The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions
Objective: The decision to become an unrelated allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a consequential and complex one. Although new registry members pledge to donate if asked in the future, significant proportions ultimately reconsider when they are notified as a potential...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health psychology 2020-04, Vol.39 (4), p.316-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 316 |
container_title | Health psychology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Vekaria, Kruti M. Hammell, Abbey E. Vincent, Laura Smith, Michael Rogers, Todd Switzer, Galen E. Marsh, Abigail A. |
description | Objective: The decision to become an unrelated allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a consequential and complex one. Although new registry members pledge to donate if asked in the future, significant proportions ultimately reconsider when they are notified as a potential match for a patient and are asked to undergo confirmatory typing (CT), resulting in many patients failing to receive transplants. We consider the roles of prospection, or thinking about the future, and ambivalence, or having mixed emotions about an event, in this phenomenon. Prospection theory dictates that distant and improbable events are construed more abstractly than near-term and probable events. We hypothesized that construals about donation in new registry members versus those asked to undergo CT would differ in accordance with these patterns, and that variation in construals would be associated with decisions about whether to proceed toward donation. Method: In collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program, we measured donation intentions and CT decisions in 516 new registry members and 213 members asked to undergo CT, respectively. Participants were asked to describe what they imagined would happen in the donation process. Results: We found that the valence and heterogeneity with which registry members construed donation were significant predictors of donation-related decisions. Assuming the temporal ordering of cognitive processes, ambivalence about donation was a mediator of these relationships. Conclusions: Findings suggest that encouraging a focus on positive central features of marrow and HSC donation may reduce ambivalence and decrease attrition from the registry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/hea0000819 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2314570404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2314570404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-459b6938e0175dd8eeefde4f78d5375cd3d371231c3c7e85ca9ca52a610c8dac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgijNeNj6AFNyIUk16kiZdquMNFEV0HTLpKdOh09SkRXx7M44XcGE2yeI7P-E_hOwxesIoyNMZGhqPYsUaGbMCaCoVo-tkTDOp0pwBjMhWCPNoskKITTICJjPOMxiTyfMMkyfXYOKq5NG70KHta9cmdZucNb0f6tDXNjl3LSb3xnv3lkxcaz7JBG0d4iPskI3KNAF3v-5t8nJ1-Xxxk949XN9enN2lBmTRp1wU07wAhZRJUZYKEasSeSVVKUAKW0IJkmXALFiJSlhTWCMykzNqVWksbJPDVW7n3euAodeLOlhsGtOiG4KOo1xIyimP9OAPnbvBt_F3USlKIVcC_leMg5A8X2YdrZSN_QSPle58vTD-XTOqlxvQvxuIeP8rcpgusPyh35VHcLwCpjO6C-_W-Nhwg8EO3mPbL8M0FJrHkRw-AAljjgI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314357464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Vekaria, Kruti M. ; Hammell, Abbey E. ; Vincent, Laura ; Smith, Michael ; Rogers, Todd ; Switzer, Galen E. ; Marsh, Abigail A.</creator><contributor>Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vekaria, Kruti M. ; Hammell, Abbey E. ; Vincent, Laura ; Smith, Michael ; Rogers, Todd ; Switzer, Galen E. ; Marsh, Abigail A. ; Freedland, Kenneth E</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The decision to become an unrelated allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a consequential and complex one. Although new registry members pledge to donate if asked in the future, significant proportions ultimately reconsider when they are notified as a potential match for a patient and are asked to undergo confirmatory typing (CT), resulting in many patients failing to receive transplants. We consider the roles of prospection, or thinking about the future, and ambivalence, or having mixed emotions about an event, in this phenomenon. Prospection theory dictates that distant and improbable events are construed more abstractly than near-term and probable events. We hypothesized that construals about donation in new registry members versus those asked to undergo CT would differ in accordance with these patterns, and that variation in construals would be associated with decisions about whether to proceed toward donation. Method: In collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program, we measured donation intentions and CT decisions in 516 new registry members and 213 members asked to undergo CT, respectively. Participants were asked to describe what they imagined would happen in the donation process. Results: We found that the valence and heterogeneity with which registry members construed donation were significant predictors of donation-related decisions. Assuming the temporal ordering of cognitive processes, ambivalence about donation was a mediator of these relationships. Conclusions: Findings suggest that encouraging a focus on positive central features of marrow and HSC donation may reduce ambivalence and decrease attrition from the registry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/hea0000819</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31724423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Ambivalence ; Attrition ; Bone Marrow ; Charitable Behavior ; Cognition ; Decision Making ; Donations ; Emotions ; Female ; Human ; Intention ; Keyboarding ; Male ; Stem Cells ; Test Construction ; Transplants</subject><ispartof>Health psychology, 2020-04, Vol.39 (4), p.316-324</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-459b6938e0175dd8eeefde4f78d5375cd3d371231c3c7e85ca9ca52a610c8dac3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3981-4637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31724423$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Freedland, Kenneth E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Vekaria, Kruti M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammell, Abbey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Galen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Abigail A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions</title><title>Health psychology</title><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><description>Objective: The decision to become an unrelated allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a consequential and complex one. Although new registry members pledge to donate if asked in the future, significant proportions ultimately reconsider when they are notified as a potential match for a patient and are asked to undergo confirmatory typing (CT), resulting in many patients failing to receive transplants. We consider the roles of prospection, or thinking about the future, and ambivalence, or having mixed emotions about an event, in this phenomenon. Prospection theory dictates that distant and improbable events are construed more abstractly than near-term and probable events. We hypothesized that construals about donation in new registry members versus those asked to undergo CT would differ in accordance with these patterns, and that variation in construals would be associated with decisions about whether to proceed toward donation. Method: In collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program, we measured donation intentions and CT decisions in 516 new registry members and 213 members asked to undergo CT, respectively. Participants were asked to describe what they imagined would happen in the donation process. Results: We found that the valence and heterogeneity with which registry members construed donation were significant predictors of donation-related decisions. Assuming the temporal ordering of cognitive processes, ambivalence about donation was a mediator of these relationships. Conclusions: Findings suggest that encouraging a focus on positive central features of marrow and HSC donation may reduce ambivalence and decrease attrition from the registry.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Ambivalence</subject><subject>Attrition</subject><subject>Bone Marrow</subject><subject>Charitable Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Keyboarding</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Stem Cells</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Transplants</subject><issn>0278-6133</issn><issn>1930-7810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctKxDAUBuAgijNeNj6AFNyIUk16kiZdquMNFEV0HTLpKdOh09SkRXx7M44XcGE2yeI7P-E_hOwxesIoyNMZGhqPYsUaGbMCaCoVo-tkTDOp0pwBjMhWCPNoskKITTICJjPOMxiTyfMMkyfXYOKq5NG70KHta9cmdZucNb0f6tDXNjl3LSb3xnv3lkxcaz7JBG0d4iPskI3KNAF3v-5t8nJ1-Xxxk949XN9enN2lBmTRp1wU07wAhZRJUZYKEasSeSVVKUAKW0IJkmXALFiJSlhTWCMykzNqVWksbJPDVW7n3euAodeLOlhsGtOiG4KOo1xIyimP9OAPnbvBt_F3USlKIVcC_leMg5A8X2YdrZSN_QSPle58vTD-XTOqlxvQvxuIeP8rcpgusPyh35VHcLwCpjO6C-_W-Nhwg8EO3mPbL8M0FJrHkRw-AAljjgI</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Vekaria, Kruti M.</creator><creator>Hammell, Abbey E.</creator><creator>Vincent, Laura</creator><creator>Smith, Michael</creator><creator>Rogers, Todd</creator><creator>Switzer, Galen E.</creator><creator>Marsh, Abigail A.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3981-4637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions</title><author>Vekaria, Kruti M. ; Hammell, Abbey E. ; Vincent, Laura ; Smith, Michael ; Rogers, Todd ; Switzer, Galen E. ; Marsh, Abigail A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-459b6938e0175dd8eeefde4f78d5375cd3d371231c3c7e85ca9ca52a610c8dac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Ambivalence</topic><topic>Attrition</topic><topic>Bone Marrow</topic><topic>Charitable Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Keyboarding</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Stem Cells</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Transplants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vekaria, Kruti M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammell, Abbey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogers, Todd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Switzer, Galen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, Abigail A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vekaria, Kruti M.</au><au>Hammell, Abbey E.</au><au>Vincent, Laura</au><au>Smith, Michael</au><au>Rogers, Todd</au><au>Switzer, Galen E.</au><au>Marsh, Abigail A.</au><au>Freedland, Kenneth E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Health psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Health Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>316-324</pages><issn>0278-6133</issn><eissn>1930-7810</eissn><abstract>Objective: The decision to become an unrelated allogeneic bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donor is a consequential and complex one. Although new registry members pledge to donate if asked in the future, significant proportions ultimately reconsider when they are notified as a potential match for a patient and are asked to undergo confirmatory typing (CT), resulting in many patients failing to receive transplants. We consider the roles of prospection, or thinking about the future, and ambivalence, or having mixed emotions about an event, in this phenomenon. Prospection theory dictates that distant and improbable events are construed more abstractly than near-term and probable events. We hypothesized that construals about donation in new registry members versus those asked to undergo CT would differ in accordance with these patterns, and that variation in construals would be associated with decisions about whether to proceed toward donation. Method: In collaboration with the National Marrow Donor Program, we measured donation intentions and CT decisions in 516 new registry members and 213 members asked to undergo CT, respectively. Participants were asked to describe what they imagined would happen in the donation process. Results: We found that the valence and heterogeneity with which registry members construed donation were significant predictors of donation-related decisions. Assuming the temporal ordering of cognitive processes, ambivalence about donation was a mediator of these relationships. Conclusions: Findings suggest that encouraging a focus on positive central features of marrow and HSC donation may reduce ambivalence and decrease attrition from the registry.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31724423</pmid><doi>10.1037/hea0000819</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3981-4637</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6133 |
ispartof | Health psychology, 2020-04, Vol.39 (4), p.316-324 |
issn | 0278-6133 1930-7810 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2314570404 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Altruism Ambivalence Attrition Bone Marrow Charitable Behavior Cognition Decision Making Donations Emotions Female Human Intention Keyboarding Male Stem Cells Test Construction Transplants |
title | The Role of Prospection in Altruistic Bone Marrow Donation Decisions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Prospection%20in%20Altruistic%20Bone%20Marrow%20Donation%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Health%20psychology&rft.au=Vekaria,%20Kruti%20M.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=316-324&rft.issn=0278-6133&rft.eissn=1930-7810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/hea0000819&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314570404%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314357464&rft_id=info:pmid/31724423&rfr_iscdi=true |