From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review

To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Value in health regional issues 2020-05, Vol.21, p.91-99
Hauptverfasser: Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni, Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana, Dahlui, Maznah, Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue
container_start_page 91
container_title Value in health regional issues
container_volume 21
creator Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni
Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana
Dahlui, Maznah
Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat
description To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand search) to identify all published economic evaluation studies related to Malaysian healthcare. Two researchers assessed the quality of selected studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. The assessment was also reviewed by expert members of the Technical Advisory Committee of Health Technology Economic Evaluations (TACHTEE). A total of 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and included in this systematic review. Thirty studies were partial economic evaluations; the full economic evaluations included 17 cost-effectiveness analyses and 17 cost-utility analyses. From all the reported ICERs, the majority (68%) were categorized as highly cost-effective (ICER of less than 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained). This review identifies information gaps and loopholes in health economics research in Malaysia. Additionally, this study provides the information that the majority of published interventions in Malaysia fell within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained. •Economic evaluation studies provide valuable inputs in healthcare decision making. Nevertheless, publications related to this area are still sparse in Malaysia; there is a need for more health economics research to cater to the demand.•This review provides essential information in determining the acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold in Malaysia based on a human capital approach or gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, which may influence the value of decision making for health interventions and programs in the country.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313358836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2212109919306053</els_id><sourcerecordid>2313358836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b6fb4dbc0a64007ff7fb1ae587debb7021bc75284f22fdd79c115abf6240f9c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWmr_gAfJ0UvrJPstXkppVVAUP25CSLITTNnd1GRb6b83perRMJAJeeaFeQg5YzBhwPLL5WTz4e2EA6smEAv4ARlwzviYMeCHvz1U1QkZhbCEeIoUkhKOyUnC8qpkRTIg7wvvWjrf2Bo7jbR39Mk1Vm-v6Fy7zrVWx0_ZrGVvXReoM_QWZdN_aOmR2o4-yEZug5VXdEpftqHHNpKaPuPG4tcpOTKyCTj6uYfkbTF_nd2O7x9v7mbT-7FOAfqxyo1Ka6VB5vFdGFMYxSRmZVGjUgVwpnSR8TI1nJu6LirNWCaVyXkKptJZMiQX-9yVd59rDL1obdDYNLJDtw6CJyxJsrJM8ojyPaq9C8GjEStvW-m3goHYiRVLsRMrdmIFxAIeh85_8teqxfpv5FdjBK73AMYt4-ZeBG13QmvrUfeidva__G9mOYm0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313358836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni ; Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana ; Dahlui, Maznah ; Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</creator><creatorcontrib>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni ; Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana ; Dahlui, Maznah ; Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</creatorcontrib><description>To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand search) to identify all published economic evaluation studies related to Malaysian healthcare. Two researchers assessed the quality of selected studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. The assessment was also reviewed by expert members of the Technical Advisory Committee of Health Technology Economic Evaluations (TACHTEE). A total of 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and included in this systematic review. Thirty studies were partial economic evaluations; the full economic evaluations included 17 cost-effectiveness analyses and 17 cost-utility analyses. From all the reported ICERs, the majority (68%) were categorized as highly cost-effective (ICER of less than 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained). This review identifies information gaps and loopholes in health economics research in Malaysia. Additionally, this study provides the information that the majority of published interventions in Malaysia fell within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained. •Economic evaluation studies provide valuable inputs in healthcare decision making. Nevertheless, publications related to this area are still sparse in Malaysia; there is a need for more health economics research to cater to the demand.•This review provides essential information in determining the acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold in Malaysia based on a human capital approach or gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, which may influence the value of decision making for health interventions and programs in the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-1099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-1102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31698173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods ; cost-effectiveness analysis ; cost-effectiveness threshold ; Delivery of Health Care - economics ; Delivery of Health Care - methods ; Delivery of Health Care - trends ; economic evaluations ; Evidence-Based Practice - methods ; Evidence-Based Practice - standards ; Health Policy ; Humans ; Malaysia ; Policy Making ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><ispartof>Value in health regional issues, 2020-05, Vol.21, p.91-99</ispartof><rights>2019 ISPOR--The professional society for health economics and outcomes research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 ISPOR--The professional society for health economics and outcomes research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b6fb4dbc0a64007ff7fb1ae587debb7021bc75284f22fdd79c115abf6240f9c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b6fb4dbc0a64007ff7fb1ae587debb7021bc75284f22fdd79c115abf6240f9c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31698173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlui, Maznah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</creatorcontrib><title>From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review</title><title>Value in health regional issues</title><addtitle>Value Health Reg Issues</addtitle><description>To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand search) to identify all published economic evaluation studies related to Malaysian healthcare. Two researchers assessed the quality of selected studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. The assessment was also reviewed by expert members of the Technical Advisory Committee of Health Technology Economic Evaluations (TACHTEE). A total of 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and included in this systematic review. Thirty studies were partial economic evaluations; the full economic evaluations included 17 cost-effectiveness analyses and 17 cost-utility analyses. From all the reported ICERs, the majority (68%) were categorized as highly cost-effective (ICER of less than 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained). This review identifies information gaps and loopholes in health economics research in Malaysia. Additionally, this study provides the information that the majority of published interventions in Malaysia fell within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained. •Economic evaluation studies provide valuable inputs in healthcare decision making. Nevertheless, publications related to this area are still sparse in Malaysia; there is a need for more health economics research to cater to the demand.