Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance

The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education in practice 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Bih-O., Liang, Hwey-Fang, Chu, Tsui-Ping, Hung, Chang-Chiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102646
container_issue
container_start_page 102646
container_title Nurse education in practice
container_volume 41
creator Lee, Bih-O.
Liang, Hwey-Fang
Chu, Tsui-Ping
Hung, Chang-Chiao
description The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups. The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination. •Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313378865</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595319300927</els_id><sourcerecordid>2313378865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhiU0JOlN_kAXQeimm7nxY0ZHyKaE9AMC3TS7gKhzLF5mdKIzhf77ONykiy668qDP-3J4ROgDJXtKqLg57CPMec8IVfWCiVacoAvaS950jPF3dW4lbTrV8XP0vpQDqSEixRk651SonnXdBXq69x7cUnDyuIRpHc0SUmysKTDgEUyOIf7CKeK45rKNZVkHiAt2aZphgeigYBMH7MYQgzMjniH7lCdTXy7RqTdjgavXc4cev9z_vPvWPPz4-v3u80PjeN8ujbREQcuVlwr6wRMvhVWGWgK2ba2wVihFgUnCekVa40nvueIESCeFFx3nO_Tp2Dvn9LxCWfQUioNxNBHSWjTjlHPZ95XdoY__oIe05li32yghZSs6Wil2pFxOpWTwes5hMvmPpkRv7vVBb-715l4f3dfQ9Wv1aicY_kbeZFfg9ghAdfE7QNbFhc3gEHL9Az2k8L_-F-OulRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316774651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><description>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups. The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination. •Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31698255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of covariance ; Behavior ; Behavioral Objectives ; Chinese languages ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Clinical performance ; Communication ; Control Groups ; Critical thinking ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Educational Environment ; Educational Strategies ; Experiential learning ; Experiential learning theory ; Female ; Humans ; Intervention ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Male ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Nursing Education Research ; Nursing student competency ; Nursing Students ; Outcomes of Education ; Patient communication ; Patient safety ; Practice placements ; Professional knowledge ; Questionnaires ; Simulation ; Simulation Training ; Simulation-based learning ; Simulation-based learning evaluation scale ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2019. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595319300927$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,12825,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31698255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups. The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination. •Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of covariance</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Clinical performance</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Experiential learning</subject><subject>Experiential learning theory</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Education Research</subject><subject>Nursing student competency</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Patient communication</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Practice placements</subject><subject>Professional knowledge</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation Training</subject><subject>Simulation-based learning</subject><subject>Simulation-based learning evaluation scale</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rHSEUhiU0JOlN_kAXQeimm7nxY0ZHyKaE9AMC3TS7gKhzLF5mdKIzhf77ONykiy668qDP-3J4ROgDJXtKqLg57CPMec8IVfWCiVacoAvaS950jPF3dW4lbTrV8XP0vpQDqSEixRk651SonnXdBXq69x7cUnDyuIRpHc0SUmysKTDgEUyOIf7CKeK45rKNZVkHiAt2aZphgeigYBMH7MYQgzMjniH7lCdTXy7RqTdjgavXc4cev9z_vPvWPPz4-v3u80PjeN8ujbREQcuVlwr6wRMvhVWGWgK2ba2wVihFgUnCekVa40nvueIESCeFFx3nO_Tp2Dvn9LxCWfQUioNxNBHSWjTjlHPZ95XdoY__oIe05li32yghZSs6Wil2pFxOpWTwes5hMvmPpkRv7vVBb-715l4f3dfQ9Wv1aicY_kbeZFfg9ghAdfE7QNbFhc3gEHL9Az2k8L_-F-OulRA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Lee, Bih-O.</creator><creator>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creator><creator>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creator><creator>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</title><author>Lee, Bih-O. ; Liang, Hwey-Fang ; Chu, Tsui-Ping ; Hung, Chang-Chiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7b09e439f79e8df0f76b9a1b0eb44b6bb6991e27028904af08f3930e0576f6533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of covariance</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Clinical performance</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Experiential learning</topic><topic>Experiential learning theory</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Education Research</topic><topic>Nursing student competency</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Patient communication</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Practice placements</topic><topic>Professional knowledge</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation Training</topic><topic>Simulation-based learning</topic><topic>Simulation-based learning evaluation scale</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Bih-O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hwey-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tsui-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chang-Chiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Bih-O.</au><au>Liang, Hwey-Fang</au><au>Chu, Tsui-Ping</au><au>Hung, Chang-Chiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>102646</spage><epage>102646</epage><pages>102646-102646</pages><artnum>102646</artnum><issn>1471-5953</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>The aims of this study were to explore the effects of simulation-based learning (SBL) on nursing student competences and performance in the clinical setting. A comparison group design was used with data obtained from self-administered questionnaires at the onset and end of the semester. Students' practicum grades were also collected to examine their clinical performance. Four simulated scenarios were added to the course and a Chinese version of the Simulation-Based Learning Evaluation Scale (SBLES) was distributed to the participants. The student practicum evaluation form was used to collect the participants' practicum grades. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, paired t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Positive, significant differences were found in five competences in the test group. In the comparison group, results in the professional knowledge and nursing process subscale showed significant differences, and no significant difference was found in the patient safety, communication, and attitude of reflection subscales. The students in the test group perceived greater competences than those in the comparison group. Finally, no significant findings were found in clinical performance between two groups. The findings showed that SBL is seen as an attractive teaching strategy for students’ learning as part of their curriculum and that the effects of SBL on clinical practice need further examination. •Simulation-based learning (SBL) affects student behaviors in actual clinical settings remained unknown.•The students in the test group perceived greater progression of “soft” competence than those in the comparison group.•No different clinical performance between the test and comparison groups was found</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31698255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-5953
ispartof Nurse education in practice, 2019-11, Vol.41, p.102646-102646, Article 102646
issn 1471-5953
1873-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313378865
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Analysis of covariance
Behavior
Behavioral Objectives
Chinese languages
Clinical Competence - standards
Clinical medicine
Clinical nursing
Clinical performance
Communication
Control Groups
Critical thinking
Curricula
Curriculum
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
Educational Environment
Educational Strategies
Experiential learning
Experiential learning theory
Female
Humans
Intervention
Knowledge
Learning
Learning Processes
Learning Theories
Male
Nursing
Nursing education
Nursing Education Research
Nursing student competency
Nursing Students
Outcomes of Education
Patient communication
Patient safety
Practice placements
Professional knowledge
Questionnaires
Simulation
Simulation Training
Simulation-based learning
Simulation-based learning evaluation scale
Student Behavior
Students
Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Young Adult
title Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing student competences and clinical performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A21%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20simulation-based%20learning%20on%20nursing%20student%20competences%20and%20clinical%20performance&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Lee,%20Bih-O.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=102646&rft.epage=102646&rft.pages=102646-102646&rft.artnum=102646&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102646&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313378865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316774651&rft_id=info:pmid/31698255&rft_els_id=S1471595319300927&rfr_iscdi=true