Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?

To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients. The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric surgery 2020-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1499-1502
Hauptverfasser: Traynor, Michael D, McKenna, Nicholas P, Habermann, Elizabeth B, Antiel, Ryan M, Moir, Christopher R, Klinkner, Denise B, Ishitani, Michael B, Potter, D Dean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1502
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1499
container_title Journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 55
creator Traynor, Michael D
McKenna, Nicholas P
Habermann, Elizabeth B
Antiel, Ryan M
Moir, Christopher R
Klinkner, Denise B
Ishitani, Michael B
Potter, D Dean
description To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients. The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram. Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46–77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1–6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch. Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients. III. Study of Diagnostic Test.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313648720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022346819306839</els_id><sourcerecordid>2313648720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e658f46380406bd149db26d81cf51400ad374df4580782488d5da6acb413bd6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcFuEzEQtRCIhsAvVD5y2TBeex2XC0RVgUiViAo5W157NnW0uw62t1L_gY_GS1quSCP7yfPejPweIZcMVgyY_HBcHU_o0hQPqxrY1QpKcfaCLFjDWdUAX78kC4C6rriQ6oK8SekIUJ6BvSYXnK1BSgYL8nsXJnsfDtEMdBd9iDQHuu0xpByGR3qHDxiT6anpMsa5UfBfSbUZCyzHTAzJJ-pHukPnTY7e0p3JHsecPtJt6WS6T9hN_czJ90h_YM5-PNDQ0bswFYj0Zr_59Ja86kyf8N3TvST7Lzc_r79Vt9-_bq83t5XlUuUKZaM6IbkCAbJ1TFy5tpZOMds1TAAYx9fCdaJRsFa1UMo1zkhjW8F462THl-T9ee4phl8TpqwHnyz2vRkxTEnXnHEp1LqGQpVnqo0hpYidPkU_mPioGeg5CX3Uz0noOQkNpYp-SS6fdkztgO6f7Nn6Qvh8JmD56YPHqJMtltliYUSbtQv-fzv-AKgonjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313648720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Traynor, Michael D ; McKenna, Nicholas P ; Habermann, Elizabeth B ; Antiel, Ryan M ; Moir, Christopher R ; Klinkner, Denise B ; Ishitani, Michael B ; Potter, D Dean</creator><creatorcontrib>Traynor, Michael D ; McKenna, Nicholas P ; Habermann, Elizabeth B ; Antiel, Ryan M ; Moir, Christopher R ; Klinkner, Denise B ; Ishitani, Michael B ; Potter, D Dean</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients. The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram. Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46–77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1–6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch. Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients. III. Study of Diagnostic Test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31706610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Colon - diagnostic imaging ; Colon - surgery ; Colonic Pouches ; Contrast study ; Exam under anesthesia (EUA) ; Female ; Humans ; Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) ; Ileostomy ; Ileostomy reversal ; Male ; Pouchogram ; Proctocolectomy, Restorative ; Radiography ; Reoperation</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric surgery, 2020-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1499-1502</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e658f46380406bd149db26d81cf51400ad374df4580782488d5da6acb413bd6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e658f46380406bd149db26d81cf51400ad374df4580782488d5da6acb413bd6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346819306839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31706610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Traynor, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Nicholas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antiel, Ryan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moir, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klinkner, Denise B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitani, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, D Dean</creatorcontrib><title>Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?</title><title>Journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients. The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram. Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46–77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1–6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch. Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients. III. Study of Diagnostic Test.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Colon - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colon - surgery</subject><subject>Colonic Pouches</subject><subject>Contrast study</subject><subject>Exam under anesthesia (EUA)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)</subject><subject>Ileostomy</subject><subject>Ileostomy reversal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pouchogram</subject><subject>Proctocolectomy, Restorative</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><issn>0022-3468</issn><issn>1531-5037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcFuEzEQtRCIhsAvVD5y2TBeex2XC0RVgUiViAo5W157NnW0uw62t1L_gY_GS1quSCP7yfPejPweIZcMVgyY_HBcHU_o0hQPqxrY1QpKcfaCLFjDWdUAX78kC4C6rriQ6oK8SekIUJ6BvSYXnK1BSgYL8nsXJnsfDtEMdBd9iDQHuu0xpByGR3qHDxiT6anpMsa5UfBfSbUZCyzHTAzJJ-pHukPnTY7e0p3JHsecPtJt6WS6T9hN_czJ90h_YM5-PNDQ0bswFYj0Zr_59Ja86kyf8N3TvST7Lzc_r79Vt9-_bq83t5XlUuUKZaM6IbkCAbJ1TFy5tpZOMds1TAAYx9fCdaJRsFa1UMo1zkhjW8F462THl-T9ee4phl8TpqwHnyz2vRkxTEnXnHEp1LqGQpVnqo0hpYidPkU_mPioGeg5CX3Uz0noOQkNpYp-SS6fdkztgO6f7Nn6Qvh8JmD56YPHqJMtltliYUSbtQv-fzv-AKgonjY</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Traynor, Michael D</creator><creator>McKenna, Nicholas P</creator><creator>Habermann, Elizabeth B</creator><creator>Antiel, Ryan M</creator><creator>Moir, Christopher R</creator><creator>Klinkner, Denise B</creator><creator>Ishitani, Michael B</creator><creator>Potter, D Dean</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?