Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments
In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of hydrometeorology 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 714 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 691 |
container_title | Journal of hydrometeorology |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Lahmers, Timothy M. Gupta, Hoshin Castro, Christopher L. Gochis, David J. Yates, David Dugger, Aubrey Goodrich, David Hazenberg, Pieter |
description | In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315254702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26675200</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26675200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LBi5dsL2nSpEfZD6dsCE7RW2jTZOvompm0wv5720128PLe4_H5Pr7vGwS3GAYYczZ8mS3QGGGBAGI6wGdBDzPCEGcUn59m9nUZXHm_AQCaYNELlpNqnVaqqFZhvdbhsnaNqhunQ2sOi8-3KZrtc2fDQy3tqlDhwua6DI114VJvi9QVeTipfgpnq62uan8dXJi09Prmr_eDj-nkfTRD89en59HjHKkoZjVKBOU5zRhkEclFHBEDCYGMJjQVKlfEiMxwzlJFIs5VpgRgHeVAGSSxybiJ-sHD8e7O2e9G-1puC690WaaVto2XJOq-phxIi97_Qze2cVXrrqUSEJgL0lHDI6Wc9d5pI3eu2KZuLzHILmTZhizHEgvZhSxxq7g7Kja-tu6EkzjmjABEv-sod_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390817822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Architecture ; Arizona ; Atmospheric forcing ; basins ; Bias ; Calibration ; Channel loss ; Computer simulation ; drainage ; Drainage area ; Drainage basins ; Estimates ; Evapotranspiration ; Evapotranspiration models ; Floods ; Fluid dynamics ; Groundwater ; Groundwater recharge ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; hydrometeorology ; Infiltration ; infiltration (hydrology) ; Meteorological services ; Ordinary differential equations ; Physical simulation ; Precipitation ; prediction ; rain ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Semi arid environments ; Semiarid environments ; Semiarid zones ; Soil ; Soil moisture ; soil water ; Soils ; stream channels ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow forecasting ; Walnuts ; Water balance ; Watersheds ; Weather forecasting ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrometeorology, 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714</ispartof><rights>2019 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26675200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26675200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugger, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><title>Journal of hydrometeorology</title><description>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Atmospheric forcing</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Channel loss</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>Drainage area</subject><subject>Drainage basins</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration models</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>hydrometeorology</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>infiltration (hydrology)</subject><subject>Meteorological services</subject><subject>Ordinary differential equations</subject><subject>Physical simulation</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Semi arid environments</subject><subject>Semiarid environments</subject><subject>Semiarid zones</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>stream channels</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow forecasting</subject><subject>Walnuts</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>1525-755X</issn><issn>1525-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LBi5dsL2nSpEfZD6dsCE7RW2jTZOvompm0wv5720128PLe4_H5Pr7vGwS3GAYYczZ8mS3QGGGBAGI6wGdBDzPCEGcUn59m9nUZXHm_AQCaYNELlpNqnVaqqFZhvdbhsnaNqhunQ2sOi8-3KZrtc2fDQy3tqlDhwua6DI114VJvi9QVeTipfgpnq62uan8dXJi09Prmr_eDj-nkfTRD89en59HjHKkoZjVKBOU5zRhkEclFHBEDCYGMJjQVKlfEiMxwzlJFIs5VpgRgHeVAGSSxybiJ-sHD8e7O2e9G-1puC690WaaVto2XJOq-phxIi97_Qze2cVXrrqUSEJgL0lHDI6Wc9d5pI3eu2KZuLzHILmTZhizHEgvZhSxxq7g7Kja-tu6EkzjmjABEv-sod_s</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Gupta, Hoshin</creator><creator>Castro, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Gochis, David J.</creator><creator>Yates, David</creator><creator>Dugger, Aubrey</creator><creator>Goodrich, David</creator><creator>Hazenberg, Pieter</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><author>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Atmospheric forcing</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Channel loss</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>Drainage area</topic><topic>Drainage basins</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration models</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>hydrometeorology</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>infiltration (hydrology)</topic><topic>Meteorological services</topic><topic>Ordinary differential equations</topic><topic>Physical simulation</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Semi arid environments</topic><topic>Semiarid environments</topic><topic>Semiarid zones</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>stream channels</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow forecasting</topic><topic>Walnuts</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugger, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahmers, Timothy M.</au><au>Gupta, Hoshin</au><au>Castro, Christopher L.</au><au>Gochis, David J.</au><au>Yates, David</au><au>Dugger, Aubrey</au><au>Goodrich, David</au><au>Hazenberg, Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>691-714</pages><issn>1525-755X</issn><eissn>1525-7541</eissn><abstract>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-755X |
ispartof | Journal of hydrometeorology, 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714 |
issn | 1525-755X 1525-7541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315254702 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accounting Architecture Arizona Atmospheric forcing basins Bias Calibration Channel loss Computer simulation drainage Drainage area Drainage basins Estimates Evapotranspiration Evapotranspiration models Floods Fluid dynamics Groundwater Groundwater recharge Hydrologic models Hydrology hydrometeorology Infiltration infiltration (hydrology) Meteorological services Ordinary differential equations Physical simulation Precipitation prediction rain Rivers Runoff Semi arid environments Semiarid environments Semiarid zones Soil Soil moisture soil water Soils stream channels Stream discharge Stream flow Streamflow forecasting Walnuts Water balance Watersheds Weather forecasting Wind |
title | Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20the%20Structure%20of%20the%20WRF-Hydro%20Hydrologic%20Model%20for%20Semiarid%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrometeorology&rft.au=Lahmers,%20Timothy%20M.&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=691-714&rft.issn=1525-755X&rft.eissn=1525-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26675200%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390817822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26675200&rfr_iscdi=true |