Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin
To compare the effect of different surface treatments (pre-treatments and bonding agents) on the bond strength between glass-fiber post and composite resin, and the topographic alterations of the treated post surface. Thirty-six glass-fiber blocks (12mm×10mm×8mm) were specifically manufactured for t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of prosthodontic research 2020-07, Vol.64 (3), p.301-306 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 306 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 301 |
| container_title | Journal of prosthodontic research |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C. Guilardi, Luís F. Wandscher, Vinicius F. Pereira, Gabriel K.R. Valandro, Luiz F. Rippe, Marília P. |
| description | To compare the effect of different surface treatments (pre-treatments and bonding agents) on the bond strength between glass-fiber post and composite resin, and the topographic alterations of the treated post surface.
Thirty-six glass-fiber blocks (12mm×10mm×8mm) were specifically manufactured for this study and randomly assigned into 12 groups considering two factors: ‘pre-treatments’ (–cleaning with 70% alcohol; air-abrasion with silica-coated aluminum oxide particles; 35% hydrogen peroxide) and type of ‘bonding agent’ (no bonding agent; application of Monobond Plus; RelyX Ceramic Primer; Single Bond Universal). After that, 6 cylindrical templates (1mm high×1mm Ø) were fixed on each block, filled with composite resin (n=18) and light-cured. Specimens were stored under 37°C for 24h and microshear tests (wire loop Ø=0.2mm) were performed. Topographic, roughness and failure analyses were also performed.
Different surface pre-treatments led to different topographic and roughness alterations; a higher surface alteration was noted after silica particles air-abrasion, while a slight surface alteration in the hydrogen peroxide group and a smooth pattern were observed in the cleaning group. The factors ‘pre-treatments’ (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2314254165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1883195819300520</els_id><sourcerecordid>2314254165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-504ca69685e47d44732ce315003d38f24672cc0db91a8215e536a13978245583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_wIPk6GVrJh-7WfEi4hcUPOg9pNmJpnQ3NdkK_ntTqh6FgWHgeV-Yh5AzYDNgUF8uZ8t1TDPOoJ2xMgz2yIRz4JWsBd8nE9BaVNAqfUSOc14yVkuA9pAcCWhAt6qdEHzZJG8d0jGhHXscxkyjp5a-rWzOlQ8LTDRhGHxMDjvqYr-OOYx4Re-8RzfSONDxHant3jGH7RFL-g8r2RyGE3Lg7Srj6c-ektf7u9fbx2r-_PB0ezOvnJLNWCkmna3bWiuUTSdlI7hDAYox0Qntuawb7hzrFi1YzUGhErUF0TaaS6W0mJKLXe06xY8N5tH0ITtcreyAcZMNFyC5klCrgvId6lLMOaE36xR6m74MMLO1a5Zma9ds7RpWhkEJnf_0bxY9dn-RX50FuN4BWJ78DJhMdgGHIi6k4sp0MfzX_w2VTYqj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2314254165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C. ; Guilardi, Luís F. ; Wandscher, Vinicius F. ; Pereira, Gabriel K.R. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Rippe, Marília P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C. ; Guilardi, Luís F. ; Wandscher, Vinicius F. ; Pereira, Gabriel K.R. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Rippe, Marília P.</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the effect of different surface treatments (pre-treatments and bonding agents) on the bond strength between glass-fiber post and composite resin, and the topographic alterations of the treated post surface.
Thirty-six glass-fiber blocks (12mm×10mm×8mm) were specifically manufactured for this study and randomly assigned into 12 groups considering two factors: ‘pre-treatments’ (–cleaning with 70% alcohol; air-abrasion with silica-coated aluminum oxide particles; 35% hydrogen peroxide) and type of ‘bonding agent’ (no bonding agent; application of Monobond Plus; RelyX Ceramic Primer; Single Bond Universal). After that, 6 cylindrical templates (1mm high×1mm Ø) were fixed on each block, filled with composite resin (n=18) and light-cured. Specimens were stored under 37°C for 24h and microshear tests (wire loop Ø=0.2mm) were performed. Topographic, roughness and failure analyses were also performed.
