The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair
Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vascular surgery 2020-06, Vol.71 (6), p.2021-2028.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2028.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2021 |
container_title | Journal of vascular surgery |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Lotto, Christine E. Sharma, Gaurav Walsh, Jillian P. Shah, Samir K. Nguyen, Louis L. Ozaki, C. Keith Menard, Matthew T. Belkin, Michael |
description | Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB.
Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed.
The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics—rather than repair type—as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years.
Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorte |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.249 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315099331</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521419323067</els_id><sourcerecordid>2315099331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f76bf3e1b614fc22ea3fdd8c32c31c5fcc3b4f78b872d28db38f2ae97c817faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0KRB-FD2CDvGST4LGT2BErVEFBqsSmbNhYznhc_JTEwU6e1L8n1StdsppZnHs1cxh7B6IGAd3HY308lVoK6Gthatn0F-wAotdVZ0T_gh2EbqBqJTSX7HUpRyEAWqNfsUsFWuqmNQf26-438TgtDleeAsc0DXEmz-MYHfKEOG4lnoj7WMgV4m723KW8RtxX2vJDmXiaeVpo5mXL9xHdyDMtLuY37GVwY6G3T_OK_fz65e76W3X74-b79efbClXfrVXQ3RAUwdBBE1BKcip4b1BJVIBtQFRDE7QZjJZeGj8oE6SjXqMBHZxTV-zDuXfJ6c9GZbVTLEjjuB-YtmKlglb0vVKwo3BGMadSMgW75Di5_GBB2Eel9mh3pfZRqRXG7kr3zPun-m2YyD8n_jncgU9ngPYnT5GyLRhpRvIxE67Wp_if-r8lXYjZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315099331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lotto, Christine E. ; Sharma, Gaurav ; Walsh, Jillian P. ; Shah, Samir K. ; Nguyen, Louis L. ; Ozaki, C. Keith ; Menard, Matthew T. ; Belkin, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Lotto, Christine E. ; Sharma, Gaurav ; Walsh, Jillian P. ; Shah, Samir K. ; Nguyen, Louis L. ; Ozaki, C. Keith ; Menard, Matthew T. ; Belkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB.
Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed.
The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics—rather than repair type—as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years.
Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorter 5-year survival. Patient and aneurysm characteristics rather than surgical repair type appear to be responsible for these differences. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality and major morbidity were comparable, making AFB an attractive alternative to endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with advanced iliac occlusive disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.249</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31727458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aortic aneurysms ; Occlusive disease</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-06, Vol.71 (6), p.2021-2028.e1</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f76bf3e1b614fc22ea3fdd8c32c31c5fcc3b4f78b872d28db38f2ae97c817faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f76bf3e1b614fc22ea3fdd8c32c31c5fcc3b4f78b872d28db38f2ae97c817faa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.249$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lotto, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Jillian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Samir K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Louis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, C. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menard, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB.
Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed.
The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics—rather than repair type—as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years.
Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorter 5-year survival. Patient and aneurysm characteristics rather than surgical repair type appear to be responsible for these differences. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality and major morbidity were comparable, making AFB an attractive alternative to endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with advanced iliac occlusive disease.</description><subject>Aortic aneurysms</subject><subject>Occlusive disease</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1TAQRa0KRB-FD2CDvGST4LGT2BErVEFBqsSmbNhYznhc_JTEwU6e1L8n1StdsppZnHs1cxh7B6IGAd3HY308lVoK6Gthatn0F-wAotdVZ0T_gh2EbqBqJTSX7HUpRyEAWqNfsUsFWuqmNQf26-438TgtDleeAsc0DXEmz-MYHfKEOG4lnoj7WMgV4m723KW8RtxX2vJDmXiaeVpo5mXL9xHdyDMtLuY37GVwY6G3T_OK_fz65e76W3X74-b79efbClXfrVXQ3RAUwdBBE1BKcip4b1BJVIBtQFRDE7QZjJZeGj8oE6SjXqMBHZxTV-zDuXfJ6c9GZbVTLEjjuB-YtmKlglb0vVKwo3BGMadSMgW75Di5_GBB2Eel9mh3pfZRqRXG7kr3zPun-m2YyD8n_jncgU9ngPYnT5GyLRhpRvIxE67Wp_if-r8lXYjZ</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Lotto, Christine E.</creator><creator>Sharma, Gaurav</creator><creator>Walsh, Jillian P.</creator><creator>Shah, Samir K.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Louis L.</creator><creator>Ozaki, C. Keith</creator><creator>Menard, Matthew T.