Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo

Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703
Hauptverfasser: Hilber, Isabel, Arrigo, Yves, Zuber, Martin, Bucheli, Thomas D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13703
container_issue 23
container_start_page 13695
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 53
creator Hilber, Isabel
Arrigo, Yves
Zuber, Martin
Bucheli, Thomas D
description Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.9b04340
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923710</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2311923710</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0596QpV6QUJbxOM7HERYoSCuBUFv1Fo0dr2qUxIudtFr-ehJ2ywGJk-2n33uj8WPsq4C5ABSnZOLcxn5eakhlCh_YTCiERBVKfGQzACGTUma_99lBjA8AgBKKT2xfiqxAIXDGni5s9GHdO9_xextd7KkzlvsVv_PNxmxM4ww_C76lfrxcb-rgDQXtu8hdx8-dN38oRH7TmUFTb-tJXfh__H5oXUcNX7rHwb2ov1wfPKdu9_jrP7O9FTXRftmdh-zn1eWPxXWyvP1-szhbJpQC9kkNBHkpNOnCIIAsCAFrRcLmFjKr86wwmcp0LlWakkZZZlpZxBKVQg21PGTH29x18I_D-FtV66KxTUOd9UOsUApRoswFjOi3N-iDH8K4x0QhplAKqUbqdEuZ4GMMdlWtg2spbCoB1VRLNdZSTe5dLaPjaJc76NbWr_z_HkbgZAtMzteZ78U9AyHAl7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322409135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><description>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing &lt;10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04340</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31682112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Animals ; Bioavailability ; Cattle ; Charcoal ; Contaminants ; Cyclodextrin ; Cyclodextrins ; Desorption ; Experiments ; Feed additives ; Female ; Incubation ; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons ; Sampling methods ; Soil ; Soil Pollutants ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 3, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31682112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing &lt;10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Charcoal</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Cyclodextrin</subject><subject>Cyclodextrins</subject><subject>Desorption</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Feed additives</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Incubation</subject><subject>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1P3DAQxa2qqCy0596QpV6QUJbxOM7HERYoSCuBUFv1Fo0dr2qUxIudtFr-ehJ2ywGJk-2n33uj8WPsq4C5ABSnZOLcxn5eakhlCh_YTCiERBVKfGQzACGTUma_99lBjA8AgBKKT2xfiqxAIXDGni5s9GHdO9_xextd7KkzlvsVv_PNxmxM4ww_C76lfrxcb-rgDQXtu8hdx8-dN38oRH7TmUFTb-tJXfh__H5oXUcNX7rHwb2ov1wfPKdu9_jrP7O9FTXRftmdh-zn1eWPxXWyvP1-szhbJpQC9kkNBHkpNOnCIIAsCAFrRcLmFjKr86wwmcp0LlWakkZZZlpZxBKVQg21PGTH29x18I_D-FtV66KxTUOd9UOsUApRoswFjOi3N-iDH8K4x0QhplAKqUbqdEuZ4GMMdlWtg2spbCoB1VRLNdZSTe5dLaPjaJc76NbWr_z_HkbgZAtMzteZ78U9AyHAl7A</recordid><startdate>20191203</startdate><enddate>20191203</enddate><creator>Hilber, Isabel</creator><creator>Arrigo, Yves</creator><creator>Zuber, Martin</creator><creator>Bucheli, Thomas D</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191203</creationdate><title>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</title><author>Hilber, Isabel ; Arrigo, Yves ; Zuber, Martin ; Bucheli, Thomas D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a402t-d0a0791bab8c20038a202d5a1e7e06eb768c656b73544ab2396b5e2292552b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Charcoal</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Cyclodextrin</topic><topic>Cyclodextrins</topic><topic>Desorption</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Feed additives</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Incubation</topic><topic>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilber, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arrigo, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuber, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bucheli, Thomas D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilber, Isabel</au><au>Arrigo, Yves</au><au>Zuber, Martin</au><au>Bucheli, Thomas D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-12-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>13695</spage><epage>13703</epage><pages>13695-13703</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><abstract>Biochar is a new, promising, and sustainable feed additive alternative in agricultural production, which may, however, contain a considerable amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). As a measure of their bioaccessibility to ruminants, we quantified PAH concentrations in biochars before and after three different incubation experiments. Specifically, the biochars were subjected to (1) an aqueous cyclodextrin suspension with a contaminant trap as (infinite) sink, (2) an in vitro experiment with cow ruminal liquid and a contaminant trap, and (3) an in vivo experiment within cow rumen. Three different biochars were used that contained 13–407 mg/kgdw of the sum of 16 U.S. EPA PAHs before the exposure. While experiment (1) resulted in no or minimal bioaccessibility (desorption resistance) of the PAHs expressed by their largely unaltered concentrations, experiments (2) and (3) caused concentration reductions on average by 35 and 56%, respectively, presumably mainly due to the presence of the ruminal fluid in (2) and (3), and the extended sorption capacity in (3). Thus, simple and “abiotic” passive sampling methods may not capture all processes contributing to bioaccessibility in complex biological systems. A comparison with average daily PAH intake of ruminants suggests that quality-controlled biochar containing &lt;10 mg/kgdw PAHs will not pose an increased risk when applied as a feed additive.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>31682112</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.9b04340</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9971-3104</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2019-12, Vol.53 (23), p.13695-13703
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2311923710
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects Agricultural production
Animals
Bioavailability
Cattle
Charcoal
Contaminants
Cyclodextrin
Cyclodextrins
Desorption
Experiments
Feed additives
Female
Incubation
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Sampling methods
Soil
Soil Pollutants
Sustainable agriculture
title Desorption Resistance of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Biochars Incubated in Cow Ruminal Liquid in Vitro and in Vivo
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Desorption%20Resistance%20of%20Polycyclic%20Aromatic%20Hydrocarbons%20in%20Biochars%20Incubated%20in%20Cow%20Ruminal%20Liquid%20in%20Vitro%20and%20in%20Vivo&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Hilber,%20Isabel&rft.date=2019-12-03&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=13695&rft.epage=13703&rft.pages=13695-13703&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.9b04340&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2311923710%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322409135&rft_id=info:pmid/31682112&rfr_iscdi=true