Different surface pre-treatments led to different topographic and roughness alterations; a higher surface alteration was noted after silica particles air-abrasion, while a slight surface alteration in the hydrogen peroxide group and a smooth pattern were observed in the cleaning group. The factors ‘pre-treatments’ (p<0.05), ‘bonding agent’ (p<0.05) and their interaction (p<0.05) influenced the bond strength. Silica coating, apart from bonding agent application, or Single Bond Universal application without pre-treatment promoted the highest bond values. The main failure type was adhesive at the resin-post interface.
In terms of pre-treatments, silica coating promotes the best bonding performance, but pre-treatments can be dispensable when applying Single Bond Universal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1883-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-4632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31718959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Airborne-particle abrasion ; Aluminum Oxide ; Chemical interaction ; Composite Resins ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; Materials Testing ; Microshear bond test ; Pre-fabricated intraradicular posts ; Resin Cements ; Silanes ; Surface pre-treatment ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontic research, 2020-07, Vol.64 (3), p.301-306</ispartof><rights>2019 Japan Prosthodontic Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-504ca69685e47d44732ce315003d38f24672cc0db91a8215e536a13978245583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-504ca69685e47d44732ce315003d38f24672cc0db91a8215e536a13978245583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31718959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilardi, Luís F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandscher, Vinicius F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Gabriel K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippe, Marília P.</creatorcontrib><title>Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin</title><title>Journal of prosthodontic research</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont Res</addtitle><description>To compare the effect of different surface treatments (pre-treatments and bonding agents) on the bond strength between glass-fiber post and composite resin, and the topographic alterations of the treated post surface.
Thirty-six glass-fiber blocks (12mm×10mm×8mm) were specifically manufactured for this study and randomly assigned into 12 groups considering two factors: ‘pre-treatments’ (–cleaning with 70% alcohol; air-abrasion with silica-coated aluminum oxide particles; 35% hydrogen peroxide) and type of ‘bonding agent’ (no bonding agent; application of Monobond Plus; RelyX Ceramic Primer; Single Bond Universal). After that, 6 cylindrical templates (1mm high×1mm Ø) were fixed on each block, filled with composite resin (n=18) and light-cured. Specimens were stored under 37°C for 24h and microshear tests (wire loop Ø=0.2mm) were performed. Topographic, roughness and failure analyses were also performed.
Different surface pre-treatments led to different topographic and roughness alterations; a higher surface alteration was noted after silica particles air-abrasion, while a slight surface alteration in the hydrogen peroxide group and a smooth pattern were observed in the cleaning group. The factors ‘pre-treatments’ (p<0.05), ‘bonding agent’ (p<0.05) and their interaction (p<0.05) influenced the bond strength. Silica coating, apart from bonding agent application, or Single Bond Universal application without pre-treatment promoted the highest bond values. The main failure type was adhesive at the resin-post interface.
