Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance
The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nurse education in practice 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102646 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102646 |
container_title | Nurse education in practice |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Lee, Bih-O. Liang, Hwey-Fang Chu, Tsui-Ping Hung, Chang-Chiao |
description | The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting.
A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups.
The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination.
•Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313378865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595319300927</els_id><sourcerecordid>2313378865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhiU0JOlN_kAXQeimm7nxY0ZHyKaE9AMC3TS7gKhzLF5mdKIzhf77ONykiy668qDP-3J4ROgDJXtKqLg57CPMec8IVfWCiVacoAvaS950jPF3dW4lbTrV8XP0vpQDqSEixRk651SonnXdBXq69x7cUnDyuIRpHc0SUmysKTDgEUyOIf7CKeK45rKNZVkHiAt2aZphgeigYBMH7MYQgzMjniH7lCdTXy7RqTdjgavXc4cev9z_vPvWPPz4-v3u80PjeN8ujbREQcuVlwr6wRMvhVWGWgK2ba2wVihFgUnCekVa40nvueIESCeFFx3nO_Tp2Dvn9LxCWfQUioNxNBHSWjTjlHPZ95XdoY__oIe05li32yghZSs6Wil2pFxOpWTwes5hMvmPpkRv7vVBb-715l4f3dfQ9Wv1aicY_kbeZFfg9ghAdfE7QNbFhc3gEHL9Az2k8L_-F-OulRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316774651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><description>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting.
A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups.
The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination.
•Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31698255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of covariance ; Behavior ; Behavioral Objectives ; Chinese languages ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Clinical performance ; Communication ; Control Groups ; Critical thinking ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Educational Environment ; Educational Strategies ; Experiential learning ; Experiential learning theory ; Female ; Humans ; Intervention ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Male ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Nursing Education Research ; Nursing student competency ; Nursing Students ; Outcomes of Education ; Patient communication ; Patient safety ; Practice placements ; Professional knowledge ; Questionnaires ; Simulation ; Simulation Training ; Simulation-based learning ; Simulation-based learning evaluation scale ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595319300927$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,12825,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31698255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting.
A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups.
The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination.
•Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of covariance</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Clinical performance</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Experiential learning theory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Nursing student competency</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Patient communication</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Practice placements</subject><subject>Professional knowledge</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation Training</subject><subject>Simulation-based learning</subject><subject>Simulation-based learning evaluation scale</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhiU0JOlN_kAXQeimm7nxY0ZHyKaE9AMC3TS7gKhzLF5mdKIzhf77ONykiy668qDP-3J4ROgDJXtKqLg57CPMec8IVfWCiVacoAvaS950jPF3dW4lbTrV8XP0vpQDqSEixRk651SonnXdBXq69x7cUnDyuIRpHc0SUmysKTDgEUyOIf7CKeK45rKNZVkHiAt2aZphgeigYBMH7MYQgzMjniH7lCdTXy7RqTdjgavXc4cev9z_vPvWPPz4-v3u80PjeN8ujbREQcuVlwr6wRMvhVWGWgK2ba2wVihFgUnCekVa40nvueIESCeFFx3nO_Tp2Dvn9LxCWfQUioNxNBHSWjTjlHPZ95XdoY__oIe05li32yghZSs6Wil2pFxOpWTwes5hMvmPpkRv7vVBb-715l4f3dfQ9Wv1aicY_kbeZFfg9ghAdfE7QNbFhc3gEHL9Az2k8L_-F-OulRA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Lee, Bih-O.</creator><creator>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creator><creator>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creator><creator>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><author>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of covariance</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Clinical performance</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Experiential learning theory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Nursing student competency</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Patient communication</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Practice placements</topic><topic>Professional knowledge</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation Training</topic><topic>Simulation-based learning</topic><topic>Simulation-based learning evaluation scale</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Bih-O.</au><au>Liang, Hwey-Fang</au><au>Chu, Tsui-Ping</au><au>Hung, Chang-Chiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>102646</spage><epage>102646</epage><pages>102646-102646</pages><artnum>102646</artnum><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting.
A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups.
The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination.
•Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31698255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-5953 |
ispartof | Nurse education in practice, 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646 |
issn | 1471-5953 1873-5223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313378865 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Analysis of covariance Behavior Behavioral Objectives Chinese languages Clinical Competence - standards Clinical medicine Clinical nursing Clinical performance Communication Control Groups Critical thinking Curricula Curriculum Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate Educational Environment Educational Strategies Experiential learning Experiential learning theory Female Humans Intervention Knowledge Learning Learning Processes Learning Theories Male Nursing Nursing education Nursing Education Research Nursing student competency Nursing Students Outcomes of Education Patient communication Patient safety Practice placements Professional knowledge Questionnaires Simulation Simulation Training Simulation-based learning Simulation-based learning evaluation scale Student Behavior Students Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching Teaching Methods Young Adult |
title | Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A21%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20simulation-based%20learning%20on%20nursing%20student%20competences%20and%20clinical%20performance&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Lee,%20Bih-O.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=102646&rft.epage=102646&rft.pages=102646-102646&rft.artnum=102646&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313378865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316774651&rft_id=info:pmid/31698255&rft_els_id=S1471595319300927&rfr_iscdi=true |