</title><author>Traynor, Michael D ; McKenna, Nicholas P ; Habermann, Elizabeth B ; Antiel, Ryan M ; Moir, Christopher R ; Klinkner, Denise B ; Ishitani, Michael B ; Potter, D Dean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-e658f46380406bd149db26d81cf51400ad374df4580782488d5da6acb413bd6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Colon - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colon - surgery</topic><topic>Colonic Pouches</topic><topic>Contrast study</topic><topic>Exam under anesthesia (EUA)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)</topic><topic>Ileostomy</topic><topic>Ileostomy reversal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pouchogram</topic><topic>Proctocolectomy, Restorative</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Traynor, Michael D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Nicholas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habermann, Elizabeth B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antiel, Ryan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moir, Christopher R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klinkner, Denise B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishitani, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, D Dean</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Traynor, Michael D</au><au>McKenna, Nicholas P</au><au>Habermann, Elizabeth B</au><au>Antiel, Ryan M</au><au>Moir, Christopher R</au><au>Klinkner, Denise B</au><au>Ishitani, Michael B</au><au>Potter, D Dean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1499</spage><epage>1502</epage><pages>1499-1502</pages><issn>0022-3468</issn><eissn>1531-5037</eissn><abstract>To determine if there is a role for routine pouchogram before ileostomy reversal after IPAA in pediatric patients. The medical records of pediatric patients who underwent pouchogram between 2007 and 2017 prior to ileostomy reversal after IPAA at two affiliated hospitals were reviewed for concordance between exam under anesthesia (EUA) and pouchogram findings, management of abnormal pouchogram findings, and short and long-term outcomes after ileostomy reversal. Clinical notes were used to find patient-reported symptoms at the time of pouchogram. Sixty patients (57% female) underwent pouchogram before planned ileostomy reversal. The median time from IPAA formation to pouchogram was 60.5 days (IQR: 46–77) and median follow-up was 4 years (IQR: 1–6). Fifty-seven patients (95%) were asymptomatic prior to reversal. Of the 40 asymptomatic patients with a normal EUA, pouchogram detected one stricture (3%), but reversal proceeded as planned. In the 16 patients with strictures on EUA, pouchogram only detected six (40%). One of 50 (2%) asymptomatic patients with normal pouchogram had anastomotic dehiscence found on EUA. Despite normal pouchogram and EUA, four asymptomatic patients required subsequent diversion for pouch-related complications between 13 and 60 months after ileostomy reversal. Three patients had pelvic pain prior to pouchogram; associated symptoms included perineal pain (n = 1) hematochezia (n = 1), and tenesmus (n = 1). EUA and pouchogram were concordant in two patients (n = 1 anastomotic complication, n = 1 pouch septum) and ileostomy reversal was delayed. In the remaining symptomatic patient, pouchogram detected an anastomotic leak where EUA detected only a stricture, and this prompted a delay in reversal. Long term, none of these patients required diversion or excision of their pouch. Routine pouchogram in asymptomatic pediatric patients does not change management and can be omitted, thereby sparing patients discomfort and unnecessary radiation exposure. Pouchogram may have diagnostic value in symptomatic patients. III. Study of Diagnostic Test.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31706610</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.031</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3468
ispartof Journal of pediatric surgery, 2020-08, Vol.55 (8), p.1499-1502
issn 0022-3468
1531-5037
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313648720
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Child
Colon - diagnostic imaging
Colon - surgery
Colonic Pouches
Contrast study
Exam under anesthesia (EUA)
Female
Humans
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)
Ileostomy
Ileostomy reversal
Male
Pouchogram
Proctocolectomy, Restorative
Radiography
Reoperation
title Pouchogram Prior to Ileostomy Reversal after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: Is it Useful in the Setting of Routine EUA?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T22%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pouchogram%20Prior%20to%20Ileostomy%20Reversal%20after%20Ileal%20Pouch-Anal%20Anastomosis%20in%20Pediatric%20Patients:%20Is%20it%20Useful%20in%20the%20Setting%20of%20Routine%20EUA?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Traynor,%20Michael%20D&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1499&rft.epage=1502&rft.pages=1499-1502&rft.issn=0022-3468&rft.eissn=1531-5037&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313648720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313648720&rft_id=info:pmid/31706610&rft_els_id=S0022346819306839&rfr_iscdi=true