Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182
Hauptverfasser: Ye, Jing, Xu, Qing, Wang, Shou-An, Zheng, Jin, Dou, Wei-Qiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e182
container_issue 7
container_start_page e176
container_title Academic radiology
container_volume 27
creator Ye, Jing
Xu, Qing
Wang, Shou-An
Zheng, Jin
Dou, Wei-Qiang
description To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters. ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p < 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533). Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315097347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1076633219304945</els_id><sourcerecordid>2315097347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu3DAMNIIWaB79gZ507MUbyZLtFZBL4Dy6aIo8kJ4FWqY2WthSKsmL9GP6r5WzPffE4ZAzIDFF8YXRFaOsOd-tQAdYVZTJTKwoo0fFMVu361JQ0XzImLZN2XBefSpOYtxRyupmzY-LP48zuGQTJLtHcr2Hcc7QO-IN2bgUYO_fcMxQ-xcM6BL54d_n4AZyZY2Z49J9n0Py0UaymWBr3ZZYRy5jxBinRZPNHiC9-NFvrYaR3AYYcGG7ESGQDseRPKHLk3fYQdDW-QnOio8Gxoif_9XT4ufN9XP3rby7v910l3el5pyn0gCtK8N6JhstGYIROAhZ99KIVoNsRUV7MwyiamRtoJUaG1YZqnsQg-6N5KfF14Pva_C_ZoxJTTbqfAo49HNUFWc1lS0XbV6tDqs6-BgDGvUa7ATht2JULVmonVqyUEsWC5ezyKKLgwjzE3uLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODt_-R_AZVQlj0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2315097347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters. ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533). Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma ; Differentiation ; Diffusion kurtosis imaging ; Intravoxel incoherent motion</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182</ispartof><rights>2019 The Association of University Radiologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><title>Academic radiology</title><description>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters. ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533). Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</description><subject>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Diffusion kurtosis imaging</subject><subject>Intravoxel incoherent motion</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu3DAMNIIWaB79gZ507MUbyZLtFZBL4Dy6aIo8kJ4FWqY2WthSKsmL9GP6r5WzPffE4ZAzIDFF8YXRFaOsOd-tQAdYVZTJTKwoo0fFMVu361JQ0XzImLZN2XBefSpOYtxRyupmzY-LP48zuGQTJLtHcr2Hcc7QO-IN2bgUYO_fcMxQ-xcM6BL54d_n4AZyZY2Z49J9n0Py0UaymWBr3ZZYRy5jxBinRZPNHiC9-NFvrYaR3AYYcGG7ESGQDseRPKHLk3fYQdDW-QnOio8Gxoif_9XT4ufN9XP3rby7v910l3el5pyn0gCtK8N6JhstGYIROAhZ99KIVoNsRUV7MwyiamRtoJUaG1YZqnsQg-6N5KfF14Pva_C_ZoxJTTbqfAo49HNUFWc1lS0XbV6tDqs6-BgDGvUa7ATht2JULVmonVqyUEsWC5ezyKKLgwjzE3uLQUVt0WkcbECd1ODt_-R_AZVQlj0</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Ye, Jing</creator><creator>Xu, Qing</creator><creator>Wang, Shou-An</creator><creator>Zheng, Jin</creator><creator>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</title><author>Ye, Jing ; Xu, Qing ; Wang, Shou-An ; Zheng, Jin ; Dou, Wei-Qiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-fa052f1b196c91eaf4ed495b9f47ca97420bfdd42695fa79ce612f0cba4dcbf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clear cell renal cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Diffusion kurtosis imaging</topic><topic>Intravoxel incoherent motion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ye, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dou, Wei-Qiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ye, Jing</au><au>Xu, Qing</au><au>Wang, Shou-An</au><au>Zheng, Jin</au><au>Dou, Wei-Qiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e176</spage><epage>e182</epage><pages>e176-e182</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) grading. A total of 60 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), true diffusivity (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), mean kurtosis (MK), and mean diffusivity (MD) maps were calculated and compared between high-grade and low-grade ccRCC using Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for all parameters. ADC, D and MD values were significantly lower for high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). MK values were significantly higher in high-grade ccRCC compared to low-grade ccRCC (p &lt; 0.05). However, D* and f were not significantly difference between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). MD had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.888), followed by ADC (AUC = 0.796), D (AUC = 0.780), MK (AUC = 0.736), f (AUC = 0.582), and D*(AUC = 0.533). Diffusion-related parameters (D, ADC, MD, and MK) were able to significantly distinguish between low- and high-grade ccRCC. However, perfusion-related parameters (D* and f) were unable to separate high- and low-grade ccRCC. MD may be the most promising parameter for grading ccRCC in the clinic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-6332
ispartof Academic radiology, 2020-07, Vol.27 (7), p.e176-e182
issn 1076-6332
1878-4046
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2315097347
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Differentiation
Diffusion kurtosis imaging
Intravoxel incoherent motion
title Quantitative Evaluation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Assessment of Pathological Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Evaluation%20of%20Intravoxel%20Incoherent%20Motion%20and%20Diffusion%20Kurtosis%20Imaging%20in%20Assessment%20of%20Pathological%20Grade%20of%20Clear%20Cell%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Ye,%20Jing&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e176&rft.epage=e182&rft.pages=e176-e182&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acra.2019.10.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2315097347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2315097347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1076633219304945&rfr_iscdi=true