•This review provides essential information in determining the acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold in Malaysia based on a human capital approach or gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, which may influence the value of decision making for health interventions and programs in the country.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>cost-effectiveness threshold</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - trends</subject><subject>economic evaluations</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice - standards</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Malaysia</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><issn>2212-1099</issn><issn>2212-1102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWmr_gAfJ0UvrJPstXkppVVAUP25CSLITTNnd1GRb6b83perRMJAJeeaFeQg5YzBhwPLL5WTz4e2EA6smEAv4ARlwzviYMeCHvz1U1QkZhbCEeIoUkhKOyUnC8qpkRTIg7wvvWjrf2Bo7jbR39Mk1Vm-v6Fy7zrVWx0_ZrGVvXReoM_QWZdN_aOmR2o4-yEZug5VXdEpftqHHNpKaPuPG4tcpOTKyCTj6uYfkbTF_nd2O7x9v7mbT-7FOAfqxyo1Ka6VB5vFdGFMYxSRmZVGjUgVwpnSR8TI1nJu6LirNWCaVyXkKptJZMiQX-9yVd59rDL1obdDYNLJDtw6CJyxJsrJM8ojyPaq9C8GjEStvW-m3goHYiRVLsRMrdmIFxAIeh85_8teqxfpv5FdjBK73AMYt4-ZeBG13QmvrUfeidva__G9mOYm0</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni</creator><creator>Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana</creator><creator>Dahlui, Maznah</creator><creator>Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review</title><author>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni ; Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana ; Dahlui, Maznah ; Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b6fb4dbc0a64007ff7fb1ae587debb7021bc75284f22fdd79c115abf6240f9c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>cost-effectiveness threshold</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - trends</topic><topic>economic evaluations</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice - standards</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Malaysia</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlui, Maznah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Value in health regional issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ku Abd Rahim, Ku Nurhasni</au><au>Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana</au><au>Dahlui, Maznah</au><au>Wan Puteh, Sharifa Ezat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Value in health regional issues</jtitle><addtitle>Value Health Reg Issues</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>91-99</pages><issn>2212-1099</issn><eissn>2212-1102</eissn><abstract>To identify and describe the various economic evaluation studies in Malaysia and to determine the range of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) as reported in these studies. A comprehensive search of the scientific electronic databases was conducted (Medline, EBM Reviews, Embase, and hand search) to identify all published economic evaluation studies related to Malaysian healthcare. Two researchers assessed the quality of selected studies using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist and Quality of Health Economic Studies instrument. The assessment was also reviewed by expert members of the Technical Advisory Committee of Health Technology Economic Evaluations (TACHTEE). A total of 64 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and included in this systematic review. Thirty studies were partial economic evaluations; the full economic evaluations included 17 cost-effectiveness analyses and 17 cost-utility analyses. From all the reported ICERs, the majority (68%) were categorized as highly cost-effective (ICER of less than 1 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained). This review identifies information gaps and loopholes in health economics research in Malaysia. Additionally, this study provides the information that the majority of published interventions in Malaysia fell within the cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP per capita per quality-adjusted life-years or disability-adjusted life-years gained. •Economic evaluation studies provide valuable inputs in healthcare decision making. Nevertheless, publications related to this area are still sparse in Malaysia; there is a need for more health economics research to cater to the demand.•This review provides essential information in determining the acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold in Malaysia based on a human capital approach or gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, which may influence the value of decision making for health interventions and programs in the country.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31698173</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-1099
ispartof Value in health regional issues, 2020-05, Vol.21, p.91-99
issn 2212-1099
2212-1102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313358836
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods
cost-effectiveness analysis
cost-effectiveness threshold
Delivery of Health Care - economics
Delivery of Health Care - methods
Delivery of Health Care - trends
economic evaluations
Evidence-Based Practice - methods
Evidence-Based Practice - standards
Health Policy
Humans
Malaysia
Policy Making
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
title From Evidence to Policy: Economic Evaluations of Healthcare in Malaysia: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A07%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20Evidence%20to%20Policy:%20Economic%20Evaluations%20of%20Healthcare%20in%20Malaysia:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health%20regional%20issues&rft.au=Ku%20Abd%20Rahim,%20Ku%20Nurhasni&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=91-99&rft.issn=2212-1099&rft.eissn=2212-1102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vhri.2019.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313358836%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313358836&rft_id=info:pmid/31698173&rft_els_id=S2212109919306053&rfr_iscdi=true