Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer

Context: Respecting Choices is an evidence-based model of facilitating advance care planning (ACP) conversations between health-care professionals and patients. However, the effectiveness of whether lay patient navigators can successfully initiate Respecting Choices ACP conversations is unknown. As...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of palliative care 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.70-78
Hauptverfasser: Niranjan, Soumya J., Huang, Chao-Hui S., Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas, Halilova, Karina I., Pisu, Maria, Drentea, Patricia, Kvale, Elizabeth A., Bevis, Kerri S., Butler, Thomas W., Partridge, Edward E., Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 78
container_issue 2
container_start_page 70
container_title Journal of palliative care
container_volume 33
creator Niranjan, Soumya J.
Huang, Chao-Hui S.
Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas
Halilova, Karina I.
Pisu, Maria
Drentea, Patricia
Kvale, Elizabeth A.
Bevis, Kerri S.
Butler, Thomas W.
Partridge, Edward E.
Rocque, Gabrielle B.
description Context: Respecting Choices is an evidence-based model of facilitating advance care planning (ACP) conversations between health-care professionals and patients. However, the effectiveness of whether lay patient navigators can successfully initiate Respecting Choices ACP conversations is unknown. As part of a large demonstration project (Patient Care Connect [PCC]), a cohort of lay patient navigators underwent Respecting Choices training and were tasked to initiate ACP conversations with Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer. Objectives: This article explores PCC lay navigators’ perceived barriers and facilitators in initiating Respecting Choices ACP conversations with older patients with cancer in order to inform implementation enhancements to lay navigator-facilitated ACP. Methods: Twenty-six lay navigators from 11 PCC cancer centers in 4 states (Alabama, George, Tennessee, and Florida) completed in-depth, one-on-one semistructured interviews between June 2015 and August 2015. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: This evaluation identifies 3 levels—patient, lay navigator, and organizational factors in addition to training needs that influence ACP implementation. Key facilitators included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and navigators’ prior experience with end-of-life decision-making. Lay navigators’ perceived challenges to initiating ACP conversations included timing of the conversation and social and personal taboos about discussing dying. Conclusion: Our results suggest that further training and health system support are needed for lay navigators playing a vital role in improving the implementation of ACP among older patients with cancer. The lived expertise of lay navigators along with flexible longitudinal relationships with patients and caregivers may uniquely position this workforce to promote ACP.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0825859718757131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2312222046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0825859718757131</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2001916522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b5a503a8de924ca13c6a73d8770f495ed2317d48acae975179ce86265952c2a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4UssWHBtP4Zj8fLdkRppajNoojl6Na-Ca4mnmA7kbrjNXgAXownwWlSkCpVeGPp3u8cH-sQ8pazI861PmatUK0ymrdaaS75MzIRsjGVEkY-J5PtutruD8irlG4ZY5oJ9pIcCFNLoZmakF9TuKMzyB5Dppew8QvIY0y_f_ykM4xphTb7DSY6zukpxOjL7CM9A-sHn-9JCsHR6wg--LCgl4guUR_oRfDZF9syO3EbCBZpBxHpbIBwT3Zj2BSzgowh0a8-f6NXg8P4EGY_67bS-Jq8mMOQ8M3-PiRfzj5dd-fV9OrzRXcyraw0ba5uFCgmoXVoRG2BS9uAlq7Vms1ro9AJybWrW7CARiuujcW2EY0ySlgBUh6SDzvfVRy_rzHlfumTxaGExnGd-qIX5bC6-T_KGDe8UUIU9P0j9HZcx1A-UijBSwAjTaHYjrJxTCnivF9Fv4R413PWb9vuH7ddJO_2xuubJbq_god6C1DtgAQL_Pfqk4Z_AN0Vsww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2021626939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Niranjan, Soumya J. ; Huang, Chao-Hui S. ; Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas ; Halilova, Karina I. ; Pisu, Maria ; Drentea, Patricia ; Kvale, Elizabeth A. ; Bevis, Kerri S. ; Butler, Thomas W. ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Rocque, Gabrielle B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, Soumya J. ; Huang, Chao-Hui S. ; Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas ; Halilova, Karina I. ; Pisu, Maria ; Drentea, Patricia ; Kvale, Elizabeth A. ; Bevis, Kerri S. ; Butler, Thomas W. ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Rocque, Gabrielle B.</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Respecting Choices is an evidence-based model of facilitating advance care planning (ACP) conversations between health-care professionals and patients. However, the effectiveness of whether lay patient navigators can successfully initiate Respecting Choices ACP conversations is unknown. As part of a large demonstration project (Patient Care Connect [PCC]), a cohort of lay patient navigators underwent Respecting Choices training and were tasked to initiate ACP conversations with Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer. Objectives: This article explores PCC lay navigators’ perceived barriers and facilitators in initiating Respecting Choices ACP conversations with older patients with cancer in order to inform implementation enhancements to lay navigator-facilitated ACP. Methods: Twenty-six lay navigators from 11 PCC cancer centers in 4 states (Alabama, George, Tennessee, and Florida) completed in-depth, one-on-one semistructured interviews between June 2015 and August 2015. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: This evaluation identifies 3 levels—patient, lay navigator, and organizational factors in addition to training needs that influence ACP implementation. Key facilitators included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and navigators’ prior experience with end-of-life decision-making. Lay navigators’ perceived challenges to initiating ACP conversations included timing of the conversation and social and personal taboos about discussing dying. Conclusion: Our results suggest that further training and health system support are needed for lay navigators playing a vital role in improving the implementation of ACP among older patients with cancer. The lived expertise of lay navigators along with flexible longitudinal relationships with patients and caregivers may uniquely position this workforce to promote ACP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0825-8597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2369-5293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0825859718757131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29432705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration ; Advance directives ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cancer ; Communication ; Counseling - organization &amp; administration ; Decision Making ; Female ; Health Personnel - education ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Older people ; Patient Navigation - organization &amp; administration ; Patients ; Planning ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of palliative care, 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.70-78</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b5a503a8de924ca13c6a73d8770f495ed2317d48acae975179ce86265952c2a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b5a503a8de924ca13c6a73d8770f495ed2317d48acae975179ce86265952c2a33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0825859718757131$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0825859718757131$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29432705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, Soumya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao-Hui S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halilova, Karina I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisu, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drentea, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvale, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevis, Kerri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocque, Gabrielle B.</creatorcontrib><title>Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer</title><title>Journal of palliative care</title><addtitle>J Palliat Care</addtitle><description>Context: Respecting Choices is an evidence-based model of facilitating advance care planning (ACP) conversations between health-care professionals and patients. However, the effectiveness of whether lay patient navigators can successfully initiate Respecting Choices ACP conversations is unknown. As part of a large demonstration project (Patient Care Connect [PCC]), a cohort of lay patient navigators underwent Respecting Choices training and were tasked to initiate ACP conversations with Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer. Objectives: This article explores PCC lay navigators’ perceived barriers and facilitators in initiating Respecting Choices ACP conversations with older patients with cancer in order to inform implementation enhancements to lay navigator-facilitated ACP. Methods: Twenty-six lay navigators from 11 PCC cancer centers in 4 states (Alabama, George, Tennessee, and Florida) completed in-depth, one-on-one semistructured interviews between June 2015 and August 2015. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: This evaluation identifies 3 levels—patient, lay navigator, and organizational factors in addition to training needs that influence ACP implementation. Key facilitators included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and navigators’ prior experience with end-of-life decision-making. Lay navigators’ perceived challenges to initiating ACP conversations included timing of the conversation and social and personal taboos about discussing dying. Conclusion: Our results suggest that further training and health system support are needed for lay navigators playing a vital role in improving the implementation of ACP among older patients with cancer. The lived expertise of lay navigators along with flexible longitudinal relationships with patients and caregivers may uniquely position this workforce to promote ACP.</description><subject>Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Advance directives</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Counseling - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Personnel - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient Navigation - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0825-8597</issn><issn>2369-5293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4UssWHBtP4Zj8fLdkRppajNoojl6Na-Ca4mnmA7kbrjNXgAXownwWlSkCpVeGPp3u8cH-sQ8pazI861PmatUK0ymrdaaS75MzIRsjGVEkY-J5PtutruD8irlG4ZY5oJ9pIcCFNLoZmakF9TuKMzyB5Dppew8QvIY0y_f_ykM4xphTb7DSY6zukpxOjL7CM9A-sHn-9JCsHR6wg--LCgl4guUR_oRfDZF9syO3EbCBZpBxHpbIBwT3Zj2BSzgowh0a8-f6NXg8P4EGY_67bS-Jq8mMOQ8M3-PiRfzj5dd-fV9OrzRXcyraw0ba5uFCgmoXVoRG2BS9uAlq7Vms1ro9AJybWrW7CARiuujcW2EY0ySlgBUh6SDzvfVRy_rzHlfumTxaGExnGd-qIX5bC6-T_KGDe8UUIU9P0j9HZcx1A-UijBSwAjTaHYjrJxTCnivF9Fv4R413PWb9vuH7ddJO_2xuubJbq_god6C1DtgAQL_Pfqk4Z_AN0Vsww</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Niranjan, Soumya J.</creator><creator>Huang, Chao-Hui S.</creator><creator>Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas</creator><creator>Halilova, Karina I.</creator><creator>Pisu, Maria</creator><creator>Drentea, Patricia</creator><creator>Kvale, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Bevis, Kerri S.