Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments

In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrometeorology 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714
Hauptverfasser: Lahmers, Timothy M., Gupta, Hoshin, Castro, Christopher L., Gochis, David J., Yates, David, Dugger, Aubrey, Goodrich, David, Hazenberg, Pieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 714
container_issue 4
container_start_page 691
container_title Journal of hydrometeorology
container_volume 20
creator Lahmers, Timothy M.
Gupta, Hoshin
Castro, Christopher L.
Gochis, David J.
Yates, David
Dugger, Aubrey
Goodrich, David
Hazenberg, Pieter
description In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315254702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26675200</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26675200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LBi5dsL2nSpEfZD6dsCE7RW2jTZOvompm0wv5720128PLe4_H5Pr7vGwS3GAYYczZ8mS3QGGGBAGI6wGdBDzPCEGcUn59m9nUZXHm_AQCaYNELlpNqnVaqqFZhvdbhsnaNqhunQ2sOi8-3KZrtc2fDQy3tqlDhwua6DI114VJvi9QVeTipfgpnq62uan8dXJi09Prmr_eDj-nkfTRD89en59HjHKkoZjVKBOU5zRhkEclFHBEDCYGMJjQVKlfEiMxwzlJFIs5VpgRgHeVAGSSxybiJ-sHD8e7O2e9G-1puC690WaaVto2XJOq-phxIi97_Qze2cVXrrqUSEJgL0lHDI6Wc9d5pI3eu2KZuLzHILmTZhizHEgvZhSxxq7g7Kja-tu6EkzjmjABEv-sod_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2390817822</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Architecture ; Arizona ; Atmospheric forcing ; basins ; Bias ; Calibration ; Channel loss ; Computer simulation ; drainage ; Drainage area ; Drainage basins ; Estimates ; Evapotranspiration ; Evapotranspiration models ; Floods ; Fluid dynamics ; Groundwater ; Groundwater recharge ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; hydrometeorology ; Infiltration ; infiltration (hydrology) ; Meteorological services ; Ordinary differential equations ; Physical simulation ; Precipitation ; prediction ; rain ; Rivers ; Runoff ; Semi arid environments ; Semiarid environments ; Semiarid zones ; Soil ; Soil moisture ; soil water ; Soils ; stream channels ; Stream discharge ; Stream flow ; Streamflow forecasting ; Walnuts ; Water balance ; Watersheds ; Weather forecasting ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrometeorology, 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714</ispartof><rights>2019 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26675200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26675200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugger, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><title>Journal of hydrometeorology</title><description>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Atmospheric forcing</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Channel loss</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>drainage</subject><subject>Drainage area</subject><subject>Drainage basins</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration models</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>hydrometeorology</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>infiltration (hydrology)</subject><subject>Meteorological services</subject><subject>Ordinary differential equations</subject><subject>Physical simulation</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Semi arid environments</subject><subject>Semiarid environments</subject><subject>Semiarid zones</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>stream channels</subject><subject>Stream discharge</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow forecasting</subject><subject>Walnuts</subject><subject>Water balance</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>1525-755X</issn><issn>1525-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LBi5dsL2nSpEfZD6dsCE7RW2jTZOvompm0wv5720128PLe4_H5Pr7vGwS3GAYYczZ8mS3QGGGBAGI6wGdBDzPCEGcUn59m9nUZXHm_AQCaYNELlpNqnVaqqFZhvdbhsnaNqhunQ2sOi8-3KZrtc2fDQy3tqlDhwua6DI114VJvi9QVeTipfgpnq62uan8dXJi09Prmr_eDj-nkfTRD89en59HjHKkoZjVKBOU5zRhkEclFHBEDCYGMJjQVKlfEiMxwzlJFIs5VpgRgHeVAGSSxybiJ-sHD8e7O2e9G-1puC690WaaVto2XJOq-phxIi97_Qze2cVXrrqUSEJgL0lHDI6Wc9d5pI3eu2KZuLzHILmTZhizHEgvZhSxxq7g7Kja-tu6EkzjmjABEv-sod_s</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Gupta, Hoshin</creator><creator>Castro, Christopher L.</creator><creator>Gochis, David J.</creator><creator>Yates, David</creator><creator>Dugger, Aubrey</creator><creator>Goodrich, David</creator><creator>Hazenberg, Pieter</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</title><author>Lahmers, Timothy M. ; Gupta, Hoshin ; Castro, Christopher L. ; Gochis, David J. ; Yates, David ; Dugger, Aubrey ; Goodrich, David ; Hazenberg, Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-9847d4b50b32d8632f0920b494a8cdc2f8bf775ac2377cbc801e3d045096fb7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Atmospheric forcing</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Channel loss</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>drainage</topic><topic>Drainage area</topic><topic>Drainage basins</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration models</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>hydrometeorology</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>infiltration (hydrology)</topic><topic>Meteorological services</topic><topic>Ordinary differential equations</topic><topic>Physical simulation</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Semi arid environments</topic><topic>Semiarid environments</topic><topic>Semiarid zones</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>stream channels</topic><topic>Stream discharge</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow forecasting</topic><topic>Walnuts</topic><topic>Water balance</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lahmers, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Hoshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yates, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugger, Aubrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenberg, Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lahmers, Timothy M.</au><au>Gupta, Hoshin</au><au>Castro, Christopher L.</au><au>Gochis, David J.</au><au>Yates, David</au><au>Dugger, Aubrey</au><au>Goodrich, David</au><au>Hazenberg, Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>691</spage><epage>714</epage><pages>691-714</pages><issn>1525-755X</issn><eissn>1525-7541</eissn><abstract>In August 2016, the National Weather Service Office of Water Prediction (NWS/OWP) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) implemented the operational National Water Model (NWM) to simulate and forecast streamflow, soil moisture, and other model states throughout the contiguous United States. Based on the architecture of the WRF-Hydro hydrologic model, the NWM does not currently resolve channel infiltration, an important component of the water balance of the semiarid western United States. Here, we demonstrate the benefit of implementing a conceptual channel infiltration function (from the KINEROS2 semidistributed hydrologic model) into the WRF-Hydro model architecture, configured as NWM v1.1. After calibration, the updated WRF-Hydro model exhibits reduced streamflow errors for the Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) and the Babocomari River in southeast Arizona. Model calibration was performed using NLDAS-2 atmospheric forcing, available from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP), paired with precipitation forcing from NLDAS-2, NCEP Stage IV, or local gauge precipitation. Including channel infiltration within WRF-Hydro results in a physically realistic hydrologic response in the WGEW, when the model is forced with high-resolution, gauge-based precipitation in lieu of a national product. The value of accounting for channel loss is also demonstrated in the Babocomari basin, where the drainage area is greater and the cumulative effect of channel infiltration ismore important. Accounting for channel infiltration loss thus improves the streamflow behavior simulated by the calibrated model and reduces evapo-transpiration bias when gauge precipitation is used as forcing. However, calibration also results in increased high soil moisture bias,which is likely due to underlying limitations of the NWM structure and calibration methodology.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-755X
ispartof Journal of hydrometeorology, 2019-04, Vol.20 (4), p.691-714
issn 1525-755X
1525-7541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315254702
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accounting
Architecture
Arizona
Atmospheric forcing
basins
Bias
Calibration
Channel loss
Computer simulation
drainage
Drainage area
Drainage basins
Estimates
Evapotranspiration
Evapotranspiration models
Floods
Fluid dynamics
Groundwater
Groundwater recharge
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
hydrometeorology
Infiltration
infiltration (hydrology)
Meteorological services
Ordinary differential equations
Physical simulation
Precipitation
prediction
rain
Rivers
Runoff
Semi arid environments
Semiarid environments
Semiarid zones
Soil
Soil moisture
soil water
Soils
stream channels
Stream discharge
Stream flow
Streamflow forecasting
Walnuts
Water balance
Watersheds
Weather forecasting
Wind
title Enhancing the Structure of the WRF-Hydro Hydrologic Model for Semiarid Environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20the%20Structure%20of%20the%20WRF-Hydro%20Hydrologic%20Model%20for%20Semiarid%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrometeorology&rft.au=Lahmers,%20Timothy%20M.&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=691&rft.epage=714&rft.pages=691-714&rft.issn=1525-755X&rft.eissn=1525-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/JHM-D-18-0064.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26675200%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2390817822&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26675200&rfr_iscdi=true