Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo
Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13703 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 13695 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Hilber, Isabel Arrigo, Yves Zuber, Martin Bucheli, Thomas D |
description | Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.est.9b04340 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311923710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0596QpV6QUJbxOM7HERYoSCuBUFv1Fo0dr2qUxIudtFr-ehJ2ywGJk-2n33uj8WPsq4C5ABSnZOLcxn5eakhlCh_YTCiERBVKfGQzACGTUma_99lBjA8AgBKKT2xfiqxAIXDGni5s9GHdO9_xextd7KkzlvsVv_PNxmxM4ww_C76lfrxcb-rgDQXtu8hdx8-dN38oRH7TmUFTb-tJXfh__H5oXUcNX7rHwb2ov1wfPKdu9_jrP7O9FTXRftmdh-zn1eWPxXWyvP1-szhbJpQC9kkNBHkpNOnCIIAsCAFrRcLmFjKr86wwmcp0LlWakkZZZlpZxBKVQg21PGTH29x18I_D-FtV66KxTUOd9UOsUApRoswFjOi3N-iDH8K4x0QhplAKqUbqdEuZ4GMMdlWtg2spbCoB1VRLNdZSTe5dLaPjaJc76NbWr_z_HkbgZAtMzteZ78U9AyHAl7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322409135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><description>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing <10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04340</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31682112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Animals ; Bioavailability ; Cattle ; Charcoal ; Contaminants ; Cyclodextrin ; Cyclodextrins ; Desorption ; Experiments ; Feed additives ; Female ; Incubation ; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ; Sampling methods ; Soil ; Soil Pollutants ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 3, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing <10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Cyclodextrin</subject><subject>Cyclodextrins</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0596QpV6QUJbxOM7HERYoSCuBUFv1Fo0dr2qUxIudtFr-ehJ2ywGJk-2n33uj8WPsq4C5ABSnZOLcxn5eakhlCh_YTCiERBVKfGQzACGTUma_99lBjA8AgBKKT2xfiqxAIXDGni5s9GHdO9_xextd7KkzlvsVv_PNxmxM4ww_C76lfrxcb-rgDQXtu8hdx8-dN38oRH7TmUFTb-tJXfh__H5oXUcNX7rHwb2ov1wfPKdu9_jrP7O9FTXRftmdh-zn1eWPxXWyvP1-szhbJpQC9kkNBHkpNOnCIIAsCAFrRcLmFjKr86wwmcp0LlWakkZZZlpZxBKVQg21PGTH29x18I_D-FtV66KxTUOd9UOsUApRoswFjOi3N-iDH8K4x0QhplAKqUbqdEuZ4GMMdlWtg2spbCoB1VRLNdZSTe5dLaPjaJc76NbWr_z_HkbgZAtMzteZ78U9AyHAl7A</recordid><startdate>20191203</startdate><enddate>20191203</enddate><creator>Hilber, Isabel</creator><creator>Arrigo, Yves</creator><creator>Zuber, Martin</creator><creator>Bucheli, Thomas D</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191203</creationdate><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><author>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Cyclodextrin</topic><topic>Cyclodextrins</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilber, Isabel</au><au>Arrigo, Yves</au><au>Zuber, Martin</au><au>Bucheli, Thomas D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-12-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>13695</spage><epage>13703</epage><pages>13695-13703</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing <10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31682112</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b04340</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923710 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | Agricultural production Animals Bioavailability Cattle Charcoal Contaminants Cyclodextrin Cyclodextrins Desorption Experiments Feed additives Female Incubation Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sampling methods Soil Soil Pollutants Sustainable agriculture |
title | Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Desorption%20Resistance%20of%20Polycyclic%20Aromatic%20Hydrocarbons%20in%20Biochars%20Incubated%20in%20Cow%20Ruminal%20Liquid%20in%20Vitro%20and%20in%20Vivo&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hilber,%20Isabel&rft.date=2019-12-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=13695&rft.epage=13703&rft.pages=13695-13703&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311923710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322409135&rft_id=info:pmid/31682112&rfr_iscdi=true |