Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line

Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food microbiology 2020-04, Vol.86, p.103350-103350, Article 103350
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Stanley H., Fegan, Narelle, Kocharunchitt, Chawalit, Bowman, John P., Duffy, Lesley L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103350
container_issue
container_start_page 103350
container_title Food microbiology
container_volume 86
creator Chen, Stanley H.
Fegan, Narelle
Kocharunchitt, Chawalit
Bowman, John P.
Duffy, Lesley L.
description Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a modern commercial processing line, along with the contents of 10 caeca. The sampled processing line effectively reduced the bacterial counts by > 4.6 Log10 CFU/ml for each of Total Viable Counts, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. However, the metagenomics results suggested that Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persisted at all sampling stages. Pseudomonas, Paeniglutamicibacter, Chryseobacterium and Pseudarthrobacter comprised 47.2% in the bacterial community on samples after air chilling compared to 0.3% on samples after immersion chilling, whereas TVCs were the same. Overall, the current interventions of the investigated poultry processing line were unable to eliminate persistence of certain foodborne pathogens, despite a significant reduction of the overall bacterial counts. Chilling is an important controlling point in contamination/cross-contamination, particularly extended air chilling. Lastly, the large presence of Pseudomonas on chickens after air chilling may lead to downstream spoilage related issues, which needs more investigation to explore quantitatively the effect on the shelf life of poultry products. •E. coli and Campylobacter were reduced >4.6 Log10 CFU/ml through processing.•Scalding reduced bacterial counts whereas air chilling had no bacterial reduction.•Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persist processing.•Microbiome profile on chicken was dramatically changed through air chilling.•Pseudomonas is the dominant bacterium on air chilled samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103350
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313357686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0740002019309608</els_id><sourcerecordid>2313357686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-52a2f621ba347e933fdd114d00650b1de98f2ae61f72e640f2de4f4f079723763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1vGyEQxVGVqnHS3nuKOOay7gD7RW6RlTSVIvXSnhGGwYuzu7jARvJ_XyynveU0M9J7b_R-hHxlsGbA2m_7tZvWHJgspxANfCArBrKppJT9BVlBV0MFwOGSXKW0B2CsEfITuRSsA9G3_YqEzaDnHSYaHM0D0q02GaPXIzVhmpbZ5yO1_hVjOm1hpmbw5gXL1NHolIozDzEsu4Hqmd4vKUc9-rIewjLmeKSHGAym5OcdHf2Mn8lHp8eEX97mNfn9-PBr81Q9__z-Y3P_XJlSI1cN19y1nG21qDuUQjhrGastQNvAllmUveMaW-Y6jm0NjlusXe2gkx0XXSuuye05t_z_s2DKavLJ4DjqGcOSFBesAOva_iSFs9TEkFJEpw7RTzoeFQN1wqz2yk3qhFmdMRfLzVv6sp3Q_jf841oEd2cBlo6vHqNKxuNs0PqIJisb_PvpfwHhEI3l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313357686</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chen, Stanley H. ; Fegan, Narelle ; Kocharunchitt, Chawalit ; Bowman, John P. ; Duffy, Lesley L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Stanley H. ; Fegan, Narelle ; Kocharunchitt, Chawalit ; Bowman, John P. ; Duffy, Lesley L.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a modern commercial processing line, along with the contents of 10 caeca. The sampled processing line effectively reduced the bacterial counts by &gt; 4.6 Log10 CFU/ml for each of Total Viable Counts, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. However, the metagenomics results suggested that Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persisted at all sampling stages. Pseudomonas, Paeniglutamicibacter, Chryseobacterium and Pseudarthrobacter comprised 47.2% in the bacterial community on samples after air chilling compared to 0.3% on samples after immersion chilling, whereas TVCs were the same. Overall, the current interventions of the investigated poultry processing line were unable to eliminate persistence of certain foodborne pathogens, despite a significant reduction of the overall bacterial counts. Chilling is an important controlling point in contamination/cross-contamination, particularly extended air chilling. Lastly, the large presence of Pseudomonas on chickens after air chilling may lead to downstream spoilage related issues, which needs more investigation to explore quantitatively the effect on the shelf life of poultry products. •E. coli and Campylobacter were reduced &gt;4.6 Log10 CFU/ml through processing.•Scalding reduced bacterial counts whereas air chilling had no bacterial reduction.•Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persist processing.•Microbiome profile on chicken was dramatically changed through air chilling.•Pseudomonas is the dominant bacterium on air chilled samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-0020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103350</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31703868</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>16S amplicon ; Animals ; Australia ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - growth &amp; development ; Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biodiversity ; Chickens - microbiology ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Food Handling ; Food safety ; Microbiome ; Poultry ; Poultry Products - analysis ; Poultry Products - microbiology ; Processing</subject><ispartof>Food microbiology, 2020-04, Vol.86, p.103350-103350, Article 103350</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-52a2f621ba347e933fdd114d00650b1de98f2ae61f72e640f2de4f4f079723763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-52a2f621ba347e933fdd114d00650b1de98f2ae61f72e640f2de4f4f079723763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002019309608$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703868$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Stanley H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fegan, Narelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocharunchitt, Chawalit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Lesley L.