In terms of pre-treatments, silica coating promotes the best bonding performance, but pre-treatments can be dispensable when applying Single Bond Universal.</description><subject>Airborne-particle abrasion</subject><subject>Aluminum Oxide</subject><subject>Chemical interaction</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microshear bond test</subject><subject>Pre-fabricated intraradicular posts</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Silanes</subject><subject>Surface pre-treatment</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1883-1958</issn><issn>2212-4632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWqt_wIPk6GVrJh-7WfEi4hcUPOg9pNmJpnQ3NdkK_ntTqh6FgWHgeV-Yh5AzYDNgUF8uZ8t1TDPOoJ2xMgz2yIRz4JWsBd8nE9BaVNAqfUSOc14yVkuA9pAcCWhAt6qdEHzZJG8d0jGhHXscxkyjp5a-rWzOlQ8LTDRhGHxMDjvqYr-OOYx4Re-8RzfSONDxHant3jGH7RFL-g8r2RyGE3Lg7Srj6c-ektf7u9fbx2r-_PB0ezOvnJLNWCkmna3bWiuUTSdlI7hDAYox0Qntuawb7hzrFi1YzUGhErUF0TaaS6W0mJKLXe06xY8N5tH0ITtcreyAcZMNFyC5klCrgvId6lLMOaE36xR6m74MMLO1a5Zma9ds7RpWhkEJnf_0bxY9dn-RX50FuN4BWJ78DJhMdgGHIi6k4sp0MfzX_w2VTYqj</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C.</creator><creator>Guilardi, Luís F.</creator><creator>Wandscher, Vinicius F.</creator><creator>Pereira, Gabriel K.R.</creator><creator>Valandro, Luiz F.</creator><creator>Rippe, Marília P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin</title><author>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C. ; Guilardi, Luís F. ; Wandscher, Vinicius F. ; Pereira, Gabriel K.R. ; Valandro, Luiz F. ; Rippe, Marília P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-504ca69685e47d44732ce315003d38f24672cc0db91a8215e536a13978245583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Airborne-particle abrasion</topic><topic>Aluminum Oxide</topic><topic>Chemical interaction</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microshear bond test</topic><topic>Pre-fabricated intraradicular posts</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Silanes</topic><topic>Surface pre-treatment</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guilardi, Luís F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wandscher, Vinicius F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Gabriel K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valandro, Luiz F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippe, Marília P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadore-Rodrigues, Ana C.</au><au>Guilardi, Luís F.</au><au>Wandscher, Vinicius F.</au><au>Pereira, Gabriel K.R.</au><au>Valandro, Luiz F.</au><au>Rippe, Marília P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont Res</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>301-306</pages><issn>1883-1958</issn><eissn>2212-4632</eissn><abstract>To compare the effect of different surface treatments (pre-treatments and bonding agents) on the bond strength between glass-fiber post and composite resin, and the topographic alterations of the treated post surface.
Thirty-six glass-fiber blocks (12mm×10mm×8mm) were specifically manufactured for this study and randomly assigned into 12 groups considering two factors: ‘pre-treatments’ (–cleaning with 70% alcohol; air-abrasion with silica-coated aluminum oxide particles; 35% hydrogen peroxide) and type of ‘bonding agent’ (no bonding agent; application of Monobond Plus; RelyX Ceramic Primer; Single Bond Universal). After that, 6 cylindrical templates (1mm high×1mm Ø) were fixed on each block, filled with composite resin (n=18) and light-cured. Specimens were stored under 37°C for 24h and microshear tests (wire loop Ø=0.2mm) were performed. Topographic, roughness and failure analyses were also performed.
Different surface pre-treatments led to different topographic and roughness alterations; a higher surface alteration was noted after silica particles air-abrasion, while a slight surface alteration in the hydrogen peroxide group and a smooth pattern were observed in the cleaning group. The factors ‘pre-treatments’ (p<0.05), ‘bonding agent’ (p<0.05) and their interaction (p<0.05) influenced the bond strength. Silica coating, apart from bonding agent application, or Single Bond Universal application without pre-treatment promoted the highest bond values. The main failure type was adhesive at the resin-post interface.
In terms of pre-treatments, silica coating promotes the best bonding performance, but pre-treatments can be dispensable when applying Single Bond Universal.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31718959</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1883-1958 |
| ispartof | Journal of prosthodontic research, 2020-07, Vol.64 (3), p.301-306 |
| issn | 1883-1958 2212-4632 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2314254165 |
| source | J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Airborne-particle abrasion Aluminum Oxide Chemical interaction Composite Resins Dental Bonding Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry Materials Testing Microshear bond test Pre-fabricated intraradicular posts Resin Cements Silanes Surface pre-treatment Surface Properties |
| title | Surface treatments of a glass-fiber reinforced composite: Effect on the adhesion to a composite resin |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A50%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20treatments%20of%20a%20glass-fiber%20reinforced%20composite:%20Effect%20on%20the%20adhesion%20to%20a%20composite%20resin&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontic%20research&rft.au=Cadore-Rodrigues,%20Ana%20C.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=301-306&rft.issn=1883-1958&rft.eissn=2212-4632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2314254165%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2314254165&rft_id=info:pmid/31718959&rft_els_id=S1883195819300520&rfr_iscdi=true |