peptide targets does not exceed millimolar level. Overall, it is found that the synthesized library showed modest affinity but lacked specificity, which should be further “tuned,” for example, by using molecular imprinting to achieve an acceptable level of affinity and specificity for practical application.
A small combinatorial library of polymeric nanoparticles was prepared and screened against six peptide epitopes of the variable regions of the AAV‐neutralizing antibodies following a protocol developed by the leader in this field, Prof Ken J. Shea. It addresses previously unanswered questions, particularly in relation to whether synthesized nanoparticles have not only affinity but also specificity to different peptide/protein modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmr.2824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31742810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acrylic acid ; Affinity ; Antibodies ; Beads ; Combinatorial analysis ; Epitopes ; Fluorescein ; Fluorescence ; Glass beads ; Hydrophobicity ; Molecular imprinting ; Monomers ; Nanoparticles ; Neutralizing ; Peptides ; Polymers ; Synthesis ; Viruses</subject><ispartof>Journal of molecular recognition, 2020-04, Vol.33 (4), p.e2824-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-cfa4c8af210342a319740f4fc5b6430339db4cca73b9189a3572f4d98328c9a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-cfa4c8af210342a319740f4fc5b6430339db4cca73b9189a3572f4d98328c9a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1474-1734 ; 0000-0001-6986-0787 ; 0000-0003-0122-1764 ; 0000-0003-2052-5763</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmr.2824$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmr.2824$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31742810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piletska, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, Eugeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piletsky, Stanislav S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abosoglu, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassim, Alfeshani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eganda, Shaun‐Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchigami, Hikari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussein, Aleah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olickal, Meedhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Neelay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Akhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piletsky, Sergey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies</title><title>Journal of molecular recognition</title><addtitle>J Mol Recognit</addtitle><description>A library of 17 nanoparticles made of acrylate and methacrylate copolymers is prepared, characterized, and screened against six epitopes of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV)‐neutralizing antibodies to assess their affinity and specificity. Peptide epitopes are immobilized onto the surface of glass beads, packed in filtration microplates, and incubated with fluorescein‐labelled nanoparticles. Following intense washing, the affinity of nanoparticles to immobilized epitopes is assessed by measuring the fluorescence of captured nanoparticles. The results show that polar monomers, acrylic acid in particular, have a positive impact on polymer affinity towards all peptides used in this study. The presence of hydrophobic monomers, on other hand, has a negative impact on polymer binding. The composition of peptides used in this study has no noticeable impact on the affinity of synthesized nanoparticles. The affinity of nanoparticles with the highest affinity to peptide targets does not exceed millimolar level. Overall, it is found that the synthesized library showed modest affinity but lacked specificity, which should be further “tuned,” for example, by using molecular imprinting to achieve an acceptable level of affinity and specificity for practical application.
A small combinatorial library of polymeric nanoparticles was prepared and screened against six peptide epitopes of the variable regions of the AAV‐neutralizing antibodies following a protocol developed by the leader in this field, Prof Ken J. Shea. It addresses previously unanswered questions, particularly in relation to whether synthesized nanoparticles have not only affinity but also specificity to different peptide/protein modalities.</description><subject>Acrylic acid</subject><subject>Affinity</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Beads</subject><subject>Combinatorial analysis</subject><subject>Epitopes</subject><subject>Fluorescein</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Glass beads</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Molecular imprinting</subject><subject>Monomers</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Neutralizing</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><issn>0952-3499</issn><issn>1099-1352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9KHDEUh4ModWsLPkEJeNOb0fybncnlstjaYhFK29shkz3RLJlkTDKU8aqP0Gf0ScxWbUHo1YFzPj5-nB9Cx5ScUkLY2XaIp6xlYg8tKJGyorxm-2hBZM0qLqQ8RK9T2hJSbjV5hQ45bQRrKVmgeR2G3nqVQ7TK4aQjgLf-GgeDx-DmASL2yodRxWy1g4RNiDjfgI1Y9dbZPOMccAQdrr29AwyjzWEsXBGsVj_uf_32MOWonL3baZXPtg8bC-kNOjDKJXj7NI_Q9w_n39YX1eXVx0_r1WWlS3JRaaOEbpVhlHDBFKeyEcQIo-t-KTjhXG56obVqeC9pKxWvG2bERractVqW9RF6_-gdY7idIOVusEmDc8pDmFLHOK13TrEs6MkLdBum6Eu6Qi3lUjDRyH9CHUNKEUw3RjuoOHeUdLs6ulJHt6ujoO-ehFM_wOYv-Pz_AlSPwE_rYP6vqPv85esf4QPXSZXu</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Piletska, Elena V.</creator><creator>Mirkes, Eugeny</creator><creator>Piletsky, Stanislav S.</creator><creator>Abosoglu, Hasan</creator><creator>Cassim, Alfeshani</creator><creator>Chu, Edmund</creator><creator>Doughty, Simon</creator><creator>Eganda, Shaun‐Jones</creator><creator>Fuchigami, Hikari</creator><creator>Hussein, Aleah</creator><creator>Olickal, Meedhu</creator><creator>Parmar, Neelay</creator><creator>Sebastian, Akhil</creator><creator>Piletsky, Sergey A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1474-1734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-0787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-1764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2052-5763</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies</title><author>Piletska, Elena V. ; Mirkes, Eugeny ; Piletsky, Stanislav S. ; Abosoglu, Hasan ; Cassim, Alfeshani ; Chu, Edmund ; Doughty, Simon ; Eganda, Shaun‐Jones ; Fuchigami, Hikari ; Hussein, Aleah ; Olickal, Meedhu ; Parmar, Neelay ; Sebastian, Akhil ; Piletsky, Sergey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3494-cfa4c8af210342a319740f4fc5b6430339db4cca73b9189a3572f4d98328c9a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acrylic acid</topic><topic>Affinity</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Beads</topic><topic>Combinatorial analysis</topic><topic>Epitopes</topic><topic>Fluorescein</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Glass beads</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Molecular imprinting</topic><topic>Monomers</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Neutralizing</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piletska, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirkes, Eugeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piletsky, Stanislav S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abosoglu, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassim, Alfeshani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Edmund</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doughty, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eganda, Shaun‐Jones</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuchigami, Hikari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussein, Aleah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olickal, Meedhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parmar, Neelay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Akhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piletsky, Sergey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of molecular recognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piletska, Elena V.</au><au>Mirkes, Eugeny</au><au>Piletsky, Stanislav S.</au><au>Abosoglu, Hasan</au><au>Cassim, Alfeshani</au><au>Chu, Edmund</au><au>Doughty, Simon</au><au>Eganda, Shaun‐Jones</au><au>Fuchigami, Hikari</au><au>Hussein, Aleah</au><au>Olickal, Meedhu</au><au>Parmar, Neelay</au><au>Sebastian, Akhil</au><au>Piletsky, Sergey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of molecular recognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Mol Recognit</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e2824</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2824-n/a</pages><issn>0952-3499</issn><eissn>1099-1352</eissn><abstract>A library of 17 nanoparticles made of acrylate and methacrylate copolymers is prepared, characterized, and screened against six epitopes of adeno‐associated viruses (AAV)‐neutralizing antibodies to assess their affinity and specificity. Peptide epitopes are immobilized onto the surface of glass beads, packed in filtration microplates, and incubated with fluorescein‐labelled nanoparticles. Following intense washing, the affinity of nanoparticles to immobilized epitopes is assessed by measuring the fluorescence of captured nanoparticles. The results show that polar monomers, acrylic acid in particular, have a positive impact on polymer affinity towards all peptides used in this study. The presence of hydrophobic monomers, on other hand, has a negative impact on polymer binding. The composition of peptides used in this study has no noticeable impact on the affinity of synthesized nanoparticles. The affinity of nanoparticles with the highest affinity to peptide targets does not exceed millimolar level. Overall, it is found that the synthesized library showed modest affinity but lacked specificity, which should be further “tuned,” for example, by using molecular imprinting to achieve an acceptable level of affinity and specificity for practical application.
A small combinatorial library of polymeric nanoparticles was prepared and screened against six peptide epitopes of the variable regions of the AAV‐neutralizing antibodies following a protocol developed by the leader in this field, Prof Ken J. Shea. It addresses previously unanswered questions, particularly in relation to whether synthesized nanoparticles have not only affinity but also specificity to different peptide/protein modalities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31742810</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmr.2824</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1474-1734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6986-0787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-1764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2052-5763</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-3499 |
ispartof | Journal of molecular recognition, 2020-04, Vol.33 (4), p.e2824-n/a |
issn | 0952-3499 1099-1352 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315974046 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Acrylic acid Affinity Antibodies Beads Combinatorial analysis Epitopes Fluorescein Fluorescence Glass beads Hydrophobicity Molecular imprinting Monomers Nanoparticles Neutralizing Peptides Polymers Synthesis Viruses |
title | Combinatorial screening of polymer nanoparticles for their ability to recognize epitopes of AAV‐neutralizing antibodies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A58%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combinatorial%20screening%20of%20polymer%20nanoparticles%20for%20their%20ability%20to%20recognize%20epitopes%20of%20AAV%E2%80%90neutralizing%20antibodies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20molecular%20recognition&rft.au=Piletska,%20Elena%20V.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e2824&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2824-n/a&rft.issn=0952-3499&rft.eissn=1099-1352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmr.2824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315974046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2369642479&rft_id=info:pmid/31742810&rfr_iscdi=true |