</creatorcontrib><title>Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line</title><title>Food microbiology</title><addtitle>Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a modern commercial processing line, along with the contents of 10 caeca. The sampled processing line effectively reduced the bacterial counts by &gt; 4.6 Log10 CFU/ml for each of Total Viable Counts, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. However, the metagenomics results suggested that Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persisted at all sampling stages. Pseudomonas, Paeniglutamicibacter, Chryseobacterium and Pseudarthrobacter comprised 47.2% in the bacterial community on samples after air chilling compared to 0.3% on samples after immersion chilling, whereas TVCs were the same. Overall, the current interventions of the investigated poultry processing line were unable to eliminate persistence of certain foodborne pathogens, despite a significant reduction of the overall bacterial counts. Chilling is an important controlling point in contamination/cross-contamination, particularly extended air chilling. Lastly, the large presence of Pseudomonas on chickens after air chilling may lead to downstream spoilage related issues, which needs more investigation to explore quantitatively the effect on the shelf life of poultry products. •E. coli and Campylobacter were reduced &gt;4.6 Log10 CFU/ml through processing.•Scalding reduced bacterial counts whereas air chilling had no bacterial reduction.•Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persist processing.•Microbiome profile on chicken was dramatically changed through air chilling.•Pseudomonas is the dominant bacterium on air chilled samples.</description><subject>16S amplicon</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Food Handling</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Microbiome</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry Products - analysis</subject><subject>Poultry Products - microbiology</subject><subject>Processing</subject><issn>0740-0020</issn><issn>1095-9998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1vGyEQxVGVqnHS3nuKOOay7gD7RW6RlTSVIvXSnhGGwYuzu7jARvJ_XyynveU0M9J7b_R-hHxlsGbA2m_7tZvWHJgspxANfCArBrKppJT9BVlBV0MFwOGSXKW0B2CsEfITuRSsA9G3_YqEzaDnHSYaHM0D0q02GaPXIzVhmpbZ5yO1_hVjOm1hpmbw5gXL1NHolIozDzEsu4Hqmd4vKUc9-rIewjLmeKSHGAym5OcdHf2Mn8lHp8eEX97mNfn9-PBr81Q9__z-Y3P_XJlSI1cN19y1nG21qDuUQjhrGastQNvAllmUveMaW-Y6jm0NjlusXe2gkx0XXSuuye05t_z_s2DKavLJ4DjqGcOSFBesAOva_iSFs9TEkFJEpw7RTzoeFQN1wqz2yk3qhFmdMRfLzVv6sp3Q_jf841oEd2cBlo6vHqNKxuNs0PqIJisb_PvpfwHhEI3l</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Chen, Stanley H.</creator><creator>Fegan, Narelle</creator><creator>Kocharunchitt, Chawalit</creator><creator>Bowman, John P.</creator><creator>Duffy, Lesley L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line</title><author>Chen, Stanley H. ; Fegan, Narelle ; Kocharunchitt, Chawalit ; Bowman, John P. ; Duffy, Lesley L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c350t-52a2f621ba347e933fdd114d00650b1de98f2ae61f72e640f2de4f4f079723763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>16S amplicon</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Food Handling</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Microbiome</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry Products - analysis</topic><topic>Poultry Products - microbiology</topic><topic>Processing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Stanley H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fegan, Narelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kocharunchitt, Chawalit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowman, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, Lesley L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Stanley H.</au><au>Fegan, Narelle</au><au>Kocharunchitt, Chawalit</au><au>Bowman, John P.</au><au>Duffy, Lesley L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line</atitle><jtitle>Food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>103350</spage><epage>103350</epage><pages>103350-103350</pages><artnum>103350</artnum><issn>0740-0020</issn><eissn>1095-9998</eissn><abstract>Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a modern commercial processing line, along with the contents of 10 caeca. The sampled processing line effectively reduced the bacterial counts by &gt; 4.6 Log10 CFU/ml for each of Total Viable Counts, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. However, the metagenomics results suggested that Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persisted at all sampling stages. Pseudomonas, Paeniglutamicibacter, Chryseobacterium and Pseudarthrobacter comprised 47.2% in the bacterial community on samples after air chilling compared to 0.3% on samples after immersion chilling, whereas TVCs were the same. Overall, the current interventions of the investigated poultry processing line were unable to eliminate persistence of certain foodborne pathogens, despite a significant reduction of the overall bacterial counts. Chilling is an important controlling point in contamination/cross-contamination, particularly extended air chilling. Lastly, the large presence of Pseudomonas on chickens after air chilling may lead to downstream spoilage related issues, which needs more investigation to explore quantitatively the effect on the shelf life of poultry products. •E. coli and Campylobacter were reduced &gt;4.6 Log10 CFU/ml through processing.•Scalding reduced bacterial counts whereas air chilling had no bacterial reduction.•Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persist processing.•Microbiome profile on chicken was dramatically changed through air chilling.•Pseudomonas is the dominant bacterium on air chilled samples.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31703868</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fm.2019.103350</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-0020
ispartof Food microbiology, 2020-04, Vol.86, p.103350-103350, Article 103350
issn 0740-0020
1095-9998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2313357686
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 16S amplicon
Animals
Australia
Bacteria
Bacteria - classification
Bacteria - genetics
Bacteria - growth & development
Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biodiversity
Chickens - microbiology
Colony Count, Microbial
Food Contamination - analysis
Food Handling
Food safety
Microbiome
Poultry
Poultry Products - analysis
Poultry Products - microbiology
Processing
title Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20of%20the%20bacterial%20community%20diversity%20on%20chicken%20carcasses%20through%20an%20Australian%20poultry%20processing%20line&rft.jtitle=Food%20microbiology&rft.au=Chen,%20Stanley%20H.&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=103350&rft.epage=103350&rft.pages=103350-103350&rft.artnum=103350&rft.issn=0740-0020&rft.eissn=1095-9998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103350&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2313357686%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313357686&rft_id=info:pmid/31703868&rft_els_id=S0740002019309608&rfr_iscdi=true