Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic radiology 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e182 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e176 |
container_title | Academic radiology |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Ye, Jing Xu, Qing Wang, Shou-An Zheng, Jin Dou, Wei-Qiang |
description | To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading.
A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.
ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533).
Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315097347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1076633219304945</els_id><sourcerecordid>2315097347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu3DAMNIIWaB79gZ507MUbyZLtFZBL4Dy6aIo8kJ4FWqY2WthSKsmL9GP6r5WzPffE4ZAzIDFF8YXRFaOsOd-tQAdYVZTJTKwoo0fFMVu361JQ0XzImLZN2XBefSpOYtxRyupmzY-LP48zuGQTJLtHcr2Hcc7QO-IN2bgUYO_fcMxQ-xcM6BL54d_n4AZyZY2Z49J9n0Py0UaymWBr3ZZYRy5jxBinRZPNHiC9-NFvrYaR3AYYcGG7ESGQDseRPKHLk3fYQdDW-QnOio8Gxoif_9XT4ufN9XP3rby7v910l3el5pyn0gCtK8N6JhstGYIROAhZ99KIVoNsRUV7MwyiamRtoJUaG1YZqnsQg-6N5KfF14Pva_C_ZoxJTTbqfAo49HNUFWc1lS0XbV6tDqs6-BgDGvUa7ATht2JULVmonVqyUEsWC5ezyKKLgwjzE3uLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODt_-R_AZVQlj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315097347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading.
A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.
ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533).
Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma ; Differentiation ; Diffusion kurtosis imaging ; Intravoxel incoherent motion</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182</ispartof><rights>2019 The Association of University Radiologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><title>Academic radiology</title><description>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading.
A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.
ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533).
Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</description><subject>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Diffusion kurtosis imaging</subject><subject>Intravoxel incoherent motion</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu3DAMNIIWaB79gZ507MUbyZLtFZBL4Dy6aIo8kJ4FWqY2WthSKsmL9GP6r5WzPffE4ZAzIDFF8YXRFaOsOd-tQAdYVZTJTKwoo0fFMVu361JQ0XzImLZN2XBefSpOYtxRyupmzY-LP48zuGQTJLtHcr2Hcc7QO-IN2bgUYO_fcMxQ-xcM6BL54d_n4AZyZY2Z49J9n0Py0UaymWBr3ZZYRy5jxBinRZPNHiC9-NFvrYaR3AYYcGG7ESGQDseRPKHLk3fYQdDW-QnOio8Gxoif_9XT4ufN9XP3rby7v910l3el5pyn0gCtK8N6JhstGYIROAhZ99KIVoNsRUV7MwyiamRtoJUaG1YZqnsQg-6N5KfF14Pva_C_ZoxJTTbqfAo49HNUFWc1lS0XbV6tDqs6-BgDGvUa7ATht2JULVmonVqyUEsWC5ezyKKLgwjzE3uLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODt_-R_AZVQlj0</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Ye, Jing</creator><creator>Xu, Qing</creator><creator>Wang, Shou-An</creator><creator>Zheng, Jin</creator><creator>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Diffusion kurtosis imaging</topic><topic>Intravoxel incoherent motion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ye, Jing</au><au>Xu, Qing</au><au>Wang, Shou-An</au><au>Zheng, Jin</au><au>Dou, Wei-Qiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e176</spage><epage>e182</epage><pages>e176-e182</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading.
A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters.
ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533).
Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-6332 |
ispartof | Academic radiology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182 |
issn | 1076-6332 1878-4046 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315097347 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Clear cell renal cell carcinoma Differentiation Diffusion kurtosis imaging Intravoxel incoherent motion |
title | Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Intravoxel%20Incoherent%20Motion%20and%20Diffusion%20Kurtosis%20Imaging%20in%20Assessment%20of%20Pathological%20Grade%20of%20Clear%20Cell%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Ye,%20Jing&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e176&rft.epage=e182&rft.pages=e176-e182&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315097347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315097347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1076633219304945&rfr_iscdi=true |