Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”

BACKGROUNDAcross the last decade, healthcare emerged as a critical space for combatting modern slavery. Accurate and informative training of healthcare professionals is, therefore, essential. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) plays a central role in the identification and care of survivor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public health (Oxford, England) England), 2021-06, Vol.43 (2), p.413-419
Hauptverfasser: Helle, Segan, Steele, Sarah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 2
container_start_page 413
container_title Journal of public health (Oxford, England)
container_volume 43
creator Helle, Segan
Steele, Sarah
description BACKGROUNDAcross the last decade, healthcare emerged as a critical space for combatting modern slavery. Accurate and informative training of healthcare professionals is, therefore, essential. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) plays a central role in the identification and care of survivors. With training at the local-level variable, an e-Learning programme was developed. We ask: has this programme reached NHS staff? Is it accurate? Should the e-Learning approach be replicated around the world? METHODA Freedom of Information request has been sent to the NHS's Health Education England for data held on registrations, sessions and completions since 2014. An open session was used to assess the content. RESULTSAcross the past 5 years, there have been 31 191 registrations (≈2% of the workforce) and 1763 completed sessions (≈0.12%). Uptake remains low. We also identify deficiencies in the ways the programme represents modern slavery, and how the program engages with the complexities of national and international law and UK policy, as well as reporting mechanisms. CONCLUSIONSe-Learning, while flexible and on-going, must be engaging and, we suggest, accompanied by in-person sessions. Materials should be co-produced with survivors and healthcare workers around the world to improve interest and relevance. Updating content regularly is critical.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/pubmed/fdz124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315526000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2315526000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8f1831e1edc13ab02440bbba1504b50be1ff24f1a4ee318203a84c58d4ea02f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kbtOw0AQRS0EEs-Sfksaw-zD4NChCAhSBAXprbV3NjE4u2ZnHSlU-RCo-S--hBgjqhlpzj0a6SbJKYdzDiN50XblEs2FNe9cqJ3kgF8pnso8g93_XYn95JDoBUCMBGQHyde4i7F2c4ZmjswHVs-dD2hYQPJdqPCaaSIk6pm4QNa1Ub8i086wyruILjJvfy-Pk2eG6RR1cD1st7IF6iYuKh22ase-Nx-12QZqu-6BXkFd2_rw-wB1YVWvfKDet_QGg2PU6BWG9ffm8zjZs7ohPPmbR8ns7nY2nqTTp_uH8c00rSSMYppbnkuOHE3FpS5BKAVlWWqegSozKJFbK5TlWiFKnguQOldVlhuFGoSVR8nZoG2Df-uQYrGsqcKm0Q59R4WQPMvEJQBs0XRAq-CJAtqiDfVSh3XBoej7KIY-iqEP-QPrnIZq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315526000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Helle, Segan ; Steele, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Helle, Segan ; Steele, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDAcross the last decade, healthcare emerged as a critical space for combatting modern slavery. Accurate and informative training of healthcare professionals is, therefore, essential. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) plays a central role in the identification and care of survivors. With training at the local-level variable, an e-Learning programme was developed. We ask: has this programme reached NHS staff? Is it accurate? Should the e-Learning approach be replicated around the world? METHODA Freedom of Information request has been sent to the NHS's Health Education England for data held on registrations, sessions and completions since 2014. An open session was used to assess the content. RESULTSAcross the past 5 years, there have been 31 191 registrations (≈2% of the workforce) and 1763 completed sessions (≈0.12%). Uptake remains low. We also identify deficiencies in the ways the programme represents modern slavery, and how the program engages with the complexities of national and international law and UK policy, as well as reporting mechanisms. CONCLUSIONSe-Learning, while flexible and on-going, must be engaging and, we suggest, accompanied by in-person sessions. Materials should be co-produced with survivors and healthcare workers around the world to improve interest and relevance. Updating content regularly is critical.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-3842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz124</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2021-06, Vol.43 (2), p.413-419</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8f1831e1edc13ab02440bbba1504b50be1ff24f1a4ee318203a84c58d4ea02f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8f1831e1edc13ab02440bbba1504b50be1ff24f1a4ee318203a84c58d4ea02f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Helle, Segan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”</title><title>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</title><description>BACKGROUNDAcross the last decade, healthcare emerged as a critical space for combatting modern slavery. Accurate and informative training of healthcare professionals is, therefore, essential. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) plays a central role in the identification and care of survivors. With training at the local-level variable, an e-Learning programme was developed. We ask: has this programme reached NHS staff? Is it accurate? Should the e-Learning approach be replicated around the world? METHODA Freedom of Information request has been sent to the NHS's Health Education England for data held on registrations, sessions and completions since 2014. An open session was used to assess the content. RESULTSAcross the past 5 years, there have been 31 191 registrations (≈2% of the workforce) and 1763 completed sessions (≈0.12%). Uptake remains low. We also identify deficiencies in the ways the programme represents modern slavery, and how the program engages with the complexities of national and international law and UK policy, as well as reporting mechanisms. CONCLUSIONSe-Learning, while flexible and on-going, must be engaging and, we suggest, accompanied by in-person sessions. Materials should be co-produced with survivors and healthcare workers around the world to improve interest and relevance. Updating content regularly is critical.</description><issn>1741-3842</issn><issn>1741-3850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kbtOw0AQRS0EEs-Sfksaw-zD4NChCAhSBAXprbV3NjE4u2ZnHSlU-RCo-S--hBgjqhlpzj0a6SbJKYdzDiN50XblEs2FNe9cqJ3kgF8pnso8g93_XYn95JDoBUCMBGQHyde4i7F2c4ZmjswHVs-dD2hYQPJdqPCaaSIk6pm4QNa1Ub8i086wyruILjJvfy-Pk2eG6RR1cD1st7IF6iYuKh22ase-Nx-12QZqu-6BXkFd2_rw-wB1YVWvfKDet_QGg2PU6BWG9ffm8zjZs7ohPPmbR8ns7nY2nqTTp_uH8c00rSSMYppbnkuOHE3FpS5BKAVlWWqegSozKJFbK5TlWiFKnguQOldVlhuFGoSVR8nZoG2Df-uQYrGsqcKm0Q59R4WQPMvEJQBs0XRAq-CJAtqiDfVSh3XBoej7KIY-iqEP-QPrnIZq</recordid><startdate>20210607</startdate><enddate>20210607</enddate><creator>Helle, Segan</creator><creator>Steele, Sarah</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210607</creationdate><title>Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”</title><author>Helle, Segan ; Steele, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8f1831e1edc13ab02440bbba1504b50be1ff24f1a4ee318203a84c58d4ea02f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Helle, Segan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Helle, Segan</au><au>Steele, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2021-06-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>413-419</pages><issn>1741-3842</issn><eissn>1741-3850</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDAcross the last decade, healthcare emerged as a critical space for combatting modern slavery. Accurate and informative training of healthcare professionals is, therefore, essential. In the UK, the National Health Service (NHS) plays a central role in the identification and care of survivors. With training at the local-level variable, an e-Learning programme was developed. We ask: has this programme reached NHS staff? Is it accurate? Should the e-Learning approach be replicated around the world? METHODA Freedom of Information request has been sent to the NHS's Health Education England for data held on registrations, sessions and completions since 2014. An open session was used to assess the content. RESULTSAcross the past 5 years, there have been 31 191 registrations (≈2% of the workforce) and 1763 completed sessions (≈0.12%). Uptake remains low. We also identify deficiencies in the ways the programme represents modern slavery, and how the program engages with the complexities of national and international law and UK policy, as well as reporting mechanisms. CONCLUSIONSe-Learning, while flexible and on-going, must be engaging and, we suggest, accompanied by in-person sessions. Materials should be co-produced with survivors and healthcare workers around the world to improve interest and relevance. Updating content regularly is critical.</abstract><doi>10.1093/pubmed/fdz124</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-3842
ispartof Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2021-06, Vol.43 (2), p.413-419
issn 1741-3842
1741-3850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315526000
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Cutting edge or ignored resource: assessing the uptake and content of the NHS e-Learning for healthcare on “identifying and supporting survivors of modern slavery”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutting%20edge%20or%20ignored%20resource:%20assessing%20the%20uptake%20and%20content%20of%20the%20NHS%20e-Learning%20for%20healthcare%20on%20%E2%80%9Cidentifying%20and%20supporting%20survivors%20of%20modern%20slavery%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Helle,%20Segan&rft.date=2021-06-07&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=413-419&rft.issn=1741-3842&rft.eissn=1741-3850&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdz124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315526000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315526000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true