</creator><creator>Butler, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Partridge, Edward E.</creator><creator>Rocque, Gabrielle B.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer</title><author>Niranjan, Soumya J. ; Huang, Chao-Hui S. ; Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas ; Halilova, Karina I. ; Pisu, Maria ; Drentea, Patricia ; Kvale, Elizabeth A. ; Bevis, Kerri S. ; Butler, Thomas W. ; Partridge, Edward E. ; Rocque, Gabrielle B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-b5a503a8de924ca13c6a73d8770f495ed2317d48acae975179ce86265952c2a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advance Care Planning - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Advance directives</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Counseling - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Personnel - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient Navigation - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niranjan, Soumya J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao-Hui S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halilova, Karina I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisu, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drentea, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvale, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bevis, Kerri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partridge, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocque, Gabrielle B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of palliative care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niranjan, Soumya J.</au><au>Huang, Chao-Hui S.</au><au>Dionne-Odom, J. Nicholas</au><au>Halilova, Karina I.</au><au>Pisu, Maria</au><au>Drentea, Patricia</au><au>Kvale, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Bevis, Kerri S.</au><au>Butler, Thomas W.</au><au>Partridge, Edward E.</au><au>Rocque, Gabrielle B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of palliative care</jtitle><addtitle>J Palliat Care</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>70-78</pages><issn>0825-8597</issn><eissn>2369-5293</eissn><abstract>Context: Respecting Choices is an evidence-based model of facilitating advance care planning (ACP) conversations between health-care professionals and patients. However, the effectiveness of whether lay patient navigators can successfully initiate Respecting Choices ACP conversations is unknown. As part of a large demonstration project (Patient Care Connect [PCC]), a cohort of lay patient navigators underwent Respecting Choices training and were tasked to initiate ACP conversations with Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer. Objectives: This article explores PCC lay navigators’ perceived barriers and facilitators in initiating Respecting Choices ACP conversations with older patients with cancer in order to inform implementation enhancements to lay navigator-facilitated ACP. Methods: Twenty-six lay navigators from 11 PCC cancer centers in 4 states (Alabama, George, Tennessee, and Florida) completed in-depth, one-on-one semistructured interviews between June 2015 and August 2015. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Results: This evaluation identifies 3 levels—patient, lay navigator, and organizational factors in addition to training needs that influence ACP implementation. Key facilitators included physician buy-in, patient readiness, and navigators’ prior experience with end-of-life decision-making. Lay navigators’ perceived challenges to initiating ACP conversations included timing of the conversation and social and personal taboos about discussing dying. Conclusion: Our results suggest that further training and health system support are needed for lay navigators playing a vital role in improving the implementation of ACP among older patients with cancer. The lived expertise of lay navigators along with flexible longitudinal relationships with patients and caregivers may uniquely position this workforce to promote ACP.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29432705</pmid><doi>10.1177/0825859718757131</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0825-8597
ispartof Journal of palliative care, 2018-04, Vol.33 (2), p.70-78
issn 0825-8597
2369-5293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2312222046
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Advance Care Planning - organization & administration
Advance directives
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cancer
Communication
Counseling - organization & administration
Decision Making
Female
Health Personnel - education
Humans
Male
Neoplasms - psychology
Older people
Patient Navigation - organization & administration
Patients
Planning
Professional-Patient Relations
Training
title Lay Patient Navigators’ Perspectives of Barriers, Facilitators and Training Needs in Initiating Advance Care Planning Conversations With Older Patients With Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A40%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lay%20Patient%20Navigators%E2%80%99%20Perspectives%20of%20Barriers,%20Facilitators%20and%20Training%20Needs%20in%20Initiating%20Advance%20Care%20Planning%20Conversations%20With%20Older%20Patients%20With%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20palliative%20care&rft.au=Niranjan,%20Soumya%20J.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=70-78&rft.issn=0825-8597&rft.eissn=2369-5293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0825859718757131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001916522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2021626939&rft_id=info:pmid/29432705&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0825859718757131&rfr_iscdi=true