</creator><creator>Belkin, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair</title><author>Lotto, Christine E. ; Sharma, Gaurav ; Walsh, Jillian P. ; Shah, Samir K. ; Nguyen, Louis L. ; Ozaki, C. Keith ; Menard, Matthew T. ; Belkin, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-f76bf3e1b614fc22ea3fdd8c32c31c5fcc3b4f78b872d28db38f2ae97c817faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aortic aneurysms</topic><topic>Occlusive disease</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lotto, Christine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Jillian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Samir K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Louis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, C. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menard, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkin, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lotto, Christine E.</au><au>Sharma, Gaurav</au><au>Walsh, Jillian P.</au><au>Shah, Samir K.</au><au>Nguyen, Louis L.</au><au>Ozaki, C. Keith</au><au>Menard, Matthew T.</au><au>Belkin, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2021</spage><epage>2028.e1</epage><pages>2021-2028.e1</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Severe aortoiliac occlusive disease is a relative contraindication for endovascular aneurysm repair, owing to an association with high stent graft-related complication and reintervention rates in this population. Open AAA repair requiring aortofemoral bypass (AFB), however, may represent a unique population with differing outcomes from standard open repair. We sought to compare the demographic and procedural characteristics, as well as outcomes of patients undergoing standard intra-abdominal repairs (STD) versus those requiring AFB.
Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively identified patients who underwent open AAA repair from 1994 to 2017. A total of 1087 consecutive cases were performed consisting of 981 STD (681 tube graft, 300 aortoiliac) and 106 AFB cases. Demographics, procedural data, postoperative complications, and long-term survival were analyzed.
The AFB cohort had more women (39.0 vs 22.8%; P = .001) and higher rates of hypertension (81.1 vs 69.8%; P = .015), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.3 vs 17.4%; P = .006), and smoking (50.9 vs 36%; P = .002). The AFB group had smaller mean aortic (5.22 vs 5.77 cm; P = .001) and graft (17.08 vs 18.2 mm; P = .001) diameters. Proximal clamp position and blood loss were equivalent, although total anesthesia time was longer (295 vs 234 minutes; P = .001) in the AFB cohort. Overall 30-day postoperative morbidity (38.7 vs 24.8%; P = .002) was higher in the AFB group. Specifically, postoperative renal insufficiency (8.2 vs 3.4%; P = .032), wound infection (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .005), and hematoma/seroma (5.7 vs 1.2%; P = .003) were more likely. Hospital length of stay was longer for AFB (11.9 vs 9.9 days; P = .007). The 30-day mortality (0.9% AFB vs 1.8% STD; P = .50) and major morbidity (17 vs 11.5%; P = .10) did not differ. Reintervention rate within 30 days of the initial surgery (12.3 vs 4.6; P = .001) and overall (33 vs 18.9%; P = .001) was higher in the AFB group. Long-term survival was lower in the AFB group (5-year survival: 63.1% AFB vs 71.9% STD; hazard ratio 0.76, log-rank P = .047). Multivariate regression analysis identified age, comorbid conditions, and aneurysm characteristics—rather than repair type—as independent predictors of 30-day reintervention and mortality at 5 years.
Patients requiring AFB for AAA owing to associated iliac occlusive disease have more preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications, a longer length of stay, reintervention rates and shorter 5-year survival. Patient and aneurysm characteristics rather than surgical repair type appear to be responsible for these differences. Nevertheless, 30-day mortality and major morbidity were comparable, making AFB an attractive alternative to endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with advanced iliac occlusive disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31727458</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.249</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-5214 |
ispartof | Journal of vascular surgery, 2020-06, Vol.71 (6), p.2021-2028.e1 |
issn | 0741-5214 1097-6809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315099331 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aortic aneurysms Occlusive disease |
title | The impact of combined iliac occlusive disease and aortic aneurysm on open surgical repair |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20combined%20iliac%20occlusive%20disease%20and%20aortic%20aneurysm%20on%20open%20surgical%20repair&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Lotto,%20Christine%20E.&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2021&rft.epage=2028.e1&rft.pages=2021-2028.e1&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.08.249&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315099331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315099331&rft_id=info:pmid/31727458&rft_els_id=S0741521419323067&rfr_